C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
BLACKROOK SAID:
'Abortion was never voted on. It was imposed on us by an unelected Supreme Court. The Roe v. Wade decision was based on bogus reasoning that has nothing to do with what is actually written in the Constitution. The Court said that an unborn child is not a "person." There was no medical evidence supporting that decision to declare an unborn child not a "person."'
This is unsurprisingly ignorant and wrong.
Voters do not have the authority to decide who will or will not have his civil rights, in this case the right to privacy; in our Constitutional Republic citizens' rights are not subject to majority rule, and one does not forfeit his civil rights merely as a consequence of his state of residence.
Moreover, the Supreme Court did not 'impose' anything on anyone, the notion is idiocy.
The Roe Court correctly and consistent with privacy rights jurisprudence invalidated state laws that violated the protected liberty of women, laws that compelled women to give birth against their will, laws fundamentally repugnant to the Constitution and the basic American tenet that government has no authority to interfere with personal, private matters.
Last, the Roe Court correctly reaffirmed the long-standing principle that prior to birth the embryo/fetus is legally not a person, and not entitled to Constitutional protections, allowing private citizens to make their own decisions as to when life begins based their faith and own good conscience – again, free from interference by the state.
The authoritarianism and extremism you exhibit and your contempt for the privacy rights of your fellow citizens is typical of the religious fanaticism common to most social conservatives and Christian fundamentalists.
'Abortion was never voted on. It was imposed on us by an unelected Supreme Court. The Roe v. Wade decision was based on bogus reasoning that has nothing to do with what is actually written in the Constitution. The Court said that an unborn child is not a "person." There was no medical evidence supporting that decision to declare an unborn child not a "person."'
This is unsurprisingly ignorant and wrong.
Voters do not have the authority to decide who will or will not have his civil rights, in this case the right to privacy; in our Constitutional Republic citizens' rights are not subject to majority rule, and one does not forfeit his civil rights merely as a consequence of his state of residence.
Moreover, the Supreme Court did not 'impose' anything on anyone, the notion is idiocy.
The Roe Court correctly and consistent with privacy rights jurisprudence invalidated state laws that violated the protected liberty of women, laws that compelled women to give birth against their will, laws fundamentally repugnant to the Constitution and the basic American tenet that government has no authority to interfere with personal, private matters.
Last, the Roe Court correctly reaffirmed the long-standing principle that prior to birth the embryo/fetus is legally not a person, and not entitled to Constitutional protections, allowing private citizens to make their own decisions as to when life begins based their faith and own good conscience – again, free from interference by the state.
The authoritarianism and extremism you exhibit and your contempt for the privacy rights of your fellow citizens is typical of the religious fanaticism common to most social conservatives and Christian fundamentalists.