Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
rightwinger would! He'd sleep with them and sniff them every night...Absolutely.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
rightwinger would! He'd sleep with them and sniff them every night...Absolutely.
Lol he actively engaged? What does that even mean? Why would it take a year for him to turn them over? That is absolute nonsense.yes, they spent a year working with the former President, and the former President was actively engaged with them....Xiden hid the documents for 6 years, and only after some random lawyer discovered them, and rated him out to the NA did he even acknowledge he had them
not ignoring a subpoenawe need to access the damage here now…6 years in some closet in some random office, with no federal agents guarding???? what other classified material migh he have? who else had access? a full probe and a raid of all his homes is necessary
not to mention we now know the chinese gave xiden 54 million to help build this office…did they have access???
Grounds for impeachment.Looks like another House probe…indictments coming…
Grounds for impeachment.
trump wasn’t ignoring it, he was objecting to it.not ignoring a subpoena
Trump had rats on his ship. He was lying, hiding and screaming 'They're all mine!"
View attachment 746492
it means working with them…turning over things, allowing them to inspectLol he actively engaged? What does that even mean? Why would it take a year for him to turn them over? That is absolute nonsense.
yes, they spent a year working with the former President, and the former President was actively engaged with them....Xiden hid the documents for 6 years, and only after some random lawyer discovered them, and rated him out to the NA did he even acknowledge he had them
trump wasn’t ignoring it, he was objecting to it.
haha so it’s obama’s fault xiden took them and hide them for 6 years? he’s still respondible to comply with the espionage age, and the administrative records act.Remember. Proper disposition of Presidential records, is the job of the president, not the vice president.
If the white house records office instructed Biden to return the classified documents, and he failed to, would he be culpable.
Otherwise the failure is one of the white house records office. And ultimately the president of the united states.
Biden wasn't hiding them. The office of the president is supposed to keep track of classified information, including who has it, and where and how it's being kept.xiden was hiding these top secret documents for 6 years…how could anyone issue a one????
If the applicant for a search warrant lies, judges may sign search warrants. The mere fact that any magistrate signed a warrant, standing alone, is not a convincing argument.It was brought before a court and a Judge issued search warrants
haha so it’s obama’s fault xiden took them and hide them for 6 years? he’s still respondible to comply with the espionage age, and the administrative records act.
Actually, this is ground for arrest under the espionage act.Grounds for impeachment.
Biden had no authority to declassify. Sorry Charlie, but this tuna don't fly..Actually Biden was authorized to have them as Vice President of the United States, through the inherent constitutional authority of his office. The same as the President, Vice President, Members of Congress, and Members of the Supreme Court.
Then the argument becomes convincing when the motion to nullify or modify or in any way invalidate that search warrant completely FAILS.If the applicant for a search warrant lies, judges may sign search warrants. The mere fact that any magistrate signed a warrant, standing alone, is not a convincing argument.
Nobody said he has the authority to declassify. He had the authority to possess. And it appears he did so during his term as Vice President. Locking them away before leaving office.Biden had no authority to declassify. Sorry Charlie, but this tuna don't fly..
That ^ makes no sense. As a general rule, “motions” regarding the alleged invalidity of a search warrant come AFTER one is charged with a crime. You might want to take note of the fact that President Trumps has not been charged with a crime.Then the argument becomes convincing when the motion to nullify or modify or in any way invalidate that search warrant completely FAILS.
Wrong, wrong wrong.That ^ makes no sense. As a general rule, “motions” regarding the alleged invalidity of a search warrant come AFTER one is charged with a crime. You might want to take note of the fact that President Trumps has not been charged with a crime.
I wasn’t wrong at all. You have to read all the words in a sentence.Wrong, wrong wrong.
Several people subject to search warrants, have raised objection to those warrants, and were never charged with a crime.
Just one famous example
Trump ally Rudy Giuliani seeks to block feds from getting 3 items of thousands seized under search warrant
Investigators are known to be probing Giuliani's dealings in Ukraine, where he had worked to dig up politically damaging material on Joe Biden and Hunter Biden.www.cnbc.com
POLITICS
Trump ally Rudy Giuliani seeks to block feds from getting 3 items of thousands seized under search warrant
Rudy Giuliani is seeking to prevent prosecutors from seeing just three items out of the more than 2,000 items contained on electronic devices seized from him as part of a criminal probe, a court filing revealed.
As they say, where did you get your legal degree from? A cracker jack box?