Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting.
The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.
That’s how it is with truth.Berg has an impenetrable echo chamber.
That’s how it is with truth.
No amount of BS can change it into anything less than truth.
Ask HillaryA hypothetical event based on an actual meeting.
Members of the Biden campaign, including his daughter, met with Russian operatives after receiving an offer, through an intermediary, to be given compromising info on Trump by the Russian government.
Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting.
The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.
***Mod Note: RED text is reserved for mods. Read the rules!
A threshold legal question is whether providing to a campaign “documents and information” of the type involved here would constitute a prohibited campaign contribution. The foreign contribution ban is not limited to contributions of money. It expressly prohibits “a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value.” 52 U.S.C. § 30121(a)(1)(A), (a)(2)(emphasis added). And the term “contribution” is defined throughout the campaign-finance laws to “include[]” “any gift, subscription, loan, advance, or deposit of money or anything of value.”52 U.S.C. § 30101(8)(A)(i) (emphasis added).The phrases “thing of value” and “anything of value” are broad and inclusive enough to encompass at least some forms of valuable information.
You have stupid opinions. I have fact and reality.You have stupid opinions
You have stupid opinions. I have fact and reality.
We can play this ping pong indefinitely but time is unfortunately not on your side.You don't have either of those.
Berg has neither of those.
You all have a Cult Narrative to follow - that's it.
Who is the fucking angel on your side?You mean like Trump's involvement with an honest business ... treating a woman with respect ... or any episode where Trump thought of someone else's needs and wants ...
They'd walk away ... Democrats are set this campaign season to press home all the attributes the voters adore about Trump ... cheating the IRS, cheating his wife and cheating the stupid people in Blue States paying taxes ... that stuff sells bigily in Red States ...
We can play this ping pong indefinitely but time is unfortunately not on your side.
The truth always wins.
Change a few things, like make it the Hillary campaign instead of Biden, and it's not so hypothetical anymore.A hypothetical event based on an actual meeting.
Members of the Biden campaign, including his daughter, met with Russian operatives after receiving an offer, through an intermediary, to be given compromising info on Trump by the Russian government.
The truth is something with which he is uniquely unfamiliar. He claims to possess knowledge of it, yet fails to substantiate that claim with alacrity.We can play this ping pong indefinitely but time is unfortunately not on your side.
The truth always wins.
That false analogy has been made by Trump cultists endlessly. But then, what else you got?Change a few things, like make it the Hillary campaign instead of Biden, and it's not so hypothetical anymore.
Steele documentary ring a bell?
You said it was hypothetical, just pointing out it's not really all that hypothetical. Democrats do this kind of thing all the time, then piously claim Republicans are evil when they do it.That false analogy has been made by Trump cultists endlessly. But then, what else you got?
True. The meeting happened. But Mueller declined to charge Kimberly's boyfriend because he was presumably ignorant of the law he broke. A seemingly insignificant detail that potentially would have turned the false "exonerated" narrative on its head.You said it was hypothetical, just pointing out it's not really all that hypothetical.
Who is the fucking angel on your side?
True. The meeting happened. But Mueller declined to charge Kimberly's boyfriend because he was presumably ignorant of the law he broke. A seemingly insignificant detail that potentially would have turned the false "exonerated" narrative on its head.
