Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because many sites are talking about it. Many media outlets have rejected it. Some have accepted it. It would take a big conspiracy to generate this much reporting on a video that never existed.Dunno. Let’s say zero of them have it. Are they all making it up?There’s many articles about it. Are they all making up the exact same story?
Really? Which article has the actual video?
Must be if they can't be found. All it takes is one to make it up, and the others just parrot what was reported without checking the source or story.
It doesn't make sense either. WTF would Trump be putting out anti-Biden commercials when he doesn't even know who his challenger will be?
Sorry man, not buying a conspiracy.
It makes perfect sense actually. Trump has a ton of cash to spend during the primary that he can’t carry over to the general. He’s getting a year long head start weakening potential opponents. Biden is the still the favorite but we both know only a couple have any real chance.
What conspiracy? They talk about a commercial that nobody posted and can't be found. Because this far left site is reporting it, that makes it true?
It doesn't matter how much cash you have, there is no such thing as too much advertising. Hillary had record amount of contributions and she still lost. Campaign ads are like any other advertising. The greater the audience, the more expensive it is. If Trump has so much cash, he could advertise on the most watched programs and still not have enough.
Nobody knows who will be the nominee. And if this interview gets more attention, it's likely he's finished. Furthermore is that Facebook is almost an extension of the Democrat party. If there was some video, and they wanted it down, FB would have been more than happy to accommodate.
Back on trackOf course there was reason to fire Shokin. He was accused of being soft on corruption. He wasn't investigating oligarchs accused of corruption. Zlochevsky being one of them. The UK had to release Zlochevsky's assets after almost a year of Shokin's refusal to cooperate with them in their investigation. And Biden wasn't the only one who wanted Shokin thrown out. He was the was thd one who got the job done. That's why Biden was bragging in that video.Liar. Shokin wasn't actively investigating Burisma.
Then there would have been no reason for Low IQ Joe to establish the QUID PRO QUO that the prosecutor must be fired before US foreign aid to Ukraine would be released, but that is exactly what happened.....
You sound like you got a KICKBACK off that aid package too....
Because many sites are talking about it. Many media outlets have rejected it. Some have accepted it. It would take a big conspiracy to generate this much reporting on a video that never existed.Dunno. Let’s say zero of them have it. Are they all making it up?Really? Which article has the actual video?
Must be if they can't be found. All it takes is one to make it up, and the others just parrot what was reported without checking the source or story.
It doesn't make sense either. WTF would Trump be putting out anti-Biden commercials when he doesn't even know who his challenger will be?
Sorry man, not buying a conspiracy.
It makes perfect sense actually. Trump has a ton of cash to spend during the primary that he can’t carry over to the general. He’s getting a year long head start weakening potential opponents. Biden is the still the favorite but we both know only a couple have any real chance.
What conspiracy? They talk about a commercial that nobody posted and can't be found. Because this far left site is reporting it, that makes it true?
It doesn't matter how much cash you have, there is no such thing as too much advertising. Hillary had record amount of contributions and she still lost. Campaign ads are like any other advertising. The greater the audience, the more expensive it is. If Trump has so much cash, he could advertise on the most watched programs and still not have enough.
Nobody knows who will be the nominee. And if this interview gets more attention, it's likely he's finished. Furthermore is that Facebook is almost an extension of the Democrat party. If there was some video, and they wanted it down, FB would have been more than happy to accommodate.
You’re twisting and turning here. Nothing you’re saying is terribly coherent.
Who says they don’t have it? They just haven’t published it.Because many sites are talking about it. Many media outlets have rejected it. Some have accepted it. It would take a big conspiracy to generate this much reporting on a video that never existed.Dunno. Let’s say zero of them have it. Are they all making it up?
Must be if they can't be found. All it takes is one to make it up, and the others just parrot what was reported without checking the source or story.
It doesn't make sense either. WTF would Trump be putting out anti-Biden commercials when he doesn't even know who his challenger will be?
Sorry man, not buying a conspiracy.
It makes perfect sense actually. Trump has a ton of cash to spend during the primary that he can’t carry over to the general. He’s getting a year long head start weakening potential opponents. Biden is the still the favorite but we both know only a couple have any real chance.
What conspiracy? They talk about a commercial that nobody posted and can't be found. Because this far left site is reporting it, that makes it true?
It doesn't matter how much cash you have, there is no such thing as too much advertising. Hillary had record amount of contributions and she still lost. Campaign ads are like any other advertising. The greater the audience, the more expensive it is. If Trump has so much cash, he could advertise on the most watched programs and still not have enough.
Nobody knows who will be the nominee. And if this interview gets more attention, it's likely he's finished. Furthermore is that Facebook is almost an extension of the Democrat party. If there was some video, and they wanted it down, FB would have been more than happy to accommodate.
You’re twisting and turning here. Nothing you’re saying is terribly coherent.
Asking for actual evidence is very coherent. And people writing about something nobody seems to have is not evidence of any kind.
Here you go.Because many sites are talking about it. Many media outlets have rejected it. Some have accepted it. It would take a big conspiracy to generate this much reporting on a video that never existed.Dunno. Let’s say zero of them have it. Are they all making it up?
Must be if they can't be found. All it takes is one to make it up, and the others just parrot what was reported without checking the source or story.
It doesn't make sense either. WTF would Trump be putting out anti-Biden commercials when he doesn't even know who his challenger will be?
Sorry man, not buying a conspiracy.
It makes perfect sense actually. Trump has a ton of cash to spend during the primary that he can’t carry over to the general. He’s getting a year long head start weakening potential opponents. Biden is the still the favorite but we both know only a couple have any real chance.
What conspiracy? They talk about a commercial that nobody posted and can't be found. Because this far left site is reporting it, that makes it true?
It doesn't matter how much cash you have, there is no such thing as too much advertising. Hillary had record amount of contributions and she still lost. Campaign ads are like any other advertising. The greater the audience, the more expensive it is. If Trump has so much cash, he could advertise on the most watched programs and still not have enough.
Nobody knows who will be the nominee. And if this interview gets more attention, it's likely he's finished. Furthermore is that Facebook is almost an extension of the Democrat party. If there was some video, and they wanted it down, FB would have been more than happy to accommodate.
You’re twisting and turning here. Nothing you’re saying is terribly coherent.
Asking for actual evidence is very coherent. And people writing about something nobody seems to have is not evidence of any kind.
LOLOLIn his own words....There is definitely something seriously wrong with our justice system if this isn't FULLY INVESTIGATED By the DoJ!!!
But then, not to be a broken record, but can it really be that surprising considering the long list of things which were dropped or buried with Hillary, the many things never even launched against Obama and even now with how the investigation of the FBI and FISA conveniently ends up empty handed? It would seem that the justice system fails once it gets a little too close to shining any light on its own sordid affairs.
After all, that would not serve the best interests of the USA.
It's more likely that when all your goofy lies and accusations are investigated, they turn out to be nothing but goofy lies and accusations. It happens all the time.
Show me one thing I've ever said that has been proven a lie.
You've supported all the crazy right wing craziness from the birth certificate crap all the way up to and including the current Russian talking point about Ukraine being responsible for the interference and hacking involved in our elections instead of Russia. You are deep into crazy territory
Asking again: Show me one thing I've ever said that has been proven a lie rather than just claim it. This isn't Schiff's impeachment inquiry---- ---- where mere accusations and opinions fly as fact. You accused me of lying. Produce one.
Here you go.Because many sites are talking about it. Many media outlets have rejected it. Some have accepted it. It would take a big conspiracy to generate this much reporting on a video that never existed.Must be if they can't be found. All it takes is one to make it up, and the others just parrot what was reported without checking the source or story.
It doesn't make sense either. WTF would Trump be putting out anti-Biden commercials when he doesn't even know who his challenger will be?
Sorry man, not buying a conspiracy.
It makes perfect sense actually. Trump has a ton of cash to spend during the primary that he can’t carry over to the general. He’s getting a year long head start weakening potential opponents. Biden is the still the favorite but we both know only a couple have any real chance.
What conspiracy? They talk about a commercial that nobody posted and can't be found. Because this far left site is reporting it, that makes it true?
It doesn't matter how much cash you have, there is no such thing as too much advertising. Hillary had record amount of contributions and she still lost. Campaign ads are like any other advertising. The greater the audience, the more expensive it is. If Trump has so much cash, he could advertise on the most watched programs and still not have enough.
Nobody knows who will be the nominee. And if this interview gets more attention, it's likely he's finished. Furthermore is that Facebook is almost an extension of the Democrat party. If there was some video, and they wanted it down, FB would have been more than happy to accommodate.
You’re twisting and turning here. Nothing you’re saying is terribly coherent.
Asking for actual evidence is very coherent. And people writing about something nobody seems to have is not evidence of any kind.
Trump Ad Slams Biden On Ukraine: Don't Let Democrats Overturn The 2016 Election
Finally found one.
Are you kidding me ? republican kiss asses trying to make a case for trump but don't have shit to shovelLook at the Dim sycophants coming in to defend corrupt Biden.
Are you kidding me ? republican kiss asses trying to make a case for trump but don't have shit to shovelLook at the Dim sycophants coming in to defend corrupt Biden.
Burisma has to justify those massive payments to Hunter Biden. Exactly what services were rendered to justify those payments? Ukrainians and Americans want to know.Does everyone have to justify to you how much they make?Do people always have to prove their innocence to you?
Receiving $16 million for doing nothing hardly suggests "innocence."
Heck, you already LIED about WHAT he did, suggesting he went to Board Meetings. He didn't. He was a "ghost director."
Are you a public education "ghost employee" right now, billing the taxpayer for your "work?"
And that is exactly what Shokin was investigating when Biden got him fired and replaced by Lutsenko.When you get to 10, it shows that you have nothing.
Nothing = Hunter Biden gets job in Ukraine, doesn't speak the language, never shows up to work, gets millions $$$ stuffed in his pockets, his daddy Low IQ Joe brags about getting the Ukraine prosecutor fired, and Dems vehemently oppose any investigation.....
Dem philosophy - once we steal your money, fuck you!!!!!!!!
It’s not illegal for Biden to work for Burisma. It might be illegal if he were paid improperly. As you said yourself, you have no idea if he was or not.
Barry AND the Moocher admit he isn't t born in America but in KenyaLOLOLBut then, not to be a broken record, but can it really be that surprising considering the long list of things which were dropped or buried with Hillary, the many things never even launched against Obama and even now with how the investigation of the FBI and FISA conveniently ends up empty handed? It would seem that the justice system fails once it gets a little too close to shining any light on its own sordid affairs.
After all, that would not serve the best interests of the USA.
It's more likely that when all your goofy lies and accusations are investigated, they turn out to be nothing but goofy lies and accusations. It happens all the time.
Show me one thing I've ever said that has been proven a lie.
You've supported all the crazy right wing craziness from the birth certificate crap all the way up to and including the current Russian talking point about Ukraine being responsible for the interference and hacking involved in our elections instead of Russia. You are deep into crazy territory
Asking again: Show me one thing I've ever said that has been proven a lie rather than just claim it. This isn't Schiff's impeachment inquiry---- ---- where mere accusations and opinions fly as fact. You accused me of lying. Produce one.
I already showed one ... here's another ... Here's you, claiming Obama was born in the Republic of Kenya -- which didn't exist in 1961...
And here's you, posting a phony photo claiming Obama was born in Kenya...
And here's the actual sign, sans photoshopping, from Oman. not Kenya...
Good Luck.
Shokin is corrupt. So yeah, let's believe Shokin. Lol.
And that is exactly what Shokin was investigating when Biden got him fired and replaced by Lutsenko.When you get to 10, it shows that you have nothing.
Nothing = Hunter Biden gets job in Ukraine, doesn't speak the language, never shows up to work, gets millions $$$ stuffed in his pockets, his daddy Low IQ Joe brags about getting the Ukraine prosecutor fired, and Dems vehemently oppose any investigation.....
Dem philosophy - once we steal your money, fuck you!!!!!!!!
It’s not illegal for Biden to work for Burisma. It might be illegal if he were paid improperly. As you said yourself, you have no idea if he was or not.
BTW,
April 7, 2013: Yuriy Lutsenko is pardoned by Yanukovych.
In an announcement on his presidential website, Yanukovych said he had signed a decree granting the pardon following appeals by Ukrainian and European Union officials, including former Polish President Alexander Kwasniewski and the former president of the European Parliament, Pat Cox.
Yanukovych Pardons Tymoshenko Ally Lutsenko, Five Others
And along with Hunter Biden, Alexander Kwasniewski just happened to be a Burisma director.
Coincidence?
Seriously?
And now a Russian bigwig is visiting the WH tomorrow No president of Ukraine ,,, but one of trumps russian buddiesGood Luck.
Shokin is corrupt. So yeah, let's believe Shokin. Lol.
Ya seriously - why are people more willing to believe corrupt Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs over our own people? It's nuts. Anti American.
Well hell, you are stupid but no one believes you anyway!Good Luck.
Shokin is corrupt. So yeah, let's believe Shokin. Lol.
Could you explain the reasoning that you used to come to that conclusion?And that is exactly what Shokin was investigating when Biden got him fired and replaced by Lutsenko.When you get to 10, it shows that you have nothing.
Nothing = Hunter Biden gets job in Ukraine, doesn't speak the language, never shows up to work, gets millions $$$ stuffed in his pockets, his daddy Low IQ Joe brags about getting the Ukraine prosecutor fired, and Dems vehemently oppose any investigation.....
Dem philosophy - once we steal your money, fuck you!!!!!!!!
It’s not illegal for Biden to work for Burisma. It might be illegal if he were paid improperly. As you said yourself, you have no idea if he was or not.
BTW,
April 7, 2013: Yuriy Lutsenko is pardoned by Yanukovych.
In an announcement on his presidential website, Yanukovych said he had signed a decree granting the pardon following appeals by Ukrainian and European Union officials, including former Polish President Alexander Kwasniewski and the former president of the European Parliament, Pat Cox.
Yanukovych Pardons Tymoshenko Ally Lutsenko, Five Others
And along with Hunter Biden, Alexander Kwasniewski just happened to be a Burisma director.
Coincidence?
Seriously?
Shokin wasn't investigating anything. That was problem.
The appearance of clout.Burisma has to justify those massive payments to Hunter Biden. Exactly what services were rendered to justify those payments? Ukrainians and Americans want to know.Does everyone have to justify to you how much they make?Do people always have to prove their innocence to you?
Receiving $16 million for doing nothing hardly suggests "innocence."
Heck, you already LIED about WHAT he did, suggesting he went to Board Meetings. He didn't. He was a "ghost director."
Are you a public education "ghost employee" right now, billing the taxpayer for your "work?"
