Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We can fault the hypocrisy that is clearly manifested by both parties on some issues...and we can also fault the reading (or hearing) comprehension by poorly educated voters......But, let us review just how the now common phrase of "NO COLLUSION.....NO OBSTRUCTION" is interpreted based on partisanship....
First, lets look at how the stooge, Barr, interpreted (spun) Mueller's report on "No Collusion"....what Mueller actually stated is this:
“.....We did not have enough evidence to make a determination regarding conspiracy"
Objectively, the above may be a legal assessment....but certainly not one that "clears" Trump and his horde of corrupt acolytes from the moral impact.
Second, lets us also look at how Barr "interpreted" the report and openly stating that there was "No Obstruction"............What Mueller actually stated both in his report and in yesterday's short statement, is this (somewhat paraphrased):
"....If we had evidence to clear Trump, we would have stated such..........under our Constitution there is only one means to charge [a sitting president] …”
Now, no one....unless highly partisan...... should interpret the above as Mueller having left the decision up to the stooge, Barr, to make a final "exoneration"......Rather, Mueller is clearly stating that the arbiter on the obstruction issue IS Congress.
Interpreted ? not guilty lol that’s what mueller gave to Barr
Go back to bed.........This thread is for grown ups.
So what you are trying to say is Trump is guilty even though there is a lack of evidence to prove so. You don't need evidence to prove he's Not guilty.
So what you are trying to say is Trump is guilty even though there is a lack of evidence to prove so. You don't need evidence to prove he's Not guilty.
Gee, the same moronic excuses that you and your ilk hear on Fox.......
Look, I'll make it clear rather than rely on your screwed up "interpretations'
The ONLY reason that Trump is "not guilty" is because he is currently a sitting president...If you read the Mueller report (instead of relying on Barr's biased summary to feed your own biases)....then you would know that ANY ONE ELSE would have been indicted........Trump's campaign slogan is now......
"VOTE FOR ME IN 2020 SO THAT I CAN STAY OUT OF PRISON..."
respect having a President that speaks the truth!
He's not guilty because your asshole hero Mueller has no fucking evidence.So what you are trying to say is Trump is guilty even though there is a lack of evidence to prove so. You don't need evidence to prove he's Not guilty.
Gee, the same moronic excuses that you and your ilk hear on Fox.......
Look, I'll make it clear rather than rely on your screwed up "interpretations'
The ONLY reason that Trump is "not guilty" is because he is currently a sitting president...If you read the Mueller report (instead of relying on Barr's biased summary to feed your own biases)....then you would know that ANY ONE ELSE would have been indicted........Trump's campaign slogan is now......
"VOTE FOR ME IN 2020 SO THAT I CAN STAY OUT OF PRISON..."
