Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What if Hobby Lobby was run by Muslims imposing Sharia law on workers?
Former Star Trek actor George Takei blasted Mondays decision by the Supreme Court allowing the craft store Hobby Lobby to opt out of the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act.
In a post on the website for his new play, Allegiance, the openly gay Takei called Mondays decision a stunning setback for womens reproductive rights.
The ruling elevates the rights of a FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION over those of its women employees and opens the door to all manner of claims that a company can refuse services based on its owners religion, Takei wrote.
He referred to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsbergs blistering 35-page dissent to the decision, saying, Think about the ramifications: As Justice Ginsbergs stinging dissent pointed out, companies run by Scientologists could refuse to cover antidepressants, and those run by Jews or Hindus could refuse to cover medications derived from pigs (such as many anesthetics, intravenous fluids, or medications coated in gelatin).
(O)ne wonders, he said, whether the case would have come out differently if a Muslim-run chain business attempted to impose Sharia law on its employees.
DOH!
Sulu corners the far-right tea brains with LOGIC!!
Remember the so-called ground zero mosque and where the conservative consensus was on that.
Yes, and I remember all the liberals lining up in support, because after all it was just something more to show America isn't that great and that is after all liberal's message.
Hell liberals should be just chanting Allah Akbar all day long.
So you confirm my assertion that people like you wanted to ignore the 1st Amendment when it applied to Muslims,
but would do no such thing if a Christian church were being built anywhere.
Hobby Lobby is imposing a potential financial penalty on their employees based on Hobby Lobby owners' religious belief.
Not providing something to someone at no cost is a financial penalty?
That's retarded.
Learn to read. It's a potential financial penalty to any woman who would have used the insurance she was entitled to, BY LAW.
In 1968, a businessman went to the Supreme Court claiming the right not to serve blacks on the grounds that it was against his religious belief that the races should be separate. It was a sincere religious belief.
He lost 8 to 0.
Now. Either that case, or the Hobby Lobby case, was decided wrongly.
Yes, and I remember all the liberals lining up in support, because after all it was just something more to show America isn't that great and that is after all liberal's message.
Hell liberals should be just chanting Allah Akbar all day long.
So you confirm my assertion that people like you wanted to ignore the 1st Amendment when it applied to Muslims,
but would do no such thing if a Christian church were being built anywhere.
typical libtard.....ignoring the elephant in the room.....
What if Hobby Lobby was run by Muslims imposing Sharia law on workers?
Former Star Trek actor George Takei blasted Mondays decision by the Supreme Court allowing the craft store Hobby Lobby to opt out of the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act.
In a post on the website for his new play, Allegiance, the openly gay Takei called Mondays decision a stunning setback for womens reproductive rights.
The ruling elevates the rights of a FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION over those of its women employees and opens the door to all manner of claims that a company can refuse services based on its owners religion, Takei wrote.
He referred to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsbergs blistering 35-page dissent to the decision, saying, Think about the ramifications: As Justice Ginsbergs stinging dissent pointed out, companies run by Scientologists could refuse to cover antidepressants, and those run by Jews or Hindus could refuse to cover medications derived from pigs (such as many anesthetics, intravenous fluids, or medications coated in gelatin).
(O)ne wonders, he said, whether the case would have come out differently if a Muslim-run chain business attempted to impose Sharia law on its employees.
DOH!
Sulu corners the far-right tea brains with LOGIC!!
What if Hobby Lobby was run by Muslims imposing Sharia law on workers?
Former Star Trek actor George Takei blasted Mondays decision by the Supreme Court allowing the craft store Hobby Lobby to opt out of the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act.
In a post on the website for his new play, Allegiance, the openly gay Takei called Mondays decision a stunning setback for womens reproductive rights.
The ruling elevates the rights of a FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION over those of its women employees and opens the door to all manner of claims that a company can refuse services based on its owners religion, Takei wrote.
He referred to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsbergs blistering 35-page dissent to the decision, saying, Think about the ramifications: As Justice Ginsbergs stinging dissent pointed out, companies run by Scientologists could refuse to cover antidepressants, and those run by Jews or Hindus could refuse to cover medications derived from pigs (such as many anesthetics, intravenous fluids, or medications coated in gelatin).
(O)ne wonders, he said, whether the case would have come out differently if a Muslim-run chain business attempted to impose Sharia law on its employees.
DOH!
Sulu corners the far-right tea brains with LOGIC!!
What the fuck's a "Hobby Lobby," and who gives a shit?
What if Hobby Lobby was run by Muslims imposing Sharia law on workers?
Former Star Trek actor George Takei blasted Mondays decision by the Supreme Court allowing the craft store Hobby Lobby to opt out of the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act.
In a post on the website for his new play, Allegiance, the openly gay Takei called Mondays decision a stunning setback for womens reproductive rights.
The ruling elevates the rights of a FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION over those of its women employees and opens the door to all manner of claims that a company can refuse services based on its owners religion, Takei wrote.
He referred to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsbergs blistering 35-page dissent to the decision, saying, Think about the ramifications: As Justice Ginsbergs stinging dissent pointed out, companies run by Scientologists could refuse to cover antidepressants, and those run by Jews or Hindus could refuse to cover medications derived from pigs (such as many anesthetics, intravenous fluids, or medications coated in gelatin).
(O)ne wonders, he said, whether the case would have come out differently if a Muslim-run chain business attempted to impose Sharia law on its employees.
DOH!
Sulu corners the far-right tea brains with LOGIC!!
What if Hobby Lobby was run by Muslims imposing Sharia law on workers?
Former Star Trek actor George Takei blasted Mondays decision by the Supreme Court allowing the craft store Hobby Lobby to opt out of the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act.
In a post on the website for his new play, Allegiance, the openly gay Takei called Mondays decision a stunning setback for womens reproductive rights.
The ruling elevates the rights of a FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION over those of its women employees and opens the door to all manner of claims that a company can refuse services based on its owners religion, Takei wrote.
He referred to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsbergs blistering 35-page dissent to the decision, saying, Think about the ramifications: As Justice Ginsbergs stinging dissent pointed out, companies run by Scientologists could refuse to cover antidepressants, and those run by Jews or Hindus could refuse to cover medications derived from pigs (such as many anesthetics, intravenous fluids, or medications coated in gelatin).
(O)ne wonders, he said, whether the case would have come out differently if a Muslim-run chain business attempted to impose Sharia law on its employees.
DOH!
Sulu corners the far-right tea brains with LOGIC!!
Remember the so-called ground zero mosque and where the conservative consensus was on that.
Yes, and I remember all the liberals lining up in support, because after all it was just something more to show America isn't that great and that is after all liberal's message.
Hell liberals should be just chanting Allah Akbar all day long.
So you confirm my assertion that people like you wanted to ignore the 1st Amendment when it applied to Muslims,
but would do no such thing if a Christian church were being built anywhere.
Corporations are People now with freedom of speech (the majority of the world's wealth) and freedom of religion (freedom to follow whichever laws they choose to obey).
Let me get this straight.
The government is forcing employers to provide a perq to their employees.
Not only that, the government is dictating exactly what the structure of that perq should be.
And you assholes are saying HOBBY LOBBY is the one forcing its beliefs on people? Really?
What if Hobby Lobby was run by Muslims imposing Sharia law on workers?
Former Star Trek actor George Takei blasted Monday’s decision by the Supreme Court allowing the craft store Hobby Lobby to opt out of the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act.
In a post on the website for his new play, Allegiance, the openly gay Takei called Monday’s decision “a stunning setback for women’s reproductive rights.”
“The ruling elevates the rights of a FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION over those of its women employees and opens the door to all manner of claims that a company can refuse services based on its owner’s religion,” Takei wrote.
He referred to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s blistering 35-page dissent to the decision, saying, “Think about the ramifications: As Justice Ginsberg’s stinging dissent pointed out, companies run by Scientologists could refuse to cover antidepressants, and those run by Jews or Hindus could refuse to cover medications derived from pigs (such as many anesthetics, intravenous fluids, or medications coated in gelatin).”
“(O)ne wonders,” he said, “whether the case would have come out differently if a Muslim-run chain business attempted to impose Sharia law on its employees.”
DOH!
Sulu corners the far-right tea brains with LOGIC!!
what if hobby lobby proposed not allowing individuals to carry a gun into their stores. you hypocritical liberal douche bags would be supporting their right to chose based on their moral standards to the max. sorry, you can't have it both ways
None of them have anything. They think that because the one more Supreme Court judge got the decision wrong than got it right somehow wins the actual argument. No.
One judge? I think you mean 4 got it totally wrong.
No, 5 got it wrong. That's my opinion. They didn't follow the Constitution and they didn't follow precedent.
Let me get this straight.
The government is forcing employers to provide a perq to their employees.
Not only that, the government is dictating exactly what the structure of that perq should be.
And you assholes are saying HOBBY LOBBY is the one forcing its beliefs on people? Really?
Yes. That's exactly what they are saying.
It's Hobby Lobby that's the bad guy. Not them for imposing this stupid law on all of us to begin with.
