Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mini mike is out. He pissed away a ton of money to be vindictive and arrogant. Anyone have any idea what all that money could have been used for, to legitimately help those that needed it? If you had that amount, and HAD to spend it all on charitable donations, what would you do?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Since it wasn't my money, I don't spend time thinking about what it "should" have been used for. That's the path to left-think.
I’m not asking that, and I’m not a Democrat. I’m just asking hypothetically what good could be done with that money to help people that really need it? Legit causes only.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didn't say you were a Democrat. I said that line of thinking leads to left-think.
Instead of looking for attacks to be "outraged" about, try just dealing with the actual words.
I don't spend time "hypothetically" thinking about how I could use someone else's money "better" than they do. Too close to covetousness for me.
Mike earned that money, it's his, he used it for what mattered to him. Works for me.
Mini mike is out. He pissed away a ton of money to be vindictive and arrogant. Anyone have any idea what all that money could have been used for, to legitimately help those that needed it? If you had that amount, and HAD to spend it all on charitable donations, what would you do?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Since it wasn't my money, I don't spend time thinking about what it "should" have been used for. That's the path to left-think.
I’m not asking that, and I’m not a Democrat. I’m just asking hypothetically what good could be done with that money to help people that really need it? Legit causes only.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didn't say you were a Democrat. I said that line of thinking leads to left-think.
Instead of looking for attacks to be "outraged" about, try just dealing with the actual words.
I don't spend time "hypothetically" thinking about how I could use someone else's money "better" than they do. Too close to covetousness for me.
Mike earned that money, it's his, he used it for what mattered to him. Works for me.
Mini mike is out. He pissed away a ton of money to be vindictive and arrogant. Anyone have any idea what all that money could have been used for, to legitimately help those that needed it? If you had that amount, and HAD to spend it all on charitable donations, what would you do?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Since it wasn't my money, I don't spend time thinking about what it "should" have been used for. That's the path to left-think.
I’m not asking that, and I’m not a Democrat. I’m just asking hypothetically what good could be done with that money to help people that really need it? Legit causes only.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didn't say you were a Democrat. I said that line of thinking leads to left-think.
Instead of looking for attacks to be "outraged" about, try just dealing with the actual words.
I don't spend time "hypothetically" thinking about how I could use someone else's money "better" than they do. Too close to covetousness for me.
Mike earned that money, it's his, he used it for what mattered to him. Works for me.
I’m not outraged, or feeling attacked. I even mentioned a few really reputable causes. It’s not even about mike. I think he’s an asshole, and could light it on fire and shove it up his ass if he wanted to. It is his money. I’m not saying distribute it to people. Just try dealing with the actual question posed, or don’t.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mini mike is out. He pissed away a ton of money to be vindictive and arrogant. Anyone have any idea what all that money could have been used for, to legitimately help those that needed it? If you had that amount, and HAD to spend it all on charitable donations, what would you do?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Since it wasn't my money, I don't spend time thinking about what it "should" have been used for. That's the path to left-think.
I’m not asking that, and I’m not a Democrat. I’m just asking hypothetically what good could be done with that money to help people that really need it? Legit causes only.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didn't say you were a Democrat. I said that line of thinking leads to left-think.
Instead of looking for attacks to be "outraged" about, try just dealing with the actual words.
I don't spend time "hypothetically" thinking about how I could use someone else's money "better" than they do. Too close to covetousness for me.
Mike earned that money, it's his, he used it for what mattered to him. Works for me.
This discussion is basically the argument my wife hits me with when she sees "needs" on TV, from sick or abused animals, to crippled kids, to disabled vets, to the poor generally. Democrats call it "income inequality" but then don't know how to vote against their donors. The basic question is, how much wealth should any one person or household have? Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and the rest have Trillions Billionaires 2019
Should people be living under bridges or in tents when so few have accumulated so much wealth?
I'm no commie, and I do appreciate those who spread and invest their wealth by expanding their businesses. Look at what Elon Musk is doing with his empire of different businesses, SPACEX, TESLA, The Boring Company, NEURALINK, OPENAI, incredible business sense.
Elon Musk - Wikipedia
I don't know if there is a metric that can be invented, like a "use it or lose it" metric for wealth. If you have a plan to expand wealth and jobs ok, if you are a "hoarder" then the higher tax rates kick in.
Like I said, my wife is a retired RN with a heart of gold, I see her point, but as I keep telling her, "whose money is it?"
Mini mike is out. He pissed away a ton of money to be vindictive and arrogant. Anyone have any idea what all that money could have been used for, to legitimately help those that needed it? If you had that amount, and HAD to spend it all on charitable donations, what would you do?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Since it wasn't my money, I don't spend time thinking about what it "should" have been used for. That's the path to left-think.
I’m not asking that, and I’m not a Democrat. I’m just asking hypothetically what good could be done with that money to help people that really need it? Legit causes only.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didn't say you were a Democrat. I said that line of thinking leads to left-think.
Instead of looking for attacks to be "outraged" about, try just dealing with the actual words.
I don't spend time "hypothetically" thinking about how I could use someone else's money "better" than they do. Too close to covetousness for me.
Mike earned that money, it's his, he used it for what mattered to him. Works for me.
This discussion is basically the argument my wife hits me with when she sees "needs" on TV, from sick or abused animals, to crippled kids, to disabled vets, to the poor generally. Democrats call it "income inequality" but then don't know how to vote against their donors. The basic question is, how much wealth should any one person or household have? Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and the rest have Trillions Billionaires 2019
Should people be living under bridges or in tents when so few have accumulated so much wealth?
I'm no commie, and I do appreciate those who spread and invest their wealth by expanding their businesses. Look at what Elon Musk is doing with his empire of different businesses, SPACEX, TESLA, The Boring Company, NEURALINK, OPENAI, incredible business sense.
Elon Musk - Wikipedia
I don't know if there is a metric that can be invented, like a "use it or lose it" metric for wealth. If you have a plan to expand wealth and jobs ok, if you are a "hoarder" then the higher tax rates kick in.
Like I said, my wife is a retired RN with a heart of gold, I see her point, but as I keep telling her, "whose money is it?"
And this right here is exactly why I feel the need to object to any sort of thinking, however idle, that might lead people to consider it their business to approve or disapprove of how others spend their money inevitably leads to talk about influencing those decisions via government.
Mini mike is out. He pissed away a ton of money to be vindictive and arrogant. Anyone have any idea what all that money could have been used for, to legitimately help those that needed it? If you had that amount, and HAD to spend it all on charitable donations, what would you do?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Since it wasn't my money, I don't spend time thinking about what it "should" have been used for. That's the path to left-think.
I’m not asking that, and I’m not a Democrat. I’m just asking hypothetically what good could be done with that money to help people that really need it? Legit causes only.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didn't say you were a Democrat. I said that line of thinking leads to left-think.
Instead of looking for attacks to be "outraged" about, try just dealing with the actual words.
I don't spend time "hypothetically" thinking about how I could use someone else's money "better" than they do. Too close to covetousness for me.
Mike earned that money, it's his, he used it for what mattered to him. Works for me.
I’m not outraged, or feeling attacked. I even mentioned a few really reputable causes. It’s not even about mike. I think he’s an asshole, and could light it on fire and shove it up his ass if he wanted to. It is his money. I’m not saying distribute it to people. Just try dealing with the actual question posed, or don’t.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I am dealing with the actual question posed . . . by pointing out that it's an inappropriate and ridiculous question.
Mini mike is out. He pissed away a ton of money to be vindictive and arrogant. Anyone have any idea what all that money could have been used for, to legitimately help those that needed it? If you had that amount, and HAD to spend it all on charitable donations, what would you do?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Since it wasn't my money, I don't spend time thinking about what it "should" have been used for. That's the path to left-think.
I’m not asking that, and I’m not a Democrat. I’m just asking hypothetically what good could be done with that money to help people that really need it? Legit causes only.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didn't say you were a Democrat. I said that line of thinking leads to left-think.
Instead of looking for attacks to be "outraged" about, try just dealing with the actual words.
I don't spend time "hypothetically" thinking about how I could use someone else's money "better" than they do. Too close to covetousness for me.
Mike earned that money, it's his, he used it for what mattered to him. Works for me.
This discussion is basically the argument my wife hits me with when she sees "needs" on TV, from sick or abused animals, to crippled kids, to disabled vets, to the poor generally. Democrats call it "income inequality" but then don't know how to vote against their donors. The basic question is, how much wealth should any one person or household have? Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and the rest have Trillions Billionaires 2019
Should people be living under bridges or in tents when so few have accumulated so much wealth?
I'm no commie, and I do appreciate those who spread and invest their wealth by expanding their businesses. Look at what Elon Musk is doing with his empire of different businesses, SPACEX, TESLA, The Boring Company, NEURALINK, OPENAI, incredible business sense.
Elon Musk - Wikipedia
I don't know if there is a metric that can be invented, like a "use it or lose it" metric for wealth. If you have a plan to expand wealth and jobs ok, if you are a "hoarder" then the higher tax rates kick in.
Like I said, my wife is a retired RN with a heart of gold, I see her point, but as I keep telling her, "whose money is it?"
And this right here is exactly why I feel the need to object to any sort of thinking, however idle, that might lead people to consider it their business to approve or disapprove of how others spend their money inevitably leads to talk about influencing those decisions via government.
Since it wasn't my money, I don't spend time thinking about what it "should" have been used for. That's the path to left-think.
I’m not asking that, and I’m not a Democrat. I’m just asking hypothetically what good could be done with that money to help people that really need it? Legit causes only.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didn't say you were a Democrat. I said that line of thinking leads to left-think.
Instead of looking for attacks to be "outraged" about, try just dealing with the actual words.
I don't spend time "hypothetically" thinking about how I could use someone else's money "better" than they do. Too close to covetousness for me.
Mike earned that money, it's his, he used it for what mattered to him. Works for me.
I’m not outraged, or feeling attacked. I even mentioned a few really reputable causes. It’s not even about mike. I think he’s an asshole, and could light it on fire and shove it up his ass if he wanted to. It is his money. I’m not saying distribute it to people. Just try dealing with the actual question posed, or don’t.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I am dealing with the actual question posed . . . by pointing out that it's an inappropriate and ridiculous question.
No. You are trolling.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’m not asking that, and I’m not a Democrat. I’m just asking hypothetically what good could be done with that money to help people that really need it? Legit causes only.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didn't say you were a Democrat. I said that line of thinking leads to left-think.
Instead of looking for attacks to be "outraged" about, try just dealing with the actual words.
I don't spend time "hypothetically" thinking about how I could use someone else's money "better" than they do. Too close to covetousness for me.
Mike earned that money, it's his, he used it for what mattered to him. Works for me.
I’m not outraged, or feeling attacked. I even mentioned a few really reputable causes. It’s not even about mike. I think he’s an asshole, and could light it on fire and shove it up his ass if he wanted to. It is his money. I’m not saying distribute it to people. Just try dealing with the actual question posed, or don’t.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I am dealing with the actual question posed . . . by pointing out that it's an inappropriate and ridiculous question.
No. You are trolling.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No, you just don't like people discussing the topic from perspectives that you haven't personally approved.
