Voting by Mail is secure

[San Souci]

What is a “few more” and who data enters the requests and double checks for accuracy? Places that have done it took years to implement it. Again you have zero business acumen and don’t know how difficult such an undertaking would be. PPP was very difficult and it was for businesses through banks. And still we don’t have a solid forgiveness plan. You want to do this for millions of voters in 80 days? It’s impossible. It is frightening how ignorant people are. Wow.

Shucks, and all we have are months and months to figure it out?

We employ over a million people to run the election every year, so it's as simple as re-purposing them.

It's a lot easier when we don't have dead weight whiners like yourself. Tell you what, go sit in the corner and cry and let everyone go do the work?

Well ,anyone who wants to vote CAN vote. The POLLS are usually a few blocks away.

 

[colfax_m]

What is a “few more” and who data enters the requests and double checks for accuracy? Places that have done it took years to implement it. Again you have zero business acumen and don’t know how difficult such an undertaking would be. PPP was very difficult and it was for businesses through banks. And still we don’t have a solid forgiveness plan. You want to do this for millions of voters in 80 days? It’s impossible. It is frightening how ignorant people are. Wow.

Shucks, and all we have are months and months to figure it out?

We employ over a million people to run the election every year, so it's as simple as re-purposing them.

It's a lot easier when we don't have dead weight whiners like yourself. Tell you what, go sit in the corner and cry and let everyone go do the work?

Well ,anyone who wants to vote CAN vote. The POLLS are usually a few blocks away.

My parent's are about 20 miles from their polling place. They vote every year by mail.

Azog thinks that makes them lazy and that they shouldn't be allowed to do so.

 

[San Souci]

What is a “few more” and who data enters the requests and double checks for accuracy? Places that have done it took years to implement it. Again you have zero business acumen and don’t know how difficult such an undertaking would be. PPP was very difficult and it was for businesses through banks. And still we don’t have a solid forgiveness plan. You want to do this for millions of voters in 80 days? It’s impossible. It is frightening how ignorant people are. Wow.

Shucks, and all we have are months and months to figure it out?

We employ over a million people to run the election every year, so it's as simple as re-purposing them.

It's a lot easier when we don't have dead weight whiners like yourself. Tell you what, go sit in the corner and cry and let everyone go do the work?

Well ,anyone who wants to vote CAN vote. The POLLS are usually a few blocks away.

My parent's are about 20 miles from their polling place. They vote every year by mail.

Azog thinks that makes them lazy and that they shouldn't be allowed to do so.

Absentee Ballots?

 

[colfax_m]

What is a “few more” and who data enters the requests and double checks for accuracy? Places that have done it took years to implement it. Again you have zero business acumen and don’t know how difficult such an undertaking would be. PPP was very difficult and it was for businesses through banks. And still we don’t have a solid forgiveness plan. You want to do this for millions of voters in 80 days? It’s impossible. It is frightening how ignorant people are. Wow.

Shucks, and all we have are months and months to figure it out?

We employ over a million people to run the election every year, so it's as simple as re-purposing them.

It's a lot easier when we don't have dead weight whiners like yourself. Tell you what, go sit in the corner and cry and let everyone go do the work?

Well ,anyone who wants to vote CAN vote. The POLLS are usually a few blocks away.

My parent's are about 20 miles from their polling place. They vote every year by mail.

Azog thinks that makes them lazy and that they shouldn't be allowed to do so.

Absentee Ballots?

Yep. No excuse needed.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What is a “few more” and who data enters the requests and double checks for accuracy? Places that have done it took years to implement it. Again you have zero business acumen and don’t know how difficult such an undertaking would be. PPP was very difficult and it was for businesses through banks. And still we don’t have a solid forgiveness plan. You want to do this for millions of voters in 80 days? It’s impossible. It is frightening how ignorant people are. Wow.

Shucks, and all we have are months and months to figure it out?

We employ over a million people to run the election every year, so it's as simple as re-purposing them.

It's a lot easier when we don't have dead weight whiners like yourself. Tell you what, go sit in the corner and cry and let everyone go do the work?

It’s not enough time. You have zero business acumen. It’s scary. Very scary.

Imagine you run a pizza shop and make 200 per day based on requests. Now you’re asked to make 20,000 and then make sure the orders are accurate. Think you d have to adjust your business model? You really need to attend business school.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What is a “few more” and who data enters the requests and double checks for accuracy? Places that have done it took years to implement it. Again you have zero business acumen and don’t know how difficult such an undertaking would be. PPP was very difficult and it was for businesses through banks. And still we don’t have a solid forgiveness plan. You want to do this for millions of voters in 80 days? It’s impossible. It is frightening how ignorant people are. Wow.

Shucks, and all we have are months and months to figure it out?

We employ over a million people to run the election every year, so it's as simple as re-purposing them.

It's a lot easier when we don't have dead weight whiners like yourself. Tell you what, go sit in the corner and cry and let everyone go do the work?

Well ,anyone who wants to vote CAN vote. The POLLS are usually a few blocks away.

My parent's are about 20 miles from their polling place. They vote every year by mail.

Azog thinks that makes them lazy and that they shouldn't be allowed to do so.

Absentee Ballots?

Yep. No excuse needed.

Those have to be requested. Colfax wants mass mailings. Not the same thing. Colfax is lying again.

 

[colfax_m]

Those have to be requested. Colfax wants mass mailings. Not the same thing. Colfax is lying again.

Show me where I said there should be mass mailings.

I leave that decision up to each state. You apparently can't emotionally handle letting the elected government do their jobs.

 

[colfax_m]

What is a “few more” and who data enters the requests and double checks for accuracy? Places that have done it took years to implement it. Again you have zero business acumen and don’t know how difficult such an undertaking would be. PPP was very difficult and it was for businesses through banks. And still we don’t have a solid forgiveness plan. You want to do this for millions of voters in 80 days? It’s impossible. It is frightening how ignorant people are. Wow.

Shucks, and all we have are months and months to figure it out?

We employ over a million people to run the election every year, so it's as simple as re-purposing them.

It's a lot easier when we don't have dead weight whiners like yourself. Tell you what, go sit in the corner and cry and let everyone go do the work?

It’s not enough time. You have zero business acumen. It’s scary. Very scary.

Imagine you run a pizza shop and make 200 per day based on requests. Now you’re asked to make 20,000 and then make sure the orders are accurate. Think you d have to adjust your business model? You really need to attend business school.

Bad analogy. Here's a better one. Imagine you have a pizza shop that makes 20,000 slices a day for dine in and then have to shift to making 20,000 slices a day for delivery. Good news the deliveries will occur over a period of a few weks and you don't even have to do the deliveries yourself (the post office will do that for you).

You're not very logical.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What is a “few more” and who data enters the requests and double checks for accuracy? Places that have done it took years to implement it. Again you have zero business acumen and don’t know how difficult such an undertaking would be. PPP was very difficult and it was for businesses through banks. And still we don’t have a solid forgiveness plan. You want to do this for millions of voters in 80 days? It’s impossible. It is frightening how ignorant people are. Wow.

Shucks, and all we have are months and months to figure it out?

We employ over a million people to run the election every year, so it's as simple as re-purposing them.

It's a lot easier when we don't have dead weight whiners like yourself. Tell you what, go sit in the corner and cry and let everyone go do the work?

It’s not enough time. You have zero business acumen. It’s scary. Very scary.

Imagine you run a pizza shop and make 200 per day based on requests. Now you’re asked to make 20,000 and then make sure the orders are accurate. Think you d have to adjust your business model? You really need to attend business school.

Bad analogy. Here's a better one. Imagine you have a pizza shop that makes 20,000 slices a day for dine in and then have to shift to making 20,000 slices a day for delivery. Good news the deliveries will occur over a period of a few weks and you don't even have to do the deliveries yourself (the post office will do that for you).

You're not very logical.

Nope...wrong because you don't have the addresses for deliveries and are assuming that what people order when they dine in they will want delivered. Your analogy is so wrong its laughable. The post office requested additional monies to handle such requests, they don't have the manpower.

If we agree that you don't support mass mailings then what are we debating?

 

[colfax_m]

What is a “few more” and who data enters the requests and double checks for accuracy? Places that have done it took years to implement it. Again you have zero business acumen and don’t know how difficult such an undertaking would be. PPP was very difficult and it was for businesses through banks. And still we don’t have a solid forgiveness plan. You want to do this for millions of voters in 80 days? It’s impossible. It is frightening how ignorant people are. Wow.

Shucks, and all we have are months and months to figure it out?

We employ over a million people to run the election every year, so it's as simple as re-purposing them.

It's a lot easier when we don't have dead weight whiners like yourself. Tell you what, go sit in the corner and cry and let everyone go do the work?

It’s not enough time. You have zero business acumen. It’s scary. Very scary.

Imagine you run a pizza shop and make 200 per day based on requests. Now you’re asked to make 20,000 and then make sure the orders are accurate. Think you d have to adjust your business model? You really need to attend business school.

Bad analogy. Here's a better one. Imagine you have a pizza shop that makes 20,000 slices a day for dine in and then have to shift to making 20,000 slices a day for delivery. Good news the deliveries will occur over a period of a few weks and you don't even have to do the deliveries yourself (the post office will do that for you).

You're not very logical.

Nope...wrong because you don't have the addresses for deliveries and are assuming that what people order when they dine in they will want delivered. Your analogy is so wrong its laughable. The post office requested additional monies to handle such requests, they don't have the manpower.

If we agree that you don't support mass mailings then what are we debating?

I support mass mailings where the elected officials authorize them. I’m not trying to force my opinion on people. You’re demanding people follow your rules.

Yes, they have the addresses. It’s a little thing called voter registration and your address is integral since that determines which elections you’re voting in. As for what they’re ordering, well that’s where the analogy fails because in terms of voting, you only get the ballot that you get based on your address.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What is a “few more” and who data enters the requests and double checks for accuracy? Places that have done it took years to implement it. Again you have zero business acumen and don’t know how difficult such an undertaking would be. PPP was very difficult and it was for businesses through banks. And still we don’t have a solid forgiveness plan. You want to do this for millions of voters in 80 days? It’s impossible. It is frightening how ignorant people are. Wow.

Shucks, and all we have are months and months to figure it out?

We employ over a million people to run the election every year, so it's as simple as re-purposing them.

It's a lot easier when we don't have dead weight whiners like yourself. Tell you what, go sit in the corner and cry and let everyone go do the work?

It’s not enough time. You have zero business acumen. It’s scary. Very scary.

Imagine you run a pizza shop and make 200 per day based on requests. Now you’re asked to make 20,000 and then make sure the orders are accurate. Think you d have to adjust your business model? You really need to attend business school.

Bad analogy. Here's a better one. Imagine you have a pizza shop that makes 20,000 slices a day for dine in and then have to shift to making 20,000 slices a day for delivery. Good news the deliveries will occur over a period of a few weks and you don't even have to do the deliveries yourself (the post office will do that for you).

You're not very logical.

Nope...wrong because you don't have the addresses for deliveries and are assuming that what people order when they dine in they will want delivered. Your analogy is so wrong its laughable. The post office requested additional monies to handle such requests, they don't have the manpower.

If we agree that you don't support mass mailings then what are we debating?

I support mass mailings where the elected officials authorize them. I’m not trying to force my opinion on people. You’re demanding people follow your rules.

Yes, they have the addresses. It’s a little thing called voter registration and your address is integral since that determines which elections you’re voting in. As for what they’re ordering, well that’s where the analogy fails because in terms of voting, you only get the ballot that you get based on your address.

You just don't get it. Mass mailings only works if you have a system to count, quality control, do so in a timely manner and report accurately. It took Utah 10 years to get it right. You want it done in 80 days. It is not feasible. It is not secure.

We are done here.

 

[colfax_m]

What is a “few more” and who data enters the requests and double checks for accuracy? Places that have done it took years to implement it. Again you have zero business acumen and don’t know how difficult such an undertaking would be. PPP was very difficult and it was for businesses through banks. And still we don’t have a solid forgiveness plan. You want to do this for millions of voters in 80 days? It’s impossible. It is frightening how ignorant people are. Wow.

Shucks, and all we have are months and months to figure it out?

We employ over a million people to run the election every year, so it's as simple as re-purposing them.

It's a lot easier when we don't have dead weight whiners like yourself. Tell you what, go sit in the corner and cry and let everyone go do the work?

It’s not enough time. You have zero business acumen. It’s scary. Very scary.

Imagine you run a pizza shop and make 200 per day based on requests. Now you’re asked to make 20,000 and then make sure the orders are accurate. Think you d have to adjust your business model? You really need to attend business school.

Bad analogy. Here's a better one. Imagine you have a pizza shop that makes 20,000 slices a day for dine in and then have to shift to making 20,000 slices a day for delivery. Good news the deliveries will occur over a period of a few weks and you don't even have to do the deliveries yourself (the post office will do that for you).

You're not very logical.

Nope...wrong because you don't have the addresses for deliveries and are assuming that what people order when they dine in they will want delivered. Your analogy is so wrong its laughable. The post office requested additional monies to handle such requests, they don't have the manpower.

If we agree that you don't support mass mailings then what are we debating?

I support mass mailings where the elected officials authorize them. I’m not trying to force my opinion on people. You’re demanding people follow your rules.

Yes, they have the addresses. It’s a little thing called voter registration and your address is integral since that determines which elections you’re voting in. As for what they’re ordering, well that’s where the analogy fails because in terms of voting, you only get the ballot that you get based on your address.

You just don't get it. Mass mailings only works if you have a system to count, quality control, do so in a timely manner and report accurately. It took Utah 10 years to get it right. You want it done in 80 days. It is not feasible. It is not secure.

We are done here.

Who said it took Utah 10 years to get it right?
I don’t share your pessimism. It’s just a labor issue. Take the poll workers who would be sitting at thousands of polling stations and give them new jobs. Loser attitudes like yours never accomplish anything.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

On a percentage basis, what percent of the billions of ballots sent in by mail over the decades were fraudulent?

Hundreds of thousands of ballots were filled out with the wrong address, according to a report from the right-leaning Public Interest Legal Foundation.

A Nevada county mailed out 1.3 million ballots for its primary election but 1 in 5 were never delivered

The June primary was Nevada's first election conducted fully through mail-in ballots due to the coronavirus pandemic but 223,000 were never delivered.

www.businessinsider.com

Nearly 20% in the recent Nevada primary had the wrong address.
Doesn't bode well for quickly making every state strictly vote by mail.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Reminder: Why sending cash through the mail is a bad idea

A government agency has a new warning about something we've probably all been told is a no-no at some point: sending cash through the mail.

www.google.com

Thinking Of Sending CASH In The Mail? Better Think TWICE! - House of Debt

You decided to lessen the stress of giving gifts for the holidays, was to just give cash instead. It would surely save time for you and avoid the holiday rush. So after writing Christmas cards for each person, you quietly slip in a few bucks in the card. You seal it and then mail it … Thinking...

houseofdebt.org

If voting by mail is secure then why does the USPS and countless other experts strongly advise people not to send cash in the mail?

Hmmmmmm.....

How do you prove you sent cash in the mail...is there a receipt?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What is a “few more” and who data enters the requests and double checks for accuracy? Places that have done it took years to implement it. Again you have zero business acumen and don’t know how difficult such an undertaking would be. PPP was very difficult and it was for businesses through banks. And still we don’t have a solid forgiveness plan. You want to do this for millions of voters in 80 days? It’s impossible. It is frightening how ignorant people are. Wow.

Shucks, and all we have are months and months to figure it out?

We employ over a million people to run the election every year, so it's as simple as re-purposing them.

It's a lot easier when we don't have dead weight whiners like yourself. Tell you what, go sit in the corner and cry and let everyone go do the work?

It’s not enough time. You have zero business acumen. It’s scary. Very scary.

Imagine you run a pizza shop and make 200 per day based on requests. Now you’re asked to make 20,000 and then make sure the orders are accurate. Think you d have to adjust your business model? You really need to attend business school.

Bad analogy. Here's a better one. Imagine you have a pizza shop that makes 20,000 slices a day for dine in and then have to shift to making 20,000 slices a day for delivery. Good news the deliveries will occur over a period of a few weks and you don't even have to do the deliveries yourself (the post office will do that for you).

You're not very logical.

Nope...wrong because you don't have the addresses for deliveries and are assuming that what people order when they dine in they will want delivered. Your analogy is so wrong its laughable. The post office requested additional monies to handle such requests, they don't have the manpower.

If we agree that you don't support mass mailings then what are we debating?

I support mass mailings where the elected officials authorize them. I’m not trying to force my opinion on people. You’re demanding people follow your rules.

Yes, they have the addresses. It’s a little thing called voter registration and your address is integral since that determines which elections you’re voting in. As for what they’re ordering, well that’s where the analogy fails because in terms of voting, you only get the ballot that you get based on your address.

You just don't get it. Mass mailings only works if you have a system to count, quality control, do so in a timely manner and report accurately. It took Utah 10 years to get it right. You want it done in 80 days. It is not feasible. It is not secure.

We are done here.

Who said it took Utah 10 years to get it right?
I don’t share your pessimism. It’s just a labor issue. Take the poll workers who would be sitting at thousands of polling stations and give them new jobs. Loser attitudes like yours never accomplish anything.

"Just a labor issue"....LOL

It takes 12 months to build a house but you want to do it in two...just a "labor issue"....Stop trolling. Research the Utah vote by mail history. It did not happen overnight. "Loser"? You mean pragmatic...

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Reminder: Why sending cash through the mail is a bad idea

A government agency has a new warning about something we've probably all been told is a no-no at some point: sending cash through the mail.

www.google.com

Thinking Of Sending CASH In The Mail? Better Think TWICE! - House of Debt

You decided to lessen the stress of giving gifts for the holidays, was to just give cash instead. It would surely save time for you and avoid the holiday rush. So after writing Christmas cards for each person, you quietly slip in a few bucks in the card. You seal it and then mail it … Thinking...

houseofdebt.org

If voting by mail is secure then why does the USPS and countless other experts strongly advise people not to send cash in the mail?

Hmmmmmm.....

How do you prove you sent cash in the mail...is there a receipt?

You may insure it.

 

[colfax_m]

What is a “few more” and who data enters the requests and double checks for accuracy? Places that have done it took years to implement it. Again you have zero business acumen and don’t know how difficult such an undertaking would be. PPP was very difficult and it was for businesses through banks. And still we don’t have a solid forgiveness plan. You want to do this for millions of voters in 80 days? It’s impossible. It is frightening how ignorant people are. Wow.

Shucks, and all we have are months and months to figure it out?

We employ over a million people to run the election every year, so it's as simple as re-purposing them.

It's a lot easier when we don't have dead weight whiners like yourself. Tell you what, go sit in the corner and cry and let everyone go do the work?

It’s not enough time. You have zero business acumen. It’s scary. Very scary.

Imagine you run a pizza shop and make 200 per day based on requests. Now you’re asked to make 20,000 and then make sure the orders are accurate. Think you d have to adjust your business model? You really need to attend business school.

Bad analogy. Here's a better one. Imagine you have a pizza shop that makes 20,000 slices a day for dine in and then have to shift to making 20,000 slices a day for delivery. Good news the deliveries will occur over a period of a few weks and you don't even have to do the deliveries yourself (the post office will do that for you).

You're not very logical.

Nope...wrong because you don't have the addresses for deliveries and are assuming that what people order when they dine in they will want delivered. Your analogy is so wrong its laughable. The post office requested additional monies to handle such requests, they don't have the manpower.

If we agree that you don't support mass mailings then what are we debating?

I support mass mailings where the elected officials authorize them. I’m not trying to force my opinion on people. You’re demanding people follow your rules.

Yes, they have the addresses. It’s a little thing called voter registration and your address is integral since that determines which elections you’re voting in. As for what they’re ordering, well that’s where the analogy fails because in terms of voting, you only get the ballot that you get based on your address.

You just don't get it. Mass mailings only works if you have a system to count, quality control, do so in a timely manner and report accurately. It took Utah 10 years to get it right. You want it done in 80 days. It is not feasible. It is not secure.

We are done here.

Who said it took Utah 10 years to get it right?
I don’t share your pessimism. It’s just a labor issue. Take the poll workers who would be sitting at thousands of polling stations and give them new jobs. Loser attitudes like yours never accomplish anything.

"Just a labor issue"....LOL

It takes 12 months to build a house but you want to do it in two...just a "labor issue"....Stop trolling. Research the Utah vote by mail history. It did not happen overnight. "Loser"? You mean pragmatic...

Well, you can’t hurry some processes because they’re sequential. You can’t drywall a house until the framing is done, for example.

Labor in vote by mail is parallel. Opening ballots, checking signatures, recording votes, repeat. Each person adds to the capacity just the same as the one before them.

What’s the difference between the labor requirements of a state that is 100% vote by mail and one who’s 80% absentee ballots requested by voters? I’d say very little, and maybe even easier to 100% vote by mail because they don’t have to process absentee ballot requests.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Reminder: Why sending cash through the mail is a bad idea

A government agency has a new warning about something we've probably all been told is a no-no at some point: sending cash through the mail.

www.google.com

Thinking Of Sending CASH In The Mail? Better Think TWICE! - House of Debt

You decided to lessen the stress of giving gifts for the holidays, was to just give cash instead. It would surely save time for you and avoid the holiday rush. So after writing Christmas cards for each person, you quietly slip in a few bucks in the card. You seal it and then mail it … Thinking...

houseofdebt.org

If voting by mail is secure then why does the USPS and countless other experts strongly advise people not to send cash in the mail?

Hmmmmmm.....

How do you prove you sent cash in the mail...is there a receipt?

You may insure it.

Why?

Because the cash has some sort of immediate value or something??

No matter how much you fantasize about wide spread voter fraud -- it aint happening....

You are moronic enough to think "Democrats" can manipulate millions of mail in ballots -- but they couldn't manipulate 70K votes across 3 states in 2016?

 

[L.K.Eder]

Reminder: Why sending cash through the mail is a bad idea

A government agency has a new warning about something we've probably all been told is a no-no at some point: sending cash through the mail.

www.google.com

Thinking Of Sending CASH In The Mail? Better Think TWICE! - House of Debt

You decided to lessen the stress of giving gifts for the holidays, was to just give cash instead. It would surely save time for you and avoid the holiday rush. So after writing Christmas cards for each person, you quietly slip in a few bucks in the card. You seal it and then mail it … Thinking...

houseofdebt.org

If voting by mail is secure then why does the USPS and countless other experts strongly advise people not to send cash in the mail?

Hmmmmmm.....

wow. such intellect. cash and a voting ballot are completely comparable. i just recently bought me a lolex with 5 ballots.

During an election votes are equal to cash why are you so fucking ignorant sauerkraut

ok, hero. that's why we guys temping during election times drive Italian sportscars. the local maserati dealer accepts cash, ballots, and gives big discounts when i go there with a bushel of stolen absentee ballots.

 

[Coyote]

Reminder: Why sending cash through the mail is a bad idea

A government agency has a new warning about something we've probably all been told is a no-no at some point: sending cash through the mail.

www.google.com

Thinking Of Sending CASH In The Mail? Better Think TWICE! - House of Debt

You decided to lessen the stress of giving gifts for the holidays, was to just give cash instead. It would surely save time for you and avoid the holiday rush. So after writing Christmas cards for each person, you quietly slip in a few bucks in the card. You seal it and then mail it … Thinking...

houseofdebt.org

If voting by mail is secure then why does the USPS and countless other experts strongly advise people not to send cash in the mail?

Hmmmmmm.....

Maybe because cash is far more desirable than a ballot.