Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The problem with deporation is that each individual case must have a court hearing. That's taking years to accomplish, and we have (by some estimates) 20 million illegals here.
Trump is stopping such new cases from happening by stopping them in Mexico and denying them entry while waiting for their asylum hearing.
Speed it up. Let Donald run this like a corporation. We need more people to drive up the demand for old housing in this country and pad our GDP.
Otherwise we're on our way to becoming Russia, the super power with the lower GDP.
Our housing is fine. We don't need these people for housing no more than we need them to pick lettuce. We don't need them for anything; they need us.
We need them. St Louis is 500,000 people in a lifetime. If we are going to keep rezoning farmland and desert into subdivisions and younwant demand for housing, you need them just like the Poles, the Italians, the Chinese, Irish and who ever else we gave 10% of our land to in the 19th century.
Not to mention, China has us on GDP. Pretty soon if they don't poop themselves back to the dark ages they'll be spending more on their Space Force.
China is not doing well these days, and nobody has more money than the US. Reagan caused the collapse of the cold war using spending.
We don't need demand for housing. Roy Rogers once said "Invest in land. God ain't making anymore of it."
As for immigrants, a good idea when we had a population of 180 million people. Not such a great idea when you have over 330 million people.
What is the trend on GDP again?
china's yearly gdp increase - Google Search
What happwned to our deficit and economy as a whole last time we ran out of tricks like stupid low interest rates to pump the land value market? Remember, that got a black man with a funny name elected.
If you want to sit still at 330 million that"s fine. Just say youdon't want to be THE super power any longer. Ask England what being a perfectly fine smaller country feels like. I'm patriotic and think our way is worth fighting for. Don't tell anyone but I'd be open to let part of Mexico vote to join the U.S.
Speed it up. Let Donald run this like a corporation. We need more people to drive up the demand for old housing in this country and pad our GDP.
Otherwise we're on our way to becoming Russia, the super power with the lower GDP.
Our housing is fine. We don't need these people for housing no more than we need them to pick lettuce. We don't need them for anything; they need us.
We need them. St Louis is 500,000 people in a lifetime. If we are going to keep rezoning farmland and desert into subdivisions and younwant demand for housing, you need them just like the Poles, the Italians, the Chinese, Irish and who ever else we gave 10% of our land to in the 19th century.
Not to mention, China has us on GDP. Pretty soon if they don't poop themselves back to the dark ages they'll be spending more on their Space Force.
China is not doing well these days, and nobody has more money than the US. Reagan caused the collapse of the cold war using spending.
We don't need demand for housing. Roy Rogers once said "Invest in land. God ain't making anymore of it."
As for immigrants, a good idea when we had a population of 180 million people. Not such a great idea when you have over 330 million people.
Like you said, China isn't doing well. Trump's first round of tariffs hurt them but the upcoming next round is going to bust their balls, bigtime.
It's a game of chicken at this point. However because of our booming economy, we have a huge advantage over China.
We are the worlds largest consumer. How do successful businesses treat their largest consumers? I think this gamble will be well worth it in the end.
Migrants made up of mostly women and children – conservatives are cowards and easily frightened.Trump has troops heading to the border. The caravan of those seeking asylum are heading to the border.
Also heading to the border are armed militias duped into thinking we are being invaded by criminals, rapists , MS-13, and middle eastern people.
What could possiblty go wrong.
If you aren't concerned about some of the serious shit going on right to the South of your country, you're either uninformed or ignorant. I suggest that you take a little trip there and find out for yourself.
What are you concerned about sir?
Yup.You think it's still 2016?So you can't. I'm guessing because you were talking outta yer ass and have nothing to back it up.Then you should easily be able to provide me with a link.
Is your Goggle broken? Do your own homework, please.
Thanks for admitting it.
Dumbfuck. Are you computer illiterate or something? Here is a simple search using the date range from 2008 to 1016. 32,800 results.
http://www.bing.com/search?q=armed+militia+patrol+border+Mexico&filters=ex1:"ez5_14173_17105"&go=Search&qs=ds&qpvt=armed+militia+patrol+border+Mexico
Do you think the number of armed militias have dwindled since 2016?
Trump has troops heading to the border. The caravan of those seeking asylum are heading to the border.
Also heading to the border are armed militias duped into thinking we are being invaded by criminals, rapists , MS-13, and middle eastern people.
What could possiblty go wrong.
The better question is what could possibly go right?
Invaders have been using our kindness of asylum to get into the country even though unqualified. Ears allowed them entry while they awaited their court date; that's what's attracting them here. What Trump is doing is having our military stop them at the border, and setup tent cities outside of the border. So if you really want to file for asylum, fine. But you can't have access to this country until your hearing. Those cases take three to four years to be heard. So if they want to live in tents all that time, fine with us. But more than likely, most will just turn around and go home.
Furthermore it will be a deterrent from other bands of people thinking they can get through our borders using asylum.
A great plan all the way around.
I'm sure the court challenges have already been prepared and ready to file. The president should suspend all immigration form Mexico, Central and South America until the court backlog has been cleared. He has every authority to do so.
.
Yeah, but that's another battle. Look how the lower activist courts stopped him from his travel ban. It's just quicker to do it this way. Just get to the heart of the problem so we can finally put this controversial issue behind us.
Or we could import them into YOUR hometown and let them drag your schools down, overcrowd your hospitals, increase your property taxes and lower your property values. It's all warm fuzzy goodness until they become YOUR problem.Trump has troops heading to the border. The caravan of those seeking asylum are heading to the border.
Also heading to the border are armed militias duped into thinking we are being invaded by criminals, rapists , MS-13, and middle eastern people.
What could possiblty go wrong.
The better question is what could possibly go right?
Invaders have been using our kindness of asylum to get into the country even though unqualified. Ears allowed them entry while they awaited their court date; that's what's attracting them here. What Trump is doing is having our military stop them at the border, and setup tent cities outside of the border. So if you really want to file for asylum, fine. But you can't have access to this country until your hearing. Those cases take three to four years to be heard. So if they want to live in tents all that time, fine with us. But more than likely, most will just turn around and go home.
Furthermore it will be a deterrent from other bands of people thinking they can get through our borders using asylum.
A great plan all the way around.
What could go right? We could import people, make them live in a city owned formerly abandoned house in the ghettos of Cleveland or Detroit for a decade like a new version of the Homestead Act and make them citizens if they work and stay clean.
Speed it up. Let Donald run this like a corporation. We need more people to drive up the demand for old housing in this country and pad our GDP.
Otherwise we're on our way to becoming Russia, the super power with the lower GDP.
Our housing is fine. We don't need these people for housing no more than we need them to pick lettuce. We don't need them for anything; they need us.
We need them. St Louis is 500,000 people in a lifetime. If we are going to keep rezoning farmland and desert into subdivisions and younwant demand for housing, you need them just like the Poles, the Italians, the Chinese, Irish and who ever else we gave 10% of our land to in the 19th century.
Not to mention, China has us on GDP. Pretty soon if they don't poop themselves back to the dark ages they'll be spending more on their Space Force.
China is not doing well these days, and nobody has more money than the US. Reagan caused the collapse of the cold war using spending.
We don't need demand for housing. Roy Rogers once said "Invest in land. God ain't making anymore of it."
As for immigrants, a good idea when we had a population of 180 million people. Not such a great idea when you have over 330 million people.
What is the trend on GDP again?
china's yearly gdp increase - Google Search
What happwned to our deficit and economy as a whole last time we ran out of tricks like stupid low interest rates to pump the land value market? Remember, that got a black man with a funny name elected.
If you want to sit still at 330 million that"s fine. Just say youdon't want to be THE super power any longer. Ask England what being a perfectly fine smaller country feels like. I'm patriotic and think our way is worth fighting for. Don't tell anyone but I'd be open to let part of Mexico vote to join the U.S.
DumBama had quantitive easing to phony up the market. Bush had the housing bubble until it collapsed. Clinton was fortunate to preside in the tech bubble. Trump? No gimmicks at all. It's a real booming economy with no bubbles.
Trump's tariffs threaten to shatter China's economy. It already has cracks
Trump has troops heading to the border. The caravan of those seeking asylum are heading to the border.
Also heading to the border are armed militias duped into thinking we are being invaded by criminals, rapists , MS-13, and middle eastern people.
What could possiblty go wrong.
Migrants made up of mostly women and children – conservatives are cowards and easily frightened.Trump has troops heading to the border. The caravan of those seeking asylum are heading to the border.
Also heading to the border are armed militias duped into thinking we are being invaded by criminals, rapists , MS-13, and middle eastern people.
What could possiblty go wrong.
If you aren't concerned about some of the serious shit going on right to the South of your country, you're either uninformed or ignorant. I suggest that you take a little trip there and find out for yourself.
What are you concerned about sir?
Most of what happens immediately south of the border doesn't even make the news: Wholesale murders, rapes, hacking people up with machetes, torture, all kinds of bad shit. The news media tends to look the other way and believe it isn't happening.
Trump has troops heading to the border. The caravan of those seeking asylum are heading to the border.
Also heading to the border are armed militias duped into thinking we are being invaded by criminals, rapists , MS-13, and middle eastern people.
What could possiblty go wrong.
The better question is what could possibly go right?
Invaders have been using our kindness of asylum to get into the country even though unqualified. Ears allowed them entry while they awaited their court date; that's what's attracting them here. What Trump is doing is having our military stop them at the border, and setup tent cities outside of the border. So if you really want to file for asylum, fine. But you can't have access to this country until your hearing. Those cases take three to four years to be heard. So if they want to live in tents all that time, fine with us. But more than likely, most will just turn around and go home.
Furthermore it will be a deterrent from other bands of people thinking they can get through our borders using asylum.
A great plan all the way around.
What could go right? We could import people, make them live in a city owned formerly abandoned house in the ghettos of Cleveland or Detroit for a decade like a new version of the Homestead Act and make them citizens if they work and stay clean.
Or we could import them into YOUR hometown and let them drag your schools down, overcrowd your hospitals, increase your property taxes and lower your property values. It's all warm fuzzy goodness until they become YOUR problem.Trump has troops heading to the border. The caravan of those seeking asylum are heading to the border.
Also heading to the border are armed militias duped into thinking we are being invaded by criminals, rapists , MS-13, and middle eastern people.
What could possiblty go wrong.
The better question is what could possibly go right?
Invaders have been using our kindness of asylum to get into the country even though unqualified. Ears allowed them entry while they awaited their court date; that's what's attracting them here. What Trump is doing is having our military stop them at the border, and setup tent cities outside of the border. So if you really want to file for asylum, fine. But you can't have access to this country until your hearing. Those cases take three to four years to be heard. So if they want to live in tents all that time, fine with us. But more than likely, most will just turn around and go home.
Furthermore it will be a deterrent from other bands of people thinking they can get through our borders using asylum.
A great plan all the way around.
What could go right? We could import people, make them live in a city owned formerly abandoned house in the ghettos of Cleveland or Detroit for a decade like a new version of the Homestead Act and make them citizens if they work and stay clean.
Trump has troops heading to the border. The caravan of those seeking asylum are heading to the border.
Also heading to the border are armed militias duped into thinking we are being invaded by criminals, rapists , MS-13, and middle eastern people.
What could possiblty go wrong.
The better question is what could possibly go right?
Invaders have been using our kindness of asylum to get into the country even though unqualified. Ears allowed them entry while they awaited their court date; that's what's attracting them here. What Trump is doing is having our military stop them at the border, and setup tent cities outside of the border. So if you really want to file for asylum, fine. But you can't have access to this country until your hearing. Those cases take three to four years to be heard. So if they want to live in tents all that time, fine with us. But more than likely, most will just turn around and go home.
Furthermore it will be a deterrent from other bands of people thinking they can get through our borders using asylum.
A great plan all the way around.
What could go right? We could import people, make them live in a city owned formerly abandoned house in the ghettos of Cleveland or Detroit for a decade like a new version of the Homestead Act and make them citizens if they work and stay clean.
Forced labor camps is what you are describing. Remember they are illegally entering the country so by definition they would have to be treated as
prisoners. So you want them to be put into detention camps right just disguised as towns?
Yup.You think it's still 2016?So you can't. I'm guessing because you were talking outta yer ass and have nothing to back it up.Is your Goggle broken? Do your own homework, please.
Thanks for admitting it.
Dumbfuck. Are you computer illiterate or something? Here is a simple search using the date range from 2008 to 1016. 32,800 results.
http://www.bing.com/search?q=armed+militia+patrol+border+Mexico&filters=ex1:"ez5_14173_17105"&go=Search&qs=ds&qpvt=armed+militia+patrol+border+Mexico
Do you think the number of armed militias have dwindled since 2016?
Migrants made up of mostly women and children – conservatives are cowards and easily frightened.Trump has troops heading to the border. The caravan of those seeking asylum are heading to the border.
Also heading to the border are armed militias duped into thinking we are being invaded by criminals, rapists , MS-13, and middle eastern people.
What could possiblty go wrong.
If you aren't concerned about some of the serious shit going on right to the South of your country, you're either uninformed or ignorant. I suggest that you take a little trip there and find out for yourself.
What are you concerned about sir?
Most of what happens immediately south of the border doesn't even make the news: Wholesale murders, rapes, hacking people up with machetes, torture, all kinds of bad shit. The news media tends to look the other way and believe it isn't happening.
Mexico sucks, no disagreemnt there.
Not sure if its really hidden by a conspiracy though.
Trump has troops heading to the border. The caravan of those seeking asylum are heading to the border.
Also heading to the border are armed militias duped into thinking we are being invaded by criminals, rapists , MS-13, and middle eastern people.
What could possiblty go wrong.
The better question is what could possibly go right?
Invaders have been using our kindness of asylum to get into the country even though unqualified. Ears allowed them entry while they awaited their court date; that's what's attracting them here. What Trump is doing is having our military stop them at the border, and setup tent cities outside of the border. So if you really want to file for asylum, fine. But you can't have access to this country until your hearing. Those cases take three to four years to be heard. So if they want to live in tents all that time, fine with us. But more than likely, most will just turn around and go home.
Furthermore it will be a deterrent from other bands of people thinking they can get through our borders using asylum.
A great plan all the way around.
What could go right? We could import people, make them live in a city owned formerly abandoned house in the ghettos of Cleveland or Detroit for a decade like a new version of the Homestead Act and make them citizens if they work and stay clean.
Forced labor camps is what you are describing. Remember they are illegally entering the country so by definition they would have to be treated as
prisoners. So you want them to be put into detention camps right just disguised as towns?
Eh, either way. I'm gonna say, "wanna be American? Join up for our new Homestead Act." We all can't live in Hawaii afterall. After twn years they"ll be citizens and can reside wherever they want
Or we could import them into YOUR hometown and let them drag your schools down, overcrowd your hospitals, increase your property taxes and lower your property values. It's all warm fuzzy goodness until they become YOUR problem.Trump has troops heading to the border. The caravan of those seeking asylum are heading to the border.
Also heading to the border are armed militias duped into thinking we are being invaded by criminals, rapists , MS-13, and middle eastern people.
What could possiblty go wrong.
The better question is what could possibly go right?
Invaders have been using our kindness of asylum to get into the country even though unqualified. Ears allowed them entry while they awaited their court date; that's what's attracting them here. What Trump is doing is having our military stop them at the border, and setup tent cities outside of the border. So if you really want to file for asylum, fine. But you can't have access to this country until your hearing. Those cases take three to four years to be heard. So if they want to live in tents all that time, fine with us. But more than likely, most will just turn around and go home.
Furthermore it will be a deterrent from other bands of people thinking they can get through our borders using asylum.
A great plan all the way around.
What could go right? We could import people, make them live in a city owned formerly abandoned house in the ghettos of Cleveland or Detroit for a decade like a new version of the Homestead Act and make them citizens if they work and stay clean.
Hell yeah! Bring them on. When we imported them Bosnians 20 or 25 years back it went plenty well.
Remember, I'm giving them houses no one wants to buy. They'll have little barrios and raise the surrounding property values. They'll largely become citizens and do well just like the Bosnians before them, the Irish, the Ooles, even the Italians and Germans did well.
The one8s that don't work or get convicted or something Trump can do as he wishes with.
Or we could import them into YOUR hometown and let them drag your schools down, overcrowd your hospitals, increase your property taxes and lower your property values. It's all warm fuzzy goodness until they become YOUR problem.Trump has troops heading to the border. The caravan of those seeking asylum are heading to the border.
Also heading to the border are armed militias duped into thinking we are being invaded by criminals, rapists , MS-13, and middle eastern people.
What could possiblty go wrong.
The better question is what could possibly go right?
Invaders have been using our kindness of asylum to get into the country even though unqualified. Ears allowed them entry while they awaited their court date; that's what's attracting them here. What Trump is doing is having our military stop them at the border, and setup tent cities outside of the border. So if you really want to file for asylum, fine. But you can't have access to this country until your hearing. Those cases take three to four years to be heard. So if they want to live in tents all that time, fine with us. But more than likely, most will just turn around and go home.
Furthermore it will be a deterrent from other bands of people thinking they can get through our borders using asylum.
A great plan all the way around.
What could go right? We could import people, make them live in a city owned formerly abandoned house in the ghettos of Cleveland or Detroit for a decade like a new version of the Homestead Act and make them citizens if they work and stay clean.
Hell yeah! Bring them on. When we imported them Bosnians 20 or 25 years back it went plenty well.
Remember, I'm giving them houses no one wants to buy. They'll have little barrios and raise the surrounding property values. They'll largely become citizens and do well just like the Bosnians before them, the Irish, the Ooles, even the Italians and Germans did well.
The one8s that don't work or get convicted or something Trump can do as he wishes with.
So how many neighborhoods increased in value with people of color moving in? How are those neighborhoods that are flooded with Mexicans doing where they stuff 12 people in a three bedroom home?
Property value is increased when there is a demand for people to live there. Taking poor people from other countries with no education or skills along with minimal income will not increase property values; it will decrease property values worse than they are today.
Our housing is fine. We don't need these people for housing no more than we need them to pick lettuce. We don't need them for anything; they need us.
We need them. St Louis is 500,000 people in a lifetime. If we are going to keep rezoning farmland and desert into subdivisions and younwant demand for housing, you need them just like the Poles, the Italians, the Chinese, Irish and who ever else we gave 10% of our land to in the 19th century.
Not to mention, China has us on GDP. Pretty soon if they don't poop themselves back to the dark ages they'll be spending more on their Space Force.
China is not doing well these days, and nobody has more money than the US. Reagan caused the collapse of the cold war using spending.
We don't need demand for housing. Roy Rogers once said "Invest in land. God ain't making anymore of it."
As for immigrants, a good idea when we had a population of 180 million people. Not such a great idea when you have over 330 million people.
What is the trend on GDP again?
china's yearly gdp increase - Google Search
What happwned to our deficit and economy as a whole last time we ran out of tricks like stupid low interest rates to pump the land value market? Remember, that got a black man with a funny name elected.
If you want to sit still at 330 million that"s fine. Just say youdon't want to be THE super power any longer. Ask England what being a perfectly fine smaller country feels like. I'm patriotic and think our way is worth fighting for. Don't tell anyone but I'd be open to let part of Mexico vote to join the U.S.
DumBama had quantitive easing to phony up the market. Bush had the housing bubble until it collapsed. Clinton was fortunate to preside in the tech bubble. Trump? No gimmicks at all. It's a real booming economy with no bubbles.
Trump's tariffs threaten to shatter China's economy. It already has cracks
Bush's housing collapse got Obama elected, right?
Hey, how are them property values of Roy Roger's doing in the rust belt cities where houses are more than 60 years old?
