LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
This is horrible news! Just horrible!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's actually worse than that Pete, they used much of the "temporary stimulus" spending to pad the baseline budget which then is used for determining budget increases (so in effect the so called "temporary stimulus" is embedded in the budget FOREVER), how's that for deceptive accounting? they should get an a "Liars of the Millennium" award for that one.They've spent at the same rate since 2009 every year, s9nce DC can't seem to pass a budget. So basically we've had 5 years of "stimulus" spending that hasn't stimulated shit.
I also notice every time they come out with a "better" rate, the numbers are "revised" a couple weeks later.
This is horrible news! Just horrible!
Yes, so fast say I ....
300,000 are retiring each month and dropping out of the work force
10,000 Boomers to Retire Each Day for 19 Years
![]()
As long as Obama is in office, it won't matter how low the unemployment numbers go down. Dispute that.
This is horrible news! Just horrible!
Quite the contrary, it's GREAT news if you enjoy being deceived.![]()
As long as Obama is in office, it won't matter how low the unemployment numbers go down. Dispute that.
except they are NOT going down![]()
Obama took office in January 2009.
Here is the January 2009 Employment Situation Summary: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02062009.pdf
We were bleeding about 600,000 jobs a month when he took office. It would be unrealistic to expect that to stop immediately upon his taking of the oath of office.
Here is the October 2009 Employment Situation Summary: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_11062009.pdf
And here is the July 2013 Employment Situation Summary: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
We find full time jobs plummeted to about 110 million by October 2009. They now stand at 116 million.
Part time jobs in October 2009 were 27 million. They now stand at 28 million.
As long as Obama is in office, it won't matter how low the unemployment numbers go down. Dispute that.
except they are NOT going down![]()
See what I mean. Case in point. Thanks for playing.
This is horrible news! Just horrible!
Quite the contrary, it's GREAT news if you enjoy being deceived.![]()
What am I being deceived about?
Have we not had 41 consecutive months of private sector job growth?
Did we not just add 160,000 jobs in June?
Is my business not up 18% year on year?
Is the economy not growing?
Horrible. All of it just horrible.
It's the same old DEMENTED story on the unemployment rate. Horrendous employment numbers, yet the UR goes down because so many people 'leave' the job market! That is not the road to recovery.
Well put, if you want to get a better picture of where the labor market stands don't look at unemployment look at civilian labor force participation.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
![]()
Notice the steep downward trend since 2008? and that's AFTER blowing nearly a trillion dollars of tax payer money in Keynesian "stimulus" in 2009.
I'm no obama fan, but to be honest the labor force participation is going to drop for the next 10-15 years regardless of anything, and while Scamulus was in large part waste, we did narrowly avert a 1930s round of deflation, and we probably would not have done so it the tea party anti-govt folks been in charge. We saw what austerity brought the EU.
However, it turns out that those blasting Europe's experience with spending restraint omit some critical facts. Contrary to what you may have heard, spending cuts have largely been lacking in Europe's economic crisis response. Instead, in most European nations, austerity has mostly taken the form of higher taxes. We shouldn't be surprised Europe is struggling: when you raise taxes in a weak economy, it has a negative effect on investment and economic growth.
[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]
In fact, most countries in Europe are spending more today than they did before the 2008 crash, according to financial reports from the European Commission, the European Union's executive arm. Yet austerity critics want to attribute the sluggish European economy entirely to spending cuts. France and the United Kingdom, for example, have made virtually no effort to cut spending; they've seen spending increase nearly every year over the last decade.
except they are NOT going down![]()
See what I mean. Case in point. Thanks for playing.
The real numbers of unemployed are not going down; it's all a shell game and you know that.
I was hoping this board had some honest debaters but I see it's the usual gang of ass munching Obama sucking faggots who think they are clever.
Just once I'd like to find some honesty on the left. Just once.
except they are NOT going down![]()
See what I mean. Case in point. Thanks for playing.
The real numbers of unemployed are not going down; it's all a shell game and you know that.
I was hoping this board had some honest debaters but I see it's the usual gang of ass munching Obama sucking faggots who think they are clever.
Just once I'd like to find some honesty on the left. Just once.
This is horrible news! Just horrible!
Quite the contrary, it's GREAT news if you enjoy being deceived.![]()
What am I being deceived about?
Have we not had 41 consecutive months of private sector job growth?
Did we not just add 160,000 jobs in June?
Is my business not up 18% year on year?
Is the economy not growing?
Horrible. All of it just horrible.
Those formulas only work when the right are in office. i look forward to this person's response though.See what I mean. Case in point. Thanks for playing.
The real numbers of unemployed are not going down; it's all a shell game and you know that.
I was hoping this board had some honest debaters but I see it's the usual gang of ass munching Obama sucking faggots who think they are clever.
Just once I'd like to find some honesty on the left. Just once.
Hello, Pennywise.
Is the formula used to determine the unemployment rate any different now than it was before President Obama took office? If that number is derived by some slight of hand....can you point us to the point where this shell game took place?
You have seen honesty from the left here. For once, I'd like to find a nutter who acknowledges my honesty. Just once. You arrogant fuck.
See what I mean. Case in point. Thanks for playing.
The real numbers of unemployed are not going down; it's all a shell game and you know that.
I was hoping this board had some honest debaters but I see it's the usual gang of ass munching Obama sucking faggots who think they are clever.
Just once I'd like to find some honesty on the left. Just once.
Hello, Pennywise.
Is the formula used to determine the unemployment rate any different now than it was before President Obama took office? If that number is derived by some slight of hand....can you point us to the point where this shell game took place?
You have seen honesty from the left here. For once, I'd like to find a nutter who acknowledges my honesty. Just once. You arrogant fuck.