What the national polls say about a 2020 Trump vs. Biden race.

[MAGAman]

We finally have polling results for Pennsylvania from the polling company EMERSON:

In a BIDEN vs. TRUMP match up in Pennsylvania, here are the results:

BIDEN: 55%

TRUMP: 45%

It should be noted that Sanders, Warren, Harris, and O'Rourke all beat Trump in Pennsylvania as well, but by smaller margins than Biden.

So in the latest polls of battleground states Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Iowa, Biden is heavily beating Trump.

Pennsylvania: BIDEN by 10 points over Trump
Iowa: BIDEN by 6 points over Trump
Wisconsin: BIDEN by 8 points over Trump
Michigan: BIDEN by 8 points over Trump
New Hampshire: BIDEN by 10 points over Trump

Arizona: BIDEN tied with Trump
South Carolina: Trump by 4 points over BIDEN
Texas: Trump by 1 point over BIDEN
North Carolina: Trump by 4 points over BIDEN

Not looking good for Trump. Trump is behind by 8 to 10 points in the key states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Without those states, Trump has virtually no chance of winning the election in 2020.

Democrats always do better before they become the nominee and they are forced to flipflop or try to defend their indefensible statements and extremist records.

Prime examples.

* GND
* Not voting for the GND even through they cosponsored it
* Post Birth Abortions (AKA, Murder or Infanticide)
* Tearing down existing border walls

Democrats will always look better standing next to another lunatic than they will standing next to someone that has vanquished the Caliphate, brought record employment and an improvement economy.

 

[Preacher]

New Poll for the Democratic nomination from Quinnipiac - March 21-25, 2019:

BIDEN: 29%

SANDERS: 19%

O'Rourke: 12%

HARRIS: 8%

Buttigieg: 4%

WARREN: 4%

BOOKER: 2%

KLOBUCHAR: 2%

CASTRO: 1%

HICKENLOOPER: 1%

GILLIBRAND: 1%

INSLEE: 1%


Notable things in this poll:

01. Biden continues his dominance
02. O'Rourke rises to #3
03. Sanders starting to slip
04. Harris not making any progress falls behind O'Rourke
05. Warren is falling.
06. Buttigieg is starting a SLOW but steady rise.

O'Rourke has shown the most improvement in this poll.

Where is the Congresswoman from Hawaii in the poll?

She has sort of dropped off the radar because her numbers are so low. She was polling below 1% before Real Clear Politics dropped her from the chart. Their chart has the top 12 people. The Quinnipiac poll actually did not have results for Gillibrand and Inslee so I just gave them 1% each.

Ah. No surprise. She doesn't toe the warmonger party line on foreign policy etc...she seems sane.

 

[Preacher]

We finally have polling results for Pennsylvania from the polling company EMERSON:

In a BIDEN vs. TRUMP match up in Pennsylvania, here are the results:

BIDEN: 55%

TRUMP: 45%

It should be noted that Sanders, Warren, Harris, and O'Rourke all beat Trump in Pennsylvania as well, but by smaller margins than Biden.

So in the latest polls of battleground states Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Iowa, Biden is heavily beating Trump.

Pennsylvania: BIDEN by 10 points over Trump
Iowa: BIDEN by 6 points over Trump
Wisconsin: BIDEN by 8 points over Trump
Michigan: BIDEN by 8 points over Trump
New Hampshire: BIDEN by 10 points over Trump

Arizona: BIDEN tied with Trump
South Carolina: Trump by 4 points over BIDEN
Texas: Trump by 1 point over BIDEN
North Carolina: Trump by 4 points over BIDEN

Not looking good for Trump. Trump is behind by 8 to 10 points in the key states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Without those states, Trump has virtually no chance of winning the election in 2020.

Polls said SAME thing in 2016....you know that.

 

[U2Edge]

We finally have polling results for Pennsylvania from the polling company EMERSON:

In a BIDEN vs. TRUMP match up in Pennsylvania, here are the results:

BIDEN: 55%

TRUMP: 45%

It should be noted that Sanders, Warren, Harris, and O'Rourke all beat Trump in Pennsylvania as well, but by smaller margins than Biden.

So in the latest polls of battleground states Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Iowa, Biden is heavily beating Trump.

Pennsylvania: BIDEN by 10 points over Trump
Iowa: BIDEN by 6 points over Trump
Wisconsin: BIDEN by 8 points over Trump
Michigan: BIDEN by 8 points over Trump
New Hampshire: BIDEN by 10 points over Trump

Arizona: BIDEN tied with Trump
South Carolina: Trump by 4 points over BIDEN
Texas: Trump by 1 point over BIDEN
North Carolina: Trump by 4 points over BIDEN

Not looking good for Trump. Trump is behind by 8 to 10 points in the key states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Without those states, Trump has virtually no chance of winning the election in 2020.

Democrats always do better before they become the nominee and they are forced to flipflop or try to defend their indefensible statements and extremist records.

Prime examples.

* GND
* Not voting for the GND even through they cosponsored it
* Post Birth Abortions (AKA, Murder or Infanticide)
* Tearing down existing border walls

Democrats will always look better standing next to another lunatic than they will standing next to someone that has vanquished the Caliphate, brought record employment and an improvement economy.

Well, then why is Trump losing by an average 10 points in key battle ground states as well as nationally to Joe Biden?

 

[U2Edge]

New Poll for the Democratic nomination from Quinnipiac - March 21-25, 2019:

BIDEN: 29%

SANDERS: 19%

O'Rourke: 12%

HARRIS: 8%

Buttigieg: 4%

WARREN: 4%

BOOKER: 2%

KLOBUCHAR: 2%

CASTRO: 1%

HICKENLOOPER: 1%

GILLIBRAND: 1%

INSLEE: 1%


Notable things in this poll:

01. Biden continues his dominance
02. O'Rourke rises to #3
03. Sanders starting to slip
04. Harris not making any progress falls behind O'Rourke
05. Warren is falling.
06. Buttigieg is starting a SLOW but steady rise.

O'Rourke has shown the most improvement in this poll.

Where is the Congresswoman from Hawaii in the poll?

She has sort of dropped off the radar because her numbers are so low. She was polling below 1% before Real Clear Politics dropped her from the chart. Their chart has the top 12 people. The Quinnipiac poll actually did not have results for Gillibrand and Inslee so I just gave them 1% each.

Ah. No surprise. She doesn't toe the warmonger party line on foreign policy etc...she seems sane.

I admire her service to the country in the military. But she is confused when it comes to U.S. Foreign Policy and Defense Policy.

 

[U2Edge]

We finally have polling results for Pennsylvania from the polling company EMERSON:

In a BIDEN vs. TRUMP match up in Pennsylvania, here are the results:

BIDEN: 55%

TRUMP: 45%

It should be noted that Sanders, Warren, Harris, and O'Rourke all beat Trump in Pennsylvania as well, but by smaller margins than Biden.

So in the latest polls of battleground states Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Iowa, Biden is heavily beating Trump.

Pennsylvania: BIDEN by 10 points over Trump
Iowa: BIDEN by 6 points over Trump
Wisconsin: BIDEN by 8 points over Trump
Michigan: BIDEN by 8 points over Trump
New Hampshire: BIDEN by 10 points over Trump

Arizona: BIDEN tied with Trump
South Carolina: Trump by 4 points over BIDEN
Texas: Trump by 1 point over BIDEN
North Carolina: Trump by 4 points over BIDEN

Not looking good for Trump. Trump is behind by 8 to 10 points in the key states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Without those states, Trump has virtually no chance of winning the election in 2020.

Polls said SAME thing in 2016....you know that.

Polling has a longer history than just 2016. It usually gives and accurate picture have how the country stands on certain candidates and how the country will vote in an upcoming election.

 

[MAGAman]

Well, then why is Trump losing by an average 10 points in key battle ground states as well as nationally to Joe Biden?

Because Biden hasn't been speaking publicly lately.

 

[The Original Tree]

Trump in a Landslide!

 

[basquebromance]

"We don't need perfect political systems, we need perfect participation." - Cesar Chavez

 

[MAGAman]

He has name recognition going his way. But the two main flavors in the dem party
are socialism, and intersectionality. He’s an old white guy so he gets negative points in the intersectional game (Kamala Harris wins this as a black woman). And Bernie flanks far left of Biden as the socialism OG, so he gets the socialism ticket. I think Harris wins it by simply parroting Bernie while looking not-white, not-wrinkly, and dongless, as she begins getting name recognition as the primary heats up.

Biden is running ad the "Not as Stupid as The rest of the Dems" candidate.

 

[Likkmee]

tRump has a second term, no question. He has no REAL competition (yet)

 

[Preacher]

New Poll for the Democratic nomination from Quinnipiac - March 21-25, 2019:

BIDEN: 29%

SANDERS: 19%

O'Rourke: 12%

HARRIS: 8%

Buttigieg: 4%

WARREN: 4%

BOOKER: 2%

KLOBUCHAR: 2%

CASTRO: 1%

HICKENLOOPER: 1%

GILLIBRAND: 1%

INSLEE: 1%


Notable things in this poll:

01. Biden continues his dominance
02. O'Rourke rises to #3
03. Sanders starting to slip
04. Harris not making any progress falls behind O'Rourke
05. Warren is falling.
06. Buttigieg is starting a SLOW but steady rise.

O'Rourke has shown the most improvement in this poll.

Where is the Congresswoman from Hawaii in the poll?

She has sort of dropped off the radar because her numbers are so low. She was polling below 1% before Real Clear Politics dropped her from the chart. Their chart has the top 12 people. The Quinnipiac poll actually did not have results for Gillibrand and Inslee so I just gave them 1% each.

Ah. No surprise. She doesn't toe the warmonger party line on foreign policy etc...she seems sane.

I admire her service to the country in the military. But she is confused when it comes to U.S. Foreign Policy and Defense Policy.

I think she is the ONLY sane democrat on foreign policy. The left AND right hate her so she is doing something right.

 

[sakinago]

We finally have polling results for Pennsylvania from the polling company EMERSON:

In a BIDEN vs. TRUMP match up in Pennsylvania, here are the results:

BIDEN: 55%

TRUMP: 45%

It should be noted that Sanders, Warren, Harris, and O'Rourke all beat Trump in Pennsylvania as well, but by smaller margins than Biden.

So in the latest polls of battleground states Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Iowa, Biden is heavily beating Trump.

Pennsylvania: BIDEN by 10 points over Trump
Iowa: BIDEN by 6 points over Trump
Wisconsin: BIDEN by 8 points over Trump
Michigan: BIDEN by 8 points over Trump
New Hampshire: BIDEN by 10 points over Trump

Arizona: BIDEN tied with Trump
South Carolina: Trump by 4 points over BIDEN
Texas: Trump by 1 point over BIDEN
North Carolina: Trump by 4 points over BIDEN

Not looking good for Trump. Trump is behind by 8 to 10 points in the key states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Without those states, Trump has virtually no chance of winning the election in 2020.

Democrats always do better before they become the nominee and they are forced to flipflop or try to defend their indefensible statements and extremist records.

Prime examples.

* GND
* Not voting for the GND even through they cosponsored it
* Post Birth Abortions (AKA, Murder or Infanticide)
* Tearing down existing border walls

Democrats will always look better standing next to another lunatic than they will standing next to someone that has vanquished the Caliphate, brought record employment and an improvement economy.

Well, then why is Trump losing by an average 10 points in key battle ground states as well as nationally to Joe Biden?

Biden’s campaign is probably going to be over before it gets started. The sexual harassment stuff seems to be hitting him hard

 

[U2Edge]

New Poll for the Democratic nomination from Quinnipiac - March 21-25, 2019:

BIDEN: 29%

SANDERS: 19%

O'Rourke: 12%

HARRIS: 8%

Buttigieg: 4%

WARREN: 4%

BOOKER: 2%

KLOBUCHAR: 2%

CASTRO: 1%

HICKENLOOPER: 1%

GILLIBRAND: 1%

INSLEE: 1%


Notable things in this poll:

01. Biden continues his dominance
02. O'Rourke rises to #3
03. Sanders starting to slip
04. Harris not making any progress falls behind O'Rourke
05. Warren is falling.
06. Buttigieg is starting a SLOW but steady rise.

O'Rourke has shown the most improvement in this poll.

Where is the Congresswoman from Hawaii in the poll?

She has sort of dropped off the radar because her numbers are so low. She was polling below 1% before Real Clear Politics dropped her from the chart. Their chart has the top 12 people. The Quinnipiac poll actually did not have results for Gillibrand and Inslee so I just gave them 1% each.

Ah. No surprise. She doesn't toe the warmonger party line on foreign policy etc...she seems sane.

I admire her service to the country in the military. But she is confused when it comes to U.S. Foreign Policy and Defense Policy.

I think she is the ONLY sane democrat on foreign policy. The left AND right hate her so she is doing something right.

She does not understand that sometimes regime change is a necessity.

 

[U2Edge]

We finally have polling results for Pennsylvania from the polling company EMERSON:

In a BIDEN vs. TRUMP match up in Pennsylvania, here are the results:

BIDEN: 55%

TRUMP: 45%

It should be noted that Sanders, Warren, Harris, and O'Rourke all beat Trump in Pennsylvania as well, but by smaller margins than Biden.

So in the latest polls of battleground states Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Iowa, Biden is heavily beating Trump.

Pennsylvania: BIDEN by 10 points over Trump
Iowa: BIDEN by 6 points over Trump
Wisconsin: BIDEN by 8 points over Trump
Michigan: BIDEN by 8 points over Trump
New Hampshire: BIDEN by 10 points over Trump

Arizona: BIDEN tied with Trump
South Carolina: Trump by 4 points over BIDEN
Texas: Trump by 1 point over BIDEN
North Carolina: Trump by 4 points over BIDEN

Not looking good for Trump. Trump is behind by 8 to 10 points in the key states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Without those states, Trump has virtually no chance of winning the election in 2020.

Democrats always do better before they become the nominee and they are forced to flipflop or try to defend their indefensible statements and extremist records.

Prime examples.

* GND
* Not voting for the GND even through they cosponsored it
* Post Birth Abortions (AKA, Murder or Infanticide)
* Tearing down existing border walls

Democrats will always look better standing next to another lunatic than they will standing next to someone that has vanquished the Caliphate, brought record employment and an improvement economy.

Well, then why is Trump losing by an average 10 points in key battle ground states as well as nationally to Joe Biden?

Biden’s campaign is probably going to be over before it gets started. The sexual harassment stuff seems to be hitting him hard

Its a joke and its all on film. Its not hurting Biden at all. Biden is killing it in the polls.

 

[busybee01]

Did they favor Clinton? Yes. Did they cheat? No. They made no rule changes which favored Clinton. Clinton got a majority of the primary vote and that is how she won the nomination.

They have since changed the rules. If there was nothing wrong, why have they done away with the Super Delegates?

Why too was the head of the DNC, the infamous Debbie Wasserman-Schultz fired?

And then there is:

CNN drops Brazile for feeding debate questions to Clinton
By Marisa Schultz
October 31, 2016 | 1:51pm | Updated
[...]
Brazile, then vice chair of the DNC and a CNN contributor, emailed Clinton’s campaign on March 12, the night before the Flint, Michigan, debate.

“One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,” Brazile wrote to Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta, and communications director, Jennifer Palmieri.

Brazile added: “Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint.”

That’s close to the question that was actually asked by local resident Mikki Wade: “If elected president, what course will you take to regain my trust in government?”

It’s unsurprising that a debate in lead-poisoned Flint would include a question about the crisis.

Nonetheless, it’s the second example of Brazile helping Clinton behind the scenes. WikiLeaks earlier revealed a separate email in which Brazile told Team Clinton that the former secretary of state would get a question about the death penalty before a March 13 town hall on CNN.

Indeed, Clinton was pressed about her stance on the death penalty during the Ohio State University forum.

New information from WikiLeaks shows Brazile fingered her source for the question as Roland Martin, who helped moderate the forum.

“I’ll send a few more,” Brazile said.
https://nypost.com/2016/10/31/cnn-drops-brazile-for-feeding-debate-questions-to-clinton/

Was this not a top news story on CNN? Ohhhh...riiiggghhhhtttt!

 

[U2Edge]

tRump has a second term, no question. He has no REAL competition (yet)

Trump is getting his ass kicked by nearly everyone that is running against him in 2020. Biden is kicking his ass by the largest margin.

 

[U2Edge]

New polling data from EMERSON on the race in Nevada between BIDEN and TRUMP:

BIDEN: 52%

TRUMP: 48%

 

[busybee01]

Did they favor Clinton? Yes. Did they cheat? No. They made no rule changes which favored Clinton. Clinton got a majority of the primary vote and that is how she won the nomination.

They have since changed the rules. If there was nothing wrong, why have they done away with the Super Delegates?

Why too was the head of the DNC, the infamous Debbie Wasserman-Schultz fired?

And then there is:

CNN drops Brazile for feeding debate questions to Clinton
By Marisa Schultz
October 31, 2016 | 1:51pm | Updated
[...]
Brazile, then vice chair of the DNC and a CNN contributor, emailed Clinton’s campaign on March 12, the night before the Flint, Michigan, debate.

“One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,” Brazile wrote to Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta, and communications director, Jennifer Palmieri.

Brazile added: “Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint.”

That’s close to the question that was actually asked by local resident Mikki Wade: “If elected president, what course will you take to regain my trust in government?”

It’s unsurprising that a debate in lead-poisoned Flint would include a question about the crisis.

Nonetheless, it’s the second example of Brazile helping Clinton behind the scenes. WikiLeaks earlier revealed a separate email in which Brazile told Team Clinton that the former secretary of state would get a question about the death penalty before a March 13 town hall on CNN.

Indeed, Clinton was pressed about her stance on the death penalty during the Ohio State University forum.

New information from WikiLeaks shows Brazile fingered her source for the question as Roland Martin, who helped moderate the forum.

“I’ll send a few more,” Brazile said.
https://nypost.com/2016/10/31/cnn-drops-brazile-for-feeding-debate-questions-to-clinton/

Was this not a top news story on CNN? Ohhhh...riiiggghhhhtttt!

Sanders did not lose because of the superdelegates. Sanders was a crybaby who lost because more people voted for Clinton than for him. The superdelegates heavily supported Clinton in 2008 but as Obama won states, the super delegates switched from Clinton to Obama.

Sanders' loss had nothing to do with the debates or Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Black voters voted heavily for Clinton. She got 75% in SC, 68% in Texas and Florida, 81% in Louisiana and Mississippi to name a few. That is why he lost. 54 beats 42 but the math of that may be to high for you to understand.

 

[busybee01]

A childish response.

As was yours.

Everyone knows that the Iraq war was a mistake. Everyone knows that one of the prime causes of the 2008 depression was the repeal of the Steagall Act.

It is apparent from everyone of those stands that Biden took, that he is no different than any other corporate tool. There isn't a soul in America that REALLY understands that Patriot Act that supports it.

You are just an idiot that doesn't understand shit about politics and only parrots what you see on TEE VEE. The corporations tell you how to think, and you oblige them.

Removing SADDAM from power in Iraq was one of the best things the United States ever did for its security, the security of the region, and the world. It would be foolish to believe that things would be better off with Saddam in power, the man that invaded and annexed Kuwait resulting in a crises in the oil markets that caused the 1991 recession.

I agree that Biden was foolish to repeal glass Steagall. That's why I listed 1999 above.

Only extreme liberals and foolish libertarians oppose the patriot act.

Bullshit.

With Saddam gone, Iran has moved into that power vacuum, and it has caused the rise of ISIS.


The only folks that have benefited are Israel and the Saudis. It has only led to chaos in the region.

He was tricked into invading Kuwait, b/c they wanted to invade him.

We have LOST freedom because of the Patriot Act, not gained it. It has not benefited America in any way.


Biden is no different than Republicans, no different.

WRONG!

Iran has not invaded or annexed any countries like Saddam did. Iran has not fired any ballistic missiles at other countries like Saddam did. Iran has not seized and destroyed oil wells of another country vital to the global economy like Saddam did.

That's why regime change was justified in Iraq but not in Iran. Iran is generally a paper tiger that hides behind proxy's when conducting its foreign policy.

The rise of ISIS was in part due to the premature pullout of U.S. troops from Iraq at the end of 2011. U.S. troops returned to Iraq in 2014, and ISIS was largely defeated in Iraq by mid-2017. The only remaining territory ISIS currently controls is in Syria. As of today they control a space of territory along the Euphrates River in Syria that is a little less than 500 meters long and 250 meters wide.

Kuwait, Bahrain, U.A.E., Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Europe, Japan, the United Sates and the rest of the industrialized world all benefited from the removal of Saddam. Saddam was a threat to global energy supply and seized and sabotaged assets vital to global energy supply in the past setting off a global recession. You can't let someone like that remain in power. That's even before discussing is vast history with the production and use of WMD.


Nobody tricked Saddam into invading Kuwait on August 2, 1990. But even if they did, he was given a chance to leave Kuwait long before the operation to remove him from Kuwait began in January 1991. Instead of leaving Kuwait, Saddam ANNEXED Kuwait in mid-August 1990. NOBODY ever stated that Saddam had a right to ANNEX KUWAIT wiping it off the face of the map.

You would think that no one in the right mind would be willing to defend someone like SADDAM, but here you are doing just that. Wonder what you would say about Hitler.

Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. Their goal is to establish a Persian Empire in the Middle East. Add Russia who wants to establish a world empire and that spells danger for the US.