Washington Post editorial board: Because of Nunes, House Intel. Russia investigation must stop

[radical right]

I'm not ready to go there yet, we'll see how it shakes out.

Have you connected the dots, why the NSA didn't warn the DNC?

 

[Coyote]

It's fun watching you regressive freaks trying to spin gold from thin air. If payed attention, nothing Nunez spoke to Trump about had anything to do with the Russian investigation. It dealt with misconduct of the intel agencies that unmasked names and discriminated reports that really had no national security implications.

But hey, don't let little things like facts stand in the way of your get rich quick scheme, after a few thousand years you might just catch a flake of gold.

It really doesn't matter. Nunes should NOT have gone to the President first.

___________________________________

Hey Jackboot.

It really doesn't matter who Nunes talked to first.

Is all you have available a whine about protocol....when the meat is in the allegations...allegations which involve serious felonies....possibly by the Obama Administration or Staff...if true...Watergate type stuff.

It does matter.

When you have an "independent" bipartisan investigation - you don't go running to the person being investigated and the media with info that you're committee hasn't even seen or been told about first. Way wrong. You know that. Nothing to do with protocol.

Do you think Nunes can conduct an independent investigation?

 

[Coyote]

It's fun watching you regressive freaks trying to spin gold from thin air. If payed attention, nothing Nunez spoke to Trump about had anything to do with the Russian investigation. It dealt with misconduct of the intel agencies that unmasked names and discriminated reports that really had no national security implications.

But hey, don't let little things like facts stand in the way of your get rich quick scheme, after a few thousand years you might just catch a flake of gold.

It really doesn't matter. Nunes should NOT have gone to the President first.

So the chairman of the intel committee shouldn't tell the man responsible for running the executive branch, which the intel agencies are a part, that people under his direct responsibility might be violating of US law. What freaking planet are you from?

It is supposed to be an independent investigation is it not? Last I heard the Executive branch is not over the Legislative. Has that changed recently?

You're assuming facts not in evidence, the chairman said these particular reports had nothing to do with the investigation. I know that doesn't fit with the regressive propaganda line where innuendo and supposition rule the day, so try supporting your BS or just STFU.

He "said". Perhaps it should have run past the committee first don't you think? Instead - it was straight to the subject of investigation and the media where he made an ass of himself and was forced to backtrack his claims.

Wonder if you'd be saying the same thing if it related to Clinton emails.....

 

[OKTexas]

I'm not ready to go there yet, we'll see how it shakes out.

Have you connected the dots, why the NSA didn't warn the DNC?

Already answered dumb ass. Are you senile like fakey too.

 

[Ted Frazier]

It's fun watching you regressive freaks trying to spin gold from thin air. If payed attention, nothing Nunez spoke to Trump about had anything to do with the Russian investigation. It dealt with misconduct of the intel agencies that unmasked names and discriminated reports that really had no national security implications.

But hey, don't let little things like facts stand in the way of your get rich quick scheme, after a few thousand years you might just catch a flake of gold.

It really doesn't matter. Nunes should NOT have gone to the President first.

So the chairman of the intel committee shouldn't tell the man responsible for running the executive branch, which the intel agencies are a part, that people under his direct responsibility might be violating of US law. What freaking planet are you from?

Nunes said it's legal.

 

[The Original Tree]

What the DNC did was Phucking make up the Fake Russian Hacking story created by "Camp" A Clinton IT advisor with a Phd and expertise in Hacking and Cyber Security. L Jean Camp - Google Search

Then they conspired with The Obama Regime to classify members of The Trump Campaign Team as suspected foreign agents.

They Phucking spied on them and found nothing even after Hillary's Hacker planted a ping in Trump Tower and a Russian Bank.

I want someone hung for that so it never happens again.

And Phucking Comey again tried to cover up yet another Obama Regime Scandal. He needs to hang too.

Wiki - he Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978("FISA" Pub.L. 95–511, 92 Stat. 1783, 50 U.S.C. ch. 36) is a United States federal law which prescribes procedures for the physical and electronicsurveillance and collection of "foreign intelligence information" between "foreign powers" and "agents of foreign powers" suspected of espionage orterrorism).[1] The Act created theForeign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to oversee requests for surveillance warrants byfederal law enforcement andintelligence agencies.

 

[OKTexas]

It's fun watching you regressive freaks trying to spin gold from thin air. If payed attention, nothing Nunez spoke to Trump about had anything to do with the Russian investigation. It dealt with misconduct of the intel agencies that unmasked names and discriminated reports that really had no national security implications.

But hey, don't let little things like facts stand in the way of your get rich quick scheme, after a few thousand years you might just catch a flake of gold.

It really doesn't matter. Nunes should NOT have gone to the President first.

So the chairman of the intel committee shouldn't tell the man responsible for running the executive branch, which the intel agencies are a part, that people under his direct responsibility might be violating of US law. What freaking planet are you from?

It is supposed to be an independent investigation is it not? Last I heard the Executive branch is not over the Legislative. Has that changed recently?

You're assuming facts not in evidence, the chairman said these particular reports had nothing to do with the investigation. I know that doesn't fit with the regressive propaganda line where innuendo and supposition rule the day, so try supporting your BS or just STFU.

He "said". Perhaps it should have run past the committee first don't you think? Instead - it was straight to the subject of investigation and the media where he made an ass of himself and was forced to backtrack his claims.

Wonder if you'd be saying the same thing if it related to Clinton emails.....

I'm amazed how easily you regressives ignore facts that don't comport with your conspiracy theories, then you run straight to deflection. Until proved different I will take Nunes word that the documents discussed had nothing to do with the investigation. But feel free to push your conspiracy theories, it's very entertaining.

 

[OKTexas]

It's fun watching you regressive freaks trying to spin gold from thin air. If payed attention, nothing Nunez spoke to Trump about had anything to do with the Russian investigation. It dealt with misconduct of the intel agencies that unmasked names and discriminated reports that really had no national security implications.

But hey, don't let little things like facts stand in the way of your get rich quick scheme, after a few thousand years you might just catch a flake of gold.

It really doesn't matter. Nunes should NOT have gone to the President first.

So the chairman of the intel committee shouldn't tell the man responsible for running the executive branch, which the intel agencies are a part, that people under his direct responsibility might be violating of US law. What freaking planet are you from?

Nunes said it's legal.

He said the collection was legal, the dissemination and unmasking of names, not so much.

 

[Billy_Bob]

It's fun watching you regressive freaks trying to spin gold from thin air. If payed attention, nothing Nunez spoke to Trump about had anything to do with the Russian investigation. It dealt with misconduct of the intel agencies that unmasked names and discriminated reports that really had no national security implications.

But hey, don't let little things like facts stand in the way of your get rich quick scheme, after a few thousand years you might just catch a flake of gold.

It really doesn't matter. Nunes should NOT have gone to the President first.

___________________________________

Hey Jackboot.

It really doesn't matter who Nunes talked to first.

Is all you have available a whine about protocol....when the meat is in the allegations...allegations which involve serious felonies....possibly by the Obama Administration or Staff...if true...Watergate type stuff.

It does matter.

When you have an "independent" bipartisan investigation - you don't go running to the person being investigated and the media with info that you're committee hasn't even seen or been told about first. Way wrong. You know that. Nothing to do with protocol.

Do you think Nunes can conduct an independent investigation?

"When you have an "independent" bipartisan investigation - you don't go running to the person being investigated and the media with info that you're committee hasn't even seen or been told about first. Way wrong. You know that. Nothing to do with protocol."

You do if it is a matter of national security that requires immediate attention. Illegal surveillance by the opposition party that jeopardizes the Constitution would fall under that premise. Nunes was not only justified but would be derelict in his oath of office if he did not tell the president.

"Do you think Nunes can conduct an independent investigation?"

Without a doubt!

Let me guess.. You have no experience in national security matters..

 

[The Original Tree]

Its a matter of National Security when the FBI Director Perjured Himself and members of The Intelligence Community are Committing Treason.

 

[The Original Tree]

It's fun watching you regressive freaks trying to spin gold from thin air. If payed attention, nothing Nunez spoke to Trump about had anything to do with the Russian investigation. It dealt with misconduct of the intel agencies that unmasked names and discriminated reports that really had no national security implications.

But hey, don't let little things like facts stand in the way of your get rich quick scheme, after a few thousand years you might just catch a flake of gold.

It really doesn't matter. Nunes should NOT have gone to the President first.

So the chairman of the intel committee shouldn't tell the man responsible for running the executive branch, which the intel agencies are a part, that people under his direct responsibility might be violating of US law. What freaking planet are you from?

Nunes said it's legal.

He said the collection was legal, the dissemination and unmasking of names, not so much.

The collection is not legal if it was done under false pretenses.

That doesn't even matter.

We have moles committing treason in our Intelligence Community and that is a matter of National Security.

 

[Care4all]

I posted this in another thread but it is relevant here...

Follow the bouncing ball..

Bounce: Democrats create a Trump/Russian collusion cover story because they cant defeat Trump.

Bounce: Obama orders/requests FISA warrants on Trump team through his AG Lynch. First warrant is denied but the second is approved to surveillance his "Russian contacts". Now all of his phone conversations and those of his staffs are now "incidental captures".

Bounce: The NSA marks these contacts/phone calls as "no intelligence value". In layman's terms 'no criminal conduct found' and should be deleted. But because Obama is "reverse targeting" without a warrant for Trump, he retains the conversations and has them transcribed and the US citizens names are revealed.

Bounce: Those reports are distributed far and wide due to his new order to let everyone have access to raw data collected by the NSA. Yet they were identified as 'no intelligence value' and this distribution was done in violation of federal laws. E-mails, phone conversations, calendars, itineraries, etc were all collected electronically and then disseminated when they were marked 'no intelligence value' when they should have been destroyed. Why were they disseminating all of this information which should have been deleted?

Bounce: Now some of those Obama cronies leak the information in an effort to discredit the Trump administration.

BOOM: the ball just popped..This whole process was a web of lies in an effort to surveillance Trump, without a warrant, for political purposes. The distribution of unmasked data that had "no intelligence value" had no value to anyone except the Clinton campaign and the Obama admin.

Bounce: Putin assists Trumps bid for President

Bounce: Trump defends Putin, trashes military support for Ukraine, lays groundwork to remove sanctions and recognize Russian support to Crimea

Bounce: Trump aids secretly meet with Russian agents immediately prior to email leaks

Bounce: Trump aids lie about Russian contacts

Way to post a bunch of Fake News Headlines with no substantiation.

You are aware all of this came out of The Clinton Camp.

But you people are National Enquirer level stupid.

Look up Hillary's Hacker who started all of this.

L. Jean Camp - Google Search

no, it appears that you are National Enquirer/Infowars level of stupid!!!

Tell us your HYPOTHESIS the original tree.... who stole the files, why did they steal the files? To what advantage was it for them to steal the files? How did they disseminate the files? how and who did they connect with to dump the files on the internet? What was their benefit for committing the Crime and dumping the files? Did the thief choose the days the files were dumped?

Give us what you got!

 

[Billy_Bob]

Its a matter of National Security when the FBI Director Perjured Himself and members of The Intelligence Community are Committing Treason.

If you have an agency head, actively against the POTUS and using federal personnel to commit crimes, it most certainly is a national security issue.

 

[OKTexas]

It's fun watching you regressive freaks trying to spin gold from thin air. If payed attention, nothing Nunez spoke to Trump about had anything to do with the Russian investigation. It dealt with misconduct of the intel agencies that unmasked names and discriminated reports that really had no national security implications.

But hey, don't let little things like facts stand in the way of your get rich quick scheme, after a few thousand years you might just catch a flake of gold.

It really doesn't matter. Nunes should NOT have gone to the President first.

So the chairman of the intel committee shouldn't tell the man responsible for running the executive branch, which the intel agencies are a part, that people under his direct responsibility might be violating of US law. What freaking planet are you from?

Nunes said it's legal.

He said the collection was legal, the dissemination and unmasking of names, not so much.

The collection is not legal if it was done under false pretenses.

That doesn't even matter.

We have moles committing treason in our Intelligence Community and that is a matter of National Security.

Sorry, I'm not going to buy your conspiracy theories either. I'll accept the chairmans word until something is proven different.

 

[The Original Tree]

Simple Questions For You.

Is unmasking a Felony?

What was the only purpose of The Unmasking?

What was uncovered by the surveillance other than intentionally unmasking Trump Team members for purposes of political innuendos?

I mean they Phucking committed Felonies to unmask all these people and provide transcripts of President Trump's conversations with Mexico, Thailand, and Australia and Flynn's congratulatory call from a diplomat.

But they apparently had nothing really juicy to leak other than that. So it's clear these were political hits.

Now if you want to talk about The DNC Podesta Emails ask Seth Rich about that.

Had The DNC not given Sanders The Shaft no one gets pissed off & rats on The DNC for rigging primaries and stealing debate questions and ugly things said and leaks those emails to Assange and Seth Rich isn't murdered.

I work IT and most leaks of information are committed from disgruntled employees inside and organization looking to do damage to the organization. The DNC leaks were leaks and The Hacking Story was a hoax created by Clinton's Cyber Security Expert Dr. Camp.

L Jean Camp - Google Search

Everything we know about this scandal comes from Leaks in fact.

I posted this in another thread but it is relevant here...

Follow the bouncing ball..

Bounce: Democrats create a Trump/Russian collusion cover story because they cant defeat Trump.

Bounce: Obama orders/requests FISA warrants on Trump team through his AG Lynch. First warrant is denied but the second is approved to surveillance his "Russian contacts". Now all of his phone conversations and those of his staffs are now "incidental captures".

Bounce: The NSA marks these contacts/phone calls as "no intelligence value". In layman's terms 'no criminal conduct found' and should be deleted. But because Obama is "reverse targeting" without a warrant for Trump, he retains the conversations and has them transcribed and the US citizens names are revealed.

Bounce: Those reports are distributed far and wide due to his new order to let everyone have access to raw data collected by the NSA. Yet they were identified as 'no intelligence value' and this distribution was done in violation of federal laws. E-mails, phone conversations, calendars, itineraries, etc were all collected electronically and then disseminated when they were marked 'no intelligence value' when they should have been destroyed. Why were they disseminating all of this information which should have been deleted?

Bounce: Now some of those Obama cronies leak the information in an effort to discredit the Trump administration.

BOOM: the ball just popped..This whole process was a web of lies in an effort to surveillance Trump, without a warrant, for political purposes. The distribution of unmasked data that had "no intelligence value" had no value to anyone except the Clinton campaign and the Obama admin.

Bounce: Putin assists Trumps bid for President

Bounce: Trump defends Putin, trashes military support for Ukraine, lays groundwork to remove sanctions and recognize Russian support to Crimea

Bounce: Trump aids secretly meet with Russian agents immediately prior to email leaks

Bounce: Trump aids lie about Russian contacts

Way to post a bunch of Fake News Headlines with no substantiation.

You are aware all of this came out of The Clinton Camp.

But you people are National Enquirer level stupid.

Look up Hillary's Hacker who started all of this.

L. Jean Camp - Google Search

no, it appears that you are National Enquirer/Infowars level of stupid!!!

Tell us your HYPOTHESIS the original tree.... who stole the files, why did they steal the files? To what advantage was it for them to steal the files? How did they disseminate the files? how and who did they connect with to dump the files on the internet? What was their benefit for committing the Crime and dumping the files? Did the thief choose the days the files were dumped?

Give us what you got!

 

[The Original Tree]

Is unmasking and leaking of classified information a felony or is it not?
Simple question.

The only reason it was done was to save a failing campaign.

And you thought Watergate was bad?

This is deep and dirty stuff that imo is so bad The GOV is going to have to cover it up. It's that bad. Hopefully they prosecute people and do the right thing!

It really doesn't matter. Nunes should NOT have gone to the President first.

So the chairman of the intel committee shouldn't tell the man responsible for running the executive branch, which the intel agencies are a part, that people under his direct responsibility might be violating of US law. What freaking planet are you from?

Nunes said it's legal.

He said the collection was legal, the dissemination and unmasking of names, not so much.

The collection is not legal if it was done under false pretenses.

That doesn't even matter.

We have moles committing treason in our Intelligence Community and that is a matter of National Security.

Sorry, I'm not going to buy your conspiracy theories either. I'll accept the chairmans word until something is proven different.

 

[OKTexas]

Is unmasking and leaking of classified information a felony or is it not?
Simple question.

The only reason it was done was to save a failing campaign.

And you thought Watergate was bad?

This is deep and dirty stuff that imo is so bad The GOV is going to have to cover it up. It's that bad. Hopefully they prosecute people and do the right thing!

So the chairman of the intel committee shouldn't tell the man responsible for running the executive branch, which the intel agencies are a part, that people under his direct responsibility might be violating of US law. What freaking planet are you from?

Nunes said it's legal.

He said the collection was legal, the dissemination and unmasking of names, not so much.

The collection is not legal if it was done under false pretenses.

That doesn't even matter.

We have moles committing treason in our Intelligence Community and that is a matter of National Security.

Sorry, I'm not going to buy your conspiracy theories either. I'll accept the chairmans word until something is proven different.

Except the documents we're discussing were after the election. Campaigns had nothing to do with it.

 

[The Original Tree]

Trump and his team have been under surveillance since The RNC Convention. So your statement is a complete falsehood.

Go ahead and throw up any evidence of when the surveillance took place or the transcripts were released, and people unmasked.

There is no tap dancing around Treason, Espionage & Felonies Committed.

All three are a FACT now, and any quibbling over details is moot.

Winning at all cost does not mean committing high crimes and misdemeanors Treason & Espionage.

Then again we were dealing with a Clinton and The Chicago Machine.

Is unmasking and leaking of classified information a felony or is it not?
Simple question.

The only reason it was done was to save a failing campaign.

And you thought Watergate was bad?

This is deep and dirty stuff that imo is so bad The GOV is going to have to cover it up. It's that bad. Hopefully they prosecute people and do the right thing!

Nunes said it's legal.

He said the collection was legal, the dissemination and unmasking of names, not so much.

The collection is not legal if it was done under false pretenses.

That doesn't even matter.

We have moles committing treason in our Intelligence Community and that is a matter of National Security.

Sorry, I'm not going to buy your conspiracy theories either. I'll accept the chairmans word until something is proven different.

Except the documents we're discussing were after the election. Campaigns had nothing to do with it.

 

[Care4all]

Simple Questions For You.

Is unmasking a Felony?

What was the only purpose of The Unmasking?

What was uncovered by the surveillance other than intentionally unmasking Trump Team members for purposes of political innuendos?

I mean they Phucking committed Felony to unmask all these people and provide transcripts of President Trump's conversations with Mexico, Thailand, and Australia.

But they apparently had nothing really juicy to leak other than that. So it's clear these were political hits.

Now if you want to talk about The DNC Podesta Emails ask Seth Rich about that. Had The DNC not given Sanders the shaft no one rats on The DNC and leaks those emails to Assange.

I work IT and most leaks of information are committed from disgruntled employees inside and organization looking to do damage to the organization. The DNC leaks were leaks and The Hacking Story was a hoax created by Clinton's Cyner Security Expert Camp.

L Jean Camp - Google Search

I posted this in another thread but it is relevant here...

Follow the bouncing ball..

Bounce: Democrats create a Trump/Russian collusion cover story because they cant defeat Trump.

Bounce: Obama orders/requests FISA warrants on Trump team through his AG Lynch. First warrant is denied but the second is approved to surveillance his "Russian contacts". Now all of his phone conversations and those of his staffs are now "incidental captures".

Bounce: The NSA marks these contacts/phone calls as "no intelligence value". In layman's terms 'no criminal conduct found' and should be deleted. But because Obama is "reverse targeting" without a warrant for Trump, he retains the conversations and has them transcribed and the US citizens names are revealed.

Bounce: Those reports are distributed far and wide due to his new order to let everyone have access to raw data collected by the NSA. Yet they were identified as 'no intelligence value' and this distribution was done in violation of federal laws. E-mails, phone conversations, calendars, itineraries, etc were all collected electronically and then disseminated when they were marked 'no intelligence value' when they should have been destroyed. Why were they disseminating all of this information which should have been deleted?

Bounce: Now some of those Obama cronies leak the information in an effort to discredit the Trump administration.

BOOM: the ball just popped..This whole process was a web of lies in an effort to surveillance Trump, without a warrant, for political purposes. The distribution of unmasked data that had "no intelligence value" had no value to anyone except the Clinton campaign and the Obama admin.

Bounce: Putin assists Trumps bid for President

Bounce: Trump defends Putin, trashes military support for Ukraine, lays groundwork to remove sanctions and recognize Russian support to Crimea

Bounce: Trump aids secretly meet with Russian agents immediately prior to email leaks

Bounce: Trump aids lie about Russian contacts

Way to post a bunch of Fake News Headlines with no substantiation.

You are aware all of this came out of The Clinton Camp.

But you people are National Enquirer level stupid.

Look up Hillary's Hacker who started all of this.

L. Jean Camp - Google Search

no, it appears that you are National Enquirer/Infowars level of stupid!!!

Tell us your HYPOTHESIS the original tree.... who stole the files, why did they steal the files? To what advantage was it for them to steal the files? How did they disseminate the files? how and who did they connect with to dump the files on the internet? What was their benefit for committing the Crime and dumping the files? Did the thief choose the days the files were dumped?

Give us what you got!

ANSWER MY QUESTIONS PLEASE!

-unmasking is legal and occurs when the legal surveillance of the foreign agent involves a conversation with an American that is PERTINENT to the probable cause for the foreign surveillance intelligence....and only THEN is it unmasked, because it is crucial to the investigation....BE WORRIED....it means the trump people were not simply playing tootsies with those under surveillance....

- Seth Rich was DEAD long before the release of the Podesta emails

-if seth rich was a mole at the DNC, he was PLANTED by Roger Stone who had PLANTED a mole in the DNC when he worked for the Dole campaign, Bob Dole found out ...and fired him....for this scuzzy dirty trick....Trump hires him FOR his dirty tricks and his business partner, Paul Manafort later.

-the ONLY people that needed seth rich dead, IF ANYONE DID, was the person who PLANTED HIM to steal the emails, to eliminate their connection to the leaks....the clinton campaign or the DNC did NOT need him DeAD, they needed him ALIVE so thy could turn him in to the police and find out who he worked for.... this whole seth rich bullcrap is simply that, right wing, bat shit crazy stuff....tin foil hat to the nth degree.

I have no idea why you keep linking to that lady professor.

NOW ANSWER MY QUESTIONS,

What's your conspiracy theory....that has any logic applied to it?

 

[rightwinger]

I posted this in another thread but it is relevant here...

Follow the bouncing ball..

Bounce: Democrats create a Trump/Russian collusion cover story because they cant defeat Trump.

Bounce: Obama orders/requests FISA warrants on Trump team through his AG Lynch. First warrant is denied but the second is approved to surveillance his "Russian contacts". Now all of his phone conversations and those of his staffs are now "incidental captures".

Bounce: The NSA marks these contacts/phone calls as "no intelligence value". In layman's terms 'no criminal conduct found' and should be deleted. But because Obama is "reverse targeting" without a warrant for Trump, he retains the conversations and has them transcribed and the US citizens names are revealed.

Bounce: Those reports are distributed far and wide due to his new order to let everyone have access to raw data collected by the NSA. Yet they were identified as 'no intelligence value' and this distribution was done in violation of federal laws. E-mails, phone conversations, calendars, itineraries, etc were all collected electronically and then disseminated when they were marked 'no intelligence value' when they should have been destroyed. Why were they disseminating all of this information which should have been deleted?

Bounce: Now some of those Obama cronies leak the information in an effort to discredit the Trump administration.

BOOM: the ball just popped..This whole process was a web of lies in an effort to surveillance Trump, without a warrant, for political purposes. The distribution of unmasked data that had "no intelligence value" had no value to anyone except the Clinton campaign and the Obama admin.

Bounce: Putin assists Trumps bid for President

Bounce: Trump defends Putin, trashes military support for Ukraine, lays groundwork to remove sanctions and recognize Russian support to Crimea

Bounce: Trump aids secretly meet with Russian agents immediately prior to email leaks

Bounce: Trump aids lie about Russian contacts

Cool man.... can you conjure up another 'bounce story' for me out of the fertile imagination of your mind???

The evidence is there

It is going to bounce Trump out of the White House and in to Prison