Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 17,547
- 5,045
I didI am still waiting for you to posts facts that prove that the War in Vietnam was justified.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didI am still waiting for you to posts facts that prove that the War in Vietnam was justified.
Feelings are not facts.I did
We did it too. Why was that?The north atttacked them and tortured and slaughtered them
Thats why I post facts and you post feelingsFeelings are not facts.
Your Rosy-Eyed View WiltedCronkite was acknowledged as the most trusted man in the media at the time. The problem was that there was no other voice in the media. Just when Americans finally defeated the V.C. after Tet, Cronkite deemed the victory to be a stalemate and the crazy commie supported American left wing declared the American victory to be a defeat. The democrat majority in congress decided to pull the plug rather than giving Nixon a win and Cronkite and the liberal media decided to grasp defeat from the arms of victory.
The Very Name Selective Service Indicates Elitist Capital TreasonTet was a propaganda victory for the Communists because Gen. Westmorland and President Johnson had not prepared the American people for an offensive of that magnitude. They kept talking about a "light at the end of the tunnel," as though the War in Vietnam was nearly won.
Instead the Communists fought on for another five years and eventually won total victory, handing the United States a humiliating defeat.
Until Tet most male college graduates thought the War would be over by graduation. Tet meant there was no end in sight. Tet gave energy to the anti war movement.
Winning Attitude to "Civilians": "Help Us Kill the Enemy or You Are the Enemy and We Will Kill You."We did it too. Why was that?
Preppies on Both the Left and the Right Owe Vietnam Veterans 60,000 LivesAmerican involvement in that war was unjust for reasons I have already stated in this thread.
Anyone Who Says, "At Least Bush Served" Deserves to Have a Son Die Taking a Richkid's PlaceINTERESTING COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PRESS COVERAGE OF
THE VIETNAM WAR AND THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT
During the Vietnam War and the I-P conflict you had-have the same giant army of journalists, talking heads, "experts", politicians constantly bombarding the american people that victory is right around the corner in Vietnam and that the 2-state solution is possible.
The average american, time and again, as the years and decades go by, see the reality in Vietnam and Palestine consistently demolishing the lies spread by the american media, the politicians, the generals and the "experts".
The average Joe:
"For 30 years I have seen battle after battle in Vietnam and attack after attack in Israel-Palestine.
What I see in front of me are two peoples (the Vietnamese and Palestinians) who will never accept the partition of their homeland and this is the exact opposite of what the journalists and "experts" say everyday.
But who am I to disagree with all those american journalists, political comentators and politicians, not to mention US generals and "experts" on the history of Vietnam and Palestine, who spent their whole lives studying the art of war and those parts of the world respectively.
My personal opinion is that the defeat of NVA and the Vietcong and the 2-state solution for Palestine are pipe dreams, miserable failures with zero chance to succeed in the future but I will continue to defer to the knowledge of the experts who know much more than I do about these two subjects."
After an HeirHead Meets His Guillotine, There Will Only Be Air Where His Head Used to BeYes they were invaded'
Your historic spin is an out right lie like the claim you served
I believe the phrase was peace with honourI think you got your dates mixed up there.
Assuming you meant the offensive of 1975, the US was well out according to the Paris Peace Accords. Ford had no intention of intervening again.
The thing was, Nixon knew he was selling the South out at the Paris Conference. He just wanted enough time to pull American Troops out to save face.
What you did get right was the 1954 Geneva meeting, the election never happened because Ho Chi Minh would have won, the Americans and their puppets in the South didn't want that, so Minh was left with no choice but to liberate the Country by force.What don't I know about the War in Vietnam that would cause me to agree with you if I learned?
What I do know is that President Eisenhower wrote in his memoirs that his advisers told him that as many as 80% of the Vietnamese supported Ho Chi Minh,
and that the Geneva Geneva Agreement of 1954 scheduled an election to be held in July 1956 to unify Vietnam, that the division of Vietnam into North and South was to be temporary, and that foreign troops were forbidden to be introduced to Vietnam.
About as legal as Hitlers attack on France.Yes
The war was legal
Sorry Hector that post was not meant for you, apologies.Your problem is you are simple and ignorant, study some Vietnamese history before you say anything instead of looking at Hollywood for history.
Blood Money for BluebloodsVietnam is one nation, not two. Vietnam veterans I have talked to told me that the Communists had considerable support in South Vietnam.
Not the Histwhorians You Use to Justify Your PreppyloveDo you believe that history books are unbiased sources of truth written by dispassionate reporters of facts?
Well, that was just weird…Not the Histwhorians You Use to Justify Your Preppylove
I heard your slimey class-treason from a friend of sissyboy Dan Quayle, the Kokomo Commando. He said that Quayle had his Daddy get him in the Gutless Guard, pretending to believe that the Democrats weren't trying to win the war.
Before They Could Stab Us in the Back, They Had to Take Away Our BackboneYou lost get over it.