Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gorbachev was probably a well meaning naive fool, he really didn't know the devils he was dealing with, he paved the way for that drunken arsehole Yeltsin who sold his Country to Oligarchs and foreign Corporate jackals who were looting Russia, then came along a new Sheriff Putin, he stopped them and rebuilt the Country and demanded respect, that's why those criminals in the West hate him.Bla-bla-bla. Another set of stupid cliches.
I'm Russian, I voted against Putin, and there are plenty of reasons to do so, but fighting against NATO expansion and Ukrainian Nazism - is one of the things that I (and any sane Russian) totally support (not only by my words and taxes, but with additional volunteering money and skills, too). One can say, that freedom of speech is limited in Russia, but in NATO-controlled areas of Europe Russian speech is banned at all. In Russia (as in any country), you can be arrested for your words, but in Ukraine you can be burn alive for it. There is the difference.
And yes, Stalin is one of the most popular leaders in Russian ratings (coz he had saved millions of Russian from eurointegration and genocide), while Gorbachev is one of the worst.
That poster is probably ten years old, it's the only explanation for that level of stupidity.Really? Who said you this?
Bluffing about what?
Bluffing about what?
"And why do we need a world without Russia?" (c) V. PutinWhich it wouldn't because Russia wouldn't dare.
Biden just called his bluff, two years too later, but this changes everything.
Putin will not do anything about it, because he simply can't afford to go to war with the US.
This world wouldn't be so bad."And why do we need a world without Russia?" (c) V. Putin
Remember that, asshole....
it's not for you to chooseThis world wouldn't be so bad.
Buy it is for me to dream.it's not for you to choose
So you think its acceptable for the US to say it's ok for Ukraine to use NATO provided missiles to attack Russia? that is like me providing a gun to my neighbour to shoot another neighbour he doesn't like, i would be arrested and charged as a accessory to murder and sent down for years, problem with your Mental senile President Russia's reaction could be terminal for a lot of people, you say Putin can't afford to go to war with the US, if his Country is attacked using Ukrainian retards he may not have a choice, as for any war between the US/NATO and Russia there are really only two scenarios, a ground war which Russia would win or a nuclear holocaust, take your pick, best thing you could do is have Biden removed and locked up in a lunatic bin.
NATO-backed Ukraine decided to invade another countries, allies of Russia. Collective self-defense is pretty legal thing by all standards. It's acceptable for the Russian Federation to eliminate Ukraine and all NATO countries (including the USA) if it's necessary to defend Russian people and allies of the Russian Federation.Yeah.
Russia decided to invade another country.
It's acceptable for the US to help the Ukraine regain its country.
Your examples are bad.
As the world burns I hope the first reduced to ashes have Uke flags in their biosJust read these extended range missiles Biden has okayed need US advisors to help launch properly. So we'll have US soldiers launching missiles into the motherland. I'm sure this will end well.
Scratch that. The first to burn should be those in DC and it’s surrounding area.As the world burns I hope the first reduced to ashes have Uke flags in their bios
Scratch that. The first to burn should be those in DC and it’s surrounding area.
NATO-backed Ukraine decided to invade another countries, allies of Russia. Collective self-defense is pretty legal thing by all standards. It's acceptable for the Russian Federation to eliminate Ukraine and all NATO countries (including the USA) if it's necessary to defend Russian people and allies of the Russian Federation.
