Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What "perceived meme" are you talking about? Are you projecting again and making up shit to be alarmed over? Just like you think that making AR's illegal will somehow trigger the government into somehow (without the military's help) taking over the citizenry and turning us into a dictatorship where we are all helpless slaves.Tad difference between the police talking to a minor who posts he wants to shoot up a school and denying Constitutional Rights to an adult over a perceived meme.Yet when that kid who shot up Parkland said "stupid stuff" on his social media, a lot of people called that a failure of the police and the system meant to protect us. You can't have it both ways. I realize there were more red flags than that, but a gun background check isn't going to be able to check that extensively into anyone's history--especially not juvenile history.That is the issue. People can say stupid stuff, and it is not the governments place to define what stupid talk is or is not.It is not a crime to say it, but why would anyone in their right mind say such trash? Does someone who says that deserve a gun? No.And what is this supposed to accomplish? Even if you post on Fakebook that illegals should be shot, that is not a crime and so therefore they have no grounds to deny you a gun purchase.Fourth Amendment, right up front.
Not sure of the laws in New York. Can cities override state law? In Virginia, they cannot.
Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation
There have been example after example of people bragging and showing off their weapons on social media and spewing hate, threatening to kill. And then they did.
You do realize that when people are traitorous to this country (that want to fundamentally transform it into a 3rd world cesspool) they deserve to be thrown in jail, or even better, shot..Jews thought the same thing when Adolf Hitler came into power...And we know how well that ended.No Tucker the Dems are not going to disarm the population. What a hoot. And not its not repealing the 2nd Amendment.
Tucker and Fox are so absurd.
Hitler didn't disarm anyone who was pro Hitler and Trump is now trying to disarm the voice and reputation of those against him and throw them in jail.
It shouldn't be if you are publicly advocating violence. That's just stupid.Owning a weapon is a right, not a privilegeIt is not a crime to say it, but why would anyone in their right mind say such trash? Does someone who says that deserve a gun? No.And what is this supposed to accomplish? Even if you post on Fakebook that illegals should be shot, that is not a crime and so therefore they have no grounds to deny you a gun purchase.Fourth Amendment, right up front.
Not sure of the laws in New York. Can cities override state law? In Virginia, they cannot.
Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation
-Geaux
What defines and who defines a social media post that would deny you your Constitutional Rights?What "perceived meme" are you talking about? Are you projecting again and making up shit to be alarmed over? Just like you think that making AR's illegal will somehow trigger the government into somehow (without the military's help) taking over the citizenry and turning us into a dictatorship where we are all helpless slaves.Tad difference between the police talking to a minor who posts he wants to shoot up a school and denying Constitutional Rights to an adult over a perceived meme.Yet when that kid who shot up Parkland said "stupid stuff" on his social media, a lot of people called that a failure of the police and the system meant to protect us. You can't have it both ways. I realize there were more red flags than that, but a gun background check isn't going to be able to check that extensively into anyone's history--especially not juvenile history.That is the issue. People can say stupid stuff, and it is not the governments place to define what stupid talk is or is not.It is not a crime to say it, but why would anyone in their right mind say such trash? Does someone who says that deserve a gun? No.And what is this supposed to accomplish? Even if you post on Fakebook that illegals should be shot, that is not a crime and so therefore they have no grounds to deny you a gun purchase.
There have been example after example of people bragging and showing off their weapons on social media and spewing hate, threatening to kill. And then they did.
You do realize that when people are traitorous to this country (that want to fundamentally transform it into a 3rd world cesspool) they deserve to be thrown in jail, or even better, shot..Jews thought the same thing when Adolf Hitler came into power...And we know how well that ended.No Tucker the Dems are not going to disarm the population. What a hoot. And not its not repealing the 2nd Amendment.
Tucker and Fox are so absurd.
Hitler didn't disarm anyone who was pro Hitler and Trump is now trying to disarm the voice and reputation of those against him and throw them in jail.
Execution by firing squad
That isnt what Mad Maxine had said, or the vagina wearing bitch Ashley Judd...But if you are wanting to make this country into a Socialist Paradise, then that is treason....You do realize that when people are traitorous to this country (that want to fundamentally transform it into a 3rd world cesspool) they deserve to be thrown in jail, or even better, shot..Jews thought the same thing when Adolf Hitler came into power...And we know how well that ended.No Tucker the Dems are not going to disarm the population. What a hoot. And not its not repealing the 2nd Amendment.
Tucker and Fox are so absurd.
Hitler didn't disarm anyone who was pro Hitler and Trump is now trying to disarm the voice and reputation of those against him and throw them in jail.
Execution by firing squad
I would not suggest for Trump to be in front of a firing squad, no matter how bad he is.
If I call the FBI twice that some guy is going to go on a shooting spree and the FBI ignores me, that is the issue.Old Lady has a point, after every mass shooting it seems that people are bashing the police for not putting together the pieces before hand.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
L.E. admits it is difficult to know what is just "hot air" and what is a true threat. No one has a crystal ball. My theory is that if a person is so full of hate/anger that they are talking violence and showing off their weapons and have a target they hate, WHY ON EARTH would you want to give them a gun?What defines and who defines a social media post that would deny you your Constitutional Rights?What "perceived meme" are you talking about? Are you projecting again and making up shit to be alarmed over? Just like you think that making AR's illegal will somehow trigger the government into somehow (without the military's help) taking over the citizenry and turning us into a dictatorship where we are all helpless slaves.Tad difference between the police talking to a minor who posts he wants to shoot up a school and denying Constitutional Rights to an adult over a perceived meme.Yet when that kid who shot up Parkland said "stupid stuff" on his social media, a lot of people called that a failure of the police and the system meant to protect us. You can't have it both ways. I realize there were more red flags than that, but a gun background check isn't going to be able to check that extensively into anyone's history--especially not juvenile history.That is the issue. People can say stupid stuff, and it is not the governments place to define what stupid talk is or is not.It is not a crime to say it, but why would anyone in their right mind say such trash? Does someone who says that deserve a gun? No.
There have been example after example of people bragging and showing off their weapons on social media and spewing hate, threatening to kill. And then they did.
My point exactly.
It is not a crime to say it, but why would anyone in their right mind say such trash? Does someone who says that deserve a gun? No.And what is this supposed to accomplish? Even if you post on Fakebook that illegals should be shot, that is not a crime and so therefore they have no grounds to deny you a gun purchase.Fourth Amendment, right up front.
Not sure of the laws in New York. Can cities override state law? In Virginia, they cannot.
Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation
Yes, in some states (like Colorado) the state constitution is written so that cities have a degree of autonomy and can pass laws more or less strict than the ones on the state's books.Fourth Amendment, right up front.
Not sure of the laws in New York. Can cities override state law? In Virginia, they cannot.
Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation
Apples and oranges, one is a legal determination based on judicial cause and evidentiary requirements the other has no legal/constitutional basis.It is not a crime to say it, but why would anyone in their right mind say such trash? Does someone who says that deserve a gun? No.And what is this supposed to accomplish? Even if you post on Fakebook that illegals should be shot, that is not a crime and so therefore they have no grounds to deny you a gun purchase.Fourth Amendment, right up front.
Not sure of the laws in New York. Can cities override state law? In Virginia, they cannot.
Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation
Judges regularly issue restraining orders based on recorded statements. Think of it as a restraining order for guns based on that same type statement.
Does that make it to the NICS database?It is not a crime to say it, but why would anyone in their right mind say such trash? Does someone who says that deserve a gun? No.And what is this supposed to accomplish? Even if you post on Fakebook that illegals should be shot, that is not a crime and so therefore they have no grounds to deny you a gun purchase.Fourth Amendment, right up front.
Not sure of the laws in New York. Can cities override state law? In Virginia, they cannot.
Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation
Judges regularly issue restraining orders based on recorded statements. Think of it as a restraining order for guns based on that same type statement.
Does that make it to the NICS database?It is not a crime to say it, but why would anyone in their right mind say such trash? Does someone who says that deserve a gun? No.And what is this supposed to accomplish? Even if you post on Fakebook that illegals should be shot, that is not a crime and so therefore they have no grounds to deny you a gun purchase.Fourth Amendment, right up front.
Not sure of the laws in New York. Can cities override state law? In Virginia, they cannot.
Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation
Judges regularly issue restraining orders based on recorded statements. Think of it as a restraining order for guns based on that same type statement.
That thing is as full of holes as swiss cheese.
But it isIt shouldn't be if you are publicly advocating violence. That's just stupid.Owning a weapon is a right, not a privilegeIt is not a crime to say it, but why would anyone in their right mind say such trash? Does someone who says that deserve a gun? No.And what is this supposed to accomplish? Even if you post on Fakebook that illegals should be shot, that is not a crime and so therefore they have no grounds to deny you a gun purchase.Fourth Amendment, right up front.
Not sure of the laws in New York. Can cities override state law? In Virginia, they cannot.
Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation
-Geaux
So you’re ok with me deciding your rights should be suspended. Or maybe a board composed of Trump appointees.L.E. admits it is difficult to know what is just "hot air" and what is a true threat. No one has a crystal ball. My theory is that if a person is so full of hate/anger that they are talking violence and showing off their weapons and have a target they hate, WHY ON EARTH would you want to give them a gun?What defines and who defines a social media post that would deny you your Constitutional Rights?What "perceived meme" are you talking about? Are you projecting again and making up shit to be alarmed over? Just like you think that making AR's illegal will somehow trigger the government into somehow (without the military's help) taking over the citizenry and turning us into a dictatorship where we are all helpless slaves.Tad difference between the police talking to a minor who posts he wants to shoot up a school and denying Constitutional Rights to an adult over a perceived meme.Yet when that kid who shot up Parkland said "stupid stuff" on his social media, a lot of people called that a failure of the police and the system meant to protect us. You can't have it both ways. I realize there were more red flags than that, but a gun background check isn't going to be able to check that extensively into anyone's history--especially not juvenile history.That is the issue. People can say stupid stuff, and it is not the governments place to define what stupid talk is or is not.
There have been example after example of people bragging and showing off their weapons on social media and spewing hate, threatening to kill. And then they did.
My point exactly.
No Tucker the Dems are not going to disarm the population.
No Tucker the Dems are not going to disarm the population.
So why are you constantly trying?
it's public in a sense....Social media is public, so where is the violation? It could have stopped some of our mass killers, couldn't it? Who had clear threats and "red flags" on their social media accounts?Fourth Amendment, right up front.
Not sure of the laws in New York. Can cities override state law? In Virginia, they cannot.
Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation
Yeah, this ignores multiple amendments. At first I thought, so they are going to look at your social media accounts, which would violate the 2nd, but not so much the 4th. Then I read the part about 3 years worth of search engine history and then realized where the 4th came in. Not to mention who does not clear their history on a regular basis?
Social media might be public but my search engine history is not
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Old Lady has a point, after every mass shooting it seems that people are bashing the police for not putting together the pieces before hand.
