Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
worked to do what??TARP workedno, because our economy must grow due to a positive multiplier effect. The Fed has more "tools" to work with, with some inflationary tendency.Wouldn’t the added debt devalue the dollar and make the dollar less stable therefore giving the dollar less value?
TARP proves you wrong.
increase the debt and steal from hard working people maybe
Banks were on the verge of collapse. A collapse that would have created a Depression
there ya go again,,,using those pesky factsworked to do what??TARP workedno, because our economy must grow due to a positive multiplier effect. The Fed has more "tools" to work with, with some inflationary tendency.
TARP proves you wrong.
increase the debt and steal from hard working people maybe
Banks were on the verge of collapse. A collapse that would have created a Depression
Really? Name a bank that was actually in direct danger of collapse, that did not collapse? Countrywide? Oh wait. IndyMac? Oh... um. Wamu? Bear Stearns?
There is no example.
You have been duped by the the banks, and the politicians who benefit from you thinking, they all saved you.
worked to do what??TARP workedno, because our economy must grow due to a positive multiplier effect. The Fed has more "tools" to work with, with some inflationary tendency.Wouldn’t the added debt devalue the dollar and make the dollar less stable therefore giving the dollar less value?
TARP proves you wrong.
increase the debt and steal from hard working people maybe
Banks were on the verge of collapse. A collapse that would have created a Depression
unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more cost effective. the Right Wing doesn't like it, Because the Poor may benefit.SO WHAT???so what; in the long run equilibrium higher paid labor must pay more in taxes and create more in demand.youre not accounting for all the jobs lost if you raise the min wage,,,what they did in Seattle proved that for uswhy not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.
fewer people working means less taxs and more on welfare
we get the biggest bang for our buck with the Poor, who tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.that is your opinion. Congress has the actual power regarding commanding fiscal policy for our command economy.All he needed to do was make an executive order, he didn’t. Why do you defend the rich tax cuts? How did they help anyone but the rich?
That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.
So why would raising taxes on the rich have a negative effect on the economy, at least that is what Obama thought.
it must have worked; the rich got to keep their multimillion dollar bonuses. only the Poor have a problem with equal protection of the law.TARP workedno, because our economy must grow due to a positive multiplier effect. The Fed has more "tools" to work with, with some inflationary tendency.the one percent are enjoying tax cut economics and putting it on the Peoples' Debt. Congress has the Power to Tax the People, for that added debt.
Wouldn’t the added debt devalue the dollar and make the dollar less stable therefore giving the dollar less value?
TARP proves you wrong.
TARP did not work by any objective measure.
stop whining about the cost of social services, right wingers.SO!!!Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. It is natural for capitalism to be that inefficient for the sake of the bottom line.easier to just get a job instead of being a burden to societyunemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more cost effective. the Right Wing doesn't like it, Because the Poor may benefit.SO WHAT???so what; in the long run equilibrium higher paid labor must pay more in taxes and create more in demand.
fewer people working means less taxs and more on welfare
whats that got to do with the price of rice in china or the government policy
private companys should at all times put the bottom line first, so that way they dont fail overnite and everyone loses their jobs
the Poor tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.the poor dont pay taxs, they suck from the tax tit,,,they need to get off their ass and stop being a burden,,or at least quit complaining about itwe get the biggest bang for our buck with the Poor, who tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.that is your opinion. Congress has the actual power regarding commanding fiscal policy for our command economy.
That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.
So why would raising taxes on the rich have a negative effect on the economy, at least that is what Obama thought.
unless it happens to be for the general warfare instead of the general welfare.worked to do what??TARP workedno, because our economy must grow due to a positive multiplier effect. The Fed has more "tools" to work with, with some inflationary tendency.
TARP proves you wrong.
increase the debt and steal from hard working people maybe
Banks were on the verge of collapse. A collapse that would have created a Depression
Iceland let their banks fail. The result was they recovered from the recession years before we did.
We allowed Lehman Brothers to fail, and absolutely nothing terrible happened. They just failed. Some rich people lost some money on a bank that made bad choices. No loss to the tax payers.
The left-wing is more in bed with the ultra-rich and bankers, than the right-wing has ever been.
no, it won't. the right wing doesn't care about economics and prefer to make up stories.unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more cost effective. the Right Wing doesn't like it, Because the Poor may benefit.SO WHAT???so what; in the long run equilibrium higher paid labor must pay more in taxes and create more in demand.youre not accounting for all the jobs lost if you raise the min wage,,,what they did in Seattle proved that for uswhy not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.
fewer people working means less taxs and more on welfare
I don’t speak for the right wing, however I don’t like your idea because it will hurt the working class and put the burden on the group that is asked to always carry the burden, the working middle class.
only the Poor are not really worth it, to the right wing.we get the biggest bang for our buck with the Poor, who tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.that is your opinion. Congress has the actual power regarding commanding fiscal policy for our command economy.
That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.
So why would raising taxes on the rich have a negative effect on the economy, at least that is what Obama thought.
So the left wing hates the poor?
the Poor tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.the poor dont pay taxs, they suck from the tax tit,,,they need to get off their ass and stop being a burden,,or at least quit complaining about itwe get the biggest bang for our buck with the Poor, who tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.
So why would raising taxes on the rich have a negative effect on the economy, at least that is what Obama thought.
the right wing doesnt play identity politics,,,only the Poor are not really worth it, to the right wing.we get the biggest bang for our buck with the Poor, who tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.That was a fact, also with majority in both the House and Senate the cuts could be voted it out the first day. They didn’t want to do it because repealing the tax on the rich would have had a negative effect on the economy. You making excuses is very funny, thanks for the laughs.
So why would raising taxes on the rich have a negative effect on the economy, at least that is what Obama thought.
So the left wing hates the poor?
now that makes sense,,,unless it happens to be for the general warfare instead of the general welfare.worked to do what??TARP workedTARP proves you wrong.
increase the debt and steal from hard working people maybe
Banks were on the verge of collapse. A collapse that would have created a Depression
Iceland let their banks fail. The result was they recovered from the recession years before we did.
We allowed Lehman Brothers to fail, and absolutely nothing terrible happened. They just failed. Some rich people lost some money on a bank that made bad choices. No loss to the tax payers.
The left-wing is more in bed with the ultra-rich and bankers, than the right-wing has ever been.
minimum wage workers pay some income tax. stop gossiping and making up stories.the Poor tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.the poor dont pay taxs, they suck from the tax tit,,,they need to get off their ass and stop being a burden,,or at least quit complaining about itwe get the biggest bang for our buck with the Poor, who tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.why not increase tax revenue by increasing the minimum wage? the law of large numbers can work for us at the new equilibrium.
So why would raising taxes on the rich have a negative effect on the economy, at least that is what Obama thought.
noooo, the poor dont pay income tax you ignorant twit,,,and sales tax is minimal and help them be a part of their community
they need to pay their fair share or just accept their place is their fault
minimum wage workers pay some income tax. stop gossiping and making up stories.the Poor tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.the poor dont pay taxs, they suck from the tax tit,,,they need to get off their ass and stop being a burden,,or at least quit complaining about itwe get the biggest bang for our buck with the Poor, who tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.So why would raising taxes on the rich have a negative effect on the economy, at least that is what Obama thought.
noooo, the poor dont pay income tax you ignorant twit,,,and sales tax is minimal and help them be a part of their community
they need to pay their fair share or just accept their place is their fault
only the right wing is that ignorant, but blame everyone else.minimum wage workers pay some income tax. stop gossiping and making up stories.the Poor tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.the poor dont pay taxs, they suck from the tax tit,,,they need to get off their ass and stop being a burden,,or at least quit complaining about itwe get the biggest bang for our buck with the Poor, who tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.
noooo, the poor dont pay income tax you ignorant twit,,,and sales tax is minimal and help them be a part of their community
they need to pay their fair share or just accept their place is their fault
thats a lie,,or you are on ignorant fuck
I am with the latter
only the right wing is that ignorant, but blame everyone else.minimum wage workers pay some income tax. stop gossiping and making up stories.the Poor tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.the poor dont pay taxs, they suck from the tax tit,,,they need to get off their ass and stop being a burden,,or at least quit complaining about it
noooo, the poor dont pay income tax you ignorant twit,,,and sales tax is minimal and help them be a part of their community
they need to pay their fair share or just accept their place is their fault
thats a lie,,or you are on ignorant fuck
I am with the latter
any tax website claims the same thing. full time minimum wage work pays a few hundred dollars in income tax.
who's fault is that? The Poor only pay the taxes they are legally obligated to pay.only the right wing is that ignorant, but blame everyone else.minimum wage workers pay some income tax. stop gossiping and making up stories.the Poor tend to spend most of their income paying taxes and creating demand.
noooo, the poor dont pay income tax you ignorant twit,,,and sales tax is minimal and help them be a part of their community
they need to pay their fair share or just accept their place is their fault
thats a lie,,or you are on ignorant fuck
I am with the latter
any tax website claims the same thing. full time minimum wage work pays a few hundred dollars in income tax.
which they get back at the end of the yr,,not only do they get that back but they get a tax credit ,,,,,if they have bastard children they get a tax credit for them as well or any children
so like I said you are either and a bold faced liar or ignorant fool,,,there are no other options
who's fault is that? The Poor only pay the taxes they are legally obligated to pay.only the right wing is that ignorant, but blame everyone else.minimum wage workers pay some income tax. stop gossiping and making up stories.noooo, the poor dont pay income tax you ignorant twit,,,and sales tax is minimal and help them be a part of their community
they need to pay their fair share or just accept their place is their fault
thats a lie,,or you are on ignorant fuck
I am with the latter
any tax website claims the same thing. full time minimum wage work pays a few hundred dollars in income tax.
which they get back at the end of the yr,,not only do they get that back but they get a tax credit ,,,,,if they have bastard children they get a tax credit for them as well or any children
so like I said you are either and a bold faced liar or ignorant fool,,,there are no other options
