Uh oh, Hillary slips behind GOP in crucial swing states

The problem for Republicans is Hillary polls well in all states

Kasich may poll well in his home state, but is unknown in the rest of the country

No Republican does well in a significant number of swing states, Hillary does....spells doom for the GOP
You're right for once.
But the problem for Hillary is she has 100% name recognition. And 45% approval. She cannot improve her name recognition.
The GOP candidates have nowhere to go but up in name recognition and they beat the snot out of her in favorability. Combine rising name recognition with steady favorability and Hillary is yesterday's dog turd.

That particular philosophy is a guaranteed loser. You have just said she has a 45% approval rating - which puts her only 6 points away from a solid majority. According to Politico in April, the highest rated Republican candidate was Rubio with 35%. An election is not a candidate running against themselves. There is going to be someone else and right now no one in the Republican party is polling anywhere near her numbers. If the Republican candidate is too far to the right or makes the same mistakes Romney made, then there will be a Democrat in the Whitehouse - whether it is Clinton or not.
 
I heard the same thing in the last two elections. And the same thing by the other side in the two preceding elections. Hot air is cheap.

You didn't hear from me, hot rod.

I predicted obama in '08 and in '12.

In fact, I was one of the first ones to predict that obama would take the nomination from Hitlery in '08. I called it in '07

I am seldom wrong about these things. Very seldom. In fact -- Hardly ever.

dimocraps are DONE. Maybe for a generation.

Tell you what else..... We have almost a year and a half to go with just about nothing good that good happen and lots and lost of bad things that can happen -- ISIS, Terrorist attacks, Israel Nukes Iran, Iran Nukes Israel, Recession, more Riots, China shoots down one of our Airplanes, Russia (Putin) HATES the Lying Cocksucker so he might do anything -- Like Invade Ukraine and spit in obama's eye, China attacks Taiwan, Japan re-militarizes......

You have no idea the things this ignorant motherfucker has done wrong that can blow up in our faces at any minute.

Because you're just as ignorant as he is

Hot air is cheap.
 
The problem for Republicans is Hillary polls well in all states

Kasich may poll well in his home state, but is unknown in the rest of the country

No Republican does well in a significant number of swing states, Hillary does....spells doom for the GOP
You're right for once.
But the problem for Hillary is she has 100% name recognition. And 45% approval. She cannot improve her name recognition.
The GOP candidates have nowhere to go but up in name recognition and they beat the snot out of her in favorability. Combine rising name recognition with steady favorability and Hillary is yesterday's dog turd.

The Republican brand does not have high public approval
Hillary may not have the approval level she had two years ago, but it is still higher than any of her Republican contenders

None of the Republicans shows the ability to be a breakout contender. Hillary will cruise to an easy victory
Untrue. virtually all the GOP candidates have a higher approval rating than Hillary.
 
The problem for Republicans is Hillary polls well in all states

Kasich may poll well in his home state, but is unknown in the rest of the country

No Republican does well in a significant number of swing states, Hillary does....spells doom for the GOP
You're right for once.
But the problem for Hillary is she has 100% name recognition. And 45% approval. She cannot improve her name recognition.
The GOP candidates have nowhere to go but up in name recognition and they beat the snot out of her in favorability. Combine rising name recognition with steady favorability and Hillary is yesterday's dog turd.

That particular philosophy is a guaranteed loser. You have just said she has a 45% approval rating - which puts her only 6 points away from a solid majority. According to Politico in April, the highest rated Republican candidate was Rubio with 35%. An election is not a candidate running against themselves. There is going to be someone else and right now no one in the Republican party is polling anywhere near her numbers. If the Republican candidate is too far to the right or makes the same mistakes Romney made, then there will be a Democrat in the Whitehouse - whether it is Clinton or not.
Try comparing apples to apples.
Virtually all the GOP candidates meet or exceed Hillary's approval rating. They are less know, is why they poll worse. But as they become more known that will change. Hillary has nowhere to go: she cannot become more known and she will struggle to become more liked.
 
The problem for Republicans is Hillary polls well in all states

Kasich may poll well in his home state, but is unknown in the rest of the country

No Republican does well in a significant number of swing states, Hillary does....spells doom for the GOP
You're right for once.
But the problem for Hillary is she has 100% name recognition. And 45% approval. She cannot improve her name recognition.
The GOP candidates have nowhere to go but up in name recognition and they beat the snot out of her in favorability. Combine rising name recognition with steady favorability and Hillary is yesterday's dog turd.

That particular philosophy is a guaranteed loser. You have just said she has a 45% approval rating - which puts her only 6 points away from a solid majority. According to Politico in April, the highest rated Republican candidate was Rubio with 35%. An election is not a candidate running against themselves. There is going to be someone else and right now no one in the Republican party is polling anywhere near her numbers. If the Republican candidate is too far to the right or makes the same mistakes Romney made, then there will be a Democrat in the Whitehouse - whether it is Clinton or not.
Try comparing apples to apples.
Virtually all the GOP candidates meet or exceed Hillary's approval rating. They are less know, is why they poll worse. But as they become more known that will change. Hillary has nowhere to go: she cannot become more known and she will struggle to become more liked.

Uh huh. They poll better but the reason they poll worse is they are less well known. Please. People have never heard of Bush, Cruz, Rubio, Paul, Walker, etc? Again... please. The election is what will decide this and it will based upon the people running. The Republican is going to have to go though a primary which, if it is anything like last time, will force him to move to the right. That's what kept us from having President Romney. If the party doesn't get its act together, we will end up with President Clinton. Wishful thinking and rationalization isn't going to stop that.
 
The problem for Republicans is Hillary polls well in all states

Kasich may poll well in his home state, but is unknown in the rest of the country

No Republican does well in a significant number of swing states, Hillary does....spells doom for the GOP
You're right for once.
But the problem for Hillary is she has 100% name recognition. And 45% approval. She cannot improve her name recognition.
The GOP candidates have nowhere to go but up in name recognition and they beat the snot out of her in favorability. Combine rising name recognition with steady favorability and Hillary is yesterday's dog turd.

The Republican brand does not have high public approval
Hillary may not have the approval level she had two years ago, but it is still higher than any of her Republican contenders

None of the Republicans shows the ability to be a breakout contender. Hillary will cruise to an easy victory
Untrue. virtually all the GOP candidates have a higher approval rating than Hillary.

Lets see?

Show one
 
The problem for Republicans is Hillary polls well in all states

Kasich may poll well in his home state, but is unknown in the rest of the country

No Republican does well in a significant number of swing states, Hillary does....spells doom for the GOP
You're right for once.
But the problem for Hillary is she has 100% name recognition. And 45% approval. She cannot improve her name recognition.
The GOP candidates have nowhere to go but up in name recognition and they beat the snot out of her in favorability. Combine rising name recognition with steady favorability and Hillary is yesterday's dog turd.

That particular philosophy is a guaranteed loser. You have just said she has a 45% approval rating - which puts her only 6 points away from a solid majority. According to Politico in April, the highest rated Republican candidate was Rubio with 35%. An election is not a candidate running against themselves. There is going to be someone else and right now no one in the Republican party is polling anywhere near her numbers. If the Republican candidate is too far to the right or makes the same mistakes Romney made, then there will be a Democrat in the Whitehouse - whether it is Clinton or not.
Try comparing apples to apples.
Virtually all the GOP candidates meet or exceed Hillary's approval rating. They are less know, is why they poll worse. But as they become more known that will change. Hillary has nowhere to go: she cannot become more known and she will struggle to become more liked.

Uh huh. They poll better but the reason they poll worse is they are less well known. Please. People have never heard of Bush, Cruz, Rubio, Paul, Walker, etc? Again... please. The election is what will decide this and it will based upon the people running. The Republican is going to have to go though a primary which, if it is anything like last time, will force him to move to the right. That's what kept us from having President Romney. If the party doesn't get its act together, we will end up with President Clinton. Wishful thinking and rationalization isn't going to stop that.
Exactly. They poll worse because they are less well known. But you really think that will continue as th media begin to focus on candidates and some emerge stronger? Of course not. By the week or so before the election the candidate will be every bit as well known as Hillary. And with higher favorability ratings it will be no contest.
 
The problem for Republicans is Hillary polls well in all states

Kasich may poll well in his home state, but is unknown in the rest of the country

No Republican does well in a significant number of swing states, Hillary does....spells doom for the GOP
You're right for once.
But the problem for Hillary is she has 100% name recognition. And 45% approval. She cannot improve her name recognition.
The GOP candidates have nowhere to go but up in name recognition and they beat the snot out of her in favorability. Combine rising name recognition with steady favorability and Hillary is yesterday's dog turd.

The Republican brand does not have high public approval
Hillary may not have the approval level she had two years ago, but it is still higher than any of her Republican contenders

None of the Republicans shows the ability to be a breakout contender. Hillary will cruise to an easy victory
Untrue. virtually all the GOP candidates have a higher approval rating than Hillary.

Lets see?

Show one
Check my sig line for that info.
 

No kidding!!! Sounds like she couldnt beat out the dog catcher at this point.

I know

Guess that means dog catchers are preferred to Republicans

Except Kasich isn't a dog catcher.

But in terms of Presidential candidates...he is a dog
So what does that make the Democrat's top loser?????
A female dog. :afro:
 
No kidding!!! Sounds like she couldnt beat out the dog catcher at this point.

I know

Guess that means dog catchers are preferred to Republicans

Except Kasich isn't a dog catcher.

But in terms of Presidential candidates...he is a dog

Yet he's beating the hildabeast.

In his homestate

Problem forKasich is nobody in the other 49 know who the hell he is
Why didn't Hillary run for the Senate in her home state?
 
Trump hammering away at the Republican candidates and about what failures and fools they are should do just great in getting them more name recognition. He absolutely pounded Rubio and the Jebster.
 
The problem for Republicans is Hillary polls well in all states

Kasich may poll well in his home state, but is unknown in the rest of the country

No Republican does well in a significant number of swing states, Hillary does....spells doom for the GOP
You're right for once.
But the problem for Hillary is she has 100% name recognition. And 45% approval. She cannot improve her name recognition.
The GOP candidates have nowhere to go but up in name recognition and they beat the snot out of her in favorability. Combine rising name recognition with steady favorability and Hillary is yesterday's dog turd.

That particular philosophy is a guaranteed loser. You have just said she has a 45% approval rating - which puts her only 6 points away from a solid majority. According to Politico in April, the highest rated Republican candidate was Rubio with 35%. An election is not a candidate running against themselves. There is going to be someone else and right now no one in the Republican party is polling anywhere near her numbers. If the Republican candidate is too far to the right or makes the same mistakes Romney made, then there will be a Democrat in the Whitehouse - whether it is Clinton or not.
Try comparing apples to apples.
Virtually all the GOP candidates meet or exceed Hillary's approval rating. They are less know, is why they poll worse. But as they become more known that will change. Hillary has nowhere to go: she cannot become more known and she will struggle to become more liked.

Uh huh. They poll better but the reason they poll worse is they are less well known. Please. People have never heard of Bush, Cruz, Rubio, Paul, Walker, etc? Again... please. The election is what will decide this and it will based upon the people running. The Republican is going to have to go though a primary which, if it is anything like last time, will force him to move to the right. That's what kept us from having President Romney. If the party doesn't get its act together, we will end up with President Clinton. Wishful thinking and rationalization isn't going to stop that.
Exactly. They poll worse because they are less well known. But you really think that will continue as th media begin to focus on candidates and some emerge stronger? Of course not. By the week or so before the election the candidate will be every bit as well known as Hillary. And with higher favorability ratings it will be no contest.

If they are polling worse, then you can't say they are meeting or exceeding Clinton's polling. The two are mutually exclusive. Trying to justify the fact doesn't change the fact and ignoring the fact doesn't make it go away.

Will a candidate emerge who is stronger? I hope so. But what I am expecting is the same absurd bloodbath we had last time with a candidate crippled by positions taken to garner the support of the extremists. The country isn't on the far right or the far left, and a candidate who has to backtrack on far right positions is at a disadvantage. If Clinton doesn't have to go through the same process on the left, then she has the center. Who has the center has the election.
 
The problem for Republicans is Hillary polls well in all states

Kasich may poll well in his home state, but is unknown in the rest of the country

No Republican does well in a significant number of swing states, Hillary does....spells doom for the GOP
You're right for once.
But the problem for Hillary is she has 100% name recognition. And 45% approval. She cannot improve her name recognition.
The GOP candidates have nowhere to go but up in name recognition and they beat the snot out of her in favorability. Combine rising name recognition with steady favorability and Hillary is yesterday's dog turd.

The Republican brand does not have high public approval
Hillary may not have the approval level she had two years ago, but it is still higher than any of her Republican contenders

None of the Republicans shows the ability to be a breakout contender. Hillary will cruise to an easy victory
Untrue. virtually all the GOP candidates have a higher approval rating than Hillary.

Lets see?

Show one
Check my sig line for that info.

When challenged on his bizarre claims....The Rabbi never fails to disappoint
 
I know

Guess that means dog catchers are preferred to Republicans

Except Kasich isn't a dog catcher.

But in terms of Presidential candidates...he is a dog

Yet he's beating the hildabeast.

In his homestate

Problem forKasich is nobody in the other 49 know who the hell he is
Why didn't Hillary run for the Senate in her home state?

She hadn't been there in eight years

She ran in the state she chose to live in and won
Winning in New York is a more impressive win than winning Arkansas
 
Except Kasich isn't a dog catcher.

But in terms of Presidential candidates...he is a dog

Yet he's beating the hildabeast.

In his homestate

Problem forKasich is nobody in the other 49 know who the hell he is
Why didn't Hillary run for the Senate in her home state?

She hadn't been there in eight years

She ran in the state she chose to live in and won
Winning in New York is a more impressive win than winning Arkansas

Whats impressive about her winning in liberal yankee land?
 
But in terms of Presidential candidates...he is a dog

Yet he's beating the hildabeast.

In his homestate

Problem forKasich is nobody in the other 49 know who the hell he is
Why didn't Hillary run for the Senate in her home state?

She hadn't been there in eight years

She ran in the state she chose to live in and won
Winning in New York is a more impressive win than winning Arkansas

Whats impressive about her winning in liberal yankee land?

Winning in a state with 20 million people instead of a state with 3 million
 
Yet he's beating the hildabeast.

In his homestate

Problem forKasich is nobody in the other 49 know who the hell he is
Why didn't Hillary run for the Senate in her home state?

She hadn't been there in eight years

She ran in the state she chose to live in and won
Winning in New York is a more impressive win than winning Arkansas

Whats impressive about her winning in liberal yankee land?

Winning in a state with 20 million people instead of a state with 3 million

A state full of liberals.
 
In his homestate

Problem forKasich is nobody in the other 49 know who the hell he is
Why didn't Hillary run for the Senate in her home state?

She hadn't been there in eight years

She ran in the state she chose to live in and won
Winning in New York is a more impressive win than winning Arkansas

Whats impressive about her winning in liberal yankee land?

Winning in a state with 20 million people instead of a state with 3 million

A state full of liberals.

New York has more conservatives than Arkansas does
 
In his homestate

Problem forKasich is nobody in the other 49 know who the hell he is
Why didn't Hillary run for the Senate in her home state?

She hadn't been there in eight years

She ran in the state she chose to live in and won
Winning in New York is a more impressive win than winning Arkansas

Whats impressive about her winning in liberal yankee land?

Winning in a state with 20 million people instead of a state with 3 million

A state full of liberals.


Here's what a lot of people don't understand......

Hitlery isn't keeping her mouth shut because she's afraid of any Republicans.

She's keeping quiet because, as of now, there's nobody in the scum of the earth dimocrap party that's a threat of any kind.

IOW, the lying, thieving, dishonest scrunt isn't running for President, she's running for the dimocrap nomination.

And she knows as well as I do that almost ANYBODY with a pulse that runs against her can defeat her in the dimocrap primary.

I know I'm not making sense but the fact is -- The race for POTUS isn't even a concern right now. We have at least three, probably four, candidates that can beat the shit our of Hitlery...... Walker, Rubio, Bush and.........

Hitlery is scared shitless that if she opens her diseased mouth, that someone on the socialist side of her disgusting party can and will overtake and beat her.

She's running scared. Not of a Republican. Of dimocraps.

Even dims hate the bitch.

I WANT her to win the dimocrap nomination. It will be over before it even begins.

Can you imagine a young, handsome, virile, Spanish Speaking (Perfect Spanish, too) Marco Rubio running against that diseased old witch?

dimocraps will be more worried about her dropping body parts, about ears and noses and tits falling off than about her winning a debate with a skilled debater like Rubio.

Or a Scott Walker -- Who has a SERIOUS Ax to grind with dimocrap scum and their criminal ways.

Or even a Jeb Bush. Don't get much smoother than ol' Jeb. He speaks perfect Spanish, too. Though not nearly as good as Marco.

Get out the shovels, people. the scum of the earth dimocrap party is so dead, it's starting to stink, starting to reek of death.

Just like its voters
 

Forum List

Back
Top