What exactly do republicans have to offer blacks?

Ben Carson's mother was on welfare. Ben is not. Ben applied himself. No one held him back or promoted him. No one offered him a stethoscope because he was black. He worked to achieve his goal.
Ben showed you how to go from welfare to wealthy. Work hard. < a non partizan approach...

That means Ben was on welfare you fool! LOL.

Maybe without welfare Ben wouldn't have been able to apply himself.

Yes someone did promote him. WELFARE promoted him. It helped him to reach adulthood.

Ben showed us welfare works. So if it worked for him, why take it away from poor people now? Because Ben thinks everyone except his mother was lazy?

How old was Ben when he applied? Or was that his mother...
Welfare hasn't gone away. It's one way to get food and necessities. Jobs, it appears, are more effective in achieving those things.
Welfare doesn't promote anybody. Hard work does. Almost 3 million welfare recipients are proving you wrong. They have chosen paychecks as opposed to welfare checks. Welfare holds you back. A job propels you forward. Welfare was never meant to be a career choice...
 
Ben Carson's mother was on welfare. Ben is not. Ben applied himself. No one held him back or promoted him. No one offered him a stethoscope because he was black. He worked to achieve his goal.
Ben showed you how to go from welfare to wealthy. Work hard. < a non partizan approach...

That means Ben was on welfare you fool! LOL.

Maybe without welfare Ben wouldn't have been able to apply himself.

Yes someone did promote him. WELFARE promoted him. It helped him to reach adulthood.

Ben showed us welfare works. So if it worked for him, why take it away from poor people now? Because Ben thinks everyone except his mother was lazy?

How old was Ben when he applied? Or was that his mother...
Welfare hasn't gone away. It's one way to get food and necessities. Jobs, it appears, are more effective in achieving those things.
Welfare doesn't promote anybody. Hard work does. Almost 3 million welfare recipients are proving you wrong. They have chosen paychecks as opposed to welfare checks. Welfare holds you back. A job propels you forward. Welfare was never meant to be a career choice...
If welfare holds you back why wasnt Ben held back? Youre not making sense and you cant have it both ways
 
I REPEAT

  1. Broken down and unsafe housing.
  2. Broken families.
  3. A high degree of violence required in order to hold the place together.
  4. Everybody gets a basic provision, but nobody gets ahead.
  5. Extreme skepticism and despair. This is an intergenerational, ongoing, lasting way of life.

Is that a fair way to describe the situation in the inner cities that are controlled by the Dems?
 
There is no democratic plantation. Blacks are able to think for ourselves. The two major reforms relative to racial equality of the last 60 years were democratic proposals. The overall platform of the democratic party deals with issues the large majority of blacks face. So what exactly does the republican party offer blacks?. We are free, so republicans don't offer that. So aside from the fact Lincoln signed a piece of paper 153 years ago, what does the republican party have to offer?
A job so you won't have to rob liquor stores anymore.
Racism noted.
Only racists rob liquor stores then. Who knew, mr troll.
The only racist in this exchange is you -- because you are the one who tries to shoe-horn your racism into a post that has ZERO to do with it..

But I guess you gotta do what you gotta do to deal with those insecurities of yours....
 
I REPEAT

  1. Broken down and unsafe housing.
  2. Broken families.
  3. A high degree of violence required in order to hold the place together.
  4. Everybody gets a basic provision, but nobody gets ahead.
  5. Extreme skepticism and despair. This is an intergenerational, ongoing, lasting way of life.

Is that a fair way to describe the situation in the inner cities that are controlled by the Dems?
That sounds more like a by-product of capitalism run wild to me

How come no one applies this logic to the majority of the poorest counties in America who happened to vote overwhelmingly republican??
 
Ben Carson's mother was on welfare. Ben is not. Ben applied himself. No one held him back or promoted him. No one offered him a stethoscope because he was black. He worked to achieve his goal.
Ben showed you how to go from welfare to wealthy. Work hard. < a non partizan approach...

That means Ben was on welfare you fool! LOL.

Maybe without welfare Ben wouldn't have been able to apply himself.

Yes someone did promote him. WELFARE promoted him. It helped him to reach adulthood.

Ben showed us welfare works. So if it worked for him, why take it away from poor people now? Because Ben thinks everyone except his mother was lazy?

How old was Ben when he applied? Or was that his mother...
Welfare hasn't gone away. It's one way to get food and necessities. Jobs, it appears, are more effective in achieving those things.
Welfare doesn't promote anybody. Hard work does. Almost 3 million welfare recipients are proving you wrong. They have chosen paychecks as opposed to welfare checks. Welfare holds you back. A job propels you forward. Welfare was never meant to be a career choice...
If welfare holds you back why wasnt Ben held back? Youre not making sense and you cant have it both ways

Because HE was not on welfare. His mother was. It held HER back. Ben chose a better path. Hard work. It "paid" off.
 
There is no democratic plantation. Blacks are able to think for ourselves. The two major reforms relative to racial equality of the last 60 years were democratic proposals. The overall platform of the democratic party deals with issues the large majority of blacks face. So what exactly does the republican party offer blacks?. We are free, so republicans don't offer that. So aside from the fact Lincoln signed a piece of paper 153 years ago, what does the republican party have to offer?
A job so you won't have to rob liquor stores anymore.
Racism noted.
Only racists rob liquor stores then. Who knew, mr troll.
The only racist in this exchange is you -- because you are the one who tries to shoe-horn your racism into a post that has ZERO to do with it..

But I guess you gotta do what you gotta do to deal with those insecurities of yours....

upload_2018-10-3_15-51-0.jpeg
 
I REPEAT

  1. Broken down and unsafe housing.
  2. Broken families.
  3. A high degree of violence required in order to hold the place together.
  4. Everybody gets a basic provision, but nobody gets ahead.
  5. Extreme skepticism and despair. This is an intergenerational, ongoing, lasting way of life.

Is that a fair way to describe the situation in the inner cities that are controlled by the Dems?
That sounds more like a by-product of capitalism run wild to me

How come no one applies this logic to the majority of the poorest counties in America who happened to vote overwhelmingly republican??

Actually those five points = how plantantions were run pre civil war, when Lincoln declared war on the South.....I just threw them in to show how the inner cities are run the SAME WAY. Those "counties" don't have the same % of broken families or high degree of violence.
 
Ben Carson's mother was on welfare. Ben is not. Ben applied himself. No one held him back or promoted him. No one offered him a stethoscope because he was black. He worked to achieve his goal.
Ben showed you how to go from welfare to wealthy. Work hard. < a non partizan approach...

That means Ben was on welfare you fool! LOL.

Maybe without welfare Ben wouldn't have been able to apply himself.

Yes someone did promote him. WELFARE promoted him. It helped him to reach adulthood.

Ben showed us welfare works. So if it worked for him, why take it away from poor people now? Because Ben thinks everyone except his mother was lazy?

How old was Ben when he applied? Or was that his mother...
Welfare hasn't gone away. It's one way to get food and necessities. Jobs, it appears, are more effective in achieving those things.
Welfare doesn't promote anybody. Hard work does. Almost 3 million welfare recipients are proving you wrong. They have chosen paychecks as opposed to welfare checks. Welfare holds you back. A job propels you forward. Welfare was never meant to be a career choice...
If welfare holds you back why wasnt Ben held back? Youre not making sense and you cant have it both ways

Because HE was not on welfare. His mother was. It held HER back. Ben chose a better path. Hard work. It "paid" off.
How did it hold her back? She was able to keep Ben alive with that welfare. Without food Ben would have been too weak to do anything other than grow weaker and eventually die.
 
Last edited:
Ben Carson's mother was on welfare. Ben is not. Ben applied himself. No one held him back or promoted him. No one offered him a stethoscope because he was black. He worked to achieve his goal.
Ben showed you how to go from welfare to wealthy. Work hard. < a non partizan approach...

That means Ben was on welfare you fool! LOL.

Maybe without welfare Ben wouldn't have been able to apply himself.

Yes someone did promote him. WELFARE promoted him. It helped him to reach adulthood.

Ben showed us welfare works. So if it worked for him, why take it away from poor people now? Because Ben thinks everyone except his mother was lazy?

How old was Ben when he applied? Or was that his mother...
Welfare hasn't gone away. It's one way to get food and necessities. Jobs, it appears, are more effective in achieving those things.
Welfare doesn't promote anybody. Hard work does. Almost 3 million welfare recipients are proving you wrong. They have chosen paychecks as opposed to welfare checks. Welfare holds you back. A job propels you forward. Welfare was never meant to be a career choice...
If welfare holds you back why wasnt Ben held back? Youre not making sense and you cant have it both ways

Because HE was not on welfare. His mother was. It held HER back. Ben chose a better path. Hard work. It "paid" off.
So Ben's mother was lazy?

And how did welfare hold her back and not the conditions affecting many black people during that time?? Ben was born in 1951 remember.
 
Ben Carson's mother was on welfare. Ben is not. Ben applied himself. No one held him back or promoted him. No one offered him a stethoscope because he was black. He worked to achieve his goal.
Ben showed you how to go from welfare to wealthy. Work hard. < a non partizan approach...

That means Ben was on welfare you fool! LOL.

Maybe without welfare Ben wouldn't have been able to apply himself.

Yes someone did promote him. WELFARE promoted him. It helped him to reach adulthood.

Ben showed us welfare works. So if it worked for him, why take it away from poor people now? Because Ben thinks everyone except his mother was lazy?

How old was Ben when he applied? Or was that his mother...
Welfare hasn't gone away. It's one way to get food and necessities. Jobs, it appears, are more effective in achieving those things.
Welfare doesn't promote anybody. Hard work does. Almost 3 million welfare recipients are proving you wrong. They have chosen paychecks as opposed to welfare checks. Welfare holds you back. A job propels you forward. Welfare was never meant to be a career choice...
If welfare holds you back why wasnt Ben held back? Youre not making sense and you cant have it both ways

Because HE was not on welfare. His mother was. It held HER back. Ben chose a better path. Hard work. It "paid" off.
So Ben's mother was lazy?

And how did welfare hold her back and not the conditions affecting many black people during that time?? Ben was born in 1951 remember.
MV5BMTI4ZDJkMmMtOGM3YS00NDJhLWIyOWUtZDBiMDhiMjM4OTg3XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTYxNjkxOQ@@._V1_.jpg
 
I REPEAT

  1. Broken down and unsafe housing.
  2. Broken families.
  3. A high degree of violence required in order to hold the place together.
  4. Everybody gets a basic provision, but nobody gets ahead.
  5. Extreme skepticism and despair. This is an intergenerational, ongoing, lasting way of life.

Is that a fair way to describe the situation in the inner cities that are controlled by the Dems?
That sounds more like a by-product of capitalism run wild to me

How come no one applies this logic to the majority of the poorest counties in America who happened to vote overwhelmingly republican??

Actually those five points = how plantantions were run pre civil war, when Lincoln declared war on the South.....I just threw them in to show how the inner cities are run the SAME WAY. Those "counties" don't have the same % of broken families or high degree of violence.

t_179.jpg


So we are no longer talking about economics? Ok....we are on to nuclear families now? cool...


So how exactly does voting republican make you get married or stay married?
 
Ben Carson's mother was on welfare. Ben is not. Ben applied himself. No one held him back or promoted him. No one offered him a stethoscope because he was black. He worked to achieve his goal.
Ben showed you how to go from welfare to wealthy. Work hard. < a non partizan approach...

That means Ben was on welfare you fool! LOL.

Maybe without welfare Ben wouldn't have been able to apply himself.

Yes someone did promote him. WELFARE promoted him. It helped him to reach adulthood.

Ben showed us welfare works. So if it worked for him, why take it away from poor people now? Because Ben thinks everyone except his mother was lazy?

How old was Ben when he applied? Or was that his mother...
Welfare hasn't gone away. It's one way to get food and necessities. Jobs, it appears, are more effective in achieving those things.
Welfare doesn't promote anybody. Hard work does. Almost 3 million welfare recipients are proving you wrong. They have chosen paychecks as opposed to welfare checks. Welfare holds you back. A job propels you forward. Welfare was never meant to be a career choice...
If welfare holds you back why wasnt Ben held back? Youre not making sense and you cant have it both ways

Because HE was not on welfare. His mother was. It held HER back. Ben chose a better path. Hard work. It "paid" off.
So Ben's mother was lazy?

And how did welfare hold her back and not the conditions affecting many black people during that time?? Ben was born in 1951 remember.
Bens mother worked her ass off but it wasnt enough. She made Ben and his siblings read a book every week and report to her. She did everything right but still needed that liberal welfare.
 
That means Ben was on welfare you fool! LOL.

Maybe without welfare Ben wouldn't have been able to apply himself.

Yes someone did promote him. WELFARE promoted him. It helped him to reach adulthood.

Ben showed us welfare works. So if it worked for him, why take it away from poor people now? Because Ben thinks everyone except his mother was lazy?

How old was Ben when he applied? Or was that his mother...
Welfare hasn't gone away. It's one way to get food and necessities. Jobs, it appears, are more effective in achieving those things.
Welfare doesn't promote anybody. Hard work does. Almost 3 million welfare recipients are proving you wrong. They have chosen paychecks as opposed to welfare checks. Welfare holds you back. A job propels you forward. Welfare was never meant to be a career choice...
If welfare holds you back why wasnt Ben held back? Youre not making sense and you cant have it both ways

Because HE was not on welfare. His mother was. It held HER back. Ben chose a better path. Hard work. It "paid" off.
So Ben's mother was lazy?

And how did welfare hold her back and not the conditions affecting many black people during that time?? Ben was born in 1951 remember.
Bens mother worked her ass off but it wasnt enough. She made Ben and his siblings read a book every week and report to her. She did everything right but still needed that liberal welfare.
Everyone knows the only good kind of welfare is corporate welfare -- the corporate class is always more deserving of government handouts....
 
I REPEAT

  1. Broken down and unsafe housing.
  2. Broken families.
  3. A high degree of violence required in order to hold the place together.
  4. Everybody gets a basic provision, but nobody gets ahead.
  5. Extreme skepticism and despair. This is an intergenerational, ongoing, lasting way of life.

Is that a fair way to describe the situation in the inner cities that are controlled by the Dems?
That sounds more like a by-product of capitalism run wild to me

How come no one applies this logic to the majority of the poorest counties in America who happened to vote overwhelmingly republican??

Actually those five points = how plantantions were run pre civil war, when Lincoln declared war on the South.....I just threw them in to show how the inner cities are run the SAME WAY. Those "counties" don't have the same % of broken families or high degree of violence.

t_179.jpg


So we are no longer talking about economics? Ok....we are on to nuclear families now? cool...


So how exactly does voting republican make you get married or stay married?

Better education: You tell the kids that if they:

#1) Graduate HS
#2) Get a job
#3) Don't become a single parent

They will not be poor. These are FACTS. Dems don't want this. They want more single moms who historically vote Dem.

I didn't move anything. I slowly led you to the truth.
 
That means Ben was on welfare you fool! LOL.

Maybe without welfare Ben wouldn't have been able to apply himself.

Yes someone did promote him. WELFARE promoted him. It helped him to reach adulthood.

Ben showed us welfare works. So if it worked for him, why take it away from poor people now? Because Ben thinks everyone except his mother was lazy?

How old was Ben when he applied? Or was that his mother...
Welfare hasn't gone away. It's one way to get food and necessities. Jobs, it appears, are more effective in achieving those things.
Welfare doesn't promote anybody. Hard work does. Almost 3 million welfare recipients are proving you wrong. They have chosen paychecks as opposed to welfare checks. Welfare holds you back. A job propels you forward. Welfare was never meant to be a career choice...
If welfare holds you back why wasnt Ben held back? Youre not making sense and you cant have it both ways

Because HE was not on welfare. His mother was. It held HER back. Ben chose a better path. Hard work. It "paid" off.
So Ben's mother was lazy?

And how did welfare hold her back and not the conditions affecting many black people during that time?? Ben was born in 1951 remember.
MV5BMTI4ZDJkMmMtOGM3YS00NDJhLWIyOWUtZDBiMDhiMjM4OTg3XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTYxNjkxOQ@@._V1_.jpg
We get it, you like Jim Kelly movies -- because that is easier to talk about then how come most of the poorest counties are republican
 
How old was Ben when he applied? Or was that his mother...
Welfare hasn't gone away. It's one way to get food and necessities. Jobs, it appears, are more effective in achieving those things.
Welfare doesn't promote anybody. Hard work does. Almost 3 million welfare recipients are proving you wrong. They have chosen paychecks as opposed to welfare checks. Welfare holds you back. A job propels you forward. Welfare was never meant to be a career choice...
If welfare holds you back why wasnt Ben held back? Youre not making sense and you cant have it both ways

Because HE was not on welfare. His mother was. It held HER back. Ben chose a better path. Hard work. It "paid" off.
So Ben's mother was lazy?

And how did welfare hold her back and not the conditions affecting many black people during that time?? Ben was born in 1951 remember.
MV5BMTI4ZDJkMmMtOGM3YS00NDJhLWIyOWUtZDBiMDhiMjM4OTg3XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTYxNjkxOQ@@._V1_.jpg
We get it, you like Jim Kelly movies -- because that is easier to talk about then how come most of the poorest counties are republican

Poverty on its own can be solved. Crime and murder are a different animal.
 
I REPEAT

  1. Broken down and unsafe housing.
  2. Broken families.
  3. A high degree of violence required in order to hold the place together.
  4. Everybody gets a basic provision, but nobody gets ahead.
  5. Extreme skepticism and despair. This is an intergenerational, ongoing, lasting way of life.

Is that a fair way to describe the situation in the inner cities that are controlled by the Dems?
That sounds more like a by-product of capitalism run wild to me

How come no one applies this logic to the majority of the poorest counties in America who happened to vote overwhelmingly republican??

Actually those five points = how plantantions were run pre civil war, when Lincoln declared war on the South.....I just threw them in to show how the inner cities are run the SAME WAY. Those "counties" don't have the same % of broken families or high degree of violence.

t_179.jpg


So we are no longer talking about economics? Ok....we are on to nuclear families now? cool...


So how exactly does voting republican make you get married or stay married?

Better education: You tell the kids that if they:

#1) Graduate HS
#2) Get a job
#3) Don't become a single parent

They will not be poor. These are FACTS. Dems don't want this. They want more single moms who historically vote Dem.

I didn't move anything. I slowly led you to the truth.
So how can the poorest counties in America be republican, since republicans are all married and in 2 parent households and stuff...studying the Bible no doubt??
 
If welfare holds you back why wasnt Ben held back? Youre not making sense and you cant have it both ways

Because HE was not on welfare. His mother was. It held HER back. Ben chose a better path. Hard work. It "paid" off.
So Ben's mother was lazy?

And how did welfare hold her back and not the conditions affecting many black people during that time?? Ben was born in 1951 remember.
MV5BMTI4ZDJkMmMtOGM3YS00NDJhLWIyOWUtZDBiMDhiMjM4OTg3XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTYxNjkxOQ@@._V1_.jpg
We get it, you like Jim Kelly movies -- because that is easier to talk about then how come most of the poorest counties are republican

Poverty on its own can be solved. Crime and murder are a different animal.
A large percentage of crime is a function of poverty -- unless you are saying "blacks" are just genetically pre-disposed to commit crime
 
I REPEAT

  1. Broken down and unsafe housing.
  2. Broken families.
  3. A high degree of violence required in order to hold the place together.
  4. Everybody gets a basic provision, but nobody gets ahead.
  5. Extreme skepticism and despair. This is an intergenerational, ongoing, lasting way of life.

Is that a fair way to describe the situation in the inner cities that are controlled by the Dems?
That sounds more like a by-product of capitalism run wild to me

How come no one applies this logic to the majority of the poorest counties in America who happened to vote overwhelmingly republican??

Actually those five points = how plantantions were run pre civil war, when Lincoln declared war on the South.....I just threw them in to show how the inner cities are run the SAME WAY. Those "counties" don't have the same % of broken families or high degree of violence.

t_179.jpg


So we are no longer talking about economics? Ok....we are on to nuclear families now? cool...


So how exactly does voting republican make you get married or stay married?

Better education: You tell the kids that if they:

#1) Graduate HS
#2) Get a job
#3) Don't become a single parent

They will not be poor. These are FACTS. Dems don't want this. They want more single moms who historically vote Dem.

I didn't move anything. I slowly led you to the truth.
So how can the poorest counties in America be republican, since republicans are all married and in 2 parent households??

Define "poor". They aren't all married. 70% of blacks come from single parent households. 40% of whites. You are also comparing small population sizes to very large ones. False equivalency. Do you disagree with the comparisons of inner cities and plantations?

Lastly, not all poor whites vote Republican. Maybe this past election.
 

Forum List

Back
Top