Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no, it wouldn't. it would be simpler.Block grants to the several States could work.[/QUOTElousy management; it solves nothing. we need something more comprehensive and cost effective.they/I paid into that which makes it a real entitlement,,,the problem with it is he forced participation
the only way to get that is to have it ran by the local community, then the money is closest to the source and the need and you don have the feds taking a cut
it would only work to make it worse and is in violation of the constitution
Generational welfare is the exceptionhow are those benefits helping the poor???Democrats support raising taxes on the wealthy, even themselves if they are wealthyDemocrats: a bunch of rich people convincing poor people to vote for rich people by telling poor people that the other rich people are the reason they're poor.
Rich Republicans vote to slash their own taxes and cut benefits to the poor
so far its done more harm than good and prolonged their suffering,
its time they learn to live or die by their own accord ;like the rest of the world does
Benefits like food stamps, housing, healthcare help to support them
Benefits like job training, low cost business loans, educational grants help to rise out of poverty
No poor person has ever done better by taking benefits away
What have Republicans done to help the poor other than build more prisons?
how would you know since its never been done
but what we do know for a fact is the majority of those that receive them never get out
and it also is not the job of the feds to steal from the majority and give to a minority
is time the communities step up and help their neighbors not the feds by stealing
It is the job of the Government to help those who need help
The federal government collects the money anyway. Block grants could get process started. It is simpler.no, it wouldn't. it would be simpler.Block grants to the several States could work.[/QUOTElousy management; it solves nothing. we need something more comprehensive and cost effective.
the only way to get that is to have it ran by the local community, then the money is closest to the source and the need and you don have the feds taking a cut
it would only work to make it worse and is in violation of the constitution
so sending money to the feds and hen having several fed workers move the money around and then giving it back to the states to then givce it to the people is easier than the people just giving it straight to the states???
HOW SO???
oh i FORGOT THAT THE FEDS WILL KEEP A BIG CUT OF THE MONEY
SO NO ITS NOT EASIER OR SIMPLER
No way is helping people survive hurting themGenerational welfare is the exceptionhow are those benefits helping the poor???Democrats support raising taxes on the wealthy, even themselves if they are wealthy
Rich Republicans vote to slash their own taxes and cut benefits to the poor
so far its done more harm than good and prolonged their suffering,
its time they learn to live or die by their own accord ;like the rest of the world does
Benefits like food stamps, housing, healthcare help to support them
Benefits like job training, low cost business loans, educational grants help to rise out of poverty
No poor person has ever done better by taking benefits away
What have Republicans done to help the poor other than build more prisons?
how would you know since its never been done
but what we do know for a fact is the majority of those that receive them never get out
and it also is not the job of the feds to steal from the majority and give to a minority
is time the communities step up and help their neighbors not the feds by stealing
It is the job of the Government to help those who need help
but its hurting more than it helps,,,thats not the general welfare
all welfare is best if its from the community and not from the feds,,,they fuck up everything they touch
Generational welfare is the exceptionhow are those benefits helping the poor???Democrats support raising taxes on the wealthy, even themselves if they are wealthy
Rich Republicans vote to slash their own taxes and cut benefits to the poor
so far its done more harm than good and prolonged their suffering,
its time they learn to live or die by their own accord ;like the rest of the world does
Benefits like food stamps, housing, healthcare help to support them
Benefits like job training, low cost business loans, educational grants help to rise out of poverty
No poor person has ever done better by taking benefits away
What have Republicans done to help the poor other than build more prisons?
how would you know since its never been done
but what we do know for a fact is the majority of those that receive them never get out
and it also is not the job of the feds to steal from the majority and give to a minority
is time the communities step up and help their neighbors not the feds by stealing
It is the job of the Government to help those who need help
When are they going to start helping? So far all government does is enable them to stay poor.
No way is helping people survive hurting themGenerational welfare is the exceptionhow are those benefits helping the poor???
so far its done more harm than good and prolonged their suffering,
its time they learn to live or die by their own accord ;like the rest of the world does
Benefits like food stamps, housing, healthcare help to support them
Benefits like job training, low cost business loans, educational grants help to rise out of poverty
No poor person has ever done better by taking benefits away
What have Republicans done to help the poor other than build more prisons?
how would you know since its never been done
but what we do know for a fact is the majority of those that receive them never get out
and it also is not the job of the feds to steal from the majority and give to a minority
is time the communities step up and help their neighbors not the feds by stealing
It is the job of the Government to help those who need help
but its hurting more than it helps,,,thats not the general welfare
all welfare is best if its from the community and not from the feds,,,they fuck up everything they touch
Nowhere in the world have poor people done better by taking away basic sustenance
Means testing does that.Generational welfare is the exceptionhow are those benefits helping the poor???Democrats support raising taxes on the wealthy, even themselves if they are wealthy
Rich Republicans vote to slash their own taxes and cut benefits to the poor
so far its done more harm than good and prolonged their suffering,
its time they learn to live or die by their own accord ;like the rest of the world does
Benefits like food stamps, housing, healthcare help to support them
Benefits like job training, low cost business loans, educational grants help to rise out of poverty
No poor person has ever done better by taking benefits away
What have Republicans done to help the poor other than build more prisons?
how would you know since its never been done
but what we do know for a fact is the majority of those that receive them never get out
and it also is not the job of the feds to steal from the majority and give to a minority
is time the communities step up and help their neighbors not the feds by stealing
It is the job of the Government to help those who need help
When are they going to start helping? So far all government does is enable them to stay poor.
the one percent. tax cut economics merely favors the rich at the expense of the Poor.keeping up with terminology. unlike the right wing.Where Is The Outrage Over Corporate Welfare?So, who are you talking about, I am not sure who you are referring to when you say the "rich are too big to fail". I have watched many rich people have ideas, investments and businesses that have failed. Obama made companies that he claimed were to big too fail, but never anyone too rich to fail.
I am against all corporate welfare, always have been. Now who are the rich that are too big to fail? I am not sure why you won't answer the simple questions, you seem to have trouble accounting for your words.
Too big to fail - Wikipedia
Still can’t answer the question? Who specifically are the rich that are too big to fail? Come on, name them, you claim they exist however you can’t name them?
Providing for the general welfare is a general power.No way is helping people survive hurting themGenerational welfare is the exceptionBenefits like food stamps, housing, healthcare help to support them
Benefits like job training, low cost business loans, educational grants help to rise out of poverty
No poor person has ever done better by taking benefits away
What have Republicans done to help the poor other than build more prisons?
how would you know since its never been done
but what we do know for a fact is the majority of those that receive them never get out
and it also is not the job of the feds to steal from the majority and give to a minority
is time the communities step up and help their neighbors not the feds by stealing
It is the job of the Government to help those who need help
but its hurting more than it helps,,,thats not the general welfare
all welfare is best if its from the community and not from the feds,,,they fuck up everything they touch
Nowhere in the world have poor people done better by taking away basic sustenance
IF ITS BASIC THEN THEY CAN DO IT THEMSELVES
and like I said it would work better at a local level ,,and it would also be legal
Generational welfare is the exceptionhow are those benefits helping the poor???
so far its done more harm than good and prolonged their suffering,
its time they learn to live or die by their own accord ;like the rest of the world does
Benefits like food stamps, housing, healthcare help to support them
Benefits like job training, low cost business loans, educational grants help to rise out of poverty
No poor person has ever done better by taking benefits away
What have Republicans done to help the poor other than build more prisons?
how would you know since its never been done
but what we do know for a fact is the majority of those that receive them never get out
and it also is not the job of the feds to steal from the majority and give to a minority
is time the communities step up and help their neighbors not the feds by stealing
It is the job of the Government to help those who need help
When are they going to start helping? So far all government does is enable them to stay poor.
They also provide educational assistance, jobs programs, small business loans
The federal government collects the money anyway. Block grants could get process started. It is simpler.no, it wouldn't. it would be simpler.Block grants to the several States could work.[/QUOTEthe only way to get that is to have it ran by the local community, then the money is closest to the source and the need and you don have the feds taking a cut
it would only work to make it worse and is in violation of the constitution
so sending money to the feds and hen having several fed workers move the money around and then giving it back to the states to then givce it to the people is easier than the people just giving it straight to the states???
HOW SO???
oh i FORGOT THAT THE FEDS WILL KEEP A BIG CUT OF THE MONEY
SO NO ITS NOT EASIER OR SIMPLER
Providing for the general welfare is a general power.No way is helping people survive hurting themGenerational welfare is the exceptionhow would you know since its never been done
but what we do know for a fact is the majority of those that receive them never get out
and it also is not the job of the feds to steal from the majority and give to a minority
is time the communities step up and help their neighbors not the feds by stealing
It is the job of the Government to help those who need help
but its hurting more than it helps,,,thats not the general welfare
all welfare is best if its from the community and not from the feds,,,they fuck up everything they touch
Nowhere in the world have poor people done better by taking away basic sustenance
IF ITS BASIC THEN THEY CAN DO IT THEMSELVES
and like I said it would work better at a local level ,,and it would also be legal
I gave you some references. It is up to you. Why blame the Poor.the one percent. tax cut economics merely favors the rich at the expense of the Poor.keeping up with terminology. unlike the right wing.
I am against all corporate welfare, always have been. Now who are the rich that are too big to fail? I am not sure why you won't answer the simple questions, you seem to have trouble accounting for your words.
Too big to fail - Wikipedia
Still can’t answer the question? Who specifically are the rich that are too big to fail? Come on, name them, you claim they exist however you can’t name them?
Can you name them or they some imaginary creature you dreamed up?
r&d costs, regardless.The federal government collects the money anyway. Block grants could get process started. It is simpler.no, it wouldn't. it would be simpler.Block grants to the several States could work.[/QUOTE
it would only work to make it worse and is in violation of the constitution
so sending money to the feds and hen having several fed workers move the money around and then giving it back to the states to then givce it to the people is easier than the people just giving it straight to the states???
HOW SO???
oh i FORGOT THAT THE FEDS WILL KEEP A BIG CUT OF THE MONEY
SO NO ITS NOT EASIER OR SIMPLER
Also, see Solyndra.
I gave you some references. It is up to you. Why blame the Poor.the one percent. tax cut economics merely favors the rich at the expense of the Poor.keeping up with terminology. unlike the right wing.I am against all corporate welfare, always have been. Now who are the rich that are too big to fail? I am not sure why you won't answer the simple questions, you seem to have trouble accounting for your words.
Too big to fail - Wikipedia
Still can’t answer the question? Who specifically are the rich that are too big to fail? Come on, name them, you claim they exist however you can’t name them?
Can you name them or they some imaginary creature you dreamed up?
what record is clear where? the right wing tells plenty of stories.Providing for the general welfare is a general power.No way is helping people survive hurting themGenerational welfare is the exception
It is the job of the Government to help those who need help
but its hurting more than it helps,,,thats not the general welfare
all welfare is best if its from the community and not from the feds,,,they fuck up everything they touch
Nowhere in the world have poor people done better by taking away basic sustenance
IF ITS BASIC THEN THEY CAN DO IT THEMSELVES
and like I said it would work better at a local level ,,and it would also be legal
you keep repeating that,,,but the record is clear it harms the country nmore than it helps
Capitalism has a Natural rate of unemployment for the bottom line.I gave you some references. It is up to you. Why blame the Poor.the one percent. tax cut economics merely favors the rich at the expense of the Poor.
Still can’t answer the question? Who specifically are the rich that are too big to fail? Come on, name them, you claim they exist however you can’t name them?
Can you name them or they some imaginary creature you dreamed up?
its their fault they are poor not mine,,,so why blame/punish me
what record is clear where? the right wing tells plenty of stories.Providing for the general welfare is a general power.No way is helping people survive hurting thembut its hurting more than it helps,,,thats not the general welfare
all welfare is best if its from the community and not from the feds,,,they fuck up everything they touch
Nowhere in the world have poor people done better by taking away basic sustenance
IF ITS BASIC THEN THEY CAN DO IT THEMSELVES
and like I said it would work better at a local level ,,and it would also be legal
you keep repeating that,,,but the record is clear it harms the country nmore than it helps
Taking money from me, my employees, and my neighbors isn't helping me, or us. I care about me, and mine. Not every other sorry bastard with a sob story...No way is helping people survive hurting themGenerational welfare is the exceptionhow are those benefits helping the poor???
so far its done more harm than good and prolonged their suffering,
its time they learn to live or die by their own accord ;like the rest of the world does
Benefits like food stamps, housing, healthcare help to support them
Benefits like job training, low cost business loans, educational grants help to rise out of poverty
No poor person has ever done better by taking benefits away
What have Republicans done to help the poor other than build more prisons?
how would you know since its never been done
but what we do know for a fact is the majority of those that receive them never get out
and it also is not the job of the feds to steal from the majority and give to a minority
is time the communities step up and help their neighbors not the feds by stealing
It is the job of the Government to help those who need help
but its hurting more than it helps,,,thats not the general welfare
all welfare is best if its from the community and not from the feds,,,they fuck up everything they touch
Nowhere in the world have poor people done better by taking away basic sustenance
misguided morals? it was a simple economic problem.what record is clear where? the right wing tells plenty of stories.Providing for the general welfare is a general power.No way is helping people survive hurting them
Nowhere in the world have poor people done better by taking away basic sustenance
IF ITS BASIC THEN THEY CAN DO IT THEMSELVES
and like I said it would work better at a local level ,,and it would also be legal
you keep repeating that,,,but the record is clear it harms the country nmore than it helps
the fact that we have generational welfare that has produced millions of bastard children of single mothers that have no hope of a good life
with a more localized system those people have a better chance
