Yep, you didn't make it up. You just butchered it in your statement. Hence my comment "Did you realize your inferior understanding of the language; did you go to a superior court for a better understanding?"dude; that Is the legal concept. i did not make it up. you simply appealed to ignorance and made up a rational excuse.Now you are changing what you wrote. Did you realize your inferior understanding of the language; did you go to a superior court for a better understanding?employment is at will; that assumes an employment relationship on that basis.My understanding is fine. Employment requires consent or agreement from both parties; the employer and the employee. If my employer consented but I did not that would satisfy your condition of either, unfortunately, that would mean I would be forced to perform labor against my will. Your problem appears to be that you do not have social morals for free.just your understanding is flawed; do you Only have diversions and special pleading?I understand the legal concept. I stated the legal concept. Employment requires consent or agreement from both parties; the employer and the employee. Your wording was flawed. I even explained why it was flawed.
You merely have an inferior understanding of the language; you may need to go to a superior court for a better understanding.
Employment at the will of either party means both until it is ended, at the will of either party.
It almost sounded like you believe I need to go to re-education camp, lol. Winston? Is that you?