Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Presenting evidence to a grand jury who decides, based on their evaluation of said evidence, whether or not to indict is a weird thing to call "without showing any evidence."
It was a serious answer as the Deep State is every bit as real as the illuminati or the nwo
Nah, it's just ridiculing the topic to avoid giving it any serious thought
Have you never noticed that no matter what party is in power or who is president, the policies are always the same... more $$$ for the MIC... more Orwellian spy powers for the 3 letter agencies.... more bombings/coups/regime changes for brown people in oil rich countries... more tax cuts and bailouts for the too big to fail/jail banks...
Did you ever wonder why?
That's all speculative/conjecture, and has no solid foundation in reasoning. Collusion is not a crime, the indictments were for Cyber Crimes. There's a consensus among all intelligence agencies, as well as literally every Gov't official except for Trump (who admits it when he doesn't) who has clearance and has seen the evidence, including the grand jury chosen by the process, that they did in fact commit those crimes or at least the evidence is there to try them for such.Presenting evidence to a grand jury who decides, based on their evaluation of said evidence, whether or not to indict is a weird thing to call "without showing any evidence."
You know as well as I do that if Mueller had any real evidence it would in all the MSM headlines
There's a reason only Russians were indicted and not a single Trump operative (for collusion that is) and that's because Mueller knows they will never show up for trial so he will never have to show the evidence
It's really obvious, but somehow the #resistence is determined to stay in denial
Presenting evidence to a grand jury who decides, based on their evaluation of said evidence, whether or not to indict is a weird thing to call "without showing any evidence."
You know as well as I do that if Mueller had any real evidence it would in all the MSM headlines
There's a reason only Russians were indicted and not a single Trump operative (for collusion that is) and that's because Mueller knows they will never show up for trial so he will never have to show the evidence
It's really obvious, but somehow the #resistence is determined to stay in denial
Why do people from other countries come on to US forums and try and tell us how to run our country
True and where is the OP proof of "the deep state?"Presenting evidence to a grand jury who decides, based on their evaluation of said evidence, whether or not to indict is a weird thing to call "without showing any evidence."
That's all speculative/conjecture, and has no solid foundation in reasoning. Collusion is not a crime, the indictments were for Cyber Crimes. There's a consensus among all intelligence agencies, as well as literally every Gov't official except for Trump (who admits it when he doesn't) who has clearance and has seen the evidence, including the grand jury chosen by the process, that they did in fact commit those crimes or at least the evidence is there to try them for such.
& Your internet conjecture is, "conspiracy" because of..."conjecture!!" and supposedly, "no evidence!!"
Knocking them out of the park this morning, Smoosh!That's all speculative/conjecture, and has no solid foundation in reasoning. Collusion is not a crime, the indictments were for Cyber Crimes. There's a consensus among all intelligence agencies, as well as literally every Gov't official except for Trump (who admits it when he doesn't) who has clearance and has seen the evidence, including the grand jury chosen by the process, that they did in fact commit those crimes or at least the evidence is there to try them for such.Presenting evidence to a grand jury who decides, based on their evaluation of said evidence, whether or not to indict is a weird thing to call "without showing any evidence."
You know as well as I do that if Mueller had any real evidence it would in all the MSM headlines
There's a reason only Russians were indicted and not a single Trump operative (for collusion that is) and that's because Mueller knows they will never show up for trial so he will never have to show the evidence
It's really obvious, but somehow the #resistence is determined to stay in denial
& Your internet conjecture is, "conspiracy" because of..."conjecture!!" and supposedly, "no evidence!!"
FNCCEO was on the mark.maybe not use such a dramatic name.
shoulda stuck with illuminati or the nwo
I was actually hoping for some serious answers...
I could also say that Mueller should have stuck with the title of grand inquisitor, nobody is fooled by this 'special counsel' crap
But that's not very helpful for a discussion...
I like to watch the Congressional hearings in full - and when that's done on any consistent basis, to conclude that these oversight committees are united against Trump is the most laughable bullshit literally possible. These idiots in these hearings hate each other, they're quite fun to watch actually. Trump's got fuckboys on oversight committees who complain when the FBI cannot show them things during an open-investigation in the Public hearings all the while admitting the FBI has shown them unredacted versions in the classified hearings. It's fucking great.True and where is the OP proof of "the deep state?"Presenting evidence to a grand jury who decides, based on their evaluation of said evidence, whether or not to indict is a weird thing to call "without showing any evidence."
The "deep state" roughly translates to .... "intelligence agencies who sometimes make moves beyond reproach(in their opinion.)"True and where is the OP proof of "the deep state?"Presenting evidence to a grand jury who decides, based on their evaluation of said evidence, whether or not to indict is a weird thing to call "without showing any evidence."
Including our first President, George Washington? He was Deep State/ Freemasons too?Back then it was the Freemasons. ...What you call 'Deep State' is status quo. Bureaucratic interference with the Chief Executive didn't start with President Trump...
... it started with President Washington.
That's all speculative/conjecture, and has no solid foundation in reasoning. Collusion is not a crime, the indictments were for Cyber Crimes. There's a consensus among all intelligence agencies, as well as literally every Gov't official except for Trump (who admits it when he doesn't) who has clearance and has seen the evidence, including the grand jury chosen by the process, that they did in fact commit those crimes or at least the evidence is there to try them for such.
& Your internet conjecture is, "conspiracy" because of..."conjecture!!" and supposedly, "no evidence!!"
I find that attitude really worrying comrade
You don't need to see the evidence for yourself because if the deep state and it's propaganda outlets (also known as the MSM) say they have evidence that's good enough for you
Didn't you learn anything from the Saddam WMD hoax?
Sad!
WINNER WINNERThe "deep state" roughly translates to .... "intelligence agencies who sometimes make moves beyond reproach(in their opinion.)"True and where is the OP proof of "the deep state?"Presenting evidence to a grand jury who decides, based on their evaluation of said evidence, whether or not to indict is a weird thing to call "without showing any evidence."
They're left alone on a bipartisan basis when their objectives are demonstrably beneficial to our security, but to believe they're completely rogue of oversight is not demonstrable, especially to the level being alleged in the OP where they've conspired as a whole against a President who they also "let" become President, somehow, against all of their otherwise magical powers.
Lets recap...you think that
1. there is a a secret entity that controls the government from the shadows
2. that because you did not see the evidence on the news, it does not exist.
3. you have no clue how things work in this country.
Why do people from other countries come on to US forums and try and tell us how to run our country
Do you find people from the US on forums in the Netherlands telling you people how to run your country?
George Washington and almost every signer of the Declaration of Independence were members of the Freemasons. ....Including our first President, George Washington? He was Deep State/ Freemasons too?
