Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your links aren't worth the bytes used to store them.Was that the only source you listed?"rasmussen is biased...
rasmussen is biased...
& these organizations aren't.
Charity Navigator - Rating for Clinton Foundation
Clinton Foundation
Charity Report - Clinton Foundation - give.org
& these organizations aren't."
the BBB is biased?
And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.
the links are right there dummy.
Your links aren't worth the bytes used to store them.Was that the only source you listed?"rasmussen is biased...rasmussen is biased...
& these organizations aren't.
Charity Navigator - Rating for Clinton Foundation
Clinton Foundation
Charity Report - Clinton Foundation - give.org
& these organizations aren't."
the BBB is biased?
And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.
the links are right there dummy.
Declaring victory seems to be your favorite tactic.Your links aren't worth the bytes used to store them.Was that the only source you listed?"rasmussen is biased...
& these organizations aren't."
the BBB is biased?
And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.
the links are right there dummy.
i accept yer surrender.
You should already know what to do.....you keep voting for them. (Obama, Gore, Bill & Hillary, Bernie, Liz Warren)What damage can a few harmless fibs do? It’s just his nature.
If a President wants support for bringing his country to war, he must have credibility.
When he describes an imminent threat, people must believe that threat to send their sons and daughters to war
Skepticism mounts over evidence of 'imminent' threat that Trump says justified Soleimani killing - CNNPolitics
Declaring victory seems to be your favorite tactic.Your links aren't worth the bytes used to store them.Was that the only source you listed?the BBB is biased?
And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.
the links are right there dummy.
i accept yer surrender.
Our nuclear weapons inspections did not include the ability to inspect and report on all Iranian military strength and capability. We would not allow such inspections either
What we did inspect was the destruction of hard to get centrifuges and enriched uranium
Much better than what Donnie Dealmaker got us
No inspections and allowing Iran to restart their nuclear program
Was that the only source you listed?"rasmussen is biased...
rasmussen is biased...
& these organizations aren't.
Charity Navigator - Rating for Clinton Foundation
Clinton Foundation
Charity Report - Clinton Foundation - give.org
& these organizations aren't."
the BBB is biased?
And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.
the links are right there dummy.
I didn't lose, moron. You're posting fake news.Declaring victory seems to be your favorite tactic.Your links aren't worth the bytes used to store them.Was that the only source you listed?
And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.
the links are right there dummy.
i accept yer surrender.
losing seems to be yours.
<sob> but....but...Democrats lie tooWhat damage can a few harmless fibs do? It’s just his nature.
If a President wants support for bringing his country to war, he must have credibility.
When he describes an imminent threat, people must believe that threat to send their sons and daughters to war
Skepticism mounts over evidence of 'imminent' threat that Trump says justified Soleimani killing - CNNPolitics
Well if it's a Democrat then nothing. Schiff lied, Pelosi lied, Schumer can't open his mouth without telling a lie and frankly, as far as Presidential lying,we saw that during 8 years of the liar and fake President Obama.
Was that the only source you listed?"rasmussen is biased...rasmussen is biased...
& these organizations aren't.
Charity Navigator - Rating for Clinton Foundation
Clinton Foundation
Charity Report - Clinton Foundation - give.org
& these organizations aren't."
the BBB is biased?
And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.
the links are right there dummy.
The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.
Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.
Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:
A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.
Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.
But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.
The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”
Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.
Clinton Foundation is above refuteWas that the only source you listed?"rasmussen is biased...rasmussen is biased...
& these organizations aren't.
Charity Navigator - Rating for Clinton Foundation
Clinton Foundation
Charity Report - Clinton Foundation - give.org
& these organizations aren't."
the BBB is biased?
And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.
the links are right there dummy.
The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.
Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.
Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:
A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.
Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.
But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.
The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”
Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.
<sob> but....but...Democrats lie too
NOBODY lies with the frequency or veracity that Trump does.
He lies about the weather, his height and weight, his golf scores, crowd sizes, people he has met
But more importantly, he lies about his policies, his military plans, his reason for doing things, his support
Next Democrat talking point coming up ^^^^^
Attacking the source: a typical leftwing propaganda tactic. The question is whether what the article says is true. Can you debunk anything in the article? If you google it, you'll find that it's all backed up by news articles.Was that the only source you listed?"rasmussen is biased...
& these organizations aren't."
the BBB is biased?
And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.
the links are right there dummy.
The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.
Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.
Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:
A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.
Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.
But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.
The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”
Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.
American Thinker
Share:
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
Detailed Report
- Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources and failed fact checks.
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Conspiracy, Propaganda, Lack of Ownership Transparency
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
American Thinker - Media Bias/Fact Check
checkmate.
The Clinton Foundation bought it's high rating from Charity Navigator. Prior to 2012, charity navigator had nothing good to say about the Clinton Foundation.Clinton Foundation is above refuteWas that the only source you listed?"rasmussen is biased...
& these organizations aren't."
the BBB is biased?
And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.
the links are right there dummy.
The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.
Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.
Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:
A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.
Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.
But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.
The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”
Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.
Charity Navigator is reporting what everyone already knows. All you can do is lodge baseless complaints
If there is anything questionable about Clinton Foundation practices, Republicans would have shut them down
<sob> but....but...Democrats lie too
NOBODY lies with the frequency or veracity that Trump does.
He lies about the weather, his height and weight, his golf scores, crowd sizes, people he has met
But more importantly, he lies about his policies, his military plans, his reason for doing things, his support
Orange man bad!!
They did?The Clinton Foundation bought it's high rating from Charity Navigator. Prior to 2012, charity navigator had nothing good to say about the Clinton Foundation.Clinton Foundation is above refuteWas that the only source you listed?the BBB is biased?
And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.
the links are right there dummy.
The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.
Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.
Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:
A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.
Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.
But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.
The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”
Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.
Charity Navigator is reporting what everyone already knows. All you can do is lodge baseless complaints
If there is anything questionable about Clinton Foundation practices, Republicans would have shut them down
Wall Street analyst uncovers Clinton Foundation fraud - WND
We trusted those people to stay out of our embassy in 1979. Look where that got us.the international inspectors signed off every time they went in to take a looksey. guess who else said they were in compliance each time they were inspecting?
Attacking the source: a typical leftwing propaganda tactic. The question is whether what the article says is true. Can you debunk anything in the article? If you google it, you'll find that it's all backed up by news articles.Was that the only source you listed?the BBB is biased?
And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.
the links are right there dummy.
The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.
Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.
Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:
A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.
Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.
But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.
The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”
Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.
American Thinker
Share:
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
Detailed Report
- Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources and failed fact checks.
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Conspiracy, Propaganda, Lack of Ownership Transparency
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
American Thinker - Media Bias/Fact Check
checkmate.
Clinton Foundation Admit 85% Of Donations Do Not Go To Charity
The Clinton Foundation bought it's high rating from Charity Navigator. Prior to 2012, charity navigator had nothing good to say about the Clinton Foundation.Clinton Foundation is above refuteWas that the only source you listed?the BBB is biased?
And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.
the links are right there dummy.
The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.
Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.
Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:
A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.
Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.
But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.
The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”
Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.
Charity Navigator is reporting what everyone already knows. All you can do is lodge baseless complaints
If there is anything questionable about Clinton Foundation practices, Republicans would have shut them down
Wall Street analyst uncovers Clinton Foundation fraud - WND
We trusted those people to stay out of our embassy in 1979. Look where that got us.the international inspectors signed off every time they went in to take a looksey. guess who else said they were in compliance each time they were inspecting?
