- Banned
- #461
The president lied.
Congress lied.
The Republicans lied.
The Democrats lied.
All the intelligence agencies lied.
Amazing.![]()
Nope, just the democrats, Obie, and Brennan. 21 more days.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The president lied.
Congress lied.
The Republicans lied.
The Democrats lied.
All the intelligence agencies lied.
Amazing.![]()
Obuthole is an idiot. He is an embarrassing piece of scum.Also bear in mind that Reuters is fake news.
I'm listening to my source speak of it this moment, and as i'm hearing it this is very DANGEROUS for Obama to currently be playing.
THERE IS SOMETHING BIG AND NOT GOOD COMING OF THIS................
. Liberals bring out the worst in most, so it's understandable.Where in this post is the evidence that Putin did shit?
"Brilliant strategy"? You mean the strategy where the hacker sent Podesta a password change link that a 12-year-old would be smart enough to ignore. I suppose that relying on complete dysfunction of the DNC right up to the top level, is a brilliant strategy indeed.
You dopes don't believe it even happened. Brilliant indeed.
There is no proof Russia did anything....you're being led by the nose......again
And when exactly did you get a top secret security clearance?
Again, troll where is the proof? That's the burr in all this.
I never thought the totalitarian regime in Russia would have so may American conservative shithouse defense lawyers.
The administration has the proof and no they don't have to let you see it.
Yet you demanded no proof on Iran.
You demanded no proof on NK.
You believed what our intelligence agencies were saying THEN.
You see the disconnect here?
I'll grant you that point as technically correct...but... Those were obviously believable and had confirmation from other nations. NK went nuclear under Bush. Iran got their technology from Russia.
Now, all we have is anonymous sources and no proof. There is quite a distinct difference.
Besides, prior actions have no bearing on the question at hand. The issue is specific and unique.
Obviously believable? Come on.
NK hacked Sony in response to a movie that ridiculed their Fearless Leader. We responded. No one asked for proof. Iran was working on nuclear enrichment. No named sources there. No one asked for proof. While not openly admitting it - we hacked them with stuxnet. No one asked for proof or named sources. Named sources almost NEVER emerge in intelligence like that. The best you get in an ongoing event is the intelligence agencies speaking.
Consider this.
Russia IS suffering under the sanctions imposed by Obama and Clinton as SOS, in response to their actions in Crimea and Ukraine. It's have an economic impact that's particularly felt given the crash in oil prices. Putin wants the sanctions lifted. He's also angry at Obama and Clinton over this. Did he INTEND to affect the election? Or did he INTEND to just disrupt things and cause mischief? Either is possible. Follow the money and follow who benefits: a Trump victory benefits Putin because it offers a better chance of getting sanctions lifted than a Clinton victory. Only the DNC was hacked and emails weren't just dumped on mass but strategically dumped to affect ONLY Clinton. Why isn't it obviously believable that Russia was involved? You have a potential benefit to Russia (at absolutely no cost); you have all of our intelligence agencies in a rare agreement, and you have a pretty darn good reason for Russia to be behind this - sanctions imposed by Obama & Clinton.
But only now is a higher standard of "proof" being demanded. Russia is no newcomer to these games - what's new is the ready willingness of some to believe Putin OVER our own government, our own president, our own intelligence agencies, our own congress - and all I can say is WTF y'all?
You Leftists used to worship Russia, you stopped worshipping Russia ONLY when it stopped being a Communist nation.
Now you are all anti-Russian, you're all still pro-Cuba and pro-North Korea though.
We are?
Yes, the most recent example with the Leftists still worshipping Cuba was when that POS Fidel Castro died and across the planet the Leftists were saying what a GIANT of the world stage he was and was a GREAT man he was and the Fidel Lovefest went on for days and days.
Nor did these snowflakes demand "proof" that Iran was working on nuclear capabilities when we hacked them with stuxnet and disrupted their nuclear enrichment program. Oh no...no proof demanded.
Israel knows what they are doing. Jews have proven their acumen and their patience with these devils. If Iran could have proven from their scrapped plants they were not nuclear I am sure we would have heard. You need to learn to distinguish between the good guys and the bad guys.
Putin told Obama to put up or shut up. They have no proof... but for some reason that does not bother sycophants like you. Or maybe Obama has his top forgers working on some "proof" now that they have finished the birth certificate job. Except we can't wait 2 1/2 years like we had to on the last one.
Convenient excuse to avoid demanding proof from Israel, proof from our intelligence agencies...well you get it. Proof.
Proof is only need now. Too funny.
There was no rigged election.
Have you noticed Trump is the ONLY one defending Russia ? Hmmm, wonder why.
Nor did these snowflakes demand "proof" that Iran was working on nuclear capabilities when we hacked them with stuxnet and disrupted their nuclear enrichment program. Oh no...no proof demanded.
Israel knows what they are doing. Jews have proven their acumen and their patience with these devils. If Iran could have proven from their scrapped plants they were not nuclear I am sure we would have heard. You need to learn to distinguish between the good guys and the bad guys.
Putin told Obama to put up or shut up. They have no proof... but for some reason that does not bother sycophants like you. Or maybe Obama has his top forgers working on some "proof" now that they have finished the birth certificate job. Except we can't wait 2 1/2 years like we had to on the last one.
Convenient excuse to avoid demanding proof from Israel, proof from our intelligence agencies...well you get it. Proof.
Proof is only need now. Too funny.
Yet you demanded no proof on Iran.
You demanded no proof on NK.
You believed what our intelligence agencies were saying THEN.
You see the disconnect here?
I'll grant you that point as technically correct...but... Those were obviously believable and had confirmation from other nations. NK went nuclear under Bush. Iran got their technology from Russia.
Now, all we have is anonymous sources and no proof. There is quite a distinct difference.
Besides, prior actions have no bearing on the question at hand. The issue is specific and unique.
Obviously believable? Come on.
NK hacked Sony in response to a movie that ridiculed their Fearless Leader. We responded. No one asked for proof. Iran was working on nuclear enrichment. No named sources there. No one asked for proof. While not openly admitting it - we hacked them with stuxnet. No one asked for proof or named sources. Named sources almost NEVER emerge in intelligence like that. The best you get in an ongoing event is the intelligence agencies speaking.
Consider this.
Russia IS suffering under the sanctions imposed by Obama and Clinton as SOS, in response to their actions in Crimea and Ukraine. It's have an economic impact that's particularly felt given the crash in oil prices. Putin wants the sanctions lifted. He's also angry at Obama and Clinton over this. Did he INTEND to affect the election? Or did he INTEND to just disrupt things and cause mischief? Either is possible. Follow the money and follow who benefits: a Trump victory benefits Putin because it offers a better chance of getting sanctions lifted than a Clinton victory. Only the DNC was hacked and emails weren't just dumped on mass but strategically dumped to affect ONLY Clinton. Why isn't it obviously believable that Russia was involved? You have a potential benefit to Russia (at absolutely no cost); you have all of our intelligence agencies in a rare agreement, and you have a pretty darn good reason for Russia to be behind this - sanctions imposed by Obama & Clinton.
But only now is a higher standard of "proof" being demanded. Russia is no newcomer to these games - what's new is the ready willingness of some to believe Putin OVER our own government, our own president, our own intelligence agencies, our own congress - and all I can say is WTF y'all?
You Leftists used to worship Russia, you stopped worshipping Russia ONLY when it stopped being a Communist nation.
Now you are all anti-Russian, you're all still pro-Cuba and pro-North Korea though.
We are?
Yes, the most recent example with the Leftists still worshipping Cuba was when that POS Fidel Castro died and across the planet the Leftists were saying what a GIANT of the world stage he was and was a GREAT man he was and the Fidel Lovefest went on for days and days.
Putin is an ex kgb scoundrel and there is no reason on earth to trust him.
They'll be back....January 21st
At least Castro started wh good intentions . Conservatives hate him cause he dared to throw out rich Americans who propped up dictator Bautista.
At the same time righties cry over the death of heros like Qudaffi . Disgraceful!
That's all well and good, but it boils down extremely poor cyber and network security, and the absence of adequate user training. Implementing safe practices the DNC didn't was the reason the RNC wasn't penetrated when they were targeted.
We are nearly all targeted everyday, most of them are less destructive than others. We need to take the proper steps to secure our home networks and learn to spot potential hazards.
. I saw this same pic, but the caption read "I am the president, I am the president, and one of the nurses said "sure you are dear, now take your pill please". LOL.
There was no rigged election.
It wasn't?....got any idea how the same Hillary votes were run through the scanner 6 times in inner-city Detroit precincts? Or how she claimed over 2M more votes in California? Or why the Nevada recount never went near Clark County? If Trump hadn't kept saying it was rigged, it would have been much worse....brilliant tactic, brilliant man.