Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rachel Maddow shares details from a new poll that shows West Virginia voters of all political stripes are very supportive of the For The People Act to protect voting rights, which makes it all the more odd that Senator Joe Manchin, who represents West Virginia, does not.
What's wrong with Manchin? Even his own people strongly disagree with him on the For The People Act to protect voting rights. So, what is his excuse now?
My mother in law lives in West Virginia, and knows that the people there, dont want Manchin to vote for the Peoples Act. Rachel Madcow is full of shit and probably did local 10 democrat voters for her poll....
WV folk are a bit slow.
If you ask them
Do you support (enter feel good name of proposal here)?
They answer
Duh, uh, yeah, sounds good
But come Election Day, someone with an IQ over 10 will have filled in the details....
Wv is actually going decisively anti dem
That may be - but they sure as hell understand "voting rights"!
What you define as "voting rights" is really a license for democrats to cheat with massive fraud.
The bill has no provisions for the Federal government to take over elections, maybe you can correct me. However, it does make election day a federal holiday, maybe that is why you are confused.You are lying. When the Federal government runs elections they will be more corrupt and partisan than ever.Who told you that? Specifically, what provisions within the bill would result in one party rule? There is one big problem with the bill for Republicans, and now Manchin. That problem has arisen in numerous bills as the Democrats continually attempt to insert it in legislation. Trump vetoed the Defense Bill because of it. It has nothing to do with voting rights.Basically everything. I do not want one party rule and that is what this bill really is about.Just curious, what provisions of the bill do you find troublesome? I mean I understand perfectly whyy Republicans, and Manchin, oppose the bill. But what problems do you see with it?I'll ask you the same thing I did in the other thread right after I say this FAKE NEWS.
What was the methodology and what questions were asked? A lot of people know nothing more about the bill but the name, if that. Fake poll, too.
Hey asshole...I guess the Kremlin didn't explain how the American government works. A slim Senate Majority ain't gonna get an ImpeachmentManchin switches parties, the GOP retakes the senate, and immediately removes Harris and Biden. I like it!
Rachel Maddow shares details from a new poll that shows West Virginia voters of all political stripes are very supportive of the For The People Act to protect voting rights, which makes it all the more odd that Senator Joe Manchin, who represents West Virginia, does not.
What's wrong with Manchin? Even his own people strongly disagree with him on the For The People Act to protect voting rights. So, what is his excuse now?
Says the low I.Q. Trump supporter. Heard that on Tucker's show, right?Basically everything. I do not want one party rule and that is what this bill really is about.Just curious, what provisions of the bill do you find troublesome? I mean I understand perfectly whyy Republicans, and Manchin, oppose the bill. But what problems do you see with it?I'll ask you the same thing I did in the other thread right after I say this FAKE NEWS.
What was the methodology and what questions were asked? A lot of people know nothing more about the bill but the name, if that. Fake poll, too.
A. The Bill does not mandate one party rule. If the voters WANT one party in power it allows THEM to make that decisionBasically everything. I do not want one party rule and that is what this bill really is about.
Rachel Maddow shares details from a new poll that shows West Virginia voters of all political stripes are very supportive of the For The People Act to protect voting rights, which makes it all the more odd that Senator Joe Manchin, who represents West Virginia, does not.
What's wrong with Manchin? Even his own people strongly disagree with him on the For The People Act to protect voting rights. So, what is his excuse now?
Manchin switches parties, the GOP retakes the senate, and immediately removes Harris and Biden. I like it!
WV folk are a bit slow.
If you ask them
Do you support (enter feel good name of proposal here)?
They answer
Duh, uh, yeah, sounds good
But come Election Day, someone with an IQ over 10 will have filled in the details....
Wv is actually going decisively anti dem
That may be - but they sure as hell understand "voting rights"!
What you define as "voting rights" is really a license for democrats to cheat with massive fraud.
How did Democrats cheat in the 2020 elections? Proof?
Only a moron would believe that Republican states, Republican election officials, Republican courts and judges (including SCOTUS) all conspired with Democrats to rig the election for Biden. Just think about that.
Rachel Maddow shares details from a new poll that shows West Virginia voters of all political stripes are very supportive of the For The People Act to protect voting rights, which makes it all the more odd that Senator Joe Manchin, who represents West Virginia, does not.
What's wrong with Manchin? Even his own people strongly disagree with him on the For The People Act to protect voting rights. So, what is his excuse now?
I wonder how much Moscow Mitch McConnell is paying him to torpedo Democratic legislation?
Bullshit.The bill has no provisions for the Federal government to take over elections, maybe you can correct me. However, it does make election day a federal holiday, maybe that is why you are confused.You are lying. When the Federal government runs elections they will be more corrupt and partisan than ever.Who told you that? Specifically, what provisions within the bill would result in one party rule? There is one big problem with the bill for Republicans, and now Manchin. That problem has arisen in numerous bills as the Democrats continually attempt to insert it in legislation. Trump vetoed the Defense Bill because of it. It has nothing to do with voting rights.Basically everything. I do not want one party rule and that is what this bill really is about.Just curious, what provisions of the bill do you find troublesome? I mean I understand perfectly whyy Republicans, and Manchin, oppose the bill. But what problems do you see with it?I'll ask you the same thing I did in the other thread right after I say this FAKE NEWS.
What was the methodology and what questions were asked? A lot of people know nothing more about the bill but the name, if that. Fake poll, too.
There is the usual dem cheating - dead people voting (always dem), people crossing state lines and voting in multiple states, throwing out military ballots ... All happened, but it was not enough.
It would be a Hell of lot better than what you losers want. But , no. The parties are necessary but we should elect Americans who care about the people, not lying opportunists willing to lie like there is no tomorrow.A. The Bill does not mandate one party rule. If the voters WANT one party in power it allows THEM to make that decisionBasically everything. I do not want one party rule and that is what this bill really is about.
B. You DO want one party rule. The TRUMP Party
So, you can't tell me what specific provisions of the bill you have a problem with. You can't explain how it will result in one party rule. Basically, you probably can't tell me a single provision within the bill. You are opposed because your "Massuhs" tell you to be opposed. They are opposed because, yet again, Democrats have inserted a provision to force Political Action Committees to publicly acknowledge the source of their funds. In a very real sense, that is precisely what you are fighting for, their right to keep their funding from public knowledge.Bullshit.The bill has no provisions for the Federal government to take over elections, maybe you can correct me. However, it does make election day a federal holiday, maybe that is why you are confused.You are lying. When the Federal government runs elections they will be more corrupt and partisan than ever.Who told you that? Specifically, what provisions within the bill would result in one party rule? There is one big problem with the bill for Republicans, and now Manchin. That problem has arisen in numerous bills as the Democrats continually attempt to insert it in legislation. Trump vetoed the Defense Bill because of it. It has nothing to do with voting rights.Basically everything. I do not want one party rule and that is what this bill really is about.Just curious, what provisions of the bill do you find troublesome? I mean I understand perfectly whyy Republicans, and Manchin, oppose the bill. But what problems do you see with it?I'll ask you the same thing I did in the other thread right after I say this FAKE NEWS.
What was the methodology and what questions were asked? A lot of people know nothing more about the bill but the name, if that. Fake poll, too.
You just admitted that you want YOUR Trump Party to be the sole power.It would be a Hell of lot better than what you losers want. But , no. The parties are necessary but we should elect Americans who care about the people, not lying opportunists willing to lie like there is no tomorrow.A. The Bill does not mandate one party rule. If the voters WANT one party in power it allows THEM to make that decisionBasically everything. I do not want one party rule and that is what this bill really is about.
B. You DO want one party rule. The TRUMP Party
Our Congress is corrupt. The DOJ is corrupt. The FBI is corrupt. The CDC is corrupt. And the present administation is is corrupt and illegitimate.
More bullshit. There is only one thing to know about a power grab, and that is that it is a power grab. Period.So, you can't tell me what specific provisions of the bill you have a problem with. You can't explain how it will result in one party rule. Basically, you probably can't tell me a single provision within the bill. You are opposed because your "Massuhs" tell you to be opposed. They are opposed because, yet again, Democrats have inserted a provision to force Political Action Committees to publicly acknowledge the source of their funds. In a very real sense, that is precisely what you are fighting for, their right to keep their funding from public knowledge.Bullshit.The bill has no provisions for the Federal government to take over elections, maybe you can correct me. However, it does make election day a federal holiday, maybe that is why you are confused.You are lying. When the Federal government runs elections they will be more corrupt and partisan than ever.Who told you that? Specifically, what provisions within the bill would result in one party rule? There is one big problem with the bill for Republicans, and now Manchin. That problem has arisen in numerous bills as the Democrats continually attempt to insert it in legislation. Trump vetoed the Defense Bill because of it. It has nothing to do with voting rights.Basically everything. I do not want one party rule and that is what this bill really is about.Just curious, what provisions of the bill do you find troublesome? I mean I understand perfectly whyy Republicans, and Manchin, oppose the bill. But what problems do you see with it?I'll ask you the same thing I did in the other thread right after I say this FAKE NEWS.
What was the methodology and what questions were asked? A lot of people know nothing more about the bill but the name, if that. Fake poll, too.
So I got to ask. How is that helpful for a functioning Republic? And to be honest, if it is not helpful for a functioning Republic, why is it so important to Republicans, and why is Manchin now all in against it as well? The truth is, Manchin does not want his constituents to know what he is fighting for. He believes they are all like you, too disengaged to actually examine the legislation, too lazy to actually attempt to think for yourself, and perhaps too stupid to understand the legislation even if you attempted to look over it. In short, he has no respect for you or his constituents.