Pop23
Gold Member
- Mar 28, 2013
- 26,685
- 4,383
I had five children not remotely related to heterosexual coupling.
So more related to homosexuality?
Please explain.
Let's see...no heterosexuals went into the making of our children, the children of my partner and I...100% all gay. We're gay, donor is gay.
Now, the surrogate children...there was a heterosexual involved in that, the egg donor was a straight woman, but the sperm donors were gay men and the oven (me) is a lesbian.
Tell us truthfully Pop...you want there to be two different marriage licenses for straights and gays, regardless of procreation. If you were being honest about your "concerns", you'd be advocating for a "breeder" or "non breeder" license.
The participant could all be gay. When he masturbated in the cup, intending to donate to a female, he participated as a male fertilizing a female.
That is far closer to Hetero than homosexual. Had it been homosexual, there would be, by definition, no children.
As for the "breeder" designation. Proud I am part of that club, as are my offspring and theirs.
By the way, take the debate out of this for a moment. I hope you and your kids are all healthy and happy.