Watch live & discuss: Jan6 hearing about Trump's "connections" to white supremacist Oath Keepers & Proud Boys who wrecked Congress on that fateful day

This is how close we came…Sidney Fucking Powell as elections gauleiter.

FXe70j2X0AEe7c0
Never happened and no one seems to know who wrote it.
 
Bill Barr, Mark Meadows, Pat Cipollone, and many more Trump loyalists didn't believe the election was stolen.

It was a Big Lie, not a Big Delusion.
Wrong. If you doubt sumpin’ and say as much to me, but I firmly believe it, even if my belief is misguided and I’m wrong, that doesn’t equal a “lie.” Not a “big lie.” Not a “lie” at all.
 

“ … Jan6 hearing about Trump's connections’ to white supremacist Oath Keepers & Proud Boys who wrecked Congress on that fateful day”​


A. Congress wasn’t “wrecked” that day. Alarmist thread headline is silly.

B. Here’s THE connection. The President and the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys were all IN Washington DC that day!!!!! !!!

This is it, boys. They got him this time! Those walls are really closing in now, baby.
 
Jan. 6 committee to say at this hearing that Trump directed far-right groups to obstruct Biden’s certification with a 19 Dec 2020 tweet about a “wild protest” — and will play the most compelling parts of Cipollone’s testimony.


Yawn. Nobody's paying attention to this partisan sideshow.
 
The committee is presenting evidence that the idea the violent mob's actions were a spontaneous escalation of a peaceful protest is bull crap.

Evidence of firearms in Jan. 6 crowd grows as arrests and trials mount

Some of the startling revelations of the recent blockbuster Jan. 6 House committee hearing came in snippets of police radio traffic captured during President Donald Trump’s rally on the Ellipse and from Trump’s purported response to being told there were armed protesters just outside a secured area.

The chatter included reports of a man with an AR-15 in a tree on Constitution Avenue who was accompanied by two men with pistols on their hips. Another officer radioed, “I’ve got three men walking down the street in fatigues carrying AR-15s, copy, at 14th and Independence.”
The recordings aired during the June 28 hearing in which former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified that Trump reportedly “was angry that we weren’t letting people through the [metal detectors] with weapons.”

The full picture of how many among the crowd were armed before the riot occurred is unclear, but court records, trial testimony and accounts from police officers and rioters have supplied growing evidence that multiple people brought firearms to Washington for Jan. 6, 2021. Six men were arrested that day for having guns in the vicinity of the U.S. Capitol, and a seventh who arrived after the riot ended was arrested the following day. Despite some instances in which alerts about people with guns turned out to be false alarms, accounts from police officers and rioters indicate that many firearms were spotted on Jan. 6 but were not seized as law enforcement focused more on defending the Capitol than on arresting gun-law violators.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/07/08/jan6-defendants-guns/

More and more we are coming to the understanding the 1/6 riot was not a protest that got out of hand. The violence was the plan all along as evidenced by all the weapons the mob brought to the Capital.
How many people had weapons when they were arrested? - Zero!

You are an idiot of the highest order.
 
CNN reports. "Former White House counsel Pat Cipollone testified for eight hours in front of the House Jan. 6 Committee on Friday in a closed-door interview. Here are some key moments of his testimony played at the committee's seventh hearing on Tuesday.

"He did not think there was sufficient evidence of election fraud: In his testimony, Cipollone said he agreed with former Attorney General Bill Barr, who concluded there was insufficient evidence of election fraud. He recounted former chief of staff Mark Meadows saying in November 2020 that then-President Trump should have conceded, to which he said he agreed. Jason Miller, a former senior adviser to Trump, told the committee that Cipollone called John Eastman's theory to overturn the election "nutty." Cipollone did not refute this statement.

"He was verbally attacked during the Dec. 18, 2020 meeting at the White House. Cipollone told the committee he walked into the Dec.18 meeting attended by Trump, former Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell, former national security adviser Michael Flynn and former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne.

"The meeting, which lasted six hours, was described as “unhinged” by former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson. Ideas circulated about overturning the election including Flynn's suggestion to invoke martial law and inspection of voting machines.

“I don’t think any of these people were providing the President with good advice,” Cipollone told the committee.

"After asking where the evidence was for claims of voter fraud, Cipollone said that he and Meadows were verbally attacked for questioning where the evidence was for Trump’s claimed victory."

CBS reports, "Tuesday's hearing began with a tweet Trump sent at 1:42 a.m. on Dec. 19, 2020, which said, "Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!"

"On January 6, Trump knew the crowd was angry," committee member Raskin said. "He knew the crowd was armed. He sent them to the Capitol anyway."

"When you catch somebody in a fraud, you are allowed to go by very different rules."
We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”
Now it is up to Congress to confront this egregious assault on our democracy. And after this, we’re going to walk down, and I’ll be there with you. We are going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country,” part of President Trump's instructions to the mob on Jan. 6, 2021.

Was this the President giving orders to those in the audience?
Wow! The lack of any logic in that post is stupefying!
 
Your being unable to back up your bluster with credible documentation does not surprise me.

Thursday's "What did the Cry Baby Loser do during the 187 minutes his goons raged through the Capitol?" prime time special promises to be a doozy! (It will feature even more Republican insider witnesses.)

Hold the ketchup!


He called for a peaceful protest. Teh rest is you people talking shit.
 
He called for a peaceful protest. Teh rest is you people talking shit.
"You people" apparently refers to Americans appalled and disgusted by the tawdry spectacle of his goons savaging vastly outnumbered police as they attacked the Capitol, while the Cry Baby Loser pleasured himself by watching for three hours, despite the pleas of his family, his Fox News masters, and others.
 
Why would he fuckin' give credibility to that shit show in the House?
He would be following in the long line of impressive Republican officeholders and Trump regime insiders giving their sworn testimonies that no one has refuted.

The relentless revelations have his bum kissers in a tizzy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top