What Retaliation For Soleimani's Death Would Justify War With Iran?

[Bush92]

I just have to say here, if you require proof that the now greasy grimy gopher guts mutilated monkey meat deaded terrorist was responsible for the deaths of at least 500 American soldiers, you're apparently eaten up by a really special kind of stupidity.

Not even CNN and MSNBC is disputing that fact.

If Iran had done what Trump did it would be an act of terrorism. It is no different because the US did it.

Big difference. We killed a murderous terrorists who planned car bombings and assassinations. You see it’s very simple dipshit. We’re the good guys here.

Ain't it funny how globalists don't see it that way? They seem to think the world is one big happy family.

They have a child’s view of the world.

Better than your moron view.

You see, liberals like to think of international affairs like it’s one of their childhood tea parties with stuffed animals and dolls. Everyone loves everyone. All is sweet and wonderful.

 

[MaryL]

Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?

I have this flashback to 1978 when the Iranians took our Embassy and the hostage crisis. THAT was an act of war. Ever since then, they have spoiling for a fight. Hell, Nobody wants war that but the Theocrats in Tehran.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You know that the Shah had to be shitting bricks. He was watching his beautiful westernized society devolve into an archaic medieval radical fundamentalist Islamic caliphate. He was probably willing to accept any help he could get but Jimmy let him down, offering only abdication as the remedy.

I grew up there, from half way through the 3rd grade to the end of the 7th. My dad worked for Halliburton. We left about 6 months before the Shah. It was sad to watch even as a kid. My mom and older siblings have told me about things I did not even know were going on. My oldest sister graduated high school from there and still has connections to Iranians living over there thanks to Facebook.

That's why we conservatives view Carter as the father of radical Islam. He could have stopped it then and there.

It is scary to think about how that one decision changed the course of history like none could have imagined.

 

[JGalt]

Serious question: what should we have done differently? Nothing? A strongly worded letter? More sanctions? What?

Red line in the sand, then step back two steps.

 

[Bush92]

You know that the Shah had to be shitting bricks. He was watching his beautiful westernized society devolve into an archaic medieval radical fundamentalist Islamic caliphate. He was probably willing to accept any help he could get but Jimmy let him down, offering only abdication as the remedy.

I grew up there, from half way through the 3rd grade to the end of the 7th. My dad worked for Halliburton. We left about 6 months before the Shah. It was sad to watch even as a kid. My mom and older siblings have told me about things I did not even know were going on. My oldest sister graduated high school from there and still has connections to Iranians living over there thanks to Facebook.

That's why we conservatives view Carter as the father of radical Islam. He could have stopped it then and there.

It is scary to think about how that one decision changed the course of history like none could have imagined.

We should never have lost Iran.

 

[White 6]

Serious question: what should we have done differently? Nothing? A strongly worded letter? More sanctions? What?

I see nothing wrong with the response after the embassy attack. They knocked. We answered the door. The General had no business being there at the battlefield. He had been a pain in the but before. Now he is not. Doing nothing would have been a mistake. It was real convenient of him to hang around long enough for us to answer.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You know that the Shah had to be shitting bricks. He was watching his beautiful westernized society devolve into an archaic medieval radical fundamentalist Islamic caliphate. He was probably willing to accept any help he could get but Jimmy let him down, offering only abdication as the remedy.

I grew up there, from half way through the 3rd grade to the end of the 7th. My dad worked for Halliburton. We left about 6 months before the Shah. It was sad to watch even as a kid. My mom and older siblings have told me about things I did not even know were going on. My oldest sister graduated high school from there and still has connections to Iranians living over there thanks to Facebook.

That's why we conservatives view Carter as the father of radical Islam. He could have stopped it then and there.

It is scary to think about how that one decision changed the course of history like none could have imagined.

We should never have lost Iran.

That is for sure.

 

[JGalt]

You know that the Shah had to be shitting bricks. He was watching his beautiful westernized society devolve into an archaic medieval radical fundamentalist Islamic caliphate. He was probably willing to accept any help he could get but Jimmy let him down, offering only abdication as the remedy.

I grew up there, from half way through the 3rd grade to the end of the 7th. My dad worked for Halliburton. We left about 6 months before the Shah. It was sad to watch even as a kid. My mom and older siblings have told me about things I did not even know were going on. My oldest sister graduated high school from there and still has connections to Iranians living over there thanks to Facebook.

That's why we conservatives view Carter as the father of radical Islam. He could have stopped it then and there.

It is scary to think about how that one decision changed the course of history like none could have imagined.

That's sad. I feel sorry for the Iranian people who have to live under that oppressive regime. Nothing against them because I understand that everyone basically wants the same things in this life.

Hopefully they'll work things out before everything goes to shit for them.

 

[B. Kidd]

Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?

Iran has had a 40+ year boner to become an irridated parking lot.

Time's up if they push it too far!

That's just the way it is.

 

[JGalt]

Serious question: what should we have done differently? Nothing? A strongly worded letter? More sanctions? What?

I see nothing wrong with the response after the embassy attack. They knocked. We answered the door. The General had no business being there at the battlefield. He had been a pain in the but before. Now he is not. Doing nothing would have been a mistake. It was real convenient of him to hang around long enough for us to answer.

Makes you wonder just what he was doing there in Iraq. My guess is to create more Iranian influence in an already destabilized country, and use that country as a base for more terrorist attacks. Probably something to do with Iran being invaded by Iraq in the 80's.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?

Should we allow Iran to assault our embassy?

 

[MaryL]

I have known a few Persians, they divorced themselves from the current regime in Iran. The Iranians are basically good people. Their theocratic dictatorship isn't any better than the Shaw was. And the current regime seems hell bent for leather for a military confrontation with America. They (the nebulous Iranian leadership) absolutely irrationally hates US. So at this point, it doesn't seem to matter what we do.

 

[White 6]

Serious question: what should we have done differently? Nothing? A strongly worded letter? More sanctions? What?

I see nothing wrong with the response after the embassy attack. They knocked. We answered the door. The General had no business being there at the battlefield. He had been a pain in the but before. Now he is not. Doing nothing would have been a mistake. It was real convenient of him to hang around long enough for us to answer.

Makes you wonder just what he was doing there in Iraq. My guess is to create more Iranian influence in an already destabilized country, and use that country as a base for more terrorist attacks. Probably something to do with Iran being invaded by Iraq in the 80's.

Possibly, or possibly coordinating the militia that attacked the Embassy. He may have been in civillian clothes, but he wasn't on vacation.

 

[HaShev]

>>>>What Retaliation For Soleimani's Death Would Justify War With Iran?

Taking away our Dems Binkies, that should be our redline.

 

[Lewdog]

I guarantee last night's attack by the U.S. gave Bush92 the biggest boner he's ever had without a little blue pill.

He is the biggest warmonger on this forum. He's John Bolton x 1,000,000,000.

Dead terrorists make my dick hard, no doubt about it. I will take that as a compliment. I’m not a warmonger, I just believe in peace through superior firepower.

Oh stop it. If a Muslim farted in an elevator you'd call it a gas attack and be ready to nuke their home country.

The U.S. should have built up all the evidence they needed and simply arrested the guy and took him to the Hague and gotten him convicted and given the death penalty, not killed him with a missile attack in a sovereign country.

Why go through all that trouble when you can just eliminate the threat?

...because what they did was an act of war based on international law? They did a missile attack in a sovereign country...

But I guess laws don't matter when it is the U.S. I love my country, but we are supposed to be the leaders with better morals and ethical standards than the scum of the world like the man we just killed.

The missile attack was in response to not only the killing of an American, but the attack on our embassy, which is considered to be a sovereign entity of the United States...

Is an Embassy on Foreign Soil the Sovereign Territory of the Host Country or the Embassy's Country?

Therefore we have every right to use whatever means are necessary to protect and defend it, unless your name is Hillary Clinton, and your embassy happens to be in Benghazi.

The embassy is part of the United States despite being in another country. They have the right to defend it. The man they killed not there, he was at an airport in Iraq.

General Patreus who is a big war hawk just questioned the move as well.

The United Sates has worked hard to get new people in power and to get a better relationship with the Iraqi leaders. Using a drone to do a missile strike in THEIR country without THEIR permission to kill a leader from THEIR neighboring country is a reckless decision.

 

[boedicca]

 

[Papageorgio]

Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?

What Trump did was an act of terrorism. The USA is now a terrorist country. Congratulations.

Wasn't the USA a terrorist country before Trump entered into office?

Not

Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?

What Trump did was an act of terrorism. The USA is now a terrorist country. Congratulations.

Wasn't the USA a terrorist country before Trump entered into office?

Terrorist? Bully for 50 some years, but not terrorist.

So all the thousands drone strikes in seven countries that killed civilians were not terrorist attacks? Do you want to explain that to the seven countries that these attacks took place in?

 

[Bush92]

Serious question: what should we have done differently? Nothing? A strongly worded letter? More sanctions? What?

I see nothing wrong with the response after the embassy attack. They knocked. We answered the door. The General had no business being there at the battlefield. He had been a pain in the but before. Now he is not. Doing nothing would have been a mistake. It was real convenient of him to hang around long enough for us to answer.

Makes you wonder just what he was doing there in Iraq. My guess is to create more Iranian influence in an already destabilized country, and use that country as a base for more terrorist attacks. Probably something to do with Iran being invaded by Iraq in the 80's.

Planning attack on Americans and U.S. assets. Why we exterminated him.

 

[B. Kidd]

Dead terrorists make my dick hard, no doubt about it. I will take that as a compliment. I’m not a warmonger, I just believe in peace through superior firepower.

Oh stop it. If a Muslim farted in an elevator you'd call it a gas attack and be ready to nuke their home country.

The U.S. should have built up all the evidence they needed and simply arrested the guy and took him to the Hague and gotten him convicted and given the death penalty, not killed him with a missile attack in a sovereign country.

Why go through all that trouble when you can just eliminate the threat?

...because what they did was an act of war based on international law? They did a missile attack in a sovereign country...

But I guess laws don't matter when it is the U.S. I love my country, but we are supposed to be the leaders with better morals and ethical standards than the scum of the world like the man we just killed.

The missile attack was in response to not only the killing of an American, but the attack on our embassy, which is considered to be a sovereign entity of the United States...

Is an Embassy on Foreign Soil the Sovereign Territory of the Host Country or the Embassy's Country?

Therefore we have every right to use whatever means are necessary to protect and defend it, unless your name is Hillary Clinton, and your embassy happens to be in Benghazi.

The embassy is part of the United States despite being in another country. They have the right to defend it. The man they killed not there, he was at an airport in Iraq.

General Patreus who is a big war hawk just questioned the move as well.

The United Sates has worked hard to get new people in power and to get a better relationship with the Iraqi leaders. Using a drone to do a missile strike in THEIR country without THEIR permission to kill a leader from THEIR neighboring country is a reckless decision.

So is mining/hijacking oil freighters, shooting down a U.S. drone, attacking Saudi oil fields, all at the same time while funding and exporting terrorism thru out the ME.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?

Will Iran attach Israel first, or America?