What Makes Poor People Poor? - Special Segment

[danielpalos]

the ninety-nine percent are paying more for less.

How so?

dont ask him such a hard question,,,his mind is addled and confused, he might go into seizures

The guy just can’t answer any question directly and honestly, he has to dance around and play silly word games because he has no answers when you bring up valid points. He uses the failed TARP plan to prove paying people for to sit home will pay for itself. He even twists his communistic ideas as being a form of capitalism.

The good is he is too lazy to go beyond a message board for his beliefs.

TARP worked

So it didn’t add any debt?

the rich benefited the most, right wingers.

 

[danielpalos]

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
tax cut economics benefits whom, the most, right wingers?

keep lauding the virtues of tax cut economics in public venues.

MAYBE the left winger should listen to the right since we can make money while all they do is steal it

problem solved since everyone will be rich right wingers

only in right wing fantasy.

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

no more than the lefties

tax cut economics is right wing policy; nothing but right wing fantasy for the rich at the expense of the Poor.

Is that why Obama repealed the tax cuts his first day in office like he promised? Oh wait...he left them in place. Looks like the left loved those cuts.

Government spending is what bailed us out; legal tender for all debts public and private; generally issued federal reserve notes.

 

[danielpalos]

dont ask him such a hard question,,,his mind is addled and confused, he might go into seizures

The guy just can’t answer any question directly and honestly, he has to dance around and play silly word games because he has no answers when you bring up valid points. He uses the failed TARP plan to prove paying people for to sit home will pay for itself. He even twists his communistic ideas as being a form of capitalism.

The good is he is too lazy to go beyond a message board for his beliefs.

TARP worked

So it didn’t add any debt?

Debt during a recession heading for depression is justified

However it added to the debt, your best friend Daniel claims that doing that again will not lead to more debt but will create a surplus, is that what you are claiming?

higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

 

[danielpalos]

the ninety-nine percent are paying more for less.

How so?

dont ask him such a hard question,,,his mind is addled and confused, he might go into seizures

The guy just can’t answer any question directly and honestly, he has to dance around and play silly word games because he has no answers when you bring up valid points. He uses the failed TARP plan to prove paying people for to sit home will pay for itself. He even twists his communistic ideas as being a form of capitalism.

The good is he is too lazy to go beyond a message board for his beliefs.

the right wing proves they know nothing about economics every time they post.

Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market recognizable not right wing fantasy.

You will never act on your fantasy that is why no one takes you seriously.

you have no valid arguments. thank goodness for our doctrine of separation powers.

 

[Papageorgio]

Who then is paying for government?

the ninety-nine percent are paying more for less.

How so?

the one percent are enjoying tax cut economics and putting it on the Peoples' Debt. Congress has the Power to Tax the People, for that added debt.

Wouldn’t the added debt devalue the dollar and make the dollar less stable therefore giving the dollar less value?

no, because our economy must grow due to a positive multiplier effect. The Fed has more "tools" to work with, with some inflationary tendency.

TARP proves you wrong.

 

[Papageorgio]

The guy just can’t answer any question directly and honestly, he has to dance around and play silly word games because he has no answers when you bring up valid points. He uses the failed TARP plan to prove paying people for to sit home will pay for itself. He even twists his communistic ideas as being a form of capitalism.

The good is he is too lazy to go beyond a message board for his beliefs.

TARP worked

So it didn’t add any debt?

Debt during a recession heading for depression is justified

However it added to the debt, your best friend Daniel claims that doing that again will not lead to more debt but will create a surplus, is that what you are claiming?

higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

It added to the debt. Have anymore myths.

 

[danielpalos]

the ninety-nine percent are paying more for less.

How so?

the one percent are enjoying tax cut economics and putting it on the Peoples' Debt. Congress has the Power to Tax the People, for that added debt.

Wouldn’t the added debt devalue the dollar and make the dollar less stable therefore giving the dollar less value?

no, because our economy must grow due to a positive multiplier effect. The Fed has more "tools" to work with, with some inflationary tendency.

TARP proves you wrong.

in right wing fantasy?

Did TARP Really Pay Off for Taxpayers?

 

[danielpalos]

TARP worked

So it didn’t add any debt?

Debt during a recession heading for depression is justified

However it added to the debt, your best friend Daniel claims that doing that again will not lead to more debt but will create a surplus, is that what you are claiming?

higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

It added to the debt. Have anymore myths.

apples and oranges.

go ahead and automate. higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

 

[Papageorgio]

How so?

dont ask him such a hard question,,,his mind is addled and confused, he might go into seizures

The guy just can’t answer any question directly and honestly, he has to dance around and play silly word games because he has no answers when you bring up valid points. He uses the failed TARP plan to prove paying people for to sit home will pay for itself. He even twists his communistic ideas as being a form of capitalism.

The good is he is too lazy to go beyond a message board for his beliefs.

TARP worked

So it didn’t add any debt?

the rich benefited the most, right wingers.

Did it add to the debt?

 

[Papageorgio]

MAYBE the left winger should listen to the right since we can make money while all they do is steal it

problem solved since everyone will be rich right wingers

only in right wing fantasy.

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

no more than the lefties

tax cut economics is right wing policy; nothing but right wing fantasy for the rich at the expense of the Poor.

Is that why Obama repealed the tax cuts his first day in office like he promised? Oh wait...he left them in place. Looks like the left loved those cuts.

Government spending is what bailed us out; legal tender for all debts public and private; generally issued federal reserve notes.

Again avoiding the question, it keeps proving your dishonesty. We are talking about Obama why he did not repeal the tax cuts on the rich after promising to repeal them on day one. Why not?

 

[Papageorgio]

How so?

dont ask him such a hard question,,,his mind is addled and confused, he might go into seizures

The guy just can’t answer any question directly and honestly, he has to dance around and play silly word games because he has no answers when you bring up valid points. He uses the failed TARP plan to prove paying people for to sit home will pay for itself. He even twists his communistic ideas as being a form of capitalism.

The good is he is too lazy to go beyond a message board for his beliefs.

the right wing proves they know nothing about economics every time they post.

Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market recognizable not right wing fantasy.

You will never act on your fantasy that is why no one takes you seriously.

you have no valid arguments. thank goodness for our doctrine of separation powers.

Another post avoiding the cure.

 

[Papageorgio]

So it didn’t add any debt?

Debt during a recession heading for depression is justified

However it added to the debt, your best friend Daniel claims that doing that again will not lead to more debt but will create a surplus, is that what you are claiming?

higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

It added to the debt. Have anymore myths.

apples and oranges.

go ahead and automate. higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

Lol! No wonder the board laughs at you daily. Your avoidance of the Law doesn’t negate the Law.

 

[danielpalos]

dont ask him such a hard question,,,his mind is addled and confused, he might go into seizures

The guy just can’t answer any question directly and honestly, he has to dance around and play silly word games because he has no answers when you bring up valid points. He uses the failed TARP plan to prove paying people for to sit home will pay for itself. He even twists his communistic ideas as being a form of capitalism.

The good is he is too lazy to go beyond a message board for his beliefs.

TARP worked

So it didn’t add any debt?

the rich benefited the most, right wingers.

Did it add to the debt?

does it matter?

The program could even turn a profit overall-not just on the financial bailouts cited by Bloomberg--if the equity investments in auto makers and banks pan out.

 

[danielpalos]

only in right wing fantasy.

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

no more than the lefties

tax cut economics is right wing policy; nothing but right wing fantasy for the rich at the expense of the Poor.

Is that why Obama repealed the tax cuts his first day in office like he promised? Oh wait...he left them in place. Looks like the left loved those cuts.

Government spending is what bailed us out; legal tender for all debts public and private; generally issued federal reserve notes.

Again avoiding the question, it keeps proving your dishonesty. We are talking about Obama why he did not repeal the tax cuts on the rich after promising to repeal them on day one. Why not?

he didn't have both houses and was focused on healthcare reform.

 

[danielpalos]

Debt during a recession heading for depression is justified

However it added to the debt, your best friend Daniel claims that doing that again will not lead to more debt but will create a surplus, is that what you are claiming?

higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

It added to the debt. Have anymore myths.

apples and oranges.

go ahead and automate. higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

Lol! No wonder the board laughs at you daily. Your avoidance of the Law doesn’t negate the Law.

i don't take the clueless and Causeless any more seriously.

 

[Papageorgio]

no more than the lefties

tax cut economics is right wing policy; nothing but right wing fantasy for the rich at the expense of the Poor.

Is that why Obama repealed the tax cuts his first day in office like he promised? Oh wait...he left them in place. Looks like the left loved those cuts.

Government spending is what bailed us out; legal tender for all debts public and private; generally issued federal reserve notes.

Again avoiding the question, it keeps proving your dishonesty. We are talking about Obama why he did not repeal the tax cuts on the rich after promising to repeal them on day one. Why not?

he didn't have both houses and was focused on healthcare reform.

All he needed to do was make an executive order, he didn’t. Why do you defend the rich tax cuts? How did they help anyone but the rich?

 

[Papageorgio]

How so?

the one percent are enjoying tax cut economics and putting it on the Peoples' Debt. Congress has the Power to Tax the People, for that added debt.

Wouldn’t the added debt devalue the dollar and make the dollar less stable therefore giving the dollar less value?

no, because our economy must grow due to a positive multiplier effect. The Fed has more "tools" to work with, with some inflationary tendency.

TARP proves you wrong.

in right wing fantasy?

Did TARP Really Pay Off for Taxpayers?

It helped the too big to fail, it increased the size of the debt. It hurt small banks, it hurt taxpayers that worked hard for their money. It did not create more money to pay down the debt.

 

[Papageorgio]

The guy just can’t answer any question directly and honestly, he has to dance around and play silly word games because he has no answers when you bring up valid points. He uses the failed TARP plan to prove paying people for to sit home will pay for itself. He even twists his communistic ideas as being a form of capitalism.

The good is he is too lazy to go beyond a message board for his beliefs.

TARP worked

So it didn’t add any debt?

the rich benefited the most, right wingers.

Did it add to the debt?

does it matter?

The program could even turn a profit overall-not just on the financial bailouts cited by Bloomberg--if the equity investments in auto makers and banks pan out.

Sure doesunless you are clueless about economics.

 

[Papageorgio]

However it added to the debt, your best friend Daniel claims that doing that again will not lead to more debt but will create a surplus, is that what you are claiming?

higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

It added to the debt. Have anymore myths.

apples and oranges.

go ahead and automate. higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

Lol! No wonder the board laughs at you daily. Your avoidance of the Law doesn’t negate the Law.

i don't take the clueless and Causeless any more seriously.

It’s all good because no one takes you seriously, you are good only for laughing at.

 

[danielpalos]

tax cut economics is right wing policy; nothing but right wing fantasy for the rich at the expense of the Poor.

Is that why Obama repealed the tax cuts his first day in office like he promised? Oh wait...he left them in place. Looks like the left loved those cuts.

Government spending is what bailed us out; legal tender for all debts public and private; generally issued federal reserve notes.

Again avoiding the question, it keeps proving your dishonesty. We are talking about Obama why he did not repeal the tax cuts on the rich after promising to repeal them on day one. Why not?

he didn't have both houses and was focused on healthcare reform.

All he needed to do was make an executive order, he didn’t. Why do you defend the rich tax cuts? How did they help anyone but the rich?

that is your opinion. Congress has the actual power regarding commanding fiscal policy for our command economy.