And please, don't give the typical excuses for this kind of state. They can fool half a dozen of simpletons posting on this Board but you can't fool someone who knows every nook and cranny of ethnocratic states. This is the same old, tired excuse used by every single ethnocracy to justify supremacism from 19th century America to Israel. Just for the sake of discussion, let's assume for a moment that an ethnic state has any right to be constituted on a multiethnic region just to expose the fallacy of your argument.
The blanket restriction of movement imposed on an ethnic group by the israeli leaders even before the war ended without any attempt to separate dangerous elements from harmless families who only fled the conflict clearly shows a supremacist state in action, confining the unofficial ethnicity in order to fabricate an artificial demographics.
Using security concerns to "quarantine" unwanted peoples where they can be easily monitored and allow the control of the state by the dominant ethnicity, punishing an entire ethnic group instead of individuals is the hallmark of every ethnocratic state from the indian reservations to the Warsaw Ghetto and the south african Bantustans.
When a state feels the need to "protect" itself from 10 year old children and harmless grandmas any pathetic excuse based on self defense and security concerns that still remains falls to the ground. Its supremacist nature is suddenly revealed.
You can sell this kind of kind of "arguments" to oponents with a fairly low intellectual level and they simply doesn't fly with me.
The US doesn't herd blacks and hispanics in Florida to eliminate interracial violence... to eliminate the problem of white americans robbed, raped and murdered by them... and no ethnic state has any right to herd the arab people of Palestine in Gaza and the WB to protect a historically persecuted ethnic group.
Any state that engages in such behavior is by definition a supremacist state.
The blanket restriction of movement imposed on an ethnic group by the israeli leaders even before the war ended without any attempt to separate dangerous elements from harmless families who only fled the conflict clearly shows a supremacist state in action, confining the unofficial ethnicity in order to fabricate an artificial demographics.
Using security concerns to "quarantine" unwanted peoples where they can be easily monitored and allow the control of the state by the dominant ethnicity, punishing an entire ethnic group instead of individuals is the hallmark of every ethnocratic state from the indian reservations to the Warsaw Ghetto and the south african Bantustans.
When a state feels the need to "protect" itself from 10 year old children and harmless grandmas any pathetic excuse based on self defense and security concerns that still remains falls to the ground. Its supremacist nature is suddenly revealed.
You can sell this kind of kind of "arguments" to oponents with a fairly low intellectual level and they simply doesn't fly with me.
The US doesn't herd blacks and hispanics in Florida to eliminate interracial violence... to eliminate the problem of white americans robbed, raped and murdered by them... and no ethnic state has any right to herd the arab people of Palestine in Gaza and the WB to protect a historically persecuted ethnic group.
Any state that engages in such behavior is by definition a supremacist state.