Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
London Mayor's Office Slams Trump's 'Ill-Informed' Politicizing Of Terror Attack Comments | HuffPost
I want to hear from conservatives what the justification of president Trump trying to make political hay out of this attack is? The way I see it. Trump has few friends in Europe. Great-Britain is the only European country that's not becoming openly hostile towards Trump. Why does he need to politicise an act of terror by openly attacking the mayor of the town attacked? What's the up side of doing this? How is this in America's best interest?
I don't know how a Muzzy got elected to be Mayor but the shot is right on the mark the Mayor said" get use to the violence it is the new normal" which is really the wrong thing to say about people getting killed.London Mayor's Office Slams Trump's 'Ill-Informed' Politicizing Of Terror Attack Comments | HuffPost
I want to hear from conservatives what the justification of president Trump trying to make political hay out of this attack is? The way I see it. Trump has few friends in Europe. Great-Britain is the only European country that's not becoming openly hostile towards Trump. Why does he need to politicise an act of terror by openly attacking the mayor of the town attacked? What's the up side of doing this? How is this in America's best interest?
Touche,bigotry is a better word for it. You are rightAnd, of course...---------------------------------------------- no Racist undertone from me , the mayor is a muslim likely elected by other muslims , lefties and enemies of western ways and culture Forkup .Let's forego the obvious racist undertone here. He wasn't appointed he was elected, which in most cases means a majority of voters like him better then the people running against him. So if you think that most brits don't like him, you of course have information to back this up? If not you are projecting your own personal opinion of a guy you never met , onto a country I suspect you know little of.--------------------------- I think that most ENGLISH have no use for their new muslim mayor of london-istan Forkup .Which is my point.If you care about the Brits,you have to realise that attacking the mayor of London is bad for the relationship. I've yet to hear a decent justification.the only ones i care about is the Brits and maybe the 'canooks' . And maybe the 'canooks' will be ok after awhile . Plus i think that MAYBE Trump will eventually make friends and allies with another powerful country when we and they have common interests Forkup .
... as we know....
... Islam is not a race.
.
The only thing I heard is. The Brits deserve it. Trump can do what he wants. Or one guy taking the tack of saying, Trump didn't attack the mayor because he really did minimize the attack. None of which is a believable justification in my opinion. Because it still directly damages America's interests.London Mayor's Office Slams Trump's 'Ill-Informed' Politicizing Of Terror Attack Comments | HuffPost
I want to hear from conservatives what the justification of president Trump trying to make political hay out of this attack is? The way I see it. Trump has few friends in Europe. Great-Britain is the only European country that's not becoming openly hostile towards Trump. Why does he need to politicise an act of terror by openly attacking the mayor of the town attacked? What's the up side of doing this? How is this in America's best interest?
The really funny thing about this post? You have absolutely no interest in anyone's response except for how you can use it to attack the poster and Trump. You already have it in your head that it was the wrong thing to do and that there is no justification for it, nothing anyone posts will change your mind. You hate Trump and his supporters. For you the discussion ends there.
--------------------------------------------- cavalier , impulsiveness while i say that Trump has well thought out plans and Trump is aware of what American Sovereignty is . Where will the Brits go , will they welcome the Chinese [maybe iran] or what because i don't know and i don't think that britain is very strong for more than a third world Falklands . Maybe the world is realigning and Trump and his advisors realize that fact Forkup !!America is the leader because the world accept them as such. Trump is being incredibly cavalier about maintaining decent relationships with his historical allies. Even worse his impulsiveness as demonstrated here threatens the few relationships that so far are clearly in his camp. That's kind of the point of this OP. Saying it's "take it or leave it" is all well and good, but beware that being the leader of the world is a status that can be lost, and it's Trump's own action that very well may cause this.----------------------------------------------- its my opinion that the USA is the leader and has been since the end of ww2 , if the Brits and others don't want to play by American rules they can leave .I guess it's a reply to something, just not what I ask. Why is it a good idea for Trump to vent his opinion so openly, when that opinion damages one of the only halfway decent relationships left with a democratically elected government?Which is my point.If you care about the Brits,you have to realise that attacking the mayor of London is bad for the relationship. I've yet to hear a decent justification.the only ones i care about is the Brits and maybe the 'canooks' . And maybe the 'canooks' will be ok after awhile . Plus i think that MAYBE Trump will eventually make friends and allies with another powerful country when we and they have common interests Forkup .
Would you rather Trump try and influence the election there, like Obama did with Brexit?
The Brits did EXACTLY what the leftists want us to do, and look how it has worked out for them. I wonder when, if ever......the left is going to wake up!
So your answer is. It doesn't matter if it's in America's best interest, they deserve it?So what? they have been riding our asses since 1941 so screw the SOB shit, they made their damn liberal shit bed let the MOFOS die in them.
He should have said nothing. A Rudy Giuliani he ain't.Honestly, though, what do you want the Mayor to say? "Oh my GOD! Everyone head for the lifeboats!"Nope. The Mayor publicly stated not to be alarmed. He then made a half assed excuse that his words were misunderstood. (Liberal pukes always do this)So your answer is. It doesn't matter if it's in America's best interest, they deserve it?So what? they have been riding our asses since 1941 so screw the SOB shit, they made their damn liberal shit bed let the MOFOS die in them.
Oh and btw I don't hate Trump supporters. Most of my in laws voted Trump and I consider them perfectly reasonable people. What I find interesting tough is how it seems that for most conservatives here, everything Trump does is justified.Most Democrats for instance didn't think Clinton's was entirely in her rights concerning her e-mails scandal . They might have come out with excuses but very few would have chosen to say Clinton had the RIGHT to use a private server. Trump on the other hand doesn't seem accountable for anything according to conservatives.London Mayor's Office Slams Trump's 'Ill-Informed' Politicizing Of Terror Attack Comments | HuffPost
I want to hear from conservatives what the justification of president Trump trying to make political hay out of this attack is? The way I see it. Trump has few friends in Europe. Great-Britain is the only European country that's not becoming openly hostile towards Trump. Why does he need to politicise an act of terror by openly attacking the mayor of the town attacked? What's the up side of doing this? How is this in America's best interest?
The really funny thing about this post? You have absolutely no interest in anyone's response except for how you can use it to attack the poster and Trump. You already have it in your head that it was the wrong thing to do and that there is no justification for it, nothing anyone posts will change your mind. You hate Trump and his supporters. For you the discussion ends there.
----------------------------- amazing eh ??The London mayor is a muzzie...
London Mayor's Office Slams Trump's 'Ill-Informed' Politicizing Of Terror Attack Comments | HuffPost
I want to hear from conservatives what the justification of president Trump trying to make political hay out of this attack is? The way I see it. Trump has few friends in Europe. Great-Britain is the only European country that's not becoming openly hostile towards Trump. Why does he need to politicise an act of terror by openly attacking the mayor of the town attacked? What's the up side of doing this? How is this in America's best interest?
How is American sovereignty helped by pissing of the British? As I pointed out, it's probably the only European country left that isn't completely disgusted with Trump. And if they draw to China, is that in America's best interest?--------------------------------------------- cavalier , impulsiveness while i say that Trump has well thought out plans and Trump is aware of what American Sovereignty is . Where will the Brits go , will they welcome the Chinese [maybe iran] or what because i don't know and i don't think that britain is very strong for more than a third world Falklands . Maybe the world is realigning and Trump and his advisors realize that fact Forkup !!America is the leader because the world accept them as such. Trump is being incredibly cavalier about maintaining decent relationships with his historical allies. Even worse his impulsiveness as demonstrated here threatens the few relationships that so far are clearly in his camp. That's kind of the point of this OP. Saying it's "take it or leave it" is all well and good, but beware that being the leader of the world is a status that can be lost, and it's Trump's own action that very well may cause this.----------------------------------------------- its my opinion that the USA is the leader and has been since the end of ww2 , if the Brits and others don't want to play by American rules they can leave .I guess it's a reply to something, just not what I ask. Why is it a good idea for Trump to vent his opinion so openly, when that opinion damages one of the only halfway decent relationships left with a democratically elected government?Which is my point.If you care about the Brits,you have to realise that attacking the mayor of London is bad for the relationship. I've yet to hear a decent justification.
Would you rather Trump try and influence the election there, like Obama did with Brexit?
The Brits did EXACTLY what the leftists want us to do, and look how it has worked out for them. I wonder when, if ever......the left is going to wake up!
-------------------------------------- most Conservative beleive that Trump is a serious American with Americans interest at heart and in mind . And the things that Trump says and does are very American style . And as to WHY make political hay out of this and all the attacks in england and euro land , why not Forkup ??Oh and btw I don't hate Trump supporters. Most of my in laws voted Trump and I consider them perfectly reasonable people. What I find interesting tough is how it seems that for most conservatives here, everything Trump does is justified.Most Democrats for instance didn't think Clinton's was entirely in her rights concerning her e-mails scandal . They might have come out with excuses but very few would have chosen to say Clinton had the RIGHT to use a private server. Trump on the other hand doesn't seem accountable for anything according to conservatives.London Mayor's Office Slams Trump's 'Ill-Informed' Politicizing Of Terror Attack Comments | HuffPost
I want to hear from conservatives what the justification of president Trump trying to make political hay out of this attack is? The way I see it. Trump has few friends in Europe. Great-Britain is the only European country that's not becoming openly hostile towards Trump. Why does he need to politicise an act of terror by openly attacking the mayor of the town attacked? What's the up side of doing this? How is this in America's best interest?
The really funny thing about this post? You have absolutely no interest in anyone's response except for how you can use it to attack the poster and Trump. You already have it in your head that it was the wrong thing to do and that there is no justification for it, nothing anyone posts will change your mind. You hate Trump and his supporters. For you the discussion ends there.
America has great friends if the money is right. And those great friends will take the money and shit on Uncle Sam. Trump bites back. Get used to it.How is American sovereignty helped by pissing of the British? As I pointed out, it's probably the only European country left that isn't completely disgusted with Trump. And if they draw to China, is that in America's best interest?--------------------------------------------- cavalier , impulsiveness while i say that Trump has well thought out plans and Trump is aware of what American Sovereignty is . Where will the Brits go , will they welcome the Chinese [maybe iran] or what because i don't know and i don't think that britain is very strong for more than a third world Falklands . Maybe the world is realigning and Trump and his advisors realize that fact Forkup !!America is the leader because the world accept them as such. Trump is being incredibly cavalier about maintaining decent relationships with his historical allies. Even worse his impulsiveness as demonstrated here threatens the few relationships that so far are clearly in his camp. That's kind of the point of this OP. Saying it's "take it or leave it" is all well and good, but beware that being the leader of the world is a status that can be lost, and it's Trump's own action that very well may cause this.----------------------------------------------- its my opinion that the USA is the leader and has been since the end of ww2 , if the Brits and others don't want to play by American rules they can leave .I guess it's a reply to something, just not what I ask. Why is it a good idea for Trump to vent his opinion so openly, when that opinion damages one of the only halfway decent relationships left with a democratically elected government?Would you rather Trump try and influence the election there, like Obama did with Brexit?
The Brits did EXACTLY what the leftists want us to do, and look how it has worked out for them. I wonder when, if ever......the left is going to wake up!
----------------------------------------------------- we don't need to kowtow to so called allies if we exercise American Sovereignty .How is American sovereignty helped by pissing of the British? As I pointed out, it's probably the only European country left that isn't completely disgusted with Trump. And if they draw to China, is that in America's best interest?--------------------------------------------- cavalier , impulsiveness while i say that Trump has well thought out plans and Trump is aware of what American Sovereignty is . Where will the Brits go , will they welcome the Chinese [maybe iran] or what because i don't know and i don't think that britain is very strong for more than a third world Falklands . Maybe the world is realigning and Trump and his advisors realize that fact Forkup !!America is the leader because the world accept them as such. Trump is being incredibly cavalier about maintaining decent relationships with his historical allies. Even worse his impulsiveness as demonstrated here threatens the few relationships that so far are clearly in his camp. That's kind of the point of this OP. Saying it's "take it or leave it" is all well and good, but beware that being the leader of the world is a status that can be lost, and it's Trump's own action that very well may cause this.----------------------------------------------- its my opinion that the USA is the leader and has been since the end of ww2 , if the Brits and others don't want to play by American rules they can leave .I guess it's a reply to something, just not what I ask. Why is it a good idea for Trump to vent his opinion so openly, when that opinion damages one of the only halfway decent relationships left with a democratically elected government?Would you rather Trump try and influence the election there, like Obama did with Brexit?
The Brits did EXACTLY what the leftists want us to do, and look how it has worked out for them. I wonder when, if ever......the left is going to wake up!
The only thing I heard is. The Brits deserve it. Trump can do what he wants. Or one guy taking the tack of saying, Trump didn't attack the mayor because he really did minimize the attack. None of which is a believable justification in my opinion. Because it still directly damages America's interests.London Mayor's Office Slams Trump's 'Ill-Informed' Politicizing Of Terror Attack Comments | HuffPost
I want to hear from conservatives what the justification of president Trump trying to make political hay out of this attack is? The way I see it. Trump has few friends in Europe. Great-Britain is the only European country that's not becoming openly hostile towards Trump. Why does he need to politicise an act of terror by openly attacking the mayor of the town attacked? What's the up side of doing this? How is this in America's best interest?
The really funny thing about this post? You have absolutely no interest in anyone's response except for how you can use it to attack the poster and Trump. You already have it in your head that it was the wrong thing to do and that there is no justification for it, nothing anyone posts will change your mind. You hate Trump and his supporters. For you the discussion ends there.
Because having decent relationships with other countries is in America's best interest. In national security you need to get information from them. Other countries have problems when you endanger their sources for instance. In trade if you want to have a good rapport, if not people will be less likely to give you what you want. For instance, his tweet might put political pressure on May causing her to lose the election. May is Pro US. She wants to have a trade deal with the US. At the moment the US should get a good deal from her. She looses the election the next guy might be inclined to prioritize the Chinese. That's why not.-------------------------------------- most Conservative beleive that Trump is a serious American with Americans interest at heart and in mind . And the things that Trump says and does are very American style . And as to WHY make political hay out of this and all the attacks in england and euro land , why not Forkup ??Oh and btw I don't hate Trump supporters. Most of my in laws voted Trump and I consider them perfectly reasonable people. What I find interesting tough is how it seems that for most conservatives here, everything Trump does is justified.Most Democrats for instance didn't think Clinton's was entirely in her rights concerning her e-mails scandal . They might have come out with excuses but very few would have chosen to say Clinton had the RIGHT to use a private server. Trump on the other hand doesn't seem accountable for anything according to conservatives.London Mayor's Office Slams Trump's 'Ill-Informed' Politicizing Of Terror Attack Comments | HuffPost
I want to hear from conservatives what the justification of president Trump trying to make political hay out of this attack is? The way I see it. Trump has few friends in Europe. Great-Britain is the only European country that's not becoming openly hostile towards Trump. Why does he need to politicise an act of terror by openly attacking the mayor of the town attacked? What's the up side of doing this? How is this in America's best interest?
The really funny thing about this post? You have absolutely no interest in anyone's response except for how you can use it to attack the poster and Trump. You already have it in your head that it was the wrong thing to do and that there is no justification for it, nothing anyone posts will change your mind. You hate Trump and his supporters. For you the discussion ends there.
What justification have you seen that I missed?The only thing I heard is. The Brits deserve it. Trump can do what he wants. Or one guy taking the tack of saying, Trump didn't attack the mayor because he really did minimize the attack. None of which is a believable justification in my opinion. Because it still directly damages America's interests.London Mayor's Office Slams Trump's 'Ill-Informed' Politicizing Of Terror Attack Comments | HuffPost
I want to hear from conservatives what the justification of president Trump trying to make political hay out of this attack is? The way I see it. Trump has few friends in Europe. Great-Britain is the only European country that's not becoming openly hostile towards Trump. Why does he need to politicise an act of terror by openly attacking the mayor of the town attacked? What's the up side of doing this? How is this in America's best interest?
The really funny thing about this post? You have absolutely no interest in anyone's response except for how you can use it to attack the poster and Trump. You already have it in your head that it was the wrong thing to do and that there is no justification for it, nothing anyone posts will change your mind. You hate Trump and his supporters. For you the discussion ends there.
Then I suggest you clean your ears or look into hearing aids.
Political ideology is at the root of the problem by BOTH SIDES. Trump merely stated the obvious.London Mayor's Office Slams Trump's 'Ill-Informed' Politicizing Of Terror Attack Comments | HuffPost
I want to hear from conservatives what the justification of president Trump trying to make political hay out of this attack is? The way I see it. Trump has few friends in Europe. Great-Britain is the only European country that's not becoming openly hostile towards Trump. Why does he need to politicise an act of terror by openly attacking the mayor of the town attacked? What's the up side of doing this? How is this in America's best interest?
