Capstone
Gold Member
- Feb 14, 2012
- 5,502
- 952
1. Example: In my understanding Libertarian party and Green party want the same thing - to defeat establishment, keep environment clean and keep economy going, HOWEVER - their arguments between themselves if they exist, to me sound like an argument over which way a roll of toilet paper must be put on. The purpose of the leader is to find common ground and speak for both parties, and other independents.[...]
Well, you see, the thing is this: the fact that you've anointed yourself humanity's Mediator-in-Chief is no reason for anyone else on the planet to accept your judgements as fair or correct. In fact, the self-appointment itself seems an excellent basis for calling into question the soundness of your mind.
Yes, your biography is interesting and I actually agree with some of your political commentary; but for anyone remotely sane, those facts shouldn't be sufficient to promote you as the sole arbitrator of truth ...much less The Leader of All Humanity.
On a related note, you've also spoken of eradicating the world's religions, which leads me to believe that mediating between opposing beliefs isn't the only modus operandi you have in mind.
Care to talk theology?
[...]I see no need to silence opposition, opposition such as Hillary Clinton and other pretend to be anti establishment trolls simply need to exposed for the fraud that they are - NOWHERE in my speeches I talked about the need to ban any media, I despise them absolutely.
And here we see the true nature of your diplomatic skills. Certain people are just frauds or trolls, ...presumably when their worldviews don't include you as their supreme leader?
For your own sake, I suggest that you stop proselytizing long enough to cast a second glance over your personal beliefs, because the signs of disorder are glaring.
Beyond your clear and present need to get over yourself, I think you have some great insights to share, and I sincerely hope that you take this as I intended it -- constructively.