Va. And Md. Governors Demand Garland Ban Protests Outside Justices Homes

[Billy_Bob]

You can continue to repeat over and over what has been covered all you want, it changes nothing.

People have a constitutional right to protest, even Supreme Court rulings.

IT is limited by the law because they have no right to intimidate the court in the discharge of their duties.. This is very like yelling fire in crowded movie theater, when there is none. Its intent is to cause fear and panic.

You have nothing to stand on..

 

[pknopp]

IT is limited by the law because they have no right to intimidate the court in the discharge of their duties.. This is very like yelling fire in crowded movie theater, when there is none. Its intent is to cause fear and panic.

You have nothing to stand on..

It is legal to yell fire in a movie theater.

 

[Billy_Bob]

It is legal to yell fire in a movie theater.

LOL.... Idiot... go try it and see what the hell happens to your idiot ass.

 

[pknopp]

LOL.... Idiot... go try it and see what the hell happens to your idiot ass.

Oliver Wendell Holmes made the analogy during a controversial Supreme Court case that was overturned more than 40 years ago.

It’s Time to Stop Using the ‘Fire in a Crowded Theater’ Quote

You are the one ignorant of the facts but you feel a need to call me names. I have found the two go hand in hand.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Oliver Wendell Holmes made the analogy during a controversial Supreme Court case that was overturned more than 40 years ago.

It’s Time to Stop Using the ‘Fire in a Crowded Theater’ Quote

You are the one ignorant of the facts but you feel a need to call me names. I have found the two go hand in hand.

Feel free to try it and see how fast you end up in jail. You will also be charged with any injuries and damages to the establishment. But feel free to be stupid.

 

[pknopp]

Feel free to try it and see how fast you end up in jail. You will also be charged with any injuries and damages to the establishment. But feel free to be stupid.

You changed the parameters of your argument. I never argued that people could damage property. That's what got people in trouble Jan 6.

 

[struth]

You can continue to repeat over and over what has been covered all you want, it changes nothing.

People have a constitutional right to protest, even Supreme Court rulings.

It is illegal to threaten a judge: Medical Examiner Finds USCP Officer Brian Sicknick Died of Natural Causes

Asking Garland and XIden to enforce the law and prosecute their brownshits however is unrealistic

 

[iceberg]

The Republican governors of Maryland and Virginia are calling on Attorney General Merrick Garland to ban protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices living in those states.

Youngkin actually tried to make Alito’s entire neighborhood sacred, or at least heavily restricted, ground. He asked local authorities to set up a perimeter around the area, limiting who could enter, and offered the state police to help. Fairfax County officials essentially told him to shove it.

People going into clinics for legal medical care are routinely harassed and threatened by anti-abortion protesters. Abortion providers live under constant threat. But a few candlelight vigils and peaceful protests directed at Supreme Court justices who hold power over the lives of everyone in this country and we’re supposed to be shocked and deeply concerned.

The Supreme Court has never been as insulated from politics as its defenders would have us believe, but now? The Supreme Court of Kavanaugh and Alito and Barrett? Of Clarence Thomas and his insurrectionist wife? A Supreme Court with five justices nominated by men who got into the White House after losing the popular vote? Spare me the pieties about the sanctity of the institution.

Daily Kos

Daily Kos is a progressive news site that fights for democracy by giving our audience information and resources to win elections and impact government. Our coverage is assiduously factual, ethical, and unapologetically liberal. We amplify what we think is important, with the proper context—not...

m.dailykos.com

Yep, conservatives can dish it out, but they can’t take it. Good for Fairfax county.

Fuck off.

 

[pknopp]

It is illegal to threaten a judge: Medical Examiner Finds USCP Officer Brian Sicknick Died of Natural Causes

Asking Garland and XIden to enforce the law and prosecute their brownshits however is unrealistic

Here you are doing the same thing. It's illegal to threaten people overall.

I have never argued it wasn't.

 

[iceberg]

Republicans want to silence lawful protest.

It's illegal you doosh

Federal Statute Bans Picketing Judges' Residences "With The Intent of Influencing [the] Judge"

There's been talk of protests outside Supreme Court Justices' homes; but it appears likely that such protests are illegal, under 18…

reason.com

 

[struth]

Here you are doing the same thing. It's illegal to threaten people overall.

I have never argued it wasn't.

So, that's all people are saying the President to do...enforce the law.

 

[pknopp]

So, that's all people are saying the President to do...enforce the law.

Protesting is not illegal.

 

[struth]

Protesting is not illegal.

I didn't say it was....we aren't talking about protesting. Please keep up.....

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Yep, conservatives can dish it out, but they can’t take it. Good for Fairfax county.

Are you saying that you want there to be violence?

 

[Resnic]

Protesting should be illegal in any residential area regardless of what it's about. You don't go to someone's private residence and hassle them. A person's home is the one place that belongs to them and can shut out the outside world.

Supreme court judges or a stage citizens. No one should be allowed to stage protests at their homes.

But for supporters of liberals the rules seem to change. They allow people to harass judges at home and let blm riot, block streets, take over entire city blocks, paint graffiti allover, harass others and so on.

It angers me quite a bit to see them allow so much illegal shit and act like it isn't happening just because it supports their agenda. Letting criminals get away with crimes because they want them to do it. Yet will go to insane lengths going after anyone that does it that isn't on their side.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

It is legal to yell fire in a movie theater.

Is it legal to yell “MOVIE!” in a firehouse?

 

[scruffy]

It all happened under Trump.

Gee, I wonder why.

The FBI was lying about Trump before he even took office.

The BLM riots wouldn't have happened AT ALL if Trump wasn't president.

THAT is why you saw the fucktard Democratic mayors endangering the lives of their constituents

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This is not protest, this is mob rule trying to influence the judge's decision by threatening his family's safety..

That's your claim. We heard you the first 100 times.

You seem to be missing the important part:

That isn't decided on the squeals and crybabying of a Trumper on a message board. It is decided by a court.

A prosecutor has to prove that in court. And they need better argument and evidence than anything you have presented.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

For the most part, people on the other side are nowhere near as proactive as Progressives. If they start doing this at the level of Progs will you be the same? Jan. 6 was not an Insurrection but Progs brought that into the everyday word usage. It was more about Progs using the building the protesters were in as sacrosanct to get away with their childish politics when it is not.

Nobody who has watched the hearings and accounts for the facts would agree with any of that.

 

[pknopp]

I didn't say it was....we aren't talking about protesting. Please keep up.....

Well I guess it's good you have abandoned the original argument..