Hutch Starskey
Diamond Member
- Mar 24, 2015
- 35,391
- 9,170
Commie.Loser
Double down loser.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Commie.Loser
You are in the 24% of Americans who think this is great legislation. Meanwhile the majority understands that giving a greater cut to the wealthy and corporations on a permanent basis while allowing the modest cuts to wage earners to sunset in a few years is not what The Donald ran on. But lacking any core values or political ideology, The Donald can concentrate on "winning" at any cost. And that cost amounts to adding $1.4 trillion to the national debt to be paid back by wage earners, not heirs.Why dont you explain to me why this bill is the devil. I would love to hear itPeople will not forget what the Republicans did come November 2018. Republicans have got to go. I won't be surprised if democrats win house and senate next year.
Triple, Goose-Stepping, Red Army Commie.Commie.Loser
Double down loser.
You should bear the burden of proving how this will result in millions of deaths and world-wide suffering.If I have to explain it then you're the target audience.
If you're relying on your ignorance to be just "fucking bullshit" then you deserve what you voted for.
Oh, well, in that case...You are in the 24% of Americans who think this is great legislation. Meanwhile the majority understands
Triple, Goose-Stepping, Red Army Commie.Commie.Loser
Double down loser.
Businesses live to expand. Capital allows expansion. Tax cuts provide interest-free capital.I've claimed neither. What are your hopes for an outcome?
When and where has trickle down economic policy ever, ever worked out the way you describe? We know today that most corporations will use the windfall to buy back their own stock and reward,shareholders. That's the bottom line they want to enhance. Not job expansion. That costs too much!Businesses live to expand. Capital allows expansion. Tax cuts provide interest-free capital.I've claimed neither. What are your hopes for an outcome?
Do you need more? You want me to give you numbers?
I can't. Businesses have different problems, needs, debts. It's hard to predict. One thing is certain, they will have the opportunity to expand, which would create more jobs, and more tax revenue. Even if businesses decide not to spend that money on expansion, is it really our decision to make? Obama has been trying to ass fuck them for 8 years. They may not be able to expand until they recover from the commie in chief's regulatory bullshit.
The 80s.When and where has trickle down economic policy ever, ever worked out the way you describe?
You really do not understand business do you?We know today that most corporations will use the windfall to buy back their own stock and reward,shareholders. That's the bottom line they want to enhance. Not job expansion. That costs too much!
Really? In the 80s, "outsourcing" became the Word of the Decade. Companies folded up like Chinese card tables and fled to Latin America and Asia. Wage disparity became,a growing and unsustainable problem. Wage earners saw their benefits,and,income,slashed.The 80s.When and where has trickle down economic policy ever, ever worked out the way you describe?
Businesses live to expand. Capital allows expansion. Tax cuts provide interest-free capital.I've claimed neither. What are your hopes for an outcome?
Do you need more? You want me to give you numbers?
I can't. Businesses have different problems, needs, debts. It's hard to predict. One thing is certain, they will have the opportunity to expand, which would create more jobs, and more tax revenue. Even if businesses decide not to spend that money on expansion, is it really our decision to make? Obama has been trying to ass fuck them for 8 years. They may not be able to expand until they recover from the commie in chief's regulatory bullshit.
I can't.
Tax cuts provide interest-free capital.
Trade unions got strong BECAUSE businesses were strong. Not the other way around.Is it a coincidence that at the very time trade unions were strongest, the middle class was strongest too?
How are 100% of Americans getting a tax break but only 24% of them like it? Are 76% of the people actually wanting to pay more in taxes?You are in the 24% of Americans who think this is great legislation. Meanwhile the majority understands that giving a greater cut to the wealthy and corporations on a permanent basis while allowing the modest cuts to wage earners to sunset in a few years is not what The Donald ran on. But lacking any core values or political ideology, The Donald can concentrate on "winning" at any cost. And that cost amounts to adding $1.4 trillion to the national debt to be paid back by wage earners, not heirs.Why dont you explain to me why this bill is the devil. I would love to hear itPeople will not forget what the Republicans did come November 2018. Republicans have got to go. I won't be surprised if democrats win house and senate next year.
When people who make money on the money they already have get bigger tax cuts than those who earn a pay check, while the disparity of wealth between the top 1 or 5 or 10% and the majority of citizen earners and spenders remains at historic levels, where's the fairness of penalizing the majority for working for a living?
But you drank the kook-aid. You believe the hype. You have found your scapegoats and bogeymen. Party on, Trumpian! You have nothing,to lose but your political power!
That's what the boardrooms tell us.You really do not understand business do you?We know today that most corporations will use the windfall to buy back their own stock and reward,shareholders. That's the bottom line they want to enhance. Not job expansion. That costs too much!
Shareholders may get dividends immediately after a tax cut (because they have been starving for several years), but they want expansion to make their shares more valuable in the future, and to gain MORE dividends.
You honestly think corps. will buy up all that stock and never expand or increase market share or expand into new markets? You really believe that?
Okay,. It's obvious that I am talking to a complete fucking idiot.Huh?
What about the capital they already have?
The 80s.When and where has trickle down economic policy ever, ever worked out the way you describe?
Well, tell us what's REALLY going on. Please. Enlighten us with your vast business experience.That's what the boardrooms tell us.
Yeah. You think businesses don't take into account their tax liability when making decisions. You are incompetent to discuss these issues.Show us how and in what way(s).
Okay,. It's obvious that I am talking to a complete fucking idiot.Huh?
What about the capital they already have?