What kind of President would allow 9.1% inflation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You know, poster 'beagle', I keep reading on this venue about this 'one world government', or 'new world order'......yet, nobody fleshes it out to give us any details we could study or contemplate.

So I gotta ask ---where are you getting these announcements about a 'one world government'?

I have questions about who is gonna run it? Will it be a representative republic? A theocracy? A committee? Authoritarian? Democratic? Socialist? Hierarchical?
Just what is the governance principles of this 'one world government'?

Will there be a headquarters?
If so, where?

How are the leaders installed?

Who do I pay my taxes to?
Who sends me my Treasury bond interests?
My Social Security?
Who is responsible for the Post Office? Schools? Fixing the damn roads?
Will there be one universal language?
No longer any 'ethnic' foods?

And, (I just thought of this)......but, if there is a 'one-world government'....that should mean the end of war. Right?
We would all be one government. Who is there to fight?

You know, that could be your 'selling point' for going to your 'one-world-government' thingy ---- 'No War'.

You may be on to something, poster 'Beagle'.
Globalism is the making of the one world government, otherwise it's a cooperation between nation state's such as what is being purported in this "climate change/ESG scoring bull crap. World bank's will be involved, and more and more influence on bordered nation's to remove those border's is happening as we speak. Read your Bible if got one, because it will educate you on the on going saga.
 
If Trump had won the election, we would have high inflation, high gas prices, high grocery prices.

And Putin would be in Kiev.
Putin would not had needed to invade Ukraine if we had President Trump, because President Trump wasn’t dumb enough to provoke war by trying to expand NATO into Ukraine.
 
China opted for severe lockdowns instead of vaccines. When there are outbreaks of covid they shut down entire cities and workplaces. Since Republicans sent all our manufacturing overseas, we suffer supply chain shortages due to locked down Chinese and shipping docks.
Uh better make that the Democrat's who promoted and pushed NAFTA with their rhino's in tow. The Clinton's are still going to go down as two of the worst government officials aside from the Biden fiasco that this nation has ever seen or experienced before. We'll be digging out for year's from the mess.
 
Putin would not had needed to invade Ukraine if we had President Trump, because President Trump wasn’t dumb enough to provoke war by trying to expand NATO into Ukraine.
If Trump had his way NATO would be disbanded.

Putin would be in Kiev and Trump would be calling him a genius.

Oh, wait. Comrade Donald already did that after Putin invaded.

There is no way Trump would defend Ukraine. He has a YUGE grudge toward Zelensky. And he has never, to this day, said a harsh word about Putin. Not once. Ever.

But if some minor celebrity insults Traitor Trump, he rage tweets for WEEKS about it.

So don't kid yourself. If Trump won the election, Putin would be in Kiev right now.
 
Sure Clinton has to share some of the fact that his last three budgets were in the black, but before that in 1969 LBJ’s last budget hit the black.

Even during the Vietnam War.


Which Great Society program are you referring too?
medicare and medicaid

it’s no real surprise to see after Johnson to see that
 
To give tax breaks to producers probably would have no effect on inflation. Probably increase profits to the producers.
The answer is to put a windfall tax on those producers having increased revenues under the current economy. Prices would not be effected, much, but it will help the deficit. The greatest control is the fed.
Most variables are out of government's hands.
I am not sure why you are so uppity with me. I am not an economist but I am a business consultant with an MBA. I know some things. How about you.

Well, then if your credentials are accurate, then you are an intelligent person. So maybe, I should take this to you from a different perspective---------------->

During a recession, manufacturers lower prices to induce you to buy their products instead of the competitions. The larger margin they have to lower them, the better for the consumer. As Democrats like to say with a few changes........the race to the bottom!

Inflation is not just about the price of products, it is also about what the public demands for compensation, is it not? If the public demand for compensation is lowered because they are being satisfied for their personal needs, it puts neutral pressure upon wage hikes which help cause inflation.

It takes a many prong approach to lower inflation---------->

1. Dry up extra money supply through interest rates.

2. Stabilize or lower prices for consumer goods as best you can.

3. Stop upwards pressure on compensation for work.

Now then, maybe by their fault, maybe by no fault of their own, let us see how Democrats have done, shall we!

A. Finally started raising interest rates, little late to the fix the problem, but better late than never.

B. Actively worked for raising costs of fuel for their green new deal. When it all fell apart, they have refused to change course except to beg The House of Saud for oil. No new drilling permits (or few) no new refineries accepted for gasoline or diesel, no summit with industry experts to fix the best they can, the problem.........which is causing around 65 to 70% of inflation.

C. Attempting to insure the doubling of minimum wage for work compensation, which then puts upward pressure on every wage above that. Instead of moving up the food chain in wages by getting a better job as you out grow your old place of employment, they instead add the fuel to inflation, by giving you more compensation for a job a teenager can do.

If your credentials are accurate, you understand exactly what I have just stated. The people who suffer most from this, are people on fixed income, the taxpayer who has to pay more, or borrow more in the name of the government to give fixed income people the raise in Social Security, and poor people that can't climb the ladder because jobs end up being tight during a recession, so they have to wait because nobody wants to take a chance on the unknown, and will only hire the known.

If you are as educated as you say you are, you know as well as I do, the odds are 85-15% this is coming. OK, OK, maybe 80-20, or at the very least, 75-25%! How you can justify this for these affected groups on a social engineering level is beyond me. To do so, is admitting you are saying-------->do as I say, because I (we) know better! Do you? Do you know what is best for the manifest, destiny, of all of these people? How? Why? Same question goes to Biden, his cabinet who is terrible I might add. Besides being in government all of their lives........including Biden.........why do THEY know better?

It is plainly obvious to everyone, it is only 1 of 2 scenarios------------->

They want to impose their will upon us no matter what Americans think, or

2. They know something we do not, and all they have to do is tell us what they know to make all of this plausible, and maybe we buy into it.

Green new deal does NOT apply, because it is contested on so many fronts by other experts, so all most of us can assume is that Joe and the Left is trying to stuff their utopia down Americans throats.

In closing, let me state that Joe has not caused all of this disaster, not even close. The same can not be said for the Democrats over the last 20 years, 15 at the very least. They have been against drilling, refineries, fracking, offshore testing for YEARS, and now the chickens are coming home to roost, helping cause massive inflation as soon as any supply in fossil fuels heads South. What we should be able to cover easily, at least for our own country, can't happen because of the green party wing of the Democrats.

So, maybe you will take solace in the fact I refuse to blame this totally on Biden, or maybe you will get pi**ed at me showing it really was all on the Democrats for the last 15 or 20 years. Either way, you can research it and see for yourself. Since the cause of inflation is almost 70% due to the rise in fossil fuels, the conclusion can not be any other way.

Do I think they planned it this way? Do I believe they wanted this to happen? Do I believe they wanted Americans to suffer? NO! But they made the call, they insisted, and now because of their misstep, the WILL pay the price!
 
If Trump had his way NATO would be disbanded.

Putin would be in Kiev and Trump would be calling him a genius.

Oh, wait. Comrade Donald already did that after Putin invaded.

There is no way Trump would defend Ukraine. He has a YUGE grudge toward Zelensky. And he has never, to this day, said a harsh word about Putin. Not once. Ever.

But if some minor celebrity insults Traitor Trump, he rage tweets for WEEKS about it.

So don't kid yourself. If Trump won the election, Putin would be in Kiev right now.
Nice fantasy.

So why wasn’t NATO “disbanded” and Putin invasion during President Trump?
 
Nice fantasy.

So why wasn’t NATO “disbanded” and Putin invasion during President Trump?
He expected Trump would be re-elected and he needed time to build his cash reserves.

 
Trump handed Biden 1.2% inflation.
He handed him zero plans for vaccinating the country.
He handed him nearly a million deaths due to his incompetence.
He handed him a surrender agreement with the Taliban.
He handed him record unemployment.
He handed him a weakened military.
He handed him a decimated diplomatic corp.
He handed him an Iran 🇮🇷 that's free to build nuclear weapons.
He handed him a Syria 🇸🇾 that's now controlled by Putin.
He handed him a White House with ketchup stains on the walls.
 

Forum List

Back
Top