What Makes Poor People Poor? - Special Segment

[danielpalos]

higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

It added to the debt. Have anymore myths.

apples and oranges.

go ahead and automate. higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

Lol! No wonder the board laughs at you daily. Your avoidance of the Law doesn’t negate the Law.

i don't take the clueless and Causeless any more seriously.

It’s all good because no one takes you seriously, you are good only for laughing at.

we should try to work on our sense of humor. i believe political humor should be humorous.

 

[Papageorgio]

Is that why Obama repealed the tax cuts his first day in office like he promised? Oh wait...he left them in place. Looks like the left loved those cuts.

Government spending is what bailed us out; legal tender for all debts public and private; generally issued federal reserve notes.

Again avoiding the question, it keeps proving your dishonesty. We are talking about Obama why he did not repeal the tax cuts on the rich after promising to repeal them on day one. Why not?

he didn't have both houses and was focused on healthcare reform.

All he needed to do was make an executive order, he didn’t. Why do you defend the rich tax cuts? How did they help anyone but the rich?

that is your opinion. Congress has the actual power regarding commanding fiscal policy for our command economy.

That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.

 

[Papageorgio]

It added to the debt. Have anymore myths.

apples and oranges.

go ahead and automate. higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

Lol! No wonder the board laughs at you daily. Your avoidance of the Law doesn’t negate the Law.

i don't take the clueless and Causeless any more seriously.

It’s all good because no one takes you seriously, you are good only for laughing at.

we should try to work on our sense of humor. i believe political humor should be humorous.

I think you are funny enough in your political humor, that’s why I don’t take you seriously.

 

[danielpalos]

Government spending is what bailed us out; legal tender for all debts public and private; generally issued federal reserve notes.

Again avoiding the question, it keeps proving your dishonesty. We are talking about Obama why he did not repeal the tax cuts on the rich after promising to repeal them on day one. Why not?

he didn't have both houses and was focused on healthcare reform.

All he needed to do was make an executive order, he didn’t. Why do you defend the rich tax cuts? How did they help anyone but the rich?

that is your opinion. Congress has the actual power regarding commanding fiscal policy for our command economy.

That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.

why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.

 

[progressive hunter]

Again avoiding the question, it keeps proving your dishonesty. We are talking about Obama why he did not repeal the tax cuts on the rich after promising to repeal them on day one. Why not?

he didn't have both houses and was focused on healthcare reform.

All he needed to do was make an executive order, he didn’t. Why do you defend the rich tax cuts? How did they help anyone but the rich?

that is your opinion. Congress has the actual power regarding commanding fiscal policy for our command economy.

That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.

why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.

youre not accounting for all the jobs lost if you raise the min wage,,,what they did in Seattle proved that for us

 

[danielpalos]

apples and oranges.

go ahead and automate. higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

Lol! No wonder the board laughs at you daily. Your avoidance of the Law doesn’t negate the Law.

i don't take the clueless and Causeless any more seriously.

It’s all good because no one takes you seriously, you are good only for laughing at.

we should try to work on our sense of humor. i believe political humor should be humorous.

I think you are funny enough in your political humor, that’s why I don’t take you seriously.

Solving for the capital effects of Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is beneficial for our capital economy simply because it enables greater capital participation by more potential capitalists.

 

[danielpalos]

he didn't have both houses and was focused on healthcare reform.

All he needed to do was make an executive order, he didn’t. Why do you defend the rich tax cuts? How did they help anyone but the rich?

that is your opinion. Congress has the actual power regarding commanding fiscal policy for our command economy.

That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.

why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.

youre not accounting for all the jobs lost if you raise the min wage,,,what they did in Seattle proved that for us

so what; in the long run equilibrium higher paid labor must pay more in taxes and create more in demand.

 

[progressive hunter]

All he needed to do was make an executive order, he didn’t. Why do you defend the rich tax cuts? How did they help anyone but the rich?

that is your opinion. Congress has the actual power regarding commanding fiscal policy for our command economy.

That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.

why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.

youre not accounting for all the jobs lost if you raise the min wage,,,what they did in Seattle proved that for us

so what; in the long run equilibrium higher paid labor must pay more in taxes and create more in demand.

SO WHAT???

fewer people working means less taxs and more on welfare

 

[rightwinger]

the ninety-nine percent are paying more for less.

How so?

the one percent are enjoying tax cut economics and putting it on the Peoples' Debt. Congress has the Power to Tax the People, for that added debt.

Wouldn’t the added debt devalue the dollar and make the dollar less stable therefore giving the dollar less value?

no, because our economy must grow due to a positive multiplier effect. The Fed has more "tools" to work with, with some inflationary tendency.

TARP proves you wrong.

TARP worked

 

[progressive hunter]

How so?

the one percent are enjoying tax cut economics and putting it on the Peoples' Debt. Congress has the Power to Tax the People, for that added debt.

Wouldn’t the added debt devalue the dollar and make the dollar less stable therefore giving the dollar less value?

no, because our economy must grow due to a positive multiplier effect. The Fed has more "tools" to work with, with some inflationary tendency.

TARP proves you wrong.

TARP worked

worked to do what??

increase the debt and steal from hard working people maybe

 

[rightwinger]

the one percent are enjoying tax cut economics and putting it on the Peoples' Debt. Congress has the Power to Tax the People, for that added debt.

Wouldn’t the added debt devalue the dollar and make the dollar less stable therefore giving the dollar less value?

no, because our economy must grow due to a positive multiplier effect. The Fed has more "tools" to work with, with some inflationary tendency.

TARP proves you wrong.

TARP worked

worked to do what??

increase the debt and steal from hard working people maybe

Banks were on the verge of collapse. A collapse that would have created a Depression

 

[danielpalos]

that is your opinion. Congress has the actual power regarding commanding fiscal policy for our command economy.

That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.

why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.

youre not accounting for all the jobs lost if you raise the min wage,,,what they did in Seattle proved that for us

so what; in the long run equilibrium higher paid labor must pay more in taxes and create more in demand.

SO WHAT???

fewer people working means less taxs and more on welfare

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more cost effective. the Right Wing doesn't like it, Because the Poor may benefit.

 

[progressive hunter]

Wouldn’t the added debt devalue the dollar and make the dollar less stable therefore giving the dollar less value?

no, because our economy must grow due to a positive multiplier effect. The Fed has more "tools" to work with, with some inflationary tendency.

TARP proves you wrong.

TARP worked

worked to do what??

increase the debt and steal from hard working people maybe

Banks were on the verge of collapse. A collapse that would have created a Depression

artificially propping them up only kicks the can down the road for our children to deal with,,,what kind of a parent does that make???

we have pissed on our children far to much already,,sorry,,, the democrats and republicans have pissed on our children too much 22 trillion

I say let them fail and learn for the next time

and thats not even talking about how it violates the constitution

 

[progressive hunter]

That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.

why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.

youre not accounting for all the jobs lost if you raise the min wage,,,what they did in Seattle proved that for us

so what; in the long run equilibrium higher paid labor must pay more in taxes and create more in demand.

SO WHAT???

fewer people working means less taxs and more on welfare

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more cost effective. the Right Wing doesn't like it, Because the Poor may benefit.

easier to just get a job instead of being a burden to society

 

[Papageorgio]

Again avoiding the question, it keeps proving your dishonesty. We are talking about Obama why he did not repeal the tax cuts on the rich after promising to repeal them on day one. Why not?

he didn't have both houses and was focused on healthcare reform.

All he needed to do was make an executive order, he didn’t. Why do you defend the rich tax cuts? How did they help anyone but the rich?

that is your opinion. Congress has the actual power regarding commanding fiscal policy for our command economy.

That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.

why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.

So why would raising taxes on the rich have a negative effect on the economy, at least that is what Obama thought.

 

[danielpalos]

why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.

youre not accounting for all the jobs lost if you raise the min wage,,,what they did in Seattle proved that for us

so what; in the long run equilibrium higher paid labor must pay more in taxes and create more in demand.

SO WHAT???

fewer people working means less taxs and more on welfare

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more cost effective. the Right Wing doesn't like it, Because the Poor may benefit.

easier to just get a job instead of being a burden to society

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. It is natural for capitalism to be that inefficient for the sake of the bottom line.

 

[danielpalos]

he didn't have both houses and was focused on healthcare reform.

All he needed to do was make an executive order, he didn’t. Why do you defend the rich tax cuts? How did they help anyone but the rich?

that is your opinion. Congress has the actual power regarding commanding fiscal policy for our command economy.

That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.

why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.

So why would raising taxes on the rich have a negative effect on the economy, at least that is what Obama thought.

we get the biggest bang for our buck with the Poor, who tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.

 

[Andylusion]

How so?

the one percent are enjoying tax cut economics and putting it on the Peoples' Debt. Congress has the Power to Tax the People, for that added debt.

Wouldn’t the added debt devalue the dollar and make the dollar less stable therefore giving the dollar less value?

no, because our economy must grow due to a positive multiplier effect. The Fed has more "tools" to work with, with some inflationary tendency.

TARP proves you wrong.

TARP worked

TARP did not work by any objective measure.

 

[progressive hunter]

youre not accounting for all the jobs lost if you raise the min wage,,,what they did in Seattle proved that for us

so what; in the long run equilibrium higher paid labor must pay more in taxes and create more in demand.

SO WHAT???

fewer people working means less taxs and more on welfare

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more cost effective. the Right Wing doesn't like it, Because the Poor may benefit.

easier to just get a job instead of being a burden to society

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. It is natural for capitalism to be that inefficient for the sake of the bottom line.

SO!!!

whats that got to do with the price of rice in china or the government policy

private companys should at all times put the bottom line first, so that way they dont fail overnite and everyone loses their jobs

 

[progressive hunter]

All he needed to do was make an executive order, he didn’t. Why do you defend the rich tax cuts? How did they help anyone but the rich?

that is your opinion. Congress has the actual power regarding commanding fiscal policy for our command economy.

That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.

why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.

So why would raising taxes on the rich have a negative effect on the economy, at least that is what Obama thought.

we get the biggest bang for our buck with the Poor, who tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.

the poor dont pay taxs, they suck from the tax tit,,,they need to get off their ass and stop being a burden,,or at least quit complaining about it