Was it over a video or not? Liberals need to pick a story and stick to it.

Within an hour of the attack in Benghazi beginning the State Department lead in Tripoli, who testified he had talked to Americans on the ground in Benghazi, said he spoke directly with Hillary Clinton and told her it was a terrorist attack.

As Americans fought to survive in Benghazi the State Department and WH changed the CIA's initial report - calling the attack a terrorist attack - 13 times, removing all references to terrorism.

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told the Egyptian Ambassador, 'We KNOW it was a terrorist attack, that the video had nothing to do with it.'

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told her own daughter in an e-mail that 'we' had lost 4 Americans in Benghazi due to a terrorist attack.

The next morning Rice and Hillary told the world that Benghazi had been a protest over a video gone wrong. Hillary vowed to make the film maker, who had exercised his 1st Amendment Right, pay, putting him in jail...which they did.

According to Obama HE acknowledged it had been a terrorist attack.

The CIA NEVER said it was a protest.

The FBI said there were NO SIGNS of a protest and called it a terrorist attack.

Hillary told the grieving families, as their loved ones returned home in flag-draped coffins, they had died because of a protest.

Weeks later, after Obama had claimed he knew it was a terrorist attack.

In an interview Hillary called the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack.

Hillary then testified before Congress. During that testimony she declared she had no idea what it was, whether it had been a protest or a 'couple of people out for a walk one night (with ak-47s, rocket launchers, mortars and mortar shells to sustain an attack for approximately 8 - 10 hours) and decided they wanted to kill some Americans..." (She never mentioned the words 'terrorist attack in that false denial.)

When pressed on the issue Hillary finally declared it had been a terrorist attack.

....Hillary supporters still claim - despite the CIA, FBI, Obama, and Hillary declaring it was a terrorist attack - Benghazi was a 'protest'.

The Benghazi Mom came out and declared Hillary told her it had been over a protest.


AGAIN, many liberals are still arguing it WAS a protest. HILLARY, however, came out and denied she ever said that, even called the mom a LIAR.
-- So Hillary is saying it WASN'T a protest?

If it was really a protest then there would be no reason to call the mom a liar, because telling her it was a protest would be telling the truth .... if it had been a protest...right?

Libs, meanwhile, continue to claim it WAS a protest and the mom is a....liar?! Again, the mom is declaring Hillary told her it was a protest. If it was a protest, why are libs attacking the mom for saying Hillary told her that's what it was?!

And finally, stretching the hell out of Slick Willey's defense of 'the definition of the word 'is', part of Hillary's defense regarding Benghazi being a protest hinges on the definition of the words 'Protest' and 'terrorist attack'.

Evidently, according to Dems - whose definition of 'terrorist attack' differs from the CIA, FBI, State department, Obama, etc... - approx. 100 people carrying AK-47s, rocket launchers, mortar tubes, mortars, and enough ammunition to carry out a 'protest' for 8-10 hours, setting fire to and destroying a compound and murdering 4 Americans who fought for their lives for hours and who waited for help that never came is NOT a 'terrorist attack'. It is a 'protest'.

So, with liberals changing their stance whenever it benefits them on this argument, can liberals FINALLY pick one argument or the other - that Benghazi was a protest or a terrorist attack and stick to it?!

Thank you.

flogging_dead_horse_what.jpg
 
What difference does it make? Dredging up old, tired stories isn't going to save Trump from free-fall.
Copied right from the Hellary comment to the House Oversight committee. Democrats are so good at falling in line like good little soldiers....just check your brain at the door.
If the Hillary bashers had a brain, they'd realize this topic had already been beat to death
 
What difference does it make? Dredging up old, tired stories isn't going to save Trump from free-fall.
Copied right from the Hellary comment to the House Oversight committee. Democrats are so good at falling in line like good little soldiers....just check your brain at the door.
If the Hillary bashers had a brain, they'd realize this topic had already been beat to death

It won't be beat to death until the pantsuit bulldyke is defeated.
 
So in summary - based on Congressional reports, testimony, and Hillary's own e-mails...

:
Hillary admitted / claimed it was NEVER a protest before she did lie about it being a protest.
- She told the Egyptian Ambassador she KNEW the video played no part.
- She told her daughter she KNEW it was a terrorist attack and the video played no part.
- She told the State Department on the 14th (2 days later) she knew the video played no part
- She testified to Congress that a terrorist group claimed responsibility, there was evidence to support this, and the video never played a part.
- She finally publicly admitted it was a terrorist attack...

The CIA testified that the video never played a part and that it was a terrorist attack from the beginning.

The FBI concluded there was NEVER a protest.

State Dept personnel on the ground during the attack said there was NEVER a protest, that it was an attack

The State Dept Lead from Tripoli testified he notified Hillary and the State Dept within an hour of the attack beginning that it was a terrorist attack, NOT anything to do with a video.

President Obama admitted it was a terrorist attack...

...but liberals on the board still insist the video played a part...

:lmao:

'Nuff said.
 
Well, since they were already dead - what difference does it make?
Regarding Hillary and her zombie liberal followers, 'NUFF SAID!

Dead is dead. Video or not won't change that fact. Would they still be alive if Hillary had not said it was because of a video? Please explain...

So why did Hillary lie to the families?

And why did both the idiots refuse to use airpower? Naval Air Station Sigonella was about an hour away. It was the location planes were staged during Clinton's fight with Gaddafi. The team defending the Ambassador was equipped with laser guidance systems to direct air strikes against the mortar teams. Obama and Clinton shit their pants when the shit hit the fan. She is incapable of making sound decisions. This proves it.
 
Hillary admitted / claimed it was NEVER a protest before she did lie about it being a protest.

Do I have to ask again what the lie was? Are you saying she knew it wasnt a protest? Ok then, HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT?
 
Hillary admitted / claimed it was NEVER a protest before she did lie about it being a protest.

Do I have to ask again what the lie was? Are you saying she knew it wasnt a protest? Ok then, HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT?
And I keep answering you. It is not MY assertion Hillary knew it was not about a protest - it is HER claim that it was never about a protest. AS PER THE INFORMATION / EVIDENCE IN ALL THE LINKS POSTED - She declared it to the Egyptian Ambassador. She declared it to Congress. She declared it to her state Department. The only ones she lied to were the American people. Want to know the specifics of how she knew? Ask Hillary.
 
Like most everything you're completely wrong about Susan Rice.

Susan Rice claimed the attack was over a protest. Since we have established it was NEVER over a protest - according to Hillary, the CIA, the FBI, eye-witnesses, etc - I was hardly wrong. She either lied as well or parroted what she was told. She obviously did not know more than the CIA, did not know more than the FBI, did not know more than the eye witnesses, did not know more than Hillary, who made up the lie.
 
Susan Rice claimed the attack was over a protest. Since we have established it was NEVER over a protest

You keep saying you est it wasnt because of a protest and everytime someone asked where this was established you change the subject
 
She never said it was not a protest dude. Come on.

Thank you for your OPINION, but the links provided have already established that she did! She said so in her own e-mails.

If you need specific evidence of just how wrong you are please allow me to provide you with it in hopes it will finally get you to stop spreading false information:

Hillary Told the Egyptian Prime Minister at 3:04 PM ET the day after the attacks that they had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack – not a protest. … Based on the information we saw today we believe the group that claimed responsibility for this was affiliated with al Qaeda.”

CIA Head: 'Analysts Never Said the Video was a Factor in the Benghazi Attacks'
 
You keep saying you est it wasnt because of a protest and everytime someone asked where this was established you change the subject
YOU LIE:

"Hillary Told the Egyptian Prime Minister at 3:04 PM ET the day after the attacks that they “had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack – not a protest. … Based on the information we saw today we believe the group that claimed responsibility for this was affiliated with al Qaeda.”

-- CIA Head: 'Analysts Never Said the Video was a Factor in the Benghazi Attacks'

Now go away, liar.
 
Ben-gotcha has done nothing except elevate Ms. Clinton. I say have more investigations.

When there have been what; 8 witch hunts so far and you guys still haven’t found a witch…the public begins to either find you completely incompetent or that there is no witch.
 
Well, since they were already dead - what difference does it make?
Regarding Hillary and her zombie liberal followers, 'NUFF SAID!

Dead is dead. Video or not won't change that fact. Would they still be alive if Hillary had not said it was because of a video? Please explain...

So you're okay with hillary lying to cover the fact it was a terrorist attack so it wouldnt reflect badly on barry and herself right before an election?
Of course you are..
 
Deadly violent protests all over the world. Are Republicans actually denying that happened? Could they be that determined to stay ignorant?
What is it?

More Liberal Lies.....

The CIA made it clear that while there was a protest in Egypt the attack in Benghazi NEVER had anything to do with the video. Again, as posted and link provided above:

CIA Head: 'Analysts Never Said the Video was a Factor in the Benghazi Attacks'

You libs should actually take the time to STOP LYING, read the facts / testimony, and get the story straight. ... or continue to spew your ignorance...your call.
 
Ben-gotcha has done nothing except elevate Ms. Clinton.
Yeah, that's why 60% of Americans don't trust her...only liberal sheep continue the lie, even after Hillary admitted it was a terrorist attack.
 

Forum List

Back
Top