Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Liar
www.bbc.com
Name a provision you disagree with instead of the bandwagon approach with no context that "it's bad."Nothing you would understand, troll.
I mean, that's what you're doing with this thread, right? Just trolling?
The president does, but within constraints set by tradition and law.Who makes public policy and who enforces it in your opinion?
So you want to weaponize the government.The FCC should be beholden to the president.
Unelected bureaucrats have no accountibilty
Lol, Trump was already president and didn't even try to do any of that.It attempts to eliminate any independence in government and centralize authority in the president.
For example, it would make the FCC beholden to the present so Trump could eliminate broadcast licenses for ABC when he doesn’t like what they say to him.
Not that the right actually cares about freedom of speech or anything.
I wouldn’t respond. MAGA are the ones that need to answer questions, like why the support a convicted criminal and rapist.Name a provision you disagree with instead of the bandwagon approach with no context that "it's bad."
So you want to weaponize the government.
He didn’t have the right people to do it all, nor the knowledge to do so.Lol, Trump was already president and didn't even try to do any of that.
Haha what a weird post. How in the world did you draw that conclusion?So you want to weaponize the government.
Gotcha.
Oh wait, you guys already did that.
As President, Trump Demanded Investigations of Foes. He Often Got Them.
He has threatened to target his perceived enemies if elected again. A look at his time in the White House shows how readily he could do so.www.nytimes.com
So you believe that public policy should be made by unelected bureaucrats instead of elected representatives?
Nobody.....You know, just like the leftist think tanks that are currently running the country.public policy IS made by congress. the bureaucracy merely mxecutes the policy, BUT
who elected the heritage foundation?????
Name a provision you disagree with instead of the bandwagon approach with no context that "it's bad."
How about a taxpayer funded far-right christian nationalist prayer circle in Trump's White House.So you believe that public policy should be made by unelected bureaucrats instead of elected representatives?
The Democrats and the media they control, which is the huge lion's share of it, have made Project 2025 their new bogeyman and scare tactic when all their other bogeymen and scare tactics failed to take down Trump. So they misrepresent or distort its origin and content.Why are libs painting this as a death knell for the country, and then falsely attributing it to Trump, when it actually makes good points and isn’t a Trump plan anyway:
Among its goals are:
1. Secure the border
2. Keep men out of women’s sports
3. Cut the growth of government spending
4. Unleash energy production to lower energy costs
5. Make federal bureaucrats accountable
6. Deweaponize the government
Project 2025 | Presidential Transition Project
Presidential Transition Project The 2025 Presidential Transition Project paves the way for an effective conservative Administration based on four pillars.www.project2025.org
Because we know those charges were politically motivated, not to mention he wasn't found liable as a rapist in a civil court -- a common misinformation tactic the left continues to communicate.I wouldn’t respond. MAGA are the ones that need to answer questions, like why the support a convicted criminal and rapist.
#ANSWERTHEQUESTION
You aren’t smart enough to understand what you’re talking about. You just repeat what you’re told.Haha what a weird post. How in the world did you draw that conclusion?
It’s so funny
Out of curiosity, what is the published provision that provides this initiative?replacing career Fed Employees with those that pass a loyalty test to the president
It's liberals that shout down anyone who expresses an opinion that they don't like.Not that the right actually cares about freedom of speech or anything.
Out of curiosity, what is the published provision that provides this initiative?
It's liberals that shout down anyone who expresses an opinion that they don't like.
