What happens when your leader is a prolific liar

Was that the only source you listed?

And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.

the links are right there dummy.

The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.


Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.

Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:

A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.

Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.

But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.

The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”

Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.

If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.​
Clinton Foundation is above refute
Charity Navigator is reporting what everyone already knows. All you can do is lodge baseless complaints

If there is anything questionable about Clinton Foundation practices, Republicans would have shut them down
The Clinton Foundation bought it's high rating from Charity Navigator. Prior to 2012, charity navigator had nothing good to say about the Clinton Foundation.

Wall Street analyst uncovers Clinton Foundation fraud - WND

for fuck's sake

World Net Daily (WND)
Share:
MixedFactual-1.jpg

extremeright041.png

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.


  • Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories and numerous failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
World Net Daily (WND) - Media Bias/Fact Check
The only place Finger Boy gets information
 
Going 10 mph over the speed limit is wrong. Crossing the street somewhere besides a crosswalk is wrong. Lying to your mother is wrong.

What the fuck is "after the fact" supposed to mean? The money in the charity was mostly his. It wasn't contributed by anonymous strangers. No one was ripped off. What part of that don't you understand?

I have had to pay a fine to the IRS for filing my taxes late. Do you imagine that should bar me from running for president? Your characterization of his motive is the result of TDS.

it means any cash given to the foundation was to be distributed among CHARITIES no matter who gave it. donny doesn't get to be an indian giver & take it back -- - - first enjoying the tax breaks it gave him, then using it for his personal benefit. once that cash goes into the foundation coffer - - taking it back is stealing. too bad so sad how the courts thought so too 'eh? hence the fines & therefore the outright BAN imposed that they can be any part of any future charity board or foundation.


Do you really want to go into this? If so, we should talk about the clinton foundation where 90% of contributions went for salaries and expenses (the clinton bank accounts) and only 10% to the needy.





5
That is a blatant lie

Fits well in this thread


At the Clinton Foundation, Access Equals Corruption - Rasmussen Reports®
The Clinton Foundation is one of the more respected in the world. It’s health initiatives have saved hundreds of thousands of lives

The Trump Foundation was shut down for corruption

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios
 
Going 10 mph over the speed limit is wrong. Crossing the street somewhere besides a crosswalk is wrong. Lying to your mother is wrong.

What the fuck is "after the fact" supposed to mean? The money in the charity was mostly his. It wasn't contributed by anonymous strangers. No one was ripped off. What part of that don't you understand?

I have had to pay a fine to the IRS for filing my taxes late. Do you imagine that should bar me from running for president? Your characterization of his motive is the result of TDS.

it means any cash given to the foundation was to be distributed among CHARITIES no matter who gave it. donny doesn't get to be an indian giver & take it back -- - - first enjoying the tax breaks it gave him, then using it for his personal benefit. once that cash goes into the foundation coffer - - taking it back is stealing. too bad so sad how the courts thought so too 'eh? hence the fines & therefore the outright BAN imposed that they can be any part of any future charity board or foundation.


Do you really want to go into this? If so, we should talk about the clinton foundation where 90% of contributions went for salaries and expenses (the clinton bank accounts) and only 10% to the needy.





5

fake news.


At the Clinton Foundation, Access Equals Corruption - Rasmussen Reports®

rasmussen is biased...

& these organizations aren't.

Screenshot-41.png

Charity Navigator - Rating for Clinton Foundation

Screenshot-42.png

Clinton Foundation

Screenshot-43.png

Charity Report - Clinton Foundation - give.org

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

and now, the rest of the story
 
it means any cash given to the foundation was to be distributed among CHARITIES no matter who gave it. donny doesn't get to be an indian giver & take it back -- - - first enjoying the tax breaks it gave him, then using it for his personal benefit. once that cash goes into the foundation coffer - - taking it back is stealing. too bad so sad how the courts thought so too 'eh? hence the fines & therefore the outright BAN imposed that they can be any part of any future charity board or foundation.


Do you really want to go into this? If so, we should talk about the clinton foundation where 90% of contributions went for salaries and expenses (the clinton bank accounts) and only 10% to the needy.





5
That is a blatant lie

Fits well in this thread


At the Clinton Foundation, Access Equals Corruption - Rasmussen Reports®
The Clinton Foundation is one of the more respected in the world. It’s health initiatives have saved hundreds of thousands of lives

The Trump Foundation was shut down for corruption

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

“Some”

LOL
 
it means any cash given to the foundation was to be distributed among CHARITIES no matter who gave it. donny doesn't get to be an indian giver & take it back -- - - first enjoying the tax breaks it gave him, then using it for his personal benefit. once that cash goes into the foundation coffer - - taking it back is stealing. too bad so sad how the courts thought so too 'eh? hence the fines & therefore the outright BAN imposed that they can be any part of any future charity board or foundation.


Do you really want to go into this? If so, we should talk about the clinton foundation where 90% of contributions went for salaries and expenses (the clinton bank accounts) and only 10% to the needy.





5

fake news.


At the Clinton Foundation, Access Equals Corruption - Rasmussen Reports®

rasmussen is biased...

& these organizations aren't.

Screenshot-41.png

Charity Navigator - Rating for Clinton Foundation

Screenshot-42.png

Clinton Foundation

Screenshot-43.png

Charity Report - Clinton Foundation - give.org

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

and now, the rest of the story

oh, so some 'liberals opinions' going back before the election carries more weight here than an independent audit dated nov 2019 ?

:71: bless yer little fishy heart.
 
Do you really want to go into this? If so, we should talk about the clinton foundation where 90% of contributions went for salaries and expenses (the clinton bank accounts) and only 10% to the needy.





5
That is a blatant lie

Fits well in this thread


At the Clinton Foundation, Access Equals Corruption - Rasmussen Reports®
The Clinton Foundation is one of the more respected in the world. It’s health initiatives have saved hundreds of thousands of lives

The Trump Foundation was shut down for corruption

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

“Some”

LOL


yeah, that's funny isn't it? I thought all liberals had to think the same or be banned from the liberal club.
 
The Clinton Foundation is one of the more respected in the world. It’s health initiatives have saved hundreds of thousands of lives

The Trump Foundation was shut down for corruption

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

“Some”

LOL


yeah, that's funny isn't it? I thought all liberals had to think the same or be banned from the liberal club.

that's the rw whackadoodle creed.
 
OK

Enough diversion of the thread. Back to the damage of having a prolific liar as President.

Trump cannot be relied on to be honest with the people he serves. He treats us like children who believe any fantasy he tells us
 
Do you really want to go into this? If so, we should talk about the clinton foundation where 90% of contributions went for salaries and expenses (the clinton bank accounts) and only 10% to the needy.





5

fake news.


At the Clinton Foundation, Access Equals Corruption - Rasmussen Reports®

rasmussen is biased...

& these organizations aren't.

Screenshot-41.png

Charity Navigator - Rating for Clinton Foundation

Screenshot-42.png

Clinton Foundation

Screenshot-43.png

Charity Report - Clinton Foundation - give.org

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

and now, the rest of the story

oh, so some 'liberals opinions' going back before the election carries more weight here than an independent audit dated nov 2019 ?

:71: bless yer little fishy heart.


"some" of them are actually capable to thinking for themselves instead of subscribing to the indoctrination of the left.

the clinton foundation was nothing but a money laundering operation to fund the clinton crime family. They paid Webb Hubbell's daughter 600K to "run" it. Hillary backers paid money into it assuming they would get favors when she won, but the bitch lost and now those same people are running from all things clinton.
 
OK

Enough diversion of the thread. Back to the damage of having a prolific liar as President.

Trump cannot be relied on to be honest with the people he serves. He treats us like children who believe any fantasy he tells us


"if you like your plan you can keep it"
"we landed under sniper fire"
"I never had classified data on my private server"
"she didn't intend to violate federal law"
"My son was not involved in Ukrainian corruption"

are those some of the Trump lies you keep talking about?
 
The Clinton Foundation is one of the more respected in the world. It’s health initiatives have saved hundreds of thousands of lives

The Trump Foundation was shut down for corruption

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

“Some”

LOL


yeah, that's funny isn't it? I thought all liberals had to think the same or be banned from the liberal club.

that's the rw whackadoodle creed.


then why did the dems run Tulsi out of the race? she refused to parrot the party line, so she was kicked out.
 
the links are right there dummy.

The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.


Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.

Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:

A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.

Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.

But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.

The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”

Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.

If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.​
Clinton Foundation is above refute
Charity Navigator is reporting what everyone already knows. All you can do is lodge baseless complaints

If there is anything questionable about Clinton Foundation practices, Republicans would have shut them down
The Clinton Foundation bought it's high rating from Charity Navigator. Prior to 2012, charity navigator had nothing good to say about the Clinton Foundation.

Wall Street analyst uncovers Clinton Foundation fraud - WND

for fuck's sake

World Net Daily (WND)
Share:
MixedFactual-1.jpg

extremeright041.png

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.


  • Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories and numerous failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
World Net Daily (WND) - Media Bias/Fact Check
The only place Finger Boy gets information
Another DemTard drops out of the race.
iu
 
The Clinton Foundation is one of the more respected in the world. It’s health initiatives have saved hundreds of thousands of lives

The Trump Foundation was shut down for corruption

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

“Some”

LOL


yeah, that's funny isn't it? I thought all liberals had to think the same or be banned from the liberal club.

that's the rw whackadoodle creed.


then why did the dems run Tulsi out of the race? she refused to parrot the party line, so she was kicked out.
The only respectable Dem in The Race.
 
What damage can a few harmless fibs do? It’s just his nature.
If a President wants support for bringing his country to war, he must have credibility.
When he describes an imminent threat, people must believe that threat to send their sons and daughters to war

Skepticism mounts over evidence of 'imminent' threat that Trump says justified Soleimani killing - CNNPolitics


You don't get to keep your doctor?
I kept my doctor
So did 98 percent of Americans

the ones that couldn't keep their doctor were on preferred networks b4 the ACA - & when the exchanges were set up, some insurance companies took their more accessible physicians off the exchange networks & put them on their own off exchange networks. the mandated protections were still in force, but the health insurers were able to jack up the premiums when they are off the ACA exchange; something that was not expected - but was legal to do. that's why people 'lost' their doctors.

funny though how any insurer can suddenly change their networks, or if your workplace changes plans/companies - you can lose your doctor anyway. that has always been a huge problem.

So great Obama told a false information now can we compare to 5 min of a trump speech...

Sorry but you have to go back to 2012 to find a lie...

This is yesterday
DONALD TRUMP
"I was the person who saved Pre-Existing Conditions in your healthcare."

Trump’s pre-ex claim ‘part fantasty, part delusion'

tom-pantsonfire.gif



Our ruling

Trump tweeted that he "was the person who saved Pre-Existing Conditions in your healthcare."

The president had nothing to do with the ban on health insurance plans discriminating against people with preexisting conditions. This consumer protection is a core part of the health care law that became law during the Obama presidency. Trump has expressly supported the repeal of this law without offering a replacement that would keep the protection intact.

And to this day, his administration is arguing in court that the law – including this provision – should be undone.

The president’s tweet is not only untrue, but it misrepresents his administration’s efforts to repeal the health care law without offering any replacement that might maintain its core protections. We rate this claim Pants on Fire.



I think this is the bit where you say he was joking and I say he is joking about US Citizens living or dying while leaving there loved ones homeless...
 
OK

Enough diversion of the thread. Back to the damage of having a prolific liar as President.

Trump cannot be relied on to be honest with the people he serves. He treats us like children who believe any fantasy he tells us


"if you like your plan you can keep it"
"we landed under sniper fire"
"I never had classified data on my private server"
"she didn't intend to violate federal law"
"My son was not involved in Ukrainian corruption"

are those some of the Trump lies you keep talking about?
I kept my plan.....so did over 98 percent of Americans
Hillary landed in a known sniper zone.....Trump lied about bone spurs
Hillary had no classified information. It was reclassified later
No evidence of Hunter Biden involved in corruption


Trump is Impeached

I win
 
The Clinton Foundation is one of the more respected in the world. It’s health initiatives have saved hundreds of thousands of lives

The Trump Foundation was shut down for corruption

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

“Some”

LOL


yeah, that's funny isn't it? I thought all liberals had to think the same or be banned from the liberal club.

that's the rw whackadoodle creed.


then why did the dems run Tulsi out of the race? she refused to parrot the party line, so she was kicked out.
Tulsi had zero support among voters
 
The Clinton Foundation is one of the more respected in the world. It’s health initiatives have saved hundreds of thousands of lives

The Trump Foundation was shut down for corruption

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

“Some”

LOL


yeah, that's funny isn't it? I thought all liberals had to think the same or be banned from the liberal club.

that's the rw whackadoodle creed.


then why did the dems run Tulsi out of the race? she refused to parrot the party line, so she was kicked out.
How exactly did they run her out of the race?

Do you know why Gabbard isn’t terribly well regarded by the party?
 


yeah, that's funny isn't it? I thought all liberals had to think the same or be banned from the liberal club.

that's the rw whackadoodle creed.


then why did the dems run Tulsi out of the race? she refused to parrot the party line, so she was kicked out.
How exactly did they run her out of the race?

Do you know why Gabbard isn’t terribly well regarded by the party?
Borderline Republican
 
Was that the only source you listed?

And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.

the links are right there dummy.

The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.


Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.

Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:

A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.

Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.

But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.

The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”

Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.

If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.​

American Thinker
Share:
LowFactual-1.jpg

extremeright051.png
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.


  • Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources and failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Conspiracy, Propaganda, Lack of Ownership Transparency
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
American Thinker - Media Bias/Fact Check

checkmate.
Attacking the source: a typical leftwing propaganda tactic. The question is whether what the article says is true. Can you debunk anything in the article? If you google it, you'll find that it's all backed up by news articles.

Clinton Foundation Admit 85% Of Donations Do Not Go To Charity

News Punch
Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.


  • Overall, we rate News Punch a Questionable source based on extreme right wing bias and promotion of tin foil hat conspiracies. This website has zero credibility due to routine publishing of fake news
Detailed Report
Reasoning Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Fake News
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
News Punch - Media Bias/Fact Check


researching a source to find out how legit it is, & to see what kind of credibility it has is what educated bipeds do instead of swallowing & pushing fake news bullshit like you are doing. it's an obvious conspiracy site posting sources bent on CONspiracy &/or are so obscure (& there's always a reason for them being so) is a rw whackadoodles' only defense. what will the next source of yours be? alex jones? :auiqs.jpg:

can you debunk the independent audit provided to the IRS by the legit business that i also linked?

Screenshot-2020-01-15-clinton-foundation-report-public-2018-pdf.png

https://www.clintonfoundation.org/sites/default/files/clinton_foundation_report_public_2018.pdf

CohnReznick: Advisory, Assurance, Tax Firm
Your letter was written after Hillary bought off Charity Navigator. It's worthless. The source is compromised.
 

Forum List

Back
Top