Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They received immunity from lawsuits as long as they agreed not to edit material or practice censorship. That would reclassify them as publishers like the New York Times. Since they have practiced censorship and edited their content according to their political ideology, they aren't a public domain anymore. They are publishers which opens them up to lawsuits.Huh, that's what we said about commie Kaepernick but people think his RIGHTS were infringed. Even though he was never put into any gulag I am aware of.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Ahhhh, but a negro multi millionaire cultural marxist should be able to express his commie views. You know, just as anyone is allowed to the N WORRRRD at work, right?
On top of being ignorant about everything, you are hypocritical about everything, but hollywood agrees with you. So, that is all that matters.
Idiots.what are you going to do? Arrest them for not being supportive enough of Teump?Google lied to Congress and said that their search engine isn't conducting censorship....which helps the left mislead people that use their service.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Is this America or is it Cuba?
Apparently they want another Cuba.
To think they claimed Russia was influencing the election, but Google, Twitter, and Fakebook put Russia to shame.
Because that’s exactly the third world corruption I’d expect from this administration.
Orwell was trying to warn us about Trump.
He was warning us about both of you
"1984" warning was against totalitarianism, and political repression. "Animal Farm" was Orwell's warning against communism - All the animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.
The topic your brought up really doesn’t have much to do with the topic of the thread, which is about Google Adsense.They received immunity from lawsuits as long as they agreed not to edit material or practice censorship. That would reclassify them as publishers like the New York Times. Since they have practiced censorship and edited their content according to their political ideology, they aren't a public domain anymore. They are publishers which opens them up to lawsuits.Huh, that's what we said about commie Kaepernick but people think his RIGHTS were infringed. Even though he was never put into any gulag I am aware of.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Ahhhh, but a negro multi millionaire cultural marxist should be able to express his commie views. You know, just as anyone is allowed to the N WORRRRD at work, right?
On top of being ignorant about everything, you are hypocritical about everything, but hollywood agrees with you. So, that is all that matters.
Idiots.what are you going to do? Arrest them for not being supportive enough of Teump?Google lied to Congress and said that their search engine isn't conducting censorship....which helps the left mislead people that use their service.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Is this America or is it Cuba?
Apparently they want another Cuba.
To think they claimed Russia was influencing the election, but Google, Twitter, and Fakebook put Russia to shame.
Because that’s exactly the third world corruption I’d expect from this administration.
Good to hear he got his silly ass fired.As people get fired for wearing t shirtsNo one is attacking their free speech.
View attachment 351487
And thats just a t-shirt promoting safety
Wearing an oann t-shirt will soon get ya shipped of to gulag
A vast left-wing conspiracy suppressing conservative voices includes Google, NBC, and a shadowy foreign group
Remember when the progressive media feigned concern over foreign influence on our elections? Now, just months before a critical election, they are conspiring with foreign groups to destroy conservative publications, with the assistance of Google, the...www.americanthinker.com
used to be back in the 1960s the left started the free speech movement. How things do change in the 21st century it seems.
It has everything to do with it. Google is trying to attack web sites they don't agree with politically. They think they can get away with shutting down the revenue source of their political enemies. Sort of the way Obama used the IRS to harass conservative fundraising. It all amounts to a thugocracy run by leftists in social media. It's harassment and actionable in court.The topic your brought up really doesn’t have much to do with the topic of the thread, which is about Google Adsense.They received immunity from lawsuits as long as they agreed not to edit material or practice censorship. That would reclassify them as publishers like the New York Times. Since they have practiced censorship and edited their content according to their political ideology, they aren't a public domain anymore. They are publishers which opens them up to lawsuits.Huh, that's what we said about commie Kaepernick but people think his RIGHTS were infringed. Even though he was never put into any gulag I am aware of.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Ahhhh, but a negro multi millionaire cultural marxist should be able to express his commie views. You know, just as anyone is allowed to the N WORRRRD at work, right?
On top of being ignorant about everything, you are hypocritical about everything, but hollywood agrees with you. So, that is all that matters.
Idiots.what are you going to do? Arrest them for not being supportive enough of Teump?Google lied to Congress and said that their search engine isn't conducting censorship....which helps the left mislead people that use their service.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Is this America or is it Cuba?
Apparently they want another Cuba.
To think they claimed Russia was influencing the election, but Google, Twitter, and Fakebook put Russia to shame.
Because that’s exactly the third world corruption I’d expect from this administration.
Google can do what they fuck they want to. If you dont like them then you can use another search engine. You need a list?It has everything to do with it. Google is trying to attack web sites they don't agree with politically. They think they can get away with shutting down the revenue source of their political enemies. Sort of the way Obama used the IRS to harass conservative fundraising. It all amounts to a thugocracy run by leftists in social media. It's harassment and actionable in court.The topic your brought up really doesn’t have much to do with the topic of the thread, which is about Google Adsense.They received immunity from lawsuits as long as they agreed not to edit material or practice censorship. That would reclassify them as publishers like the New York Times. Since they have practiced censorship and edited their content according to their political ideology, they aren't a public domain anymore. They are publishers which opens them up to lawsuits.Huh, that's what we said about commie Kaepernick but people think his RIGHTS were infringed. Even though he was never put into any gulag I am aware of.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Ahhhh, but a negro multi millionaire cultural marxist should be able to express his commie views. You know, just as anyone is allowed to the N WORRRRD at work, right?
On top of being ignorant about everything, you are hypocritical about everything, but hollywood agrees with you. So, that is all that matters.
Idiots.what are you going to do? Arrest them for not being supportive enough of Teump?Google lied to Congress and said that their search engine isn't conducting censorship....which helps the left mislead people that use their service.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Is this America or is it Cuba?
Apparently they want another Cuba.
To think they claimed Russia was influencing the election, but Google, Twitter, and Fakebook put Russia to shame.
Because that’s exactly the third world corruption I’d expect from this administration.
Which has nothing to do with section 230. Section 230 says a website can not be held accountable for material posted on their website by other users. That’s not the issue here. The issue is whether Google has a right to refuse to let The Federalist participate in their advertiser program.It has everything to do with it. Google is trying to attack web sites they don't agree with politically. They think they can get away with shutting down the revenue source of their political enemies. Sort of the way Obama used the IRS to harass conservative fundraising. It all amounts to a thugocracy run by leftists in social media. It's harassment and actionable in court.The topic your brought up really doesn’t have much to do with the topic of the thread, which is about Google Adsense.They received immunity from lawsuits as long as they agreed not to edit material or practice censorship. That would reclassify them as publishers like the New York Times. Since they have practiced censorship and edited their content according to their political ideology, they aren't a public domain anymore. They are publishers which opens them up to lawsuits.Huh, that's what we said about commie Kaepernick but people think his RIGHTS were infringed. Even though he was never put into any gulag I am aware of.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Ahhhh, but a negro multi millionaire cultural marxist should be able to express his commie views. You know, just as anyone is allowed to the N WORRRRD at work, right?
On top of being ignorant about everything, you are hypocritical about everything, but hollywood agrees with you. So, that is all that matters.
Idiots.what are you going to do? Arrest them for not being supportive enough of Teump?Google lied to Congress and said that their search engine isn't conducting censorship....which helps the left mislead people that use their service.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Is this America or is it Cuba?
Apparently they want another Cuba.
To think they claimed Russia was influencing the election, but Google, Twitter, and Fakebook put Russia to shame.
Because that’s exactly the third world corruption I’d expect from this administration.
Well you misread Orwell then. His concern was liberalism being coopted by communism. What you're bitching about is a supposedly liberal censorship of conservatism. That's not what's happening, but that was Eagle's OP.Orwell was trying to warn us about Trump.
He was warning us about both of you
"1984" warning was against totalitarianism, and political repression. "Animal Farm" was Orwell's warning against communism - All the animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.
I've read the books. Describes you to a tee.
Weird how repubs are all for businesses doing what they want to until they cant search the internet to find sites that feed their sick ideology.Which has nothing to do with section 230.It has everything to do with it. Google is trying to attack web sites they don't agree with politically. They think they can get away with shutting down the revenue source of their political enemies. Sort of the way Obama used the IRS to harass conservative fundraising. It all amounts to a thugocracy run by leftists in social media. It's harassment and actionable in court.The topic your brought up really doesn’t have much to do with the topic of the thread, which is about Google Adsense.They received immunity from lawsuits as long as they agreed not to edit material or practice censorship. That would reclassify them as publishers like the New York Times. Since they have practiced censorship and edited their content according to their political ideology, they aren't a public domain anymore. They are publishers which opens them up to lawsuits.Huh, that's what we said about commie Kaepernick but people think his RIGHTS were infringed. Even though he was never put into any gulag I am aware of.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Ahhhh, but a negro multi millionaire cultural marxist should be able to express his commie views. You know, just as anyone is allowed to the N WORRRRD at work, right?
On top of being ignorant about everything, you are hypocritical about everything, but hollywood agrees with you. So, that is all that matters.
Idiots.what are you going to do? Arrest them for not being supportive enough of Teump?Google lied to Congress and said that their search engine isn't conducting censorship....which helps the left mislead people that use their service.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Is this America or is it Cuba?
Apparently they want another Cuba.
To think they claimed Russia was influencing the election, but Google, Twitter, and Fakebook put Russia to shame.
Because that’s exactly the third world corruption I’d expect from this administration.
What grounds makes this actionable in court?
There is a dollar amount evolved. The site can prove damages.Which has nothing to do with section 230. Section 230 says a website can not be held accountable for material posted on their website by other users. That’s not the issue here. The issue is whether Google has a right to refuse to let The Federalist participate in their advertiser program.It has everything to do with it. Google is trying to attack web sites they don't agree with politically. They think they can get away with shutting down the revenue source of their political enemies. Sort of the way Obama used the IRS to harass conservative fundraising. It all amounts to a thugocracy run by leftists in social media. It's harassment and actionable in court.The topic your brought up really doesn’t have much to do with the topic of the thread, which is about Google Adsense.They received immunity from lawsuits as long as they agreed not to edit material or practice censorship. That would reclassify them as publishers like the New York Times. Since they have practiced censorship and edited their content according to their political ideology, they aren't a public domain anymore. They are publishers which opens them up to lawsuits.Huh, that's what we said about commie Kaepernick but people think his RIGHTS were infringed. Even though he was never put into any gulag I am aware of.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Ahhhh, but a negro multi millionaire cultural marxist should be able to express his commie views. You know, just as anyone is allowed to the N WORRRRD at work, right?
On top of being ignorant about everything, you are hypocritical about everything, but hollywood agrees with you. So, that is all that matters.
Idiots.what are you going to do? Arrest them for not being supportive enough of Teump?Google lied to Congress and said that their search engine isn't conducting censorship....which helps the left mislead people that use their service.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Is this America or is it Cuba?
Apparently they want another Cuba.
To think they claimed Russia was influencing the election, but Google, Twitter, and Fakebook put Russia to shame.
Because that’s exactly the third world corruption I’d expect from this administration.
What grounds makes this actionable in court?
So? If your boss fires you for being drunk on the job, you can prove financial damages too.There is a dollar amount evolved. The site can prove damages.Which has nothing to do with section 230. Section 230 says a website can not be held accountable for material posted on their website by other users. That’s not the issue here. The issue is whether Google has a right to refuse to let The Federalist participate in their advertiser program.It has everything to do with it. Google is trying to attack web sites they don't agree with politically. They think they can get away with shutting down the revenue source of their political enemies. Sort of the way Obama used the IRS to harass conservative fundraising. It all amounts to a thugocracy run by leftists in social media. It's harassment and actionable in court.The topic your brought up really doesn’t have much to do with the topic of the thread, which is about Google Adsense.They received immunity from lawsuits as long as they agreed not to edit material or practice censorship. That would reclassify them as publishers like the New York Times. Since they have practiced censorship and edited their content according to their political ideology, they aren't a public domain anymore. They are publishers which opens them up to lawsuits.Huh, that's what we said about commie Kaepernick but people think his RIGHTS were infringed. Even though he was never put into any gulag I am aware of.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Ahhhh, but a negro multi millionaire cultural marxist should be able to express his commie views. You know, just as anyone is allowed to the N WORRRRD at work, right?
On top of being ignorant about everything, you are hypocritical about everything, but hollywood agrees with you. So, that is all that matters.
Idiots.what are you going to do? Arrest them for not being supportive enough of Teump?Google lied to Congress and said that their search engine isn't conducting censorship....which helps the left mislead people that use their service.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Is this America or is it Cuba?
Apparently they want another Cuba.
To think they claimed Russia was influencing the election, but Google, Twitter, and Fakebook put Russia to shame.
Because that’s exactly the third world corruption I’d expect from this administration.
What grounds makes this actionable in court?
Not unless they have a contract with Google to list them in their search.There is a dollar amount evolved. The site can prove damages.Which has nothing to do with section 230. Section 230 says a website can not be held accountable for material posted on their website by other users. That’s not the issue here. The issue is whether Google has a right to refuse to let The Federalist participate in their advertiser program.It has everything to do with it. Google is trying to attack web sites they don't agree with politically. They think they can get away with shutting down the revenue source of their political enemies. Sort of the way Obama used the IRS to harass conservative fundraising. It all amounts to a thugocracy run by leftists in social media. It's harassment and actionable in court.The topic your brought up really doesn’t have much to do with the topic of the thread, which is about Google Adsense.They received immunity from lawsuits as long as they agreed not to edit material or practice censorship. That would reclassify them as publishers like the New York Times. Since they have practiced censorship and edited their content according to their political ideology, they aren't a public domain anymore. They are publishers which opens them up to lawsuits.Huh, that's what we said about commie Kaepernick but people think his RIGHTS were infringed. Even though he was never put into any gulag I am aware of.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Ahhhh, but a negro multi millionaire cultural marxist should be able to express his commie views. You know, just as anyone is allowed to the N WORRRRD at work, right?
On top of being ignorant about everything, you are hypocritical about everything, but hollywood agrees with you. So, that is all that matters.
Idiots.what are you going to do? Arrest them for not being supportive enough of Teump?Google lied to Congress and said that their search engine isn't conducting censorship....which helps the left mislead people that use their service.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Is this America or is it Cuba?
Apparently they want another Cuba.
To think they claimed Russia was influencing the election, but Google, Twitter, and Fakebook put Russia to shame.
Because that’s exactly the third world corruption I’d expect from this administration.
What grounds makes this actionable in court?
Liberals don't believe in censorship.Well you misread Orwell then. His concern was liberalism being coopted by communism. What you're bitching about is a supposedly liberal censorship of conservatism. That's not what's happening, but that was Eagle's OP.Orwell was trying to warn us about Trump.
He was warning us about both of you
"1984" warning was against totalitarianism, and political repression. "Animal Farm" was Orwell's warning against communism - All the animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.
I've read the books. Describes you to a tee.
It "could" happen. But what twitter did was to tell the Federalist to remove Federalist content urging people to get infected, and infect others with Corvid. It's not clear what google did, but it appears they told Federalist to remove racist comments to a Federalist posting. And the zero hedge was the same thing, although zero hedge may have created the racist posting themselves … they have track record for that.
This isn’t censorship.Liberals don't believe in censorship.Well you misread Orwell then. His concern was liberalism being coopted by communism. What you're bitching about is a supposedly liberal censorship of conservatism. That's not what's happening, but that was Eagle's OP.Orwell was trying to warn us about Trump.
He was warning us about both of you
"1984" warning was against totalitarianism, and political repression. "Animal Farm" was Orwell's warning against communism - All the animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.
I've read the books. Describes you to a tee.
It "could" happen. But what twitter did was to tell the Federalist to remove Federalist content urging people to get infected, and infect others with Corvid. It's not clear what google did, but it appears they told Federalist to remove racist comments to a Federalist posting. And the zero hedge was the same thing, although zero hedge may have created the racist posting themselves … they have track record for that.
Communists and fascists do.
The problem here is the left isn't liberal anymore. They call themselves progressives which is another word for communists. Social Democrats are also communists.
Yur fulla shit, fella.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.Nope. NBC is not stopping anyone from engaging in speech.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
Yes there is. Non Prog sites are lit up constantly on the internet and other ways of social media. The fact is there are many more Prog sites. By a great multitude. Progs have endless amounts of resources from globalists on down.No one is attacking their free speech.
Google doesn't have the right to dictate content to The Federalist. So your example is moot. Showing up to work drunk is one thing. Publishing free expression is something else.So? If your boss fires you for being drunk on the job, you can prove financial damages too.There is a dollar amount evolved. The site can prove damages.Which has nothing to do with section 230. Section 230 says a website can not be held accountable for material posted on their website by other users. That’s not the issue here. The issue is whether Google has a right to refuse to let The Federalist participate in their advertiser program.It has everything to do with it. Google is trying to attack web sites they don't agree with politically. They think they can get away with shutting down the revenue source of their political enemies. Sort of the way Obama used the IRS to harass conservative fundraising. It all amounts to a thugocracy run by leftists in social media. It's harassment and actionable in court.The topic your brought up really doesn’t have much to do with the topic of the thread, which is about Google Adsense.They received immunity from lawsuits as long as they agreed not to edit material or practice censorship. That would reclassify them as publishers like the New York Times. Since they have practiced censorship and edited their content according to their political ideology, they aren't a public domain anymore. They are publishers which opens them up to lawsuits.Huh, that's what we said about commie Kaepernick but people think his RIGHTS were infringed. Even though he was never put into any gulag I am aware of.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Ahhhh, but a negro multi millionaire cultural marxist should be able to express his commie views. You know, just as anyone is allowed to the N WORRRRD at work, right?
On top of being ignorant about everything, you are hypocritical about everything, but hollywood agrees with you. So, that is all that matters.
Idiots.what are you going to do? Arrest them for not being supportive enough of Teump?Google lied to Congress and said that their search engine isn't conducting censorship....which helps the left mislead people that use their service.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Is this America or is it Cuba?
Apparently they want another Cuba.
To think they claimed Russia was influencing the election, but Google, Twitter, and Fakebook put Russia to shame.
Because that’s exactly the third world corruption I’d expect from this administration.
What grounds makes this actionable in court?
That doesn’t make them liable for those damages.
Tell me, now did NBC stop them from engaging in speech.Yur fulla shit, fella.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.Nope. NBC is not stopping anyone from engaging in speech.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
Google isn’t dictating content. They have the right to chose not to work with some people.Google doesn't have the right to dictate content to The Federalist. So your example is moot. Showing up to work drunk is one thing. Publishing free expression is something else.So? If your boss fires you for being drunk on the job, you can prove financial damages too.There is a dollar amount evolved. The site can prove damages.Which has nothing to do with section 230. Section 230 says a website can not be held accountable for material posted on their website by other users. That’s not the issue here. The issue is whether Google has a right to refuse to let The Federalist participate in their advertiser program.It has everything to do with it. Google is trying to attack web sites they don't agree with politically. They think they can get away with shutting down the revenue source of their political enemies. Sort of the way Obama used the IRS to harass conservative fundraising. It all amounts to a thugocracy run by leftists in social media. It's harassment and actionable in court.The topic your brought up really doesn’t have much to do with the topic of the thread, which is about Google Adsense.They received immunity from lawsuits as long as they agreed not to edit material or practice censorship. That would reclassify them as publishers like the New York Times. Since they have practiced censorship and edited their content according to their political ideology, they aren't a public domain anymore. They are publishers which opens them up to lawsuits.Huh, that's what we said about commie Kaepernick but people think his RIGHTS were infringed. Even though he was never put into any gulag I am aware of.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Ahhhh, but a negro multi millionaire cultural marxist should be able to express his commie views. You know, just as anyone is allowed to the N WORRRRD at work, right?
On top of being ignorant about everything, you are hypocritical about everything, but hollywood agrees with you. So, that is all that matters.
Idiots.what are you going to do? Arrest them for not being supportive enough of Teump?Google lied to Congress and said that their search engine isn't conducting censorship....which helps the left mislead people that use their service.That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.Google isn’t stopping any speech.No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.NBC seems to be.No one is attacking their free speech.
NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.
Is this America or is it Cuba?
Apparently they want another Cuba.
To think they claimed Russia was influencing the election, but Google, Twitter, and Fakebook put Russia to shame.
Because that’s exactly the third world corruption I’d expect from this administration.
What grounds makes this actionable in court?
That doesn’t make them liable for those damages.
