Well if Bloomberg entering into the 2020 president race didn't spell it out for you this should

The Dems are going to split into two parties: Socialists and StatusQuo Corporatists.
That’s would be great. The Reps should split too... Conservatives, NeoCons, and Trumptards

Repubs are going in the other direction....solidarity!
Just stay tuned to Wednesdays acquittal vote for proof.
they all will vote for acquittal but you have half saying that what Trump did was inappropriate and the other half who are full blown puppets still claiming that Trump and his perfect call did nothing wrong.

No.
You said that Not me. Even halfway!
Huh? Did you not understand what I wrote? Read slower. I wasn’t literally saying that YOU said that. It’s an expression... half say trump was wrong and half say he was perfect. There’s a split there.

Crime is wrong. But there was no crime.
So the half that you profess say he's wrong, are indeed, themselves wrong!
 
That’s would be great. The Reps should split too... Conservatives, NeoCons, and Trumptards

Repubs are going in the other direction....solidarity!
Just stay tuned to Wednesdays acquittal vote for proof.
they all will vote for acquittal but you have half saying that what Trump did was inappropriate and the other half who are full blown puppets still claiming that Trump and his perfect call did nothing wrong.

No.
You said that Not me. Even halfway!
Huh? Did you not understand what I wrote? Read slower. I wasn’t literally saying that YOU said that. It’s an expression... half say trump was wrong and half say he was perfect. There’s a split there.

Crime is wrong. But there was no crime.
So the half that you profess say he's wrong, are indeed, themselves wrong!
It’s also wrong to not go into work, it’s not criminal but you can still get fired for it... doesn’t have to be a crime for it to be wrong.
 
Repubs are going in the other direction....solidarity!
Just stay tuned to Wednesdays acquittal vote for proof.
they all will vote for acquittal but you have half saying that what Trump did was inappropriate and the other half who are full blown puppets still claiming that Trump and his perfect call did nothing wrong.

No.
You said that Not me. Even halfway!
Huh? Did you not understand what I wrote? Read slower. I wasn’t literally saying that YOU said that. It’s an expression... half say trump was wrong and half say he was perfect. There’s a split there.

Crime is wrong. But there was no crime.
So the half that you profess say he's wrong, are indeed, themselves wrong!
It’s also wrong to not go into work, it’s not criminal but you can still get fired for it... doesn’t have to be a crime for it to be wrong.

Comparing not going into work to high level political warfare may work for you.

Most likely, only you.
Good luck!
 
they all will vote for acquittal but you have half saying that what Trump did was inappropriate and the other half who are full blown puppets still claiming that Trump and his perfect call did nothing wrong.

No.
You said that Not me. Even halfway!
Huh? Did you not understand what I wrote? Read slower. I wasn’t literally saying that YOU said that. It’s an expression... half say trump was wrong and half say he was perfect. There’s a split there.

Crime is wrong. But there was no crime.
So the half that you profess say he's wrong, are indeed, themselves wrong!
It’s also wrong to not go into work, it’s not criminal but you can still get fired for it... doesn’t have to be a crime for it to be wrong.

Comparing not going into work to high level political warfare may work for you.

Most likely, only you.
Good luck!
I'm not comparing the two... I’m making a point that somebody doesn’t need to commit a crime to get fired.

If a president locked himself in his room and watched CNN and tweeted all day so you think there would be any cause to impeach or fire him even though he didn’t commit a crime?
 
No.
You said that Not me. Even halfway!
Huh? Did you not understand what I wrote? Read slower. I wasn’t literally saying that YOU said that. It’s an expression... half say trump was wrong and half say he was perfect. There’s a split there.

Crime is wrong. But there was no crime.
So the half that you profess say he's wrong, are indeed, themselves wrong!
It’s also wrong to not go into work, it’s not criminal but you can still get fired for it... doesn’t have to be a crime for it to be wrong.

Comparing not going into work to high level political warfare may work for you.

Most likely, only you.
Good luck!
I'm not comparing the two... I’m making a point that somebody doesn’t need to commit a crime to get fired.

If a president locked himself in his room and watched CNN and tweeted all day so you think there would be any cause to impeach or fire him even though he didn’t commit a crime?

If, if, if.....maybe, maybe, maybe....possibly, possibly, possibly....
 
Huh? Did you not understand what I wrote? Read slower. I wasn’t literally saying that YOU said that. It’s an expression... half say trump was wrong and half say he was perfect. There’s a split there.

Crime is wrong. But there was no crime.
So the half that you profess say he's wrong, are indeed, themselves wrong!
It’s also wrong to not go into work, it’s not criminal but you can still get fired for it... doesn’t have to be a crime for it to be wrong.

Comparing not going into work to high level political warfare may work for you.

Most likely, only you.
Good luck!
I'm not comparing the two... I’m making a point that somebody doesn’t need to commit a crime to get fired.

If a president locked himself in his room and watched CNN and tweeted all day so you think there would be any cause to impeach or fire him even though he didn’t commit a crime?

If, if, if.....maybe, maybe, maybe....possibly, possibly, possibly....
that's almost like Russia Russia Russia,
 
Repubs are going in the other direction....solidarity!
Just stay tuned to Wednesdays acquittal vote for proof.
they all will vote for acquittal but you have half saying that what Trump did was inappropriate and the other half who are full blown puppets still claiming that Trump and his perfect call did nothing wrong.

No.
You said that Not me. Even halfway!
Huh? Did you not understand what I wrote? Read slower. I wasn’t literally saying that YOU said that. It’s an expression... half say trump was wrong and half say he was perfect. There’s a split there.

Crime is wrong. But there was no crime.
So the half that you profess say he's wrong, are indeed, themselves wrong!
It’s also wrong to not go into work, it’s not criminal but you can still get fired for it... doesn’t have to be a crime for it to be wrong.
Dude the president has done more for America than the last three combined even with the party of obstruction democrats trying to stop him.
 
I can't believe anyone would vote for a man who tried to ban Big Gulps. Democrats are so stupid. He's also an old rich white male, exactly what they say they hate.
There has to be something mentally wrong with a person who is so eager to waste billions of dollars even if it's their money.
Think how they would handle your money
 
I can't believe anyone would vote for a man who tried to ban Big Gulps. Democrats are so stupid. He's also an old rich white male, exactly what they say they hate.
There has to be something mentally wrong with a person who is so eager to waste billions of dollars even if it's their money.
Think how they would handle your money

I don't like his control freak nature. I find that much more concerning.

It's also funny how the democrats scream about rich old white men, and those are their main contenders. Lol. This just proves they are psychos.
 
Huh? Did you not understand what I wrote? Read slower. I wasn’t literally saying that YOU said that. It’s an expression... half say trump was wrong and half say he was perfect. There’s a split there.

Crime is wrong. But there was no crime.
So the half that you profess say he's wrong, are indeed, themselves wrong!
It’s also wrong to not go into work, it’s not criminal but you can still get fired for it... doesn’t have to be a crime for it to be wrong.

Comparing not going into work to high level political warfare may work for you.

Most likely, only you.
Good luck!
I'm not comparing the two... I’m making a point that somebody doesn’t need to commit a crime to get fired.

If a president locked himself in his room and watched CNN and tweeted all day so you think there would be any cause to impeach or fire him even though he didn’t commit a crime?

If, if, if.....maybe, maybe, maybe....possibly, possibly, possibly....
Can’t give a straight answer to a straight question Ha? Figures
 
Crime is wrong. But there was no crime.
So the half that you profess say he's wrong, are indeed, themselves wrong!
It’s also wrong to not go into work, it’s not criminal but you can still get fired for it... doesn’t have to be a crime for it to be wrong.

Comparing not going into work to high level political warfare may work for you.

Most likely, only you.
Good luck!
I'm not comparing the two... I’m making a point that somebody doesn’t need to commit a crime to get fired.

If a president locked himself in his room and watched CNN and tweeted all day so you think there would be any cause to impeach or fire him even though he didn’t commit a crime?

If, if, if.....maybe, maybe, maybe....possibly, possibly, possibly....
Can’t give a straight answer to a straight question Ha? Figures

You haven't asked a straight question since 'Hector was a pup'.
 
they all will vote for acquittal but you have half saying that what Trump did was inappropriate and the other half who are full blown puppets still claiming that Trump and his perfect call did nothing wrong.

No.
You said that Not me. Even halfway!
Huh? Did you not understand what I wrote? Read slower. I wasn’t literally saying that YOU said that. It’s an expression... half say trump was wrong and half say he was perfect. There’s a split there.

Crime is wrong. But there was no crime.
So the half that you profess say he's wrong, are indeed, themselves wrong!
It’s also wrong to not go into work, it’s not criminal but you can still get fired for it... doesn’t have to be a crime for it to be wrong.
Dude the president has done more for America than the last three combined even with the party of obstruction democrats trying to stop him.
What does that have to do with anything I said?
 
I can't believe anyone would vote for a man who tried to ban Big Gulps. Democrats are so stupid. He's also an old rich white male, exactly what they say they hate.
I never understood why people care so much about big gulps? Is it seriously that big of an issue for you?
 
No.
You said that Not me. Even halfway!
Huh? Did you not understand what I wrote? Read slower. I wasn’t literally saying that YOU said that. It’s an expression... half say trump was wrong and half say he was perfect. There’s a split there.

Crime is wrong. But there was no crime.
So the half that you profess say he's wrong, are indeed, themselves wrong!
It’s also wrong to not go into work, it’s not criminal but you can still get fired for it... doesn’t have to be a crime for it to be wrong.
Dude the president has done more for America than the last three combined even with the party of obstruction democrats trying to stop him.
What does that have to do with anything I said?

So you want to be able to impeach presidents when they have not committed a crime, because they are late for work? Lol! I hope the republicans remember that. The democrat party has made a CIRCUS of impeachment, and it won't be forgotten.
 
I can't believe anyone would vote for a man who tried to ban Big Gulps. Democrats are so stupid. He's also an old rich white male, exactly what they say they hate.
I never understood why people care so much about big gulps? Is it seriously that big of an issue for you?

It's not Big Gulps. It is the principle of banning things. Do you not see this?
 
I can't believe anyone would vote for a man who tried to ban Big Gulps. Democrats are so stupid. He's also an old rich white male, exactly what they say they hate.
There has to be something mentally wrong with a person who is so eager to waste billions of dollars even if it's their money.
Think how they would handle your money
He probably would not have billions of dollars if he was mentally ill. Perhaps there is another reason? Do you think?
 

Forum List

Back
Top