There is no coup. Trump violated the constitution.
Again.
Please tell us how, and when
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no coup. Trump violated the constitution.
Again.
You know how and when he has violated the constitution every time he has done it. This last episode is just one of many. So if you don't know, figure it out. Because Trump has violated the constitution.There is no coup. Trump violated the constitution.
Again.
Please tell us how, and when
You know how and when he has violated the constitution every time he has done it. This last episode is just one of many. So if you don't know, figure it out. Because Trump has violated the constitution.There is no coup. Trump violated the constitution.
Again.
Please tell us how, and when
The democrats should not be the only ones having to sell anything. Yet you have ascribed to the both sides are the problem argument when one side is supporting and excusing a lawless president. Republicans have been complicit in violating our constitution. As members of congress it is just as much their job as the democrats to check the president. Instead they enabled him.If the Dems go through with the proceedings, the charges will all be laid out in the Articles. That's where the rubber meets the road. The proceedings themselves only matter in that the Dems need to sell the whole thing to voters.
Politics, politics, politics.
.
Your source is dubious.
I don't know what that has to do with my point.The democrats should not be the only ones having to sell anything. Yet you have ascribed to the both sides are the problem argument when one side is supporting and excusing a lawless president. Republicans have been complicit in violating our constitution. As members of congress it is just as much their job as the democrats to check the president. Instead they enabled him.If the Dems go through with the proceedings, the charges will all be laid out in the Articles. That's where the rubber meets the road. The proceedings themselves only matter in that the Dems need to sell the whole thing to voters.
Politics, politics, politics.
.
No you don't know when Obama did it. You want to claim that while you excuse Trump. You know exactly what Trump has done, you don't need it explained to you. The simple reality is that you are fine with Trump breaking the law, which is why you are sitting on your ass lying about what you haven't seen Trump do.You know how and when he has violated the constitution every time he has done it. This last episode is just one of many. So if you don't know, figure it out. Because Trump has violated the constitution.There is no coup. Trump violated the constitution.
Again.
Please tell us how, and when
No, I don't. I know when obummer did, but I can't find a single instance of trump doing it.
Educate us.
Everything. The democrats should not be alone in having to prove to the people for the 1000th time about another instance of Trump violating the constitution. The right is once again lying and excusing his behavior. But to you, liberals angrily calling out this tyranny is the same as protecting it.I don't know what that has to do with my point.The democrats should not be the only ones having to sell anything. Yet you have ascribed to the both sides are the problem argument when one side is supporting and excusing a lawless president. Republicans have been complicit in violating our constitution. As members of congress it is just as much their job as the democrats to check the president. Instead they enabled him.If the Dems go through with the proceedings, the charges will all be laid out in the Articles. That's where the rubber meets the road. The proceedings themselves only matter in that the Dems need to sell the whole thing to voters.
Politics, politics, politics.
.
.
No. Not when both the IG and DNI say the complaint had merit.Your source is dubious.
You think? But it is valiantly making a case for the "the requirement that a person must contain first-hand information of wrongdoing", doesn't it?
I'm waiting to see what the Articles of Impeachment say. That's where this gets beyond shallow assumptions, simplistic theories & rhetorical slap fights, and into concrete reality.Everything. The democrats should not be alone in having to prove to the people for the 1000th time about another instance of Trump violating the constitution. The right is once again lying and excusing his behavior. But to you, liberals angrily calling out this tyranny is the same as protecting it.I don't know what that has to do with my point.The democrats should not be the only ones having to sell anything. Yet you have ascribed to the both sides are the problem argument when one side is supporting and excusing a lawless president. Republicans have been complicit in violating our constitution. As members of congress it is just as much their job as the democrats to check the president. Instead they enabled him.If the Dems go through with the proceedings, the charges will all be laid out in the Articles. That's where the rubber meets the road. The proceedings themselves only matter in that the Dems need to sell the whole thing to voters.
Politics, politics, politics.
.
.
You ready to nominate Bill Weld?We sure are in the middle of a coup, and the people in DC have such disdain and animosity for us they don't even care if we believe them or not at this point.
Let's see how this turns out in 2020 for them.
We are ready.
No you don't know when Obama did it. You want to claim that while you excuse Trump. You know exactly what Trump has done, you don't need it explained to you. The simple reality is that you are fine with Trump breaking the law, which is why you are sitting on your ass lying about what you haven't seen Trump do.You know how and when he has violated the constitution every time he has done it. This last episode is just one of many. So if you don't know, figure it out. Because Trump has violated the constitution.There is no coup. Trump violated the constitution.
Again.
Please tell us how, and when
No, I don't. I know when obummer did, but I can't find a single instance of trump doing it.
Educate us.
No. Not when both the IG and DNI say the complaint had merit.Your source is dubious.
You think? But it is valiantly making a case for the "the requirement that a person must contain first-hand information of wrongdoing", doesn't it?
I'm waiting to see what the Articles of Impeachment say. That's where this gets beyond shallow assumptions & rhetorical slap fights, and into concrete reality.Everything. The democrats should not be alone in having to prove to the people for the 1000th time about another instance of Trump violating the constitution. The right is once again lying and excusing his behavior. But to you, liberals angrily calling out this tyranny is the same as protecting it.I don't know what that has to do with my point.The democrats should not be the only ones having to sell anything. Yet you have ascribed to the both sides are the problem argument when one side is supporting and excusing a lawless president. Republicans have been complicit in violating our constitution. As members of congress it is just as much their job as the democrats to check the president. Instead they enabled him.If the Dems go through with the proceedings, the charges will all be laid out in the Articles. That's where the rubber meets the road. The proceedings themselves only matter in that the Dems need to sell the whole thing to voters.
Politics, politics, politics.
.
.
Maybe the Dems will have a great case. That's what the investigative process is for. I don't know at the moment.
But my opinion won't be swayed by transparent partisans tooting vague platitudes about the violation of the Constitution.
.
The personal insults really aren't necessary.I'm waiting to see what the Articles of Impeachment say. That's where this gets beyond shallow assumptions & rhetorical slap fights, and into concrete reality.Everything. The democrats should not be alone in having to prove to the people for the 1000th time about another instance of Trump violating the constitution. The right is once again lying and excusing his behavior. But to you, liberals angrily calling out this tyranny is the same as protecting it.I don't know what that has to do with my point.The democrats should not be the only ones having to sell anything. Yet you have ascribed to the both sides are the problem argument when one side is supporting and excusing a lawless president. Republicans have been complicit in violating our constitution. As members of congress it is just as much their job as the democrats to check the president. Instead they enabled him.If the Dems go through with the proceedings, the charges will all be laid out in the Articles. That's where the rubber meets the road. The proceedings themselves only matter in that the Dems need to sell the whole thing to voters.
Politics, politics, politics.
.
.
Maybe the Dems will have a great case. That's what the investigative process is for. I don't know at the moment.
But my opinion won't be swayed by transparent partisans tooting vague platitudes about the violation of the Constitution.
.
I'm not worried about swaying your opinion. Trump has violated the constitution on numerous occasions and has consistently abused his power. That's what the Mueller report showed and every instance of him refusing to answer to congress shows this as well. So your choice to be stupid and adopt right wing doubts is your problem. We have a transcript of the call, we have the documented complaint of the whistle blower. Both stories match. I don't toot vague platitudes, the facts show what I have said to be correct.
No you don't know when Obama did it. You want to claim that while you excuse Trump. You know exactly what Trump has done, you don't need it explained to you. The simple reality is that you are fine with Trump breaking the law, which is why you are sitting on your ass lying about what you haven't seen Trump do.You know how and when he has violated the constitution every time he has done it. This last episode is just one of many. So if you don't know, figure it out. Because Trump has violated the constitution.There is no coup. Trump violated the constitution.
Again.
Please tell us how, and when
No, I don't. I know when obummer did, but I can't find a single instance of trump doing it.
Educate us.
Trump got elected. That's what he did. That's what triggered you and you and your cohorts have been trying to undo that since Nov 2016.
The personal insults really aren't necessary.I'm waiting to see what the Articles of Impeachment say. That's where this gets beyond shallow assumptions & rhetorical slap fights, and into concrete reality.Everything. The democrats should not be alone in having to prove to the people for the 1000th time about another instance of Trump violating the constitution. The right is once again lying and excusing his behavior. But to you, liberals angrily calling out this tyranny is the same as protecting it.I don't know what that has to do with my point.The democrats should not be the only ones having to sell anything. Yet you have ascribed to the both sides are the problem argument when one side is supporting and excusing a lawless president. Republicans have been complicit in violating our constitution. As members of congress it is just as much their job as the democrats to check the president. Instead they enabled him.
.
Maybe the Dems will have a great case. That's what the investigative process is for. I don't know at the moment.
But my opinion won't be swayed by transparent partisans tooting vague platitudes about the violation of the Constitution.
.
I'm not worried about swaying your opinion. Trump has violated the constitution on numerous occasions and has consistently abused his power. That's what the Mueller report showed and every instance of him refusing to answer to congress shows this as well. So your choice to be stupid and adopt right wing doubts is your problem. We have a transcript of the call, we have the documented complaint of the whistle blower. Both stories match. I don't toot vague platitudes, the facts show what I have said to be correct.
Okay, show me. List the verified actions and the corresponding passages in the Constitution. Maybe you're right.
.
Those accusations are all based on interpretation of the law. And yes, I can see them being included in the Articles with specifics. It wouldn't surprise me at all to see more actions like that come to light.The personal insults really aren't necessary.I'm waiting to see what the Articles of Impeachment say. That's where this gets beyond shallow assumptions & rhetorical slap fights, and into concrete reality.Everything. The democrats should not be alone in having to prove to the people for the 1000th time about another instance of Trump violating the constitution. The right is once again lying and excusing his behavior. But to you, liberals angrily calling out this tyranny is the same as protecting it.I don't know what that has to do with my point.
.
Maybe the Dems will have a great case. That's what the investigative process is for. I don't know at the moment.
But my opinion won't be swayed by transparent partisans tooting vague platitudes about the violation of the Constitution.
.
I'm not worried about swaying your opinion. Trump has violated the constitution on numerous occasions and has consistently abused his power. That's what the Mueller report showed and every instance of him refusing to answer to congress shows this as well. So your choice to be stupid and adopt right wing doubts is your problem. We have a transcript of the call, we have the documented complaint of the whistle blower. Both stories match. I don't toot vague platitudes, the facts show what I have said to be correct.
Okay, show me. List the verified actions and the corresponding passages in the Constitution. Maybe you're right.
.
You're right. The personal insults are not necessary.
But my opinion won't be swayed by transparent partisans tooting vague platitudes about the violation of the Constitution.
Trump has violated the constitution on numerous occasions. If you are incapable of understanding that he has consistently obstructed justice, abused his power, tampered with witnesses, personally enriched himself off the presidency, and now has attempted extortion, then you just aren't very aware.