Contumacious
Radical Freedom
There seems to be some confusion that the idiots define the debate. The initial question in this thread was what rights come from nature. There are always going to be idiots that insist that God is the only possible source of rights, just like there are going to be idiots that, since we cannot prove God exists, that negates the concept of natural rights entirely. .
That is merely a ploy.
They are NEVER going to admit that there is a such a thing as "natural rights" because they are criminals who believe they have a right to your wealth, your intellect, to the unearned.
.