Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's my main question. At what age are children separated. I can't imagine that under age 6 it is possibly legal to separate children unless their parents are a danger to them?It's the law, dope and we don't have to give 2 billion people asylum like you stupidly suggested.
Do you even have any idea of how many applicants there are annually?
What the approval process is?
What percent of applicants actually receive asylum?
Is that number trending up or down over time?
What difference does any of that make? We provide asylum to people who are in great danger of oppressive governments, not people who don't like the direction their country has been the last 20 years.
However they come here anyway, why? Because of people like you. If they can draw enough sympathy from surrender first whites, they may be able to sneak into this country bypassing the millions that await entering our country the right way.
Well gee.......what would happen if we virtually closed our borders? They would quit coming here. This is a concept you will never get through that thick head of yours.
Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
It’s unimaginable that there are people in favor of ripping 1y/o babies from their parents by policy.
Makes you wonder about their upbringing
That's my main question. At what age are children separated. I can't imagine that under age 6 it is possibly legal to separate children unless their parents are a danger to them?What difference does any of that make? We provide asylum to people who are in great danger of oppressive governments, not people who don't like the direction their country has been the last 20 years.
However they come here anyway, why? Because of people like you. If they can draw enough sympathy from surrender first whites, they may be able to sneak into this country bypassing the millions that await entering our country the right way.
Well gee.......what would happen if we virtually closed our borders? They would quit coming here. This is a concept you will never get through that thick head of yours.
Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
It’s unimaginable that there are people in favor of ripping 1y/o babies from their parents by policy.
Makes you wonder about their upbringing
Separating asylum seekers is also legally and morally problematical. First as has been pointed out IT ISN'T ILLEGAL TO SEEK ASYLUM. Sessions has changed policy to require these people be detained while their claims for asylum are considered.
That's my main question. At what age are children separated. I can't imagine that under age 6 it is possibly legal to separate children unless their parents are a danger to them?Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
It’s unimaginable that there are people in favor of ripping 1y/o babies from their parents by policy.
Makes you wonder about their upbringing
Separating asylum seekers is also legally and morally problematical. First as has been pointed out IT ISN'T ILLEGAL TO SEEK ASYLUM. Sessions has changed policy to require these people be detained while their claims for asylum are considered.
As I understand it, Obama did the same thing but it was on the basis of only doing it when it was impossible to keep the family unit together. The hard and fast policy of ripping kids away from their parents as just an enhanced form of deterrence is, frankly, sickening. It say much more about how far we have sunk as a society than what it says to those who break our immigration laws.
That's just it, dope. We don't let in everyone who applies for asylum. There is a process in place to make the determination on their "standing". Asylum applicants are not criminals and have a right to due process under the law.
Yep, and with the time and money spent, we could be doing better things for our country instead. They come here knowing they don't have the qualifications to be granted asylum you dope.
It's the law, dope and we don't have to give 2 billion people asylum like you stupidly suggested.
Do you even have any idea of how many applicants there are annually?
What the approval process is?
What percent of applicants actually receive asylum?
Is that number trending up or down over time?
What difference does any of that make? We provide asylum to people who are in great danger of oppressive governments, not people who don't like the direction their country has been the last 20 years.
However they come here anyway, why? Because of people like you. If they can draw enough sympathy from surrender first whites, they may be able to sneak into this country bypassing the millions that await entering our country the right way.
Well gee.......what would happen if we virtually closed our borders? They would quit coming here. This is a concept you will never get through that thick head of yours.
Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
Why do you ignorant fools take such pride in being suckered?
My guess is, when you get suckered it cost others because you’re a liability yourself?
That's my main question. At what age are children separated. I can't imagine that under age 6 it is possibly legal to separate children unless their parents are a danger to them?And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
It’s unimaginable that there are people in favor of ripping 1y/o babies from their parents by policy.
Makes you wonder about their upbringing
Separating asylum seekers is also legally and morally problematical. First as has been pointed out IT ISN'T ILLEGAL TO SEEK ASYLUM. Sessions has changed policy to require these people be detained while their claims for asylum are considered.
As I understand it, Obama did the same thing but it was on the basis of only doing it when it was impossible to keep the family unit together. The hard and fast policy of ripping kids away from their parents as just an enhanced form of deterrence is, frankly, sickening. It say much more about how far we have sunk as a society than what it says to those who break our immigration laws.
The difference is that Obama did not hold the people until trial. It was called "catch and release." They were literally dumped across the border if they were arrested in some vicinity to it. If they made it to Utah or Kansas, they were detained until a deportation hearing. One can argue that Obama was not humane, but either we try to enforce borders of just give up.
Trump doesn't like the numbers of catch and release because it highlites that we have an uptick in border crossings. So Sessions is imprisoning folks until they get a court deportation.
I probably posted this, and if so I apologize for spamming.
Analysis | Why separate immigrant children from parents? The politics of fear — just indirectly.
There are federal guidelines on when children can be separated at what age, and how children are not to be housed with adults. Even mothers in prison for felonies don't have kids separated at birth. The reasons should be obvious for both.
but when a kid even of age 6-12 is separated from a parent that has a bond with a child, the child's development is hurt. Doing that for the sole reason of making it more punitive for breaking a law is morally and legally wrong. We cannot punish children with criminal justice. It's unconstitutional and wrong - although the Trump administration has not been taken to court ... yet, but it will be. And the separation can cause damage to children's development.
School-Age Children Development & Parenting Tips (6 – 12 Years Old)
Raising school-age children can be awesome. Watching them try new activities, cheering them on at athletic events and applauding their accomplishments at recitals are usually some of the high points for most parents. However, achieving success is often preceded by frustration and sometimes learning to accept one’s weaknesses as well as celebrating and building on strengths. When will equipped parents can be excellent coaches for their child no matter what the endeavor.
While toddlers and preschoolers need constant supervision, school-age children become gradually ready for more independence. However, learning to make good choices and exercise self-discipline does not come easily for many. Parents need to impart a moral code that the child gradually internalizes. As children struggle with these important tasks parents must be able to provide praise and encouragement for achievement but parents must also be able to allow them to sometimes experience the natural consequences for their behavior or provide logical consequences to help them learn from mistakes.
That's just it, dope. We don't let in everyone who applies for asylum. There is a process in place to make the determination on their "standing". Asylum applicants are not criminals and have a right to due process under the law.
Yep, and with the time and money spent, we could be doing better things for our country instead. They come here knowing they don't have the qualifications to be granted asylum you dope.
It's the law, dope and we don't have to give 2 billion people asylum like you stupidly suggested.
Do you even have any idea of how many applicants there are annually?
What the approval process is?
What percent of applicants actually receive asylum?
Is that number trending up or down over time?
What difference does any of that make? We provide asylum to people who are in great danger of oppressive governments, not people who don't like the direction their country has been the last 20 years.
However they come here anyway, why? Because of people like you. If they can draw enough sympathy from surrender first whites, they may be able to sneak into this country bypassing the millions that await entering our country the right way.
Well gee.......what would happen if we virtually closed our borders? They would quit coming here. This is a concept you will never get through that thick head of yours.
Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
It's the law, dope and we don't have to give 2 billion people asylum like you stupidly suggested.
Do you even have any idea of how many applicants there are annually?
What the approval process is?
What percent of applicants actually receive asylum?
Is that number trending up or down over time?
What difference does any of that make? We provide asylum to people who are in great danger of oppressive governments, not people who don't like the direction their country has been the last 20 years.
However they come here anyway, why? Because of people like you. If they can draw enough sympathy from surrender first whites, they may be able to sneak into this country bypassing the millions that await entering our country the right way.
Well gee.......what would happen if we virtually closed our borders? They would quit coming here. This is a concept you will never get through that thick head of yours.
Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
What difference does any of that make? We provide asylum to people who are in great danger of oppressive governments, not people who don't like the direction their country has been the last 20 years.
However they come here anyway, why? Because of people like you. If they can draw enough sympathy from surrender first whites, they may be able to sneak into this country bypassing the millions that await entering our country the right way.
Well gee.......what would happen if we virtually closed our borders? They would quit coming here. This is a concept you will never get through that thick head of yours.
Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
It’s unimaginable that there are people in favor of ripping 1y/o babies from their parents by policy.
Makes you wonder about their upbringing
Your “tolerant based” cries are just plain comical.
You fools realize that ALL detained criminals are separated from their children....RIGHT?
And you realize they’re seperated as a result of their own actions...RIGHT?
Were none of you fools ever taught cause and effect?
That's the thing - the legal process. What Trump is doing is prolonging the legal process of deporting. Rather than catch and a relatively quick over the border you go, Trump is making it more punitive by making it take longer to actually go to court.Yep, and with the time and money spent, we could be doing better things for our country instead. They come here knowing they don't have the qualifications to be granted asylum you dope.
It's the law, dope and we don't have to give 2 billion people asylum like you stupidly suggested.
Do you even have any idea of how many applicants there are annually?
What the approval process is?
What percent of applicants actually receive asylum?
Is that number trending up or down over time?
What difference does any of that make? We provide asylum to people who are in great danger of oppressive governments, not people who don't like the direction their country has been the last 20 years.
However they come here anyway, why? Because of people like you. If they can draw enough sympathy from surrender first whites, they may be able to sneak into this country bypassing the millions that await entering our country the right way.
Well gee.......what would happen if we virtually closed our borders? They would quit coming here. This is a concept you will never get through that thick head of yours.
Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
What is the point in doing so?
Why separate families while going through a legal process?
What difference does any of that make? We provide asylum to people who are in great danger of oppressive governments, not people who don't like the direction their country has been the last 20 years.
However they come here anyway, why? Because of people like you. If they can draw enough sympathy from surrender first whites, they may be able to sneak into this country bypassing the millions that await entering our country the right way.
Well gee.......what would happen if we virtually closed our borders? They would quit coming here. This is a concept you will never get through that thick head of yours.
Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
It’s unimaginable that there are people in favor of ripping 1y/o babies from their parents by policy.
Makes you wonder about their upbringing
Your “tolerant based” cries are just plain comical.
You fools realize that ALL detained criminals are separated from their children....RIGHT?
And you realize they’re seperated as a result of their own actions...RIGHT?
Were none of you fools ever taught cause and effect?
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
It’s unimaginable that there are people in favor of ripping 1y/o babies from their parents by policy.
Makes you wonder about their upbringing
Your “tolerant based” cries are just plain comical.
You fools realize that ALL detained criminals are separated from their children....RIGHT?
And you realize they’re seperated as a result of their own actions...RIGHT?
Were none of you fools ever taught cause and effect?
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
Knowing you can’t qualify for a asylum…And trying anyway knowing you’ll be separated from your children…Should be a crime though...right?
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
It’s unimaginable that there are people in favor of ripping 1y/o babies from their parents by policy.
Makes you wonder about their upbringing
Your “tolerant based” cries are just plain comical.
You fools realize that ALL detained criminals are separated from their children....RIGHT?
And you realize they’re seperated as a result of their own actions...RIGHT?
Were none of you fools ever taught cause and effect?
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
Knowing you can’t qualify for a asylum…And trying anyway knowing you’ll be separated from your children…Should be a crime though...right?
No. Seeking asylum should NEVER be a crime.
Taking children away from their parents in order to frighten and terrorize the parents should be, though.
Right you are. Under the best of circumstances, it’s terrifying. Can you imagine if the kid has separation anxiety, Autism, or some other special needs situation?
Yep, and with the time and money spent, we could be doing better things for our country instead. They come here knowing they don't have the qualifications to be granted asylum you dope.
It's the law, dope and we don't have to give 2 billion people asylum like you stupidly suggested.
Do you even have any idea of how many applicants there are annually?
What the approval process is?
What percent of applicants actually receive asylum?
Is that number trending up or down over time?
What difference does any of that make? We provide asylum to people who are in great danger of oppressive governments, not people who don't like the direction their country has been the last 20 years.
However they come here anyway, why? Because of people like you. If they can draw enough sympathy from surrender first whites, they may be able to sneak into this country bypassing the millions that await entering our country the right way.
Well gee.......what would happen if we virtually closed our borders? They would quit coming here. This is a concept you will never get through that thick head of yours.
Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
That's all of it and like I said, you won't admit it.
White folks are already the minority on the planet, dope. As people migrate around the world, populations will increasingly reflect that fact. I'm not afraid of that.
Then you're probably a minority or a Surrender First white. If you're a minority, then of course you don't care. If you are a surrender first white, then I ask that you move to an all minority community to see how you're treated there first.
Yes, whites are a minority in the world. Did you ever ask why most of the world always want to be where the whites are? Think about that for a few days.
As I suspected; it has nothing to do with illegal immigrants taking jobs. Because if you have any skill at all, the illegal alien isn’t taking your job, a skilled person will.
Its about ethnic cleansing…
So much for the shining city on the hill.
Actually it's more about preservation. You see, we whites came here and made claim to this land. We took this wilderness and built it into the strongest and most prosperous nation on earth in just a few hundred years. We surpassed societies that have been around since the dinosaur.
Now that we created the greatest place around, everybody else wants to share in this success. But the left wants to eliminate the very race of people who created this wonderful wealthy country.
Yes, jobs are only part of it. But tell me one other country in the world where the natives would welcome a political party wanting to make them a minority outside of Surrender First whites such as here and Europe? And look what's happening to Europe!
But surrender first whites never learn a thing. They refuse to look around and see what's happening here and abroad, and instead, insist that it will work out better this time.
After I made my first pickup downtown this morning, I was stopped by a guy trying to back a trailer into a fairly easy dock. I was puzzled by his lack of experience. Then out came the driver, a foreigner in sandals (a dead giveaway) and he continued to stop traffic to open his Fn doors which he should have done before he started to back in.
It took him ten minutes to hit that dock; something I could have done in under 60 seconds. But the reason he's here is because he's working for crap money keeping the rest of our wages down. I know you're fine with this, but God forbid, when one of these Fn foreigners are driving a 75,000 lbs vehicle next to your minivan with your family, and he swerves across three lanes because he can't read the signs on the highway, let's hope you're not right next to him. Because if he takes you and your family out, all he has to do is move back to his country.
Nice supremacist screed, loser.
And they wonder why they get called racist….
Yep, and with the time and money spent, we could be doing better things for our country instead. They come here knowing they don't have the qualifications to be granted asylum you dope.
It's the law, dope and we don't have to give 2 billion people asylum like you stupidly suggested.
Do you even have any idea of how many applicants there are annually?
What the approval process is?
What percent of applicants actually receive asylum?
Is that number trending up or down over time?
What difference does any of that make? We provide asylum to people who are in great danger of oppressive governments, not people who don't like the direction their country has been the last 20 years.
However they come here anyway, why? Because of people like you. If they can draw enough sympathy from surrender first whites, they may be able to sneak into this country bypassing the millions that await entering our country the right way.
Well gee.......what would happen if we virtually closed our borders? They would quit coming here. This is a concept you will never get through that thick head of yours.
Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
No one gives a shit about your melodramatic hyperbole any more.
It's the law, dope and we don't have to give 2 billion people asylum like you stupidly suggested.
Do you even have any idea of how many applicants there are annually?
What the approval process is?
What percent of applicants actually receive asylum?
Is that number trending up or down over time?
What difference does any of that make? We provide asylum to people who are in great danger of oppressive governments, not people who don't like the direction their country has been the last 20 years.
However they come here anyway, why? Because of people like you. If they can draw enough sympathy from surrender first whites, they may be able to sneak into this country bypassing the millions that await entering our country the right way.
Well gee.......what would happen if we virtually closed our borders? They would quit coming here. This is a concept you will never get through that thick head of yours.
Asylum is a "right way", dope.
Applying for asylum is not a crime.
And neither is the government taking their kids away during the process, yet you on the left bitch about that.
Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations.
This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents.
Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
It’s unimaginable that there are people in favor of ripping 1y/o babies from their parents by policy.
Makes you wonder about their upbringing
Deuteronomy 10:18-19 – “For the Lord your God...loves the strangers, providing them food and clothing. You shall also love the stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.”
From my twitter feed
Incorrect....Ripping children out of the arms of their parents is a crime against humanity. At the very least it is a human rights violation of the children’s rights as stated by the United Nations...
If their parents do not want this to happen to their children, then they should not cross over onto sovereign United States soil without our express prior consent....This is a traumatizing and terrorizing event for these children, one which will affect them all of their lives. Many of the children are being drugged to deal with the emotional effects of being separated from the parents...
No. It is our intent to send the message that coming (or overstaying) here without our permission will no longer be tolerated, regardless of the cost....Is this the image the USA wants to project to the world. A nation which terrorizes and traumatizes children for political gain?
True. Stepping onto (or overstaying on) sovereign United States soil without our express prior consent should be, however, and it IS....No. Seeking asylum should NEVER be a crime...
Good thing for us, then, that that is not what is happening....Taking children away from their parents in order to frighten and terrorize the parents should be, though.
