Crick
Gold Member
- May 10, 2014
- 29,062
- 5,614
That Newsweek and Time mentioned the possibility of a new glaciation is irrelevant and smacks of some serious desperation on your part. The number of scientists seriously concerned about such a possibility at ANY time was trivial. The majority of people working in climate sciences AT THAT TIME were concerned about global warming caused by human GHG emissions. That has been demonstrated a FACT.
Given what deniers have to go through to try to make a case, it would probably astound you how easy it is to hold up the other side of this fight. We have virtually all of the world's scientists on our side. Our argument is prolix with evidence - we have it coming out our ears. We can pick from thousands and thousands of peer reviewed studies all demonstrating that the PoV we choose to believe is correct.
Perhaps you like to lose.
Given what deniers have to go through to try to make a case, it would probably astound you how easy it is to hold up the other side of this fight. We have virtually all of the world's scientists on our side. Our argument is prolix with evidence - we have it coming out our ears. We can pick from thousands and thousands of peer reviewed studies all demonstrating that the PoV we choose to believe is correct.
Perhaps you like to lose.