Rshermr
VIP Member
He does not care that it does not work. Not in the least. Your problem, Pinqy, is that you are dead honest, always. And you understand unemployment to the point that I am blown away. I mean, to the smallest point. Thanks. It is always a joy to read your posts.What he's doing is saying that if the number of jobs gained is enough to keep up with population growth, then that's a net gain of zero.A little over 40,000 jobs a month?? Really.Your insanity worsens.There was no job recovery in 2009. No one is claiming there was. The Great Recession had just ended only a few months before that Fox video aired. The recovery began in March, 2010. But three months later in June, the overall numbers dropped due to the government laying ¼ million temp census workers. Meanwhile, the private sector continued growing.
Over the last 73 months, there hasn't been one single month the private sector (14.4 million jobs added) lost jobs and the only months we lost jobs overall (14.0 million jobs added) was due to collecting census data.
That's what you moronically call a "jobless" recovery.
You're every bit the con tool Rshermr figured out you are.
Just because we added a small number of jobs each month instead of losing them doesn't mean that it wasn't a jobless recovery, Faun! It was. The Private Sector has indeed grown but it has done so not because of the economic policies of Barack Obama but DESPITE the economic policies of a President who struggles mightily when it comes to economics in general.
And Rshermr hasn't figured out anything in so long it's laughable! He's the guy who uses the internet to pretend he's something he isn't...educated! He's the George Costanza of the US Message Board!
george costanza architect - - Yahoo Search Results
We need somewhere in the neighborhood of 150,000 jobs to be added each month to keep up with population growth.
Since March, 2010, when the job markets began recovering, we've added 14 million jobs ... or 192,000 jobs per month on average.
You know, what you idiotically call a "small number" of jobs in a "jobless" recovery.
So we've had an average net gain of a little over 40,000 jobs per month in a country the size of America with millions out of work and you label that as a recovery full of jobs? Really, Faun?
Show your [fuzzy] math that resulted in 40,000 jobs gained per month...
No I don't understand how he thinks that works