easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,149
- 2,645
How many American lives did Reagan lose in Lebanon? 241?
USMB seriously needs a 'WTF? - Stay On Topic' Button/emoji...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many American lives did Reagan lose in Lebanon? 241?
And leaves classified information in a hotel room.What kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
Checkmate!What kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
Typical lib deflection.....reagan isnt runningWhat kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
How many American lives did Reagan lose in Lebanon? 241?
Did you read the report? Show me where they claimed to have accounted for all of the $6 billion.Losing track of $6 billion is the same as losing a lunch receipt? Lol. Ok.What kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
I am aware of no Secretary of State who's lost any of those things, including Hillary Clinton.
Things for which responsibility falls on the President, not the Secretary of State:
Misrepresentation of material fact:
- Americans who die while giving service to the nation in a foreign locale
Things not worth discussing when lives or $916M are the points of comparison.
- $6 billion lost
A spokesman for the Office of the Inspector General told PolitiFact the alert speaks for itself, but many seemed to misinterpret what it actually said. The confusion prompted Inspector General Steve Linick to pen a clarification in the Washington Post.
"Some have concluded based on this that $6 billion is missing. The alert, however, did not draw that conclusion," he wrote. "Instead, it found that the failure to adequately maintain contract files — documents necessary to ensure the full accounting of U.S. tax dollars — ‘creates significant financial risk and demonstrates a lack of internal control over the Department’s contract actions.’ "
In other words, the State Department was terrible at paperwork. The $6 billion figure refers to the total amount affected by file mismanagement. It’s akin to spending $20 on lunch and losing or not asking for a receipt. Documentation over where that $20 went was lost, but not the $20 itself.
So the State Department under Clinton, who wasn’t mentioned in the alert, may have been financially disorganized, but it didn’t "lose" $6 billion.
- 1 laptop?
- 4 cell phones?
- 3 tables?
I'm not aware that any emails were lost. I am aware that some were deleted. Where are your deleted emails? Did you lose them?
- 30,000 emails?
If that's what you think about losing $6B, that's on you. What I pointed out is that the Inspector General himself clarified that $6B was not in fact "lost."
Stupid libs think Reagan is running. You can't help stupid.What kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
How many American lives did Reagan lose in Lebanon? 241?
What did Hillary do with the $6 billion? Was is part of the $11.9 billion she gave to Iran?
I have no idea wtf you are talking about. I am not a liberal. I am recently pushed by the religious take over of the republican party by religeous zealots into calling myself an independent with conservative leanings. This election has nothing to do with liberals or conservatives anyway as neither candidate represents conservative or liberal platforms. Both Clinton and Trump are corporotists. You just need to decide what flavor of corporate representative you prefer.
Did you read the report? Show me where they claimed to have accounted for all of the $6 billion.Losing track of $6 billion is the same as losing a lunch receipt? Lol. Ok.What kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
I am aware of no Secretary of State who's lost any of those things, including Hillary Clinton.
Things for which responsibility falls on the President, not the Secretary of State:
Misrepresentation of material fact:
- Americans who die while giving service to the nation in a foreign locale
Things not worth discussing when lives or $916M are the points of comparison.
- $6 billion lost
A spokesman for the Office of the Inspector General told PolitiFact the alert speaks for itself, but many seemed to misinterpret what it actually said. The confusion prompted Inspector General Steve Linick to pen a clarification in the Washington Post.
"Some have concluded based on this that $6 billion is missing. The alert, however, did not draw that conclusion," he wrote. "Instead, it found that the failure to adequately maintain contract files — documents necessary to ensure the full accounting of U.S. tax dollars — ‘creates significant financial risk and demonstrates a lack of internal control over the Department’s contract actions.’ "
In other words, the State Department was terrible at paperwork. The $6 billion figure refers to the total amount affected by file mismanagement. It’s akin to spending $20 on lunch and losing or not asking for a receipt. Documentation over where that $20 went was lost, but not the $20 itself.
So the State Department under Clinton, who wasn’t mentioned in the alert, may have been financially disorganized, but it didn’t "lose" $6 billion.
- 1 laptop?
- 4 cell phones?
- 3 tables?
I'm not aware that any emails were lost. I am aware that some were deleted. Where are your deleted emails? Did you lose them?
- 30,000 emails?
If that's what you think about losing $6B, that's on you. What I pointed out is that the Inspector General himself clarified that $6B was not in fact "lost."
Yes. I think all of us know Clinton has issues with records. Post the part where they say all the money is accounted for.Did you read the report? Show me where they claimed to have accounted for all of the $6 billion.Losing track of $6 billion is the same as losing a lunch receipt? Lol. Ok.What kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
I am aware of no Secretary of State who's lost any of those things, including Hillary Clinton.
Things for which responsibility falls on the President, not the Secretary of State:
Misrepresentation of material fact:
- Americans who die while giving service to the nation in a foreign locale
Things not worth discussing when lives or $916M are the points of comparison.
- $6 billion lost
A spokesman for the Office of the Inspector General told PolitiFact the alert speaks for itself, but many seemed to misinterpret what it actually said. The confusion prompted Inspector General Steve Linick to pen a clarification in the Washington Post.
"Some have concluded based on this that $6 billion is missing. The alert, however, did not draw that conclusion," he wrote. "Instead, it found that the failure to adequately maintain contract files — documents necessary to ensure the full accounting of U.S. tax dollars — ‘creates significant financial risk and demonstrates a lack of internal control over the Department’s contract actions.’ "
In other words, the State Department was terrible at paperwork. The $6 billion figure refers to the total amount affected by file mismanagement. It’s akin to spending $20 on lunch and losing or not asking for a receipt. Documentation over where that $20 went was lost, but not the $20 itself.
So the State Department under Clinton, who wasn’t mentioned in the alert, may have been financially disorganized, but it didn’t "lose" $6 billion.
- 1 laptop?
- 4 cell phones?
- 3 tables?
I'm not aware that any emails were lost. I am aware that some were deleted. Where are your deleted emails? Did you lose them?
- 30,000 emails?
If that's what you think about losing $6B, that's on you. What I pointed out is that the Inspector General himself clarified that $6B was not in fact "lost."
Did you read the Inspector General's remarks that he issued to clarify the report his office published? I included a link to it in my post.
Solyndra for 100 AlexWhat kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
Hillary did not lose any emailsWhat kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
Did he lose those because of his own callousness?What kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
How many American lives did Reagan lose in Lebanon? 241?
What kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
Did he lose those because of his own callousness?What kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
How many American lives did Reagan lose in Lebanon? 241?
Yes. The security for access to that converted hotel was abysmal. The roads leading to it could have easily been made vehicle proof with something as common as a series of jersey barriers. Apparently the lives of the Marines weren't important enough to be treated with the care one would if they were in actual U S barracks. Reagan housed them on the cheap which I would definitely call "callous".
What kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
How many American lives did Reagan lose in Lebanon? 241?
He didn't lie about it and blame it on a video. He also didn't ignore repeated pleas for more security.
Please. Stop being such a drooling moron. Clinton wasn't responsible for the attack. How she represented the attack was unfortunate but completely after the fact. Yes, she reported the cause inaccurately. So what? Somehow you are trying to make her miss statements equal to the actual murders. That is crazy. The REAL culprit was the ambassador himself as he CHOSE to be in Benghazi during a very dangerous moment when he should have been safe in the embassy guarded by actual U S Marines ..not those "guns for hire"..private security.
Neither did Hillary after 13 hours.Did he lose those because of his own callousness?What kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
How many American lives did Reagan lose in Lebanon? 241?
He didn't save them because of his concern....
Hillary did not lose any emails
Sure you are. That is why you referenced Reagan.Stupid libs think Reagan is running. You can't help stupid.What kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
How many American lives did Reagan lose in Lebanon? 241?
What did Hillary do with the $6 billion? Was is part of the $11.9 billion she gave to Iran?
I have no idea wtf you are talking about. I am not a liberal. I am recently pushed by the religious take over of the republican party by religeous zealots into calling myself an independent with conservative leanings. This election has nothing to do with liberals or conservatives anyway as neither candidate represents conservative or liberal platforms. Both Clinton and Trump are corporotists. You just need to decide what flavor of corporate representative you prefer.
When did you become a bigot?
Stupid libs think Reagan is running. You can't help stupid.What kind of Secretary of State loses ...
4 American lives?
$6 billion?
1 laptop?
4 cell phones?
3 tables?
30,000 emails?
How many American lives did Reagan lose in Lebanon? 241?
What did Hillary do with the $6 billion? Was is part of the $11.9 billion she gave to Iran?
I have no idea wtf you are talking about. I am not a liberal. I am recently pushed by the religious take over of the republican party by religeous zealots into calling myself an independent with conservative leanings. This election has nothing to do with liberals or conservatives anyway as neither candidate represents conservative or liberal platforms. Both Clinton and Trump are corporotists. You just need to decide what flavor of corporate representative you prefer.
If you are are going to use words that exceed your vocabulary, please use spell check!