So they now live at the same level (not even really) as private sector workers. Huh. fancy that?They cut teachers' pay. This isn't rocket science. If you cut people's pay you get to pay them less and save money. This is Business 101. Doesn't mean it's good for the economy though. How is less consumer spending going to help that community? Answer: it won't.
What makes you think they should not have to share in the hardship all the rest that work in the private sector do? Plus with the savings they are hiring more teachers to reduce workload on the teachers. Lost spending? HAH! Not even close. try INCREASED spending in the community. I thought you socialists were all about redistribution of wealth.
Starting compensation for teachers are in the low $30s, and only after a Masters Degree and years of experience do they reach the $50s or $60s. And that was before the pay cuts, which are 6% - 8%. So now, that teacher receiving $50K is now getting about $47.5K, and taking home even less than before. And I'm not even counting the cuts in their sick days and snow days or the furlough options.
So, now, put your hate for teachers aside one second, and explain to us how consumers with less money in their pockets is a good thing. This is no different than if taxes had been raised. Working people now have less money to spend, and you are cheering for it. Why?
You are 100% right on with your figures. My wife teaches special education, has 20 years seniority and a Master's Degree (I'm so proud of her!!). You pretty much nailed her salary range.
.