WH responds to Cheney

Cheney should go to prison for ordering torture

Cheney was right on target. The three master terrorists were uncooperative. When asked about further terrorist attacks, they answered "soon, you will know." They were made uncomfortable and terrorist attacks were thwarted that saved thousands of american civilian lives.

CNSNews.com - CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style Attack on Los Angeles



CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style Attack on Los Angeles
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief



Khalid Sheik Mohammad, a top al Qaeda leader who divulged information -- after being waterboarded -- that allowed the U.S. government to stop a planned terrorist attack on Los Angeles. (CNSNews.com) - The Central Intelligence Agency told CNSNews.com today that it stands by the assertion made in a May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo that the use of “enhanced techniques” of interrogation on al Qaeda leader Khalid Sheik Mohammed (KSM) -- including the use of waterboarding -- caused KSM to reveal information that allowed the U.S. government to thwart a planned attack on Los Angeles.
Before he was waterboarded, when KSM was asked about planned attacks on the United States, he ominously told his CIA interrogators, “Soon, you will know.”

According to the previously classified May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo that was released by President Barack Obama last week, the thwarted attack -- which KSM called the “Second Wave”-- planned “ ‘to use East Asian operatives to crash a hijacked airliner into’ a building in Los Angeles.”


KSM was the mastermind of the first “hijacked-airliner” attacks on the United States, which struck the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Northern Virginia on Sept. 11, 2001.

After KSM was captured by the United States, he was not initially cooperative with CIA interrogators. Nor was another top al Qaeda leader named Zubaydah. KSM, Zubaydah, and a third terrorist named Nashiri were the only three persons ever subjected to waterboarding by the CIA. (Additional terrorist detainees were subjected to other “enhanced techniques” that included slapping, sleep deprivation, dietary limitations, and temporary confinement to small spaces -- but not to water-boarding.)

This was because the CIA imposed very tight restrictions on the use of waterboarding. “The ‘waterboard,’ which is the most intense of the CIA interrogation techniques, is subject to additional limits,” explained the May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo. “It may be used on a High Value Detainee only if the CIA has ‘credible intelligence that a terrorist attack is imminent’; ‘substantial and credible indicators that the subject has actionable intelligence that can prevent, disrupt or deny this attack’; and ‘[o]ther interrogation methods have failed to elicit this information within the perceived time limit for preventing the attack.’”

The quotations in this part of the Justice memo were taken from an Aug. 2, 2004 letter that CIA Acting General Counsel John A. Rizzo sent to the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel.

Before they were subjected to “enhanced techniques” of interrogation that included waterboarding, KSM and Zubaydah were not only uncooperative but also appeared contemptuous of the will of the American people to defend themselves.

“In particular, the CIA believes that it would have been unable to obtain critical information from numerous detainees, including KSM and Abu Zubaydah, without these enhanced techniques,” says the Justice Department memo. “Both KSM and Zubaydah had ‘expressed their belief that the general US population was ‘weak,’ lacked resilience, and would be unable to ‘do what was necessary’ to prevent the terrorists from succeeding in their goals.’ Indeed, before the CIA used enhanced techniques in its interrogation of KSM, KSM resisted giving any answers to questions about future attacks, simply noting, ‘Soon you will know.’”

After he was subjected to the “waterboard” technique, KSM became cooperative, providing intelligence that led to the capture of key al Qaeda allies and, eventually, the closing down of an East Asian terrorist cell that had been tasked with carrying out the 9/11-style attack on Los Angeles

CNS???? I live in L.A. and I never heard this story. Don't you tea baggers ever quote any reals news sources??? What about the L.A. Times or ABC or CNN??? Nope. It always has to be Fox or some other whacked out conservative news source.

L.A. Times or ABC or CNN. you wear colored glass's - thought so. living in LA is a contradiction in terms. everybody is packin up and leaving. do the gangs there get taxpayer $$$$ no wonder your belly up. best hurry up and get your bail out. or do you want Osama/Pelosi to own cal ????
 
CNS???? I live in L.A. and I never heard this story. Don't you tea baggers ever quote any reals news sources??? What about the L.A. Times or ABC or CNN??? Nope. It always has to be Fox or some other whacked out conservative news source.

The better question is "why do the other "news" outlets buy into the Obama propaganda, like renaming the WOT, and terrorists"? What will they do when the dems lose in 2010 and 2012? At the rate they are losing ratings they may not even be around that long. So why criticize the most popular news outlet? During the Gulf War, guess which station was preferred by the troops? Liberalism isn't taking, but keep drinking that cool-aid.


Wtf? The MSM is pro government no matter who is in office and it did a spectacular job of supporting the bush admin's bullshit. CNS is a news source like Michael Vick is an international Animal Welfare spokesperson.
 
The MSM is pro government no matter who is in office and it did a spectacular job of supporting the bush admin's bullshit. CNS is a news source like Michael Vick is an international Animal Welfare spokesperson.

Case in point: The supposedly-liberal NYT acting as stenographer for Cheney regarding the WMD issue in the run-up to the Iraq invasion.
 
CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - White House forcefully responds to Cheney « - Blogs from CNN.com

"There are numerous…public statements that explicitly state we are at war," writes Pfeifer. "The difference is this: President Obama doesn't need to beat his chest to prove it, and – unlike the last Administration – we are not at war with a tactic ("terrorism"), we at war with something that is tangible: al Qaeda and its violent extremist allies. And we will prosecute that war as long as the American people are endangered."

Can this guy just go away? I heard there was going to be a remake of the Addams Family. Maybe Uncle Fester can get a part in the movie? That would keep him busy for a while!

That's just pathetic. Looks like Obama needs to get a new mouthpiece, 'cause if that's the best rebuttal they can come up with, it's a pretty sorry state of affairs.

To begin with, and as has already been pointed out, trying to split hairs between the "tactic" of terrorism and the TERRORISTS which employ it, is just a transparent exercise in attempted misdirection. It's raw comedy, put forth because these idiots don't have anything better to say. Why not just send Mr. Mouthpiece to the podium with a rousing "Nuh-uh!"? :lol:
Same difference in consideration of just how short the response falls.

And it doesn't even begin to make sense. Particularly when one considers that the "Underwear Bomber" was directed by... wait for it.... al Qaeda. :rolleyes:
Which means, that this is the very terrorist (and his "tactic") that we're supposed to be at war with, according to Mr. Mouthpiece.

Charles Krauthammer has a few interesting thoughts today on this whole thing, and I recommend the entire article, but the following quote in particular cuts to the heart of the idiocy in Obama's stance.

Exerpt:
This is all quite mad even in Obama’s terms. He sends 30,000 troops to fight terror overseas, yet if any terrorists come to attack us here, they are magically transformed from enemy into defendant.

The logic is perverse. If we find Abdulmutallab in an al-Qaeda training camp in Yemen, where he is merely preparing for a terror attack, we snuff him out with a Predator — no judge, no jury, no qualms. But if we catch him in the United States in the very act of mass murder, he instantly acquires protection not just from execution by drone but even from interrogation.


(more...)

War? What War? by Charles Krauthammer on National Review Online


Krauthammer is exactly right. If this guy had threatened us anywhere outside our own borders he'd have met with a military response due to his act of war against us. But HERE, al Queda operatives are "magically transformed from enemy into defendant" by some mysterious application of liberal logic, and the action is no longer considered an "act of war", but rather.. a simple crime.

If the "Underwear Bomber" had arrived here in his OWN enemy aircraft, rather than trying to weaponize one of ours, an invasion force of one... what then? Do we "arrest" him, endow him with Constitutional Rights, and then try him in civilian court? :eusa_eh:

Obama's position is ridiculous. Farcical even. It's deserving of criticism because it doesn't make sense. No coherent defense of it is possible, so we end up with idiot exercises in misdirection like the one we see above. But no one with the God-given sense of a jack rabbit is even mildly fooled by it.
 
Last edited:
Anyone who uses "supposedly-liberal NYT" (emphasis on "supposedly") when describing the NYT is not living in reality...

No, those are the people who think just about every media source except Fox and a few conservative rags are liberally-biased news sources. The rest of us understand that most of the MSM is biased towards their bottom line, which doesn't really discriminate against one ideology or the other. And like I said earlier, the Times let Judith Miller pretty much act as stenographer for Cheney and co.
 
Cheney was right on target. The three master terrorists were uncooperative. When asked about further terrorist attacks, they answered "soon, you will know." They were made uncomfortable and terrorist attacks were thwarted that saved thousands of american civilian lives.

CNSNews.com - CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style Attack on Los Angeles



CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style Attack on Los Angeles
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief



Khalid Sheik Mohammad, a top al Qaeda leader who divulged information -- after being waterboarded -- that allowed the U.S. government to stop a planned terrorist attack on Los Angeles. (CNSNews.com) - The Central Intelligence Agency told CNSNews.com today that it stands by the assertion made in a May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo that the use of “enhanced techniques” of interrogation on al Qaeda leader Khalid Sheik Mohammed (KSM) -- including the use of waterboarding -- caused KSM to reveal information that allowed the U.S. government to thwart a planned attack on Los Angeles.
Before he was waterboarded, when KSM was asked about planned attacks on the United States, he ominously told his CIA interrogators, “Soon, you will know.”

According to the previously classified May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo that was released by President Barack Obama last week, the thwarted attack -- which KSM called the “Second Wave”-- planned “ ‘to use East Asian operatives to crash a hijacked airliner into’ a building in Los Angeles.”


KSM was the mastermind of the first “hijacked-airliner” attacks on the United States, which struck the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Northern Virginia on Sept. 11, 2001.

After KSM was captured by the United States, he was not initially cooperative with CIA interrogators. Nor was another top al Qaeda leader named Zubaydah. KSM, Zubaydah, and a third terrorist named Nashiri were the only three persons ever subjected to waterboarding by the CIA. (Additional terrorist detainees were subjected to other “enhanced techniques” that included slapping, sleep deprivation, dietary limitations, and temporary confinement to small spaces -- but not to water-boarding.)

This was because the CIA imposed very tight restrictions on the use of waterboarding. “The ‘waterboard,’ which is the most intense of the CIA interrogation techniques, is subject to additional limits,” explained the May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo. “It may be used on a High Value Detainee only if the CIA has ‘credible intelligence that a terrorist attack is imminent’; ‘substantial and credible indicators that the subject has actionable intelligence that can prevent, disrupt or deny this attack’; and ‘[o]ther interrogation methods have failed to elicit this information within the perceived time limit for preventing the attack.’”

The quotations in this part of the Justice memo were taken from an Aug. 2, 2004 letter that CIA Acting General Counsel John A. Rizzo sent to the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel.

Before they were subjected to “enhanced techniques” of interrogation that included waterboarding, KSM and Zubaydah were not only uncooperative but also appeared contemptuous of the will of the American people to defend themselves.

“In particular, the CIA believes that it would have been unable to obtain critical information from numerous detainees, including KSM and Abu Zubaydah, without these enhanced techniques,” says the Justice Department memo. “Both KSM and Zubaydah had ‘expressed their belief that the general US population was ‘weak,’ lacked resilience, and would be unable to ‘do what was necessary’ to prevent the terrorists from succeeding in their goals.’ Indeed, before the CIA used enhanced techniques in its interrogation of KSM, KSM resisted giving any answers to questions about future attacks, simply noting, ‘Soon you will know.’”

After he was subjected to the “waterboard” technique, KSM became cooperative, providing intelligence that led to the capture of key al Qaeda allies and, eventually, the closing down of an East Asian terrorist cell that had been tasked with carrying out the 9/11-style attack on Los Angeles

CNS???? I live in L.A. and I never heard this story. Don't you tea baggers ever quote any reals news sources??? What about the L.A. Times or ABC or CNN??? Nope. It always has to be Fox or some other whacked out conservative news source.

L.A. Times or ABC or CNN. you wear colored glass's - thought so. living in LA is a contradiction in terms. everybody is packin up and leaving. do the gangs there get taxpayer $$$$ no wonder your belly up. best hurry up and get your bail out. or do you want Osama/Pelosi to own cal ????

I don't have rose colored glasses. I was born and raised here and worked here for all of my adult life. My finances are good and I know nothing about gang members because I've never met any. And if we are going belly up, remember that we have a Republican governor.

In any case, all of that has nothing to do with you and the other bag heads watching only news that you like. As usual, you completely changed the subject. You need to ask yourself who is really wearing those rose colored glasses.
 
Anyone who uses "supposedly-liberal NYT" (emphasis on "supposedly") when describing the NYT is not living in reality...

No, those are the people who think just about every media source except Fox and a few conservative rags are liberally-biased news sources. The rest of us understand that most of the MSM is biased towards their bottom line, which doesn't really discriminate against one ideology or the other. And like I said earlier, the Times let Judith Miller pretty much act as stenographer for Cheney and co.

If you believe that the majority of articles written for the NYSlimes do not carry a left-leaning bias, then you really can't be taken seriously when discussing any of the other MSM sources...
 
CNS???? I live in L.A. and I never heard this story. Don't you tea baggers ever quote any reals news sources??? What about the L.A. Times or ABC or CNN??? Nope. It always has to be Fox or some other whacked out conservative news source.

The better question is "why do the other "news" outlets buy into the Obama propaganda, like renaming the WOT, and terrorists"? What will they do when the dems lose in 2010 and 2012? At the rate they are losing ratings they may not even be around that long. So why criticize the most popular news outlet? During the Gulf War, guess which station was preferred by the troops? Liberalism isn't taking, but keep drinking that cool-aid.


Wtf? The MSM is pro government no matter who is in office and it did a spectacular job of supporting the bush admin's bullshit. CNS is a news source like Michael Vick is an international Animal Welfare spokesperson.



CNSNews.com endeavors to fairly present all legitimate sides of a story and debunk popular, albeit incorrect, myths about cultural and policy issues.

CNSNews.com has a full staff of credentialed journalists at its world headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia, staffs full time news bureaus on in Jerusalem and the Pacific Rim, and works with credentialed correspondents in London, Paris, Moscow and Nairobi. In addition to news, CNSNews.com is proud to present a full slate of commentaries by some of the brightest minds and sharpest wits in the nation, and a full stable of cartoonists to provides you with a morning political chuckle.

CNSNews.com is a division of the Media Research Center, a not-for-profit 501 (c)(3) organization. Like National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System, CNSNews.com is able to provide its services and information to the public at no cost, thanks to the generous support of our thousands of donors and their tax-deductible contributions. However, unlike NPR or PBS, CNSNews.com does not accept any federal tax money for its operations.


And the problem is?
 
Cheney should go to prison for ordering torture

Cheney was right on target. The three master terrorists were uncooperative. When asked about further terrorist attacks, they answered "soon, you will know." They were made uncomfortable and terrorist attacks were thwarted that saved thousands of american civilian lives.

CNSNews.com - CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style Attack on Los Angeles



CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style Attack on Los Angeles
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief



Khalid Sheik Mohammad, a top al Qaeda leader who divulged information -- after being waterboarded -- that allowed the U.S. government to stop a planned terrorist attack on Los Angeles. (CNSNews.com) - The Central Intelligence Agency told CNSNews.com today that it stands by the assertion made in a May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo that the use of “enhanced techniques” of interrogation on al Qaeda leader Khalid Sheik Mohammed (KSM) -- including the use of waterboarding -- caused KSM to reveal information that allowed the U.S. government to thwart a planned attack on Los Angeles.
Before he was waterboarded, when KSM was asked about planned attacks on the United States, he ominously told his CIA interrogators, “Soon, you will know.”

According to the previously classified May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo that was released by President Barack Obama last week, the thwarted attack -- which KSM called the “Second Wave”-- planned “ ‘to use East Asian operatives to crash a hijacked airliner into’ a building in Los Angeles.”


KSM was the mastermind of the first “hijacked-airliner” attacks on the United States, which struck the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Northern Virginia on Sept. 11, 2001.

After KSM was captured by the United States, he was not initially cooperative with CIA interrogators. Nor was another top al Qaeda leader named Zubaydah. KSM, Zubaydah, and a third terrorist named Nashiri were the only three persons ever subjected to waterboarding by the CIA. (Additional terrorist detainees were subjected to other “enhanced techniques” that included slapping, sleep deprivation, dietary limitations, and temporary confinement to small spaces -- but not to water-boarding.)

This was because the CIA imposed very tight restrictions on the use of waterboarding. “The ‘waterboard,’ which is the most intense of the CIA interrogation techniques, is subject to additional limits,” explained the May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo. “It may be used on a High Value Detainee only if the CIA has ‘credible intelligence that a terrorist attack is imminent’; ‘substantial and credible indicators that the subject has actionable intelligence that can prevent, disrupt or deny this attack’; and ‘[o]ther interrogation methods have failed to elicit this information within the perceived time limit for preventing the attack.’”

The quotations in this part of the Justice memo were taken from an Aug. 2, 2004 letter that CIA Acting General Counsel John A. Rizzo sent to the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel.

Before they were subjected to “enhanced techniques” of interrogation that included waterboarding, KSM and Zubaydah were not only uncooperative but also appeared contemptuous of the will of the American people to defend themselves.

“In particular, the CIA believes that it would have been unable to obtain critical information from numerous detainees, including KSM and Abu Zubaydah, without these enhanced techniques,” says the Justice Department memo. “Both KSM and Zubaydah had ‘expressed their belief that the general US population was ‘weak,’ lacked resilience, and would be unable to ‘do what was necessary’ to prevent the terrorists from succeeding in their goals.’ Indeed, before the CIA used enhanced techniques in its interrogation of KSM, KSM resisted giving any answers to questions about future attacks, simply noting, ‘Soon you will know.’”

After he was subjected to the “waterboard” technique, KSM became cooperative, providing intelligence that led to the capture of key al Qaeda allies and, eventually, the closing down of an East Asian terrorist cell that had been tasked with carrying out the 9/11-style attack on Los Angeles

CNS???? I live in L.A. and I never heard this story. Don't you tea baggers ever quote any reals news sources??? What about the L.A. Times or ABC or CNN??? Nope. It always has to be Fox or some other whacked out conservative news source.

I am not quoting CNS, I am quoting CIA documents, DOD documents, and the CIA Director.

You see media outlets should never be news sources. They are supposed to report what news sources say.

The problem is that CNN, the LA Times, and ABC, have a liberal agenda, so they are going to ignore reporting news that conflicts with their agenda.

Until I posted that the number two of Hussein's airforce, Saada, and the head of Israeli intelligence said that Hussein's WMD were transfered to Syria you probably never even knew these people existed. Why?? Because the liberal media news outlets refused to report what they said.

You should always look for internal documentation. Who in the news souce is actually saying what.
 
This is actually an interview from PBS's frontline.

PBS - frontline: gunning for saddam: interviews: sabah khodada

It's with "Sabah Khodada was a captain in the Iraqi army from 1982 to 1992. He worked at what he describes as a highly secret terrorist training camp at Salman Pak (see Khodada's hand-drawn map of the camp), an area south of Baghdad. In this translated interview, conducted in association with The New York Times on Oct. 14, 2001, Khodada describes what went on at Salman Pak, including details on training hijackers. He emigrated to the U.S. in May 2001."

What kind of training went on, and who was being trained?

Training is majorly on terrorism. They would be trained on assassinations, kidnapping, hijacking of airplanes, hijacking of buses, public buses, hijacking of trains and all other kinds of operations related to terrorism.



The people being trained were Iraqis in one group, and non-Iraqis, or foreign nationals, in another?

Non-Iraqis were trained separately from us. There were strict orders not to meet with them and not to talk to them. And even when they conduct their training, their training has to occur at times different from the times when we conduct the Iraqis our own training.




So you were training Iraqis, Saddam's fedayeen, members of the militia in Iraq. And someone else, other groups, were training the non-Iraqis?

They were special trainers or teachers from the Iraqi intelligence and al-Mukhabarat. And those same trainers or teachers will train the fedayeen, the Iraqi fedayeen, and also the same group of those teachers will train the non-Iraqis, foreigners who are in the camp. Personally, my profession is not this kind of training. My profession is to train people on infantry, typical infantry training, such as training on machine guns, pistols, hand grenades, rocket launchers on the shoulder and this kind of training. The special training that I'm talking about, such as the kidnapping and so, is conducted by those trainers who are not from the army; they are from ... al-Mukhabarat.And there was a person who is very famous. They call him Al-Shaba. [ph]. This is Arabic word means "The Ghost," who was responsible for all the training, and those trainers or the teachers.

...So did you find out what kind of training was going on?

I don't necessarily know what kind of training they do, but they were trained exactly at the same locations, and they were trained by the same teachers who were training ... [the fighters for] Saddam. Training includes hijacking and kidnapping of airplanes, trains, public buses, and planting explosives in cities, sabotaging villages, sabotaging houses, assassinations.

And the training also included how to prepare for suicidal operations. For example, they will train them how to belt themselves around with explosives, and jump in a place and explode themselves out as part of the suicidal training. I think the trainings of the Arabs was much harsher, and much stricter, than the training of the Iraqis.

Why?

Because we know that Arabs, non-Iraqis who come to train in these kind of camps, are going to be sent to very dangerous and important operations outside Iraq; not inside Iraq. And they will be conducting very specific operations and dangerous operations in their own cities, or in their own countries, or other countries all over the world. Those Arabs are real volunteers. They come in small numbers, and they come with the intention to do some real suicidal operations. ...

There are other types of training, such as physical training, which we are all familiar with. But there's another kind of special training, which is called "self-confidence training." ... For example, a bunch of the fedayeen will be taken in a helicopter. They will fly them away to an unknown area, and they will be asked to jump out of the plane without knowing if there is underneath them a desert or a house or there's water. But they're supposed to jump. So, they will jump.


...And they trained people to hijack airplanes?

Yes.


For what purpose?

... It has been said openly in the media and even to us, from the highest command, that the purpose of establishing Saddam's fighters is to attack American targets and American interests. This is known. There's no doubt about it.

All this training is directed towards attacking American targets, and American interests. The training does not only include hijacking of planes and sabotage. ... Some other people were trained to do parachuting. Some other areas were training on how to penetrate enemy lines and get information from behind enemy lines. But it's all for the general concept of hitting and attacking American targets and American interests.



Who controlled this operation?

In terms of training, they will train in this special camp. But after this training, they will go in small groups. These small groups are directly connected with Saddam, or to Saddam's son. For example, the Iraqi fighters, they will be spread all over the country. Occasionally those individual groups, very small groups, will be called for. They might encounter different kind of special training beyond this training on specific things. I'll give you an example.
They were calling for some of these groups to train intensively to learn English language, Persian language, Hebrew language, to be sent out to different places of the world to conduct such kind of ... different kind of operations. I suspect that the higher level of training, or the additional training they encounter, has a lot to do with what happened. And there's a lot of similarity with what happened with New York and Washington on September 11.


That was your reaction on September 11 -- that some of these people might be involved?


I assure you, this operation was conducted by people who were trained by Saddam. And I'm going to keep assuring the world this is what happened.

Osama bin Laden has no such capabilities. Why? Because this kind of attacks must be, and has to be, organized by a capable state, such as Iraq; a state where they can provide high level of training, and they can provide high level of intelligence to do such training.

How could Osama bin Laden -- who's hiding in the middle of nowhere in Afghanistan in small caves and valleys -- train people and gather information and send people to do such high-level operation? We all know this is a high-level operation. This cannot be done by a person who does not even own a plane in Afghanistan, who cannot offer such training in Afghanistan. This is definitely done by a mastermind like Saddam. ...


And the camp has a 707 that they train on?

Yes, there's a real whole 707 plane, a whole real plane, standing in the middle of the training area in this camp.


And they train people on how to get access to the cabin, to the crew?

Yes.


And how to take over the plane using weapons? How?

They will get trained on how to get weapons inside the plane. If there is a security weakness that they know of, they will prefer to get weapons. But I am sure that, before the attack of September 11, those people made a very thorough study. And they learned that getting weapons into the plane might not be a very good idea. But in this camp, I saw them getting trained on this kind of situations where security will not allow you to get weapons into the plane -- then what you need to do is to use all available methods and very advanced terrorizing method.

These methods are used to terrorize the passengers and the crew of the plane. They are even trained how to use utensils for food, like forks and knives provided in the plane. ... They are trained how to plant horror within the passengers by doing such actions. Even pens and pencils can be used for that purpose they were trained. They can do it, and they can overcome any plane because they are very well physically trained, and they are very strong, and they can do it. They can overtake a plane in a very efficient manner. ...


Recently, here in Washington, you met with the FBI.

Yes.
 
1982 to 1992? That's your evidence for invading eleven years later and we did not find anything? Were you born a moron or did you develop because you were home schooled then went to Patrick Henry or John Jay or Liberty? Good gosh.
 
Hello?? Unfortunately, Syria is not very cooperative in providing that information.
 
CNS???? I live in L.A. and I never heard this story. Don't you tea baggers ever quote any reals news sources??? What about the L.A. Times or ABC or CNN??? Nope. It always has to be Fox or some other whacked out conservative news source.

L.A. Times or ABC or CNN. you wear colored glass's - thought so. living in LA is a contradiction in terms. everybody is packin up and leaving. do the gangs there get taxpayer $$$$ no wonder your belly up. best hurry up and get your bail out. or do you want Osama/Pelosi to own cal ????

I don't have rose colored glasses. I was born and raised here and worked here for all of my adult life. My finances are good and I know nothing about gang members because I've never met any. And if we are going belly up, remember that we have a Republican governor.

In any case, all of that has nothing to do with you and the other bag heads watching only news that you like. As usual, you completely changed the subject. You need to ask yourself who is really wearing those rose colored glasses.

2 whores. Pelosi and Boxer
 
CNS???? I live in L.A. and I never heard this story. Don't you tea baggers ever quote any reals news sources??? What about the L.A. Times or ABC or CNN??? Nope. It always has to be Fox or some other whacked out conservative news source.

The better question is "why do the other "news" outlets buy into the Obama propaganda, like renaming the WOT, and terrorists"? What will they do when the dems lose in 2010 and 2012? At the rate they are losing ratings they may not even be around that long. So why criticize the most popular news outlet? During the Gulf War, guess which station was preferred by the troops? Liberalism isn't taking, but keep drinking that cool-aid.


Wtf? The MSM is pro government no matter who is in office and it did a spectacular job of supporting the bush admin's bullshit. CNS is a news source like Michael Vick is an international Animal Welfare spokesperson.

:lol: Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Cheney was right on target. The three master terrorists were uncooperative. When asked about further terrorist attacks, they answered "soon, you will know." They were made uncomfortable and terrorist attacks were thwarted that saved thousands of american civilian lives.

CNSNews.com - CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style Attack on Los Angeles



CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style Attack on Los Angeles
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief



Khalid Sheik Mohammad, a top al Qaeda leader who divulged information -- after being waterboarded -- that allowed the U.S. government to stop a planned terrorist attack on Los Angeles. (CNSNews.com) - The Central Intelligence Agency told CNSNews.com today that it stands by the assertion made in a May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo that the use of “enhanced techniques” of interrogation on al Qaeda leader Khalid Sheik Mohammed (KSM) -- including the use of waterboarding -- caused KSM to reveal information that allowed the U.S. government to thwart a planned attack on Los Angeles.
Before he was waterboarded, when KSM was asked about planned attacks on the United States, he ominously told his CIA interrogators, “Soon, you will know.”

According to the previously classified May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo that was released by President Barack Obama last week, the thwarted attack -- which KSM called the “Second Wave”-- planned “ ‘to use East Asian operatives to crash a hijacked airliner into’ a building in Los Angeles.”


KSM was the mastermind of the first “hijacked-airliner” attacks on the United States, which struck the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Northern Virginia on Sept. 11, 2001.

After KSM was captured by the United States, he was not initially cooperative with CIA interrogators. Nor was another top al Qaeda leader named Zubaydah. KSM, Zubaydah, and a third terrorist named Nashiri were the only three persons ever subjected to waterboarding by the CIA. (Additional terrorist detainees were subjected to other “enhanced techniques” that included slapping, sleep deprivation, dietary limitations, and temporary confinement to small spaces -- but not to water-boarding.)

This was because the CIA imposed very tight restrictions on the use of waterboarding. “The ‘waterboard,’ which is the most intense of the CIA interrogation techniques, is subject to additional limits,” explained the May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo. “It may be used on a High Value Detainee only if the CIA has ‘credible intelligence that a terrorist attack is imminent’; ‘substantial and credible indicators that the subject has actionable intelligence that can prevent, disrupt or deny this attack’; and ‘[o]ther interrogation methods have failed to elicit this information within the perceived time limit for preventing the attack.’”

The quotations in this part of the Justice memo were taken from an Aug. 2, 2004 letter that CIA Acting General Counsel John A. Rizzo sent to the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel.

Before they were subjected to “enhanced techniques” of interrogation that included waterboarding, KSM and Zubaydah were not only uncooperative but also appeared contemptuous of the will of the American people to defend themselves.

“In particular, the CIA believes that it would have been unable to obtain critical information from numerous detainees, including KSM and Abu Zubaydah, without these enhanced techniques,” says the Justice Department memo. “Both KSM and Zubaydah had ‘expressed their belief that the general US population was ‘weak,’ lacked resilience, and would be unable to ‘do what was necessary’ to prevent the terrorists from succeeding in their goals.’ Indeed, before the CIA used enhanced techniques in its interrogation of KSM, KSM resisted giving any answers to questions about future attacks, simply noting, ‘Soon you will know.’”

After he was subjected to the “waterboard” technique, KSM became cooperative, providing intelligence that led to the capture of key al Qaeda allies and, eventually, the closing down of an East Asian terrorist cell that had been tasked with carrying out the 9/11-style attack on Los Angeles

CNS???? I live in L.A. and I never heard this story. Don't you tea baggers ever quote any reals news sources??? What about the L.A. Times or ABC or CNN??? Nope. It always has to be Fox or some other whacked out conservative news source.

I am not quoting CNS, I am quoting CIA documents, DOD documents, and the CIA Director.

You see media outlets should never be news sources. They are supposed to report what news sources say.

The problem is that CNN, the LA Times, and ABC, have a liberal agenda, so they are going to ignore reporting news that conflicts with their agenda.

Until I posted that the number two of Hussein's airforce, Saada, and the head of Israeli intelligence said that Hussein's WMD were transfered to Syria you probably never even knew these people existed. Why?? Because the liberal media news outlets refused to report what they said.

You should always look for internal documentation. Who in the news souce is actually saying what.

Look at your original post!!! That's the post I was responding to!!! You posted CNS as your source. Oh, geez. Forget it. You seem so frantic and confused. But I'm not interested enough to even be curious.
 

Forum List

Back
Top