Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And what about racism? Racism is stupid. But if some people want to live only with their own kind, so what?
And what about racism? Racism is stupid. But if some people want to live only with their own kind, so what?
You know, anarchism actually has a large sub ideology known as National Anarchism which argues that all human beings should live in peaceful coexistence within different communities which share a single racial background.
Rather than complaining about choices we don't have, why not see choices we DO have, and make the most of it.
I can't change the price of store A, but I can go to store B, and if too many people go to store B, then store A will lower it's price.
If too many productive people move to more libertarian countries and contribute economically there, other countries will be forced to be more libertarians.
That's a gray area, and an interesting example. Federal laws protect basic human rights, but other animals?Do you want to live in a state where people eat cats? What about freedom to torture cat.
Rather than complaining about choices we don't have, why not see choices we DO have, and make the most of it.
It isn't about what liberties you do or do not have.
It is the idealistic belief that mankind should be free, rather than subjected to state slavery.
I can't change the price of store A, but I can go to store B, and if too many people go to store B, then store A will lower it's price.
I am not a fan of this equivalency. Countries are not mere stores.
Humans have their land, livelihood, family, friends, and culture tied up into their country.
If too many productive people move to more libertarian countries and contribute economically there, other countries will be forced to be more libertarians.
More likely that libertarian state (which would never exist btw) would be subjected to neocolonialism.
It should also be noted that no state can sustain a limited government for very long, since like capitalism, all power starts to consolidate in favor of a powerful concentrated minority.
I don't see Choice 1 as impractical. The US Bill of Rights crosses state boundaries and protects basic liberties of ALL citizens ... nowadays.The point of this post is the following.
Choice 1 is ideal. But not practical.
Choice 2 is just as good, AND practical. In fact, we are close to choice 2 right now, if not already there.
I agree; the US Bill of Rights needs to evolve more fully to support individual liberties for ALL citizens across states.And where is your so called US Bill of Rights when government prohibit men from smoking joint, draft your sons to war, tax you for your earning, and ...
I am a practical man. Any "right" is just theoretical unless it's actually enforced.
Since the Trump POTUS election victory, i've heard about "CALexit", the initiative to have the state of California separate from USA to be its own nation.What about if a group of people, say 1 million, say we want to make our own country and makes our own rule. And say the rules are not libertarians.
Can they have that? Say they have their own land and stuff.
There is no pure "Libertarianism", unless it exists on its own isolated property like an island, with few people.Yea but libertarians would complain. Not all of California wants to secede. And that would be another collective decision, with collective result.