Ravi
Diamond Member
How soon til FOX reports that black people are evil?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How soon til FOX reports that black people are evil?
What do you think he should have done?There's no doubt that some of the racial incidents occurred because there are witnesses. But, what I believe about the Mizzou thing is irrelevant, because the views of the students faculty administrators and pols are that Wolfe did not react adequately to campus racial problems.Why do you automatically believe the complaints? You don't believe Dr Carson...why would you believe radical students looking fo mo benefits?He who doesn't speak up against evil, condones evil. Pretty simple. And since he was the leader of the University he got what he deserved.
There are no witnesses to Carson's likely fabrications, or at least factual stretches to fit his political ideology. And, while I find that humorous in all pols, including Hillary, I find the truly insane stuff Carson believes to be really disturbing in that people could actually vote for some one who is a borderline lunatic.
My answer was that I see no evidence of a witch hunt. All I see is a well meaning political appointee with no background in educational administration failing to respond to racial incidents, and losing support of students, faculty, administration and ultimately the governor.
What was he supposed to do? Do you know who painted the shit swastika? Was he supposed to find a white scapegoat and just throw them to the mob?
It wasn't one incident. It was a series of incidents and a perception that he failed to react decisively to racial incidents. He's probably not a bad guy. But when the governor says you gotta go ... you go.
And with no one being caught, what was he supposed to do?
Lead the investigation himself? Make some touchy feeling speeches? What?What do you think he should have done?There's no doubt that some of the racial incidents occurred because there are witnesses. But, what I believe about the Mizzou thing is irrelevant, because the views of the students faculty administrators and pols are that Wolfe did not react adequately to campus racial problems.Why do you automatically believe the complaints? You don't believe Dr Carson...why would you believe radical students looking fo mo benefits?He who doesn't speak up against evil, condones evil. Pretty simple. And since he was the leader of the University he got what he deserved.
There are no witnesses to Carson's likely fabrications, or at least factual stretches to fit his political ideology. And, while I find that humorous in all pols, including Hillary, I find the truly insane stuff Carson believes to be really disturbing in that people could actually vote for some one who is a borderline lunatic.
My answer was that I see no evidence of a witch hunt. All I see is a well meaning political appointee with no background in educational administration failing to respond to racial incidents, and losing support of students, faculty, administration and ultimately the governor.
What was he supposed to do? Do you know who painted the shit swastika? Was he supposed to find a white scapegoat and just throw them to the mob?
It wasn't one incident. It was a series of incidents and a perception that he failed to react decisively to racial incidents. He's probably not a bad guy. But when the governor says you gotta go ... you go.
And with no one being caught, what was he supposed to do?
Lead the investigation himself? Make some touchy feeling speeches? What?
Why thank you for asking. I will be happy to tell you my opinion on that as soon as you give my yours, as I asked first.
Blacks aren't evil....but blacks making demands and threatening violence on people unless they get what they want are criminals and 'racial extorters / terrorists'.How soon til FOX reports that black people are evil?
He did the right thing after showing him self to be such a poor leader. If only Dubya had had that many balls.
What do you think he should have done?There's no doubt that some of the racial incidents occurred because there are witnesses. But, what I believe about the Mizzou thing is irrelevant, because the views of the students faculty administrators and pols are that Wolfe did not react adequately to campus racial problems.Why do you automatically believe the complaints? You don't believe Dr Carson...why would you believe radical students looking fo mo benefits?
There are no witnesses to Carson's likely fabrications, or at least factual stretches to fit his political ideology. And, while I find that humorous in all pols, including Hillary, I find the truly insane stuff Carson believes to be really disturbing in that people could actually vote for some one who is a borderline lunatic.
What was he supposed to do? Do you know who painted the shit swastika? Was he supposed to find a white scapegoat and just throw them to the mob?
It wasn't one incident. It was a series of incidents and a perception that he failed to react decisively to racial incidents. He's probably not a bad guy. But when the governor says you gotta go ... you go.
And with no one being caught, what was he supposed to do?
Lead the investigation himself? Make some touchy feeling speeches? What?What do you think he should have done?There's no doubt that some of the racial incidents occurred because there are witnesses. But, what I believe about the Mizzou thing is irrelevant, because the views of the students faculty administrators and pols are that Wolfe did not react adequately to campus racial problems.Why do you automatically believe the complaints? You don't believe Dr Carson...why would you believe radical students looking fo mo benefits?
There are no witnesses to Carson's likely fabrications, or at least factual stretches to fit his political ideology. And, while I find that humorous in all pols, including Hillary, I find the truly insane stuff Carson believes to be really disturbing in that people could actually vote for some one who is a borderline lunatic.
What was he supposed to do? Do you know who painted the shit swastika? Was he supposed to find a white scapegoat and just throw them to the mob?
It wasn't one incident. It was a series of incidents and a perception that he failed to react decisively to racial incidents. He's probably not a bad guy. But when the governor says you gotta go ... you go.
And with no one being caught, what was he supposed to do?
Lead the investigation himself? Make some touchy feeling speeches? What?
Why thank you for asking. I will be happy to tell you my opinion on that as soon as you give my yours, as I asked first.
nnnnuuuuhh, you're not playing that game with me, laddy. YOU posted "what was he supposed to do. there were no witnesses to who drew the swastika." I responded with giving you the link to the Star story that the swastiska was merely one of a series of incidents. And admin, student body, and pols apparently felt he wasn't doing enough."
Then you said "what should he do"
You need to ask them, they got him fired, or allowed to resign.
Don't be asking me. Put up or STFU
The market spoke?First of all, no one in this world is innocent.I am complaining because you assholes cost an innocent man his career.I created this thread to expose the damage whiney pussy ass blacks like you are doing to our country.It's a free society. If someone wants to say ignorant shit so be it. If it doesn't interfere with my property, family or business why should I care? You dumbfucks call each other racist names so why the hell should I care?
You created this thread because you dont care Womp Womp
The racism isnt the problem, complaining about the racism is the real problem. Stop being stupid.
And you're damn right I walked past the shit. We have janitorial staff paid to deal with that crap.
You walked past racism and property damage to complain about blacks complaining about racism and property damage. You're not even whining about being called a name, you're just whining for fun.
Just out of curiosity how badly did the poop swastika damage your delicate nature pussy?
It damaged the walls and it was enough to make the President step. I imagine it was the same smell that was in your cell your first night.
Secondly, the man clearly was not cut out for the job.
Lastly, the market has spoken. Be happy.
Sent from my SM-N910T3 using Tapatalk
How soon til FOX reports that black people are evil?
None of the bad actors were known to be punished. If they were and they were given a pass for some reason this would be a different conversation.
HOw soon until you libs have something to say that isn't the Race Card or a strawman? Or some other form of Logical Fallacy?
No. It's bogus. The question is why weren't miscreants identified. At ole miss a frat did white face and some drunken fool hung a noose on James Meredith's statute. The miscreants were found and kicked out. If you want to ask what more he should do, find out what he did do. But what is apparent, the people in Missouri concluded Wolfe didn't do enough. Now take your gotcha games and FO.What do you think he should have done?There's no doubt that some of the racial incidents occurred because there are witnesses. But, what I believe about the Mizzou thing is irrelevant, because the views of the students faculty administrators and pols are that Wolfe did not react adequately to campus racial problems.
There are no witnesses to Carson's likely fabrications, or at least factual stretches to fit his political ideology. And, while I find that humorous in all pols, including Hillary, I find the truly insane stuff Carson believes to be really disturbing in that people could actually vote for some one who is a borderline lunatic.
It wasn't one incident. It was a series of incidents and a perception that he failed to react decisively to racial incidents. He's probably not a bad guy. But when the governor says you gotta go ... you go.
And with no one being caught, what was he supposed to do?
Lead the investigation himself? Make some touchy feeling speeches? What?What do you think he should have done?There's no doubt that some of the racial incidents occurred because there are witnesses. But, what I believe about the Mizzou thing is irrelevant, because the views of the students faculty administrators and pols are that Wolfe did not react adequately to campus racial problems.
There are no witnesses to Carson's likely fabrications, or at least factual stretches to fit his political ideology. And, while I find that humorous in all pols, including Hillary, I find the truly insane stuff Carson believes to be really disturbing in that people could actually vote for some one who is a borderline lunatic.
It wasn't one incident. It was a series of incidents and a perception that he failed to react decisively to racial incidents. He's probably not a bad guy. But when the governor says you gotta go ... you go.
And with no one being caught, what was he supposed to do?
Lead the investigation himself? Make some touchy feeling speeches? What?
Why thank you for asking. I will be happy to tell you my opinion on that as soon as you give my yours, as I asked first.
nnnnuuuuhh, you're not playing that game with me, laddy. YOU posted "what was he supposed to do. there were no witnesses to who drew the swastika." I responded with giving you the link to the Star story that the swastiska was merely one of a series of incidents. And admin, student body, and pols apparently felt he wasn't doing enough."
Then you said "what should he do"
You need to ask them, they got him fired, or allowed to resign.
Don't be asking me. Put up or STFU
No game here.
None of the bad actors were known to be punished. If they were and they were given a pass for some reason this would be a different conversation.
So I asked you "What should he have done"?
POinting out that there were multiple instances is not an answer to that question.
I already have an answer for your question. I want to tell you.
Just answer my question first.
U. Missouri president resigns over handling of racial incidents
No longer can you say screaming from the streets is ineffective. Liberals have the process backwards.
Part of the condemnation of him was because he didn't take a stand against the Ferguson police for shooting Michael Brown.
It is ridiculous how far BACKWARDS modern day liberals have pushed race relations and how much power is given to a minority that is NOT oppressed
No. It's bogus. The question is why weren't miscreants identified. At ole miss a frat did white face and some drunken fool hung a noose on James Meredith's statute. The miscreants were found and kicked out. If you want to ask what more he should do, find out what he did do. But what is apparent, the people in Missouri concluded Wolfe didn't do enough. Now take your gotcha games and FO.What do you think he should have done?And with no one being caught, what was he supposed to do?
Lead the investigation himself? Make some touchy feeling speeches? What?What do you think he should have done?And with no one being caught, what was he supposed to do?
Lead the investigation himself? Make some touchy feeling speeches? What?
Why thank you for asking. I will be happy to tell you my opinion on that as soon as you give my yours, as I asked first.
nnnnuuuuhh, you're not playing that game with me, laddy. YOU posted "what was he supposed to do. there were no witnesses to who drew the swastika." I responded with giving you the link to the Star story that the swastiska was merely one of a series of incidents. And admin, student body, and pols apparently felt he wasn't doing enough."
Then you said "what should he do"
You need to ask them, they got him fired, or allowed to resign.
Don't be asking me. Put up or STFU
No game here.
None of the bad actors were known to be punished. If they were and they were given a pass for some reason this would be a different conversation.
So I asked you "What should he have done"?
POinting out that there were multiple instances is not an answer to that question.
I already have an answer for your question. I want to tell you.
Just answer my question first.
Once again, nonviolent protest shows how effective it can be
Effective yes, appropriate hell no.Once again, nonviolent protest shows how effective it can be
Until you threaten violence ... declaring the campus area - not their property - NOT to be a 'safe zone' for media crossed a line. Take your ass home and declare THAT a 'non-safe zone' if you want.Once again, nonviolent protest shows how effective it can be